Check a VIN

1991 Buick Regal body problems

20 complaints (10% of all complaints for this car). Typical mileage when it fails: 102,000. 2 crashes reported.

owner complaints
20
of this car's complaints
10%
typical mileage
102,000
crashes
2
recalls
2

Which part fails

  • Frame and members
    5
  • Body: door
    3
  • Body
    2
  • Body: hatchback/liftgate: support device/strut
    1
  • Body: bumpers
    1

At what mileage

Complaints by mileage at the time of the problem.

0k-25k
25k-50k
50k-75k
75k-100k
100k-125k
125k-150k
150k-175k
175k-200k
200k+

Buick Regal body problems in other years

1990199520002019

Related recalls

StructureReported July 11, 2000 · 713,435 vehicles affected
What is wrong
Vehicle description: passenger vehicles originally sold or currently registered in the states of connecticut, delaware, illinois, indiana, iowa, maine, maryland, massachusetts, michigan, minnesota, missouri, new hampshire, new jersey, new york, ohio, pennsylvania, rhode island, vermont, west virginia, wisconsin, and the district of columbia, where road salt use is heavy. A condition where one or both front engine cradle bolts can pull through the retainers due to corrosion of the retainers.
Risk
If both bolts pull through, the front of the cradle would no longer be supported at the mounting locations and the steering intermediate shaft could separate from the steering gear.
Remedy
Dealers will replace the front and rear frame/cradle bolts and retainers.

Recall number 00V189000 · Recall details

StructureReported April 8, 1997 · 676,535 vehicles affected
What is wrong
Vehicle description: passenger vehicles and mini vans originally sold or currently registered in the following states: connecticut, illinois, indiana, maine, massachusetts, michigan, new hampshire, new jersey, new york, ohio, pennsylvania, rhode island, vermont and wisconsin. The rear cradle bolts pull through the retainers due to corrosion of the retainer. If both bolts pull through, the rear cradle would not longer be supported at these mounting locations and the steering intermediate shaft can separate from the steering gear.
Risk
If this were to occur while the vehicle was in motion, a vehicle crash could result.
Remedy
Dealers will replace the rear cradle bolts and retainers.

Recall number 97V058000 · Recall details

Related investigations

StructureOpened November 28, 2001, closed June 13, 2002

There is no summary currently available

RP01001

Cradle bolt failuresOpened October 2, 1997, still open

There is no summary currently available

RQ97017

What 1991 Buick Regal owners say

Most recent owner complaints, unedited.

Filed May 21, 2014 · Airbags, Body · 75,000 miles · IA · crash · 1 injury

Federal authorities are investigating whether general motors hid an ignition switch defect when it filed for bankruptcy in 2009,the justice department's investigation of the automaker includes a probe of whether gm committed bankruptcy fraud by not disclosing the ignition problem, a person briefed on the inquiry, authorities are also investigating whether gm understated the defect to federal safety regulators,under the tread act or the fed recall act,the manufacturer is to replace the faulty car,when will my car be replaced what about the frame cradle bolt recall, I had a roll over accident in a buick and gm did nothing , never replaced ,repaired , or reimbursed me . My air bag never deployed , my seat belt was also defected , yet during this recall gm gave congress over $300 million in election funds to look the other way? $35 million fine is a joke if someone gave you $50 billion,the $35 million should be 10 x that amount or at least pay for my car , pay for my medical bills ($100,000 and climbing) look at ford , they are recalling cars today for steering issues yet gm comes up with a key fraud to hide the frame cradle bolt issue see pictures,my airbag never went off and my seat belt was also faulty gm customer care [xxx], I am sorry to hear that you experienced this with your buick. I am happy to hear that you are okay! I believe I have located your previous case within our system. If there is anything I can look into for you, please private message me your VIN or case number to our gm customer care page. [xxx] gm customer care if gm is looking into 10+ year old recalls it can look into mine,its not about key recall ,this is about any gm recall,my case is on the federal safety agency web site https://www.facebook.com/[xxx]/posts/10202966721162013 information redacted pursuant to the freedom of information act (foia), 5 u.s.c. 552(b)(6).

