Check a VIN

1995 Chrysler Cirrus suspension problems

39 complaints (11% of all complaints for this car). Typical mileage when it fails: 97,000. 1 crash reported.

owner complaints
39
of this car's complaints
11%
typical mileage
97,000
crashes
1
recalls
1

Which part fails

  • Front
    11
  • Front: control arm: lower ball joint
    9
  • Front: control arm: lower arm
    6
  • Front: control arm
    5
  • Front: control arm: upper ball joint
    3
  • Rear
    2
  • Front: stabilizer bar
    2
  • Front: wheel bearing
    1

At what mileage

Complaints by mileage at the time of the problem.

0k-25k
25k-50k
50k-75k
75k-100k
100k-125k
125k-150k
150k-175k
175k-200k
200k+

Chrysler Cirrus suspension problems in other years

199519961997199819992000

Specific symptoms reported on the 1995 Chrysler Cirrus suspension

Phrases found in the owners' own descriptions, so one complaint can mention several symptoms.

Ball joint 25

Related recalls

Suspension: front: control arm: lower ball jointReported November 13, 1997 · 599,000 vehicles affected
What is wrong
Vehicle description: passenger vehicles. The lower control arm ball joint can separate due to loss of lubrication.
Risk
Separation of the ball joint could cause a loss of steering control increasing the risk of a vehicle crash.
Remedy
Dealers will inspect the ball joint end housing cover seal for leakage with a high pressure air tester and the rubber boot will be visually inspected for damage. If the cover seal leaks or the boot is damaged, the lower control arm will be replaced.

Recall number 97V201000 · Recall details

Related investigations

Lower control arm ball joint failureOpened September 29, 1997, closed November 20, 1997

By letter dated november 6, 1997, the manufacturer advised this agency of its decision to initiate a safety recall campaign of the subject vehicles to correct the defect identified in this ea.the recall will also cover 1996 and 1997 chrysler cirrus/dodge stratus vehicles, as well as 1995 through 1997 chrysler sebring convertible and plymouth breeze vehicles equipped with identical lower control arm ball joints.an estimated total of 599,00vehicles are affected by this recall.the manufacturer's investigation disclosed that process variability, together with the ball joint housing cover crimping operation, can result in an ineffective seal that permits a loss of lubrication and accelerted wear of the ball joint assembly.this condition can lead to failure and separtion of the lower control arm ball joint.the recall is identified as the federal safety agency 97v‑201 and a copy of chrysler's letter to the federal safety agency is attached hereto.

EA97016

Lower control arm ball joint failureOpened March 13, 1997, closed September 29, 1997

The manufacturer identifed vehicle owner complaints of the subject ball joint failures as tabulated above.in addition, a total of 72 warranty reports were identified for replacement of broken or cracked ball joint assemblies in the subject vehicles.chrysler also reported that 1996 and 1997 models are equipped with identical ball joint assemblies as the subject 1995 model year vehicles.a partial response to the federal safety agency's information request indicated that the manufacturer's analyses and evaluations of the condition were continuing.in order to continue the federal safety agency's complete assessment of the nature and scope of this matter, this investigation has been upgraded to an engineering analysis.

PE97009

What 1995 Chrysler Cirrus owners say

Most recent owner complaints, unedited.

Filed Nov 12, 2008 · Suspension · 75,500 miles · FL

Tl*the contact owns a 1995 chrysler cirrus. Several months ago, while driving 20 MPH, the driver's side front suspension began making a creaking noise. The noise did not sound like the springs, but more like plastic rubbing over a heavy load. The contact took the vehicle to a mechanic and was informed that both the passenger and driver's side front suspension were out of lubricant. In addition, the suspension joints needed to be replaced. After researching the issue, the contact discovered the federal safety agency campaign id number 97v201000 (suspension:front:control arm:lower ball joint) for the same failure his vehicle was experiencing. The manufacturer stated that the recall did apply to his vehicle; the manufacturer was taking responsibility for the repairs. The failure mileage was 75,500 and current mileage was 76,200. Updated 12-02-08 *bf updated 12/02/08.

Filed May 1, 2006 · Brakes, Engine · 122,150 miles · PA

I've had my engine checked back in may of 05 by the dealer they said it was engine misfire,the distributor ignition was bad. They charged me $321 just to check it,then I paid $276 to get it fixed. The car has had a drip ever since. In the past 6 to 8 months or longer I've had a drip from the engine that can't be fixed , I recently had my car worked on it was in the shop for a month it cost me $2500 to repair and it still has a leak. It's back there again because it needs that expansion plug and retaining bracket that only the dealer can provide according to every site but the place the car comes from. I'm also having transmission problems which I've had since I brought the vehicle. Because I need a shift mechanism and cable from the dealer according to every site but where the car comes from. A few of the problems that are on the list I've either got fixed or got an estimate for.(one ) of the problems on the list ,the dealer sent something in the mail and I got it taken care of by the dealer,it was the( trans. Floor shifter). Also on your list! I've spent a lot of money to repair this vehicle for mistakes made by the dealer and it's not fair . I would like to be reimbursed and the recall problem fixed.

