Tl* the contact called on behalf of a friend who owns a 1992 chrysler imperial. The contact stated that upon starting the vehicle, the engine made an abnormal noise without warning. Upon driving the vehicle at various speeds, the contact's friend would had to depress the brake paddle with great effort, as the brake failure light illuminated. The vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic where the vehicle was diagnosed with a defective ABS system. The vehicle was repaired however, the failure recurred. Upon further investigation the contact associated recall the federal safety agency campaign number: 96v099000 (service brakes, hydraulic) with the failure. The failure mileage was 247,053.
1992 Chrysler Imperial brakes problems
39 complaints (80% of all complaints for this car). Typical mileage when it fails: 123,000. 1 crash reported.
- owner complaints
- 39
- of this car's complaints
- 80%
- typical mileage
- 123,000
- crashes
- 1
- recalls
- 1
Which part fails
- Antilock/traction control/electronic limited slip28
- Foundation components3
- Foundation components: master cylinder2
- Foundation components: disc: rotor2
- Foundation components: disc: pads1
- Antilock/traction control/electronic limited slip: ABS warning light1
At what mileage
Complaints by mileage at the time of the problem.
0k-25k
25k-50k
50k-75k
75k-100k
100k-125k
125k-150k
150k-175k
175k-200k
200k+
Chrysler Imperial brakes problems in other years
Specific symptoms reported on the 1992 Chrysler Imperial brakes
Phrases found in the owners' own descriptions, so one complaint can mention several symptoms.
Related recalls
Service brakes, hydraulic: antilock/traction control/electronic limited slip
- What is wrong
- The ABS hydraulic control unit can experience excessive brake actuator piston seal wear causing pump-motor deterioration.
- Risk
- If this condition occurs, the ABS function could be lost and reduced power assist would be experienced during vehicle braking increasing the potential for a vehicle accident.
- Remedy
- Dealers will test the vehicle's anti-lock brake system and repair the vehicles if necessary. Also the warranty on all ABS components will be extended to 10 years or 100,000 miles (except for the brake actuator piston assembly and the pump-motor assembly which will have a lifetime coverage). Owners will also be reimbursed for previous ABS component repair costs.
Recall number 96V099000 · Recall details
Related investigations
Abs braking malfunction
There is no summary currently available
EA95016
What 1992 Chrysler Imperial owners say
Most recent owner complaints, unedited.
Power brakes stopped working on the way home driving 35 MPH. Had to press very hard to get the brakes to start to slow the car. Told that the ABS pump motor had burned out and is covered by recall 685. Dealer said they had no one who could work on it . Chrysler says they will not honor the recall on november 2 2015 on the phone. The car is to old and recall only good for ten years . Read the recall and it says this part is guarantee for the lifetime of the car other parts only for ten years.
We have a 1992 chrysler imperial that has a recall no.# 685 for ABS lifetime. Larry h. Miller chrysler jeep tucson. Refuses to fix the recall. It's not safe to drive on the road. They are threatening to file a abandon vich. To claim it and sell it. I cannot drive it off the lot until it is fixed. I need some help. Can anyone help with this problem? If I tow it and sell it. It is still unsafe to drive if not fixed for other owner. Can you help?
Tl* the contact owns a 1992 chrysler imperial. The contact stated that while driving 35 MPH, the contact depressed the brake pedal but it was stiff and he had to let the vehicle coast to the side of the road. The vehicle was towed to the dealer for inspection and they stated that the acute piston pump regulator needed to be replaced. The vehicle was repaired but the failure recurred. The manufacturer was notified but provided no assistance. The failure mileage was 104,000.
Tl* the contact owns a 1992 chrysler imperial. The contact was driving 35 MPH when the brakes failed. The contact tried to depress the brake pedal but the pedal went to the floorboard abnormally and the vehicle would not stop. The contact coasted the vehicle to the shoulder and the vehicle was taken to the dealer where they advised the contact that the brakes would have to be bled. The dealer also stated that there was a recall for the failure under the federal safety agency campaign id number: 96v099000 (service brakes, hydraulic:anti lock) but the part needed to complete the recall repair was no linger being manufactured. The vehicle was not repaired. The failure mileage was 91,000.
Tl*the contact owns a 1992 chrysler imperial. The contact stated when attempting to exit a parking space, the ABS warning light illuminated on the instrument control, and then the brakes failed. A technician from the dealer concluded that the ABS pump motor failed. He then added that because of the age of the vehicle, they would not provide a free remedy. No repairs were made. The manufacturer was notified, but no assistance was provided. The vehicle identification number was unavailable. The failure and current mileages were 107,000.
Tl*the contact owns a 1992 chrysler imperial. While driving approximately 60 MPH, the brake pedal extended to the floor when it was depressed. The vehicle swerved off the road into a vineyard. There were no other vehicles involved in the crash. The contact sustained major injuries. A police report was filed. The manufacturer was not notified. After the crash, the vehicle was taken to a local repair shop and they stated that the brakes failed due to the retaining clip being improperly installed. The dealer also stated that the vehicle was repaired according to the federal safety agency campaign id number 96v099000 (service brakes, hydraulic:antilock). He called the dealer and had the vehicle towed to another dealer. The vehicle has not been repaired at this time. The failure mileage was 162,021. Updated 020209 *bf the consumer was informed that the retaining pin that connected the brake pedal to the brake piston rod had fallen out due to a missing retaining clip. Updated 02/03/09.
Dt*: the contact stated the ABS light illuminated. There is a the federal safety agency recall, # 96v099000 on the vehicle regarding the antilock brakes. The parts needed to repair their vehicle are not available at their local dealership. The manufacturer confirmed the parts are not available. Updated 04/11/06.
Abs recall, the dealer stated that it would be a charge to tell the consumer if the ABS was defective. They could not tell if the recall part failed until additional work was performed. 96v099000.
While driving at any speed applied the brakes and pedal went to the floor, resulting in extended stopping distance.
Questions about the 1992 Chrysler Imperial brakes
Does the 1992 Chrysler Imperial