Filed Feb 23, 2010 · Body, Seat belts · 80,000 miles · IA · crash

Was traveling on a curve when in split second loss steering and ended off roadway upside down ,it was after about a year I started getting recall notices that said this same thing would happen ,these recalls started in 2000,and 2001 ,and that's when I started to think that infact the bolts failing caused my accident or contributed to it . I made calls to buick and was even sent a recall list post dated 12-20-2000, today looking online seems alot of trouble with bolts were occurring 96 + 97 but I was never noticed until it was too late ,I called buick last year and they now say they have no info on my prior years calls to them ,and to date I have not been reimbursed for my losses ,no offer to repair ,refund ect . My only thought that these need to be better noticed to consumers for safety reasons, as with toyota recall I'm not sure the public is or has been made aware that they should report any thing about a car to the federal safety agency web site and let it work out itself thru the database, I did not have a computer back then to access the 10 fold info on such recalls to protect the public ,my main concern today is what is buick going to do for my losses? Thank you

Filed Aug 11, 2008 · Body · 125,000 miles · WI

Tl*the contact owns a 1991 buick regal. While attempting to pull into a parking space at 2 MPH, the contact heard a loud noise. He inspected the vehicle and noticed that the subframe failed and was hanging from the vehicle. The vehicle was towed to a local repair shop and it was discovered that the rear cradle bolts pulled through the retainers due to corrosion. The failure caused a separation of the steering shaft. The dealer stated that his VIN was excluded from the federal safety agency campaign id number 97v058000 (structure); therefore, the contact would be responsible for the repair costs, which exceeded $600. The manufacturer was unable to assist. The failure and current mileages were 125,000.

Filed Oct 3, 2006 · Body · 102,000 miles · NY

Dt*: the contact stated while driving 2 MPH on a city street, there was a banging noise followed by a loss of power steering. The contact managed to pull the vehicle over without incident. The vehicle was towed to a dealer who determined the engine slipped out of its mount because the engine cradle bolts had fractured and needed to be replaced. There was a the federal safety agency recall, # 00v189000, regarding the structure. The vehicle was not included in the recall due to the VIN. The manufacturer was notified.

Filed Mar 28, 2006 · Body · 145,285 miles · MI

Dt*: the contact stated while driving less than 20 MPH and making turns a clunking noise was heard coming from the engine. Upon inspection, the independent repair shop determined the bolts and washers from the engine cradle were corroded and needed to be replaced. The mechanic discovered two recalls for the bolts, the federal safety agency campaign # 97v058000 and # 00v189000. According to the manufacturer's records both recalls were previously performed. The bolts and washers are being replaced. Updated 04/11/06.

Filed Aug 7, 2002 · Body · MI

Oo v 189 000/cradle bolts: dealer: suburban buick in rochester, mi. Phone# 248/643-0070 is refusing to honor recall because they stated that repairs would cost more then vehicle was worth. Feel free to provide any further information.

Filed Mar 25, 2002 · Body · OH

Consumer was pulling away from a street light and heard a noise, frame to vehicle fell out, and steering wheel was spining.*ak consumer stats that engine cradle vender, engine frame, fell down to ground, frame bolts still in body but retainers rusted out allowing frame section to fall through, steering column separated from rack and pinion and steering wheel spins freely.

Filed Jan 11, 2002 · Body · MI

My son purchased this car in nov. Of 2001. He was coming up to a red light and he heard a loud "pop". When he proceeded from the light , the car wouldn"t steer. When he got out and looked , his engine cradle was sitting on the ground. We called a tow truck and the driver told us that issue was a recall item. I went up the road to a buick dealer and the tech. Told me "yes " it was a recall and to have the car towed there. The tech. Said it would be about $1,000. To fix. 2 days later the dealer ship calls my son and asked him how much he paid for his car , because the damages could be more than the value of the car. The next day the dealer ship calls my son and said the broken engine cradle bolts aren"t a recall issue and it will cost him more than $800. Out of his pocket. My son hasn"t given the dealer ship the ok to start working on the car now because it sounds like their trying to double-dip on this recall issue.

Filed Oct 31, 2001 · Body · MI

Consumer contacted dealership for recall 00v189000 concerning structure, but was unable to complete work for lack of parts. Please provide further details.

Filed May 1, 2001 · Body · AK

Both engine cradle bolts corroded, causing cradle to drop and pull steering assembly loose, along with several other engine compartment parts. Cost to repair-$895.00.

Questions about the 1991 Buick Regal body

Does the 1991 Buick Regal have body problems?

Owners have filed 20 complaints about the body of the 1991 Buick Regal, 10% of all its complaints.

At what mileage do 1991 Buick Regal body problems start?

The typical (median) mileage in owner complaints is 102,000 miles.

Was there a recall on the 1991 Buick Regal body?

Yes, 2 recalls: 00V189000, 97V058000. Check your VIN to see if your car still needs the free repair.

What year does the Buick Regal have the most body problems?

The Buick Regal model years with the most body complaints are 1991 (20 complaints) and 1996 (10 complaints).

Other 1991 Buick Regal problems

Brakes 117Engine 15Seat belts 14Electrical 12Steering 12Lights 9Transmission 7Wheels 7Fuel system 6Suspension 6Acceleration 5Tires 3Locks 2Seats 2Visibility 2Airbags 1

VIN decoder

See the problems and recalls for an exact car

Buying a used 1991 Buick Regal?

Check the exact car before you pay: accidents, salvage or flood titles, odometer readings and previous owners.

Check its history