Filed Sep 2, 2005 · Suspension · OR

1995 chrysler cirrus castle nut and pin fell off allowing the upper control arm to fall apart.*mr this failure resulted in hundreds of dollars in damage. After the failure, the consumer received a recall notice on this problem and had it repaired. After the repairs the part failed again. *nm updated 9/15/05.

Filed Sep 14, 2004 · Steering, Suspension · 90,000 miles · IA

While driving, the consumer heard a grinding noise in the steering wheel and it felt loose. The vehicle was taken to a body shop for inspection. The mechanic informed the consumer that the rack and pinion needed to be replaced which had already been replaced twice. It twice. *jb revised: the original rack and pinion had worn out. The steering was loose at 90k miles and the rack and pinion at 23k miles. Both of the stabilizers had frozen in the lower control arms. *sc

Filed Oct 29, 2003 · Suspension, Tires · 97,000 miles · MI

While driving at 60/70 MPH, there was a loud noise from the rear of vehicle. Consumer pulled vehicle over. Upon inspection of the vehicle, consumer noticed rear driver's side wheel was out of line, and almost came completely off. Had vehicle towed to dealership. The mechanic replaced the ball joints because they had broken apart. Also serviced the driver's side rear wheel and tire.

Filed Jan 29, 2002 · Suspension · PA

The federal safety agency recall 97v201000/manufacturers recall 750 concerning lower control arm: while driving 20 MPH, the front left wheel locked up, dealer was notified, and informed consumer that this vehicle was not covered under recall due to VIN.*ak consumer also had 4-wheel alignment performed.

Filed May 16, 2001 · Suspension · CA · crash

I purchased my car at chrysler chase in stockton ca. The first day I noticed a noise comming fron the steering wheel when I braked so I asked the dealer to hear the noise. The sales person directed me to the service department where they heard the noise and assured me that it was normal for that car. I kept hearing the noise but I believed it was normal. The noise presisted so I contacted the dealer I took the car back in I was told that the steering colum needed replacing because they had a recall well this has been going on for the past 5 years I have been taking it back for the same problem over and over again and I have always been told that the noise was normal. I have taken my car for major repairs according to the dealer they repair it but when I take it back for the same thing it is only convenient for them to say that they can't hear the noise, and when they have heard the noise it is normal to them yet I still have the same breaking and steering problems. The dealer let my warranty run out by telling me that the noise was normal, and when my warranty was over they just said well we don't know if is the same thing even though they end up replacing the same things. The last time I had the parts replaced was at about 89,000 miles I again told the dealer that the problem was still there but they said it was normal. I had my brakes worked on on feb, 2001 at the dealer but the brakes were making alot of noise squeeling and a grinding noise my wife took the car back and the told her that the had put lock fast and that was the reason the metal was grinding they worked on my brakes again for this reason, but the noise was even louder and the grinding noise got worse. I took the car in to try to get them to check it but chad the person who I spoke to told me that he already had told my wife that the noise was normal because they were using new materials that were always going to make noise, and that the grinding noise was just the parts settling in.

Filed Jan 23, 2001 · Suspension · NY

Grinding in the wheels when turning and loose of power stering fluid. Checked with 2 auto machanics (garages) stated that with such low miles they should not be going bad. Talked to customer service for european u.s military sales and they stated that I should contact you since this is not in the recales listed for my car recall numbers 750,78a.

Filed Nov 27, 2000 · Suspension · NY

Consumer had vehicle checked for recall 97v201000-750. Steering wheel would make a mild grinding noise when turning. Consumer was trying to convince dealer there was a problem, but they wouldn't cooperate. Consumer received a recall notice from chrysler & had taken it to another dealer, which wasn't able to do it because one dealer had recorded it as being done. Chrysler manufacturer & dealer have given consumer problems.

Filed Apr 27, 2000 · Brakes, Electrical · PA

Consumer was not aware that the support beam was replaced prior to ownership.

Questions about the 1995 Chrysler Cirrus suspension

Does the 1995 Chrysler Cirrus have suspension problems?

Owners have filed 39 complaints about the suspension of the 1995 Chrysler Cirrus, 11% of all its complaints.

At what mileage do 1995 Chrysler Cirrus suspension problems start?

The typical (median) mileage in owner complaints is 97,000 miles.

Was there a recall on the 1995 Chrysler Cirrus suspension?

Yes, 1 recall: 97V201000. Check your VIN to see if your car still needs the free repair.

What year does the Chrysler Cirrus have bad suspension?

The Chrysler Cirrus model years with the most suspension complaints are 1995 (39 complaints) and 1996 (18 complaints).

Other 1995 Chrysler Cirrus problems

Brakes 121Transmission 65Engine 42Electrical 37Acceleration 35Visibility 27Steering 26Airbags 16Body 14Seat belts 14Fuel system 12Lights 12Locks 5Wheels 5Tires 4Seats 3

VIN decoder

See the problems and recalls for an exact car

Buying a used 1995 Chrysler Cirrus?

Check the exact car before you pay: accidents, salvage or flood titles, odometer readings and previous owners.

Check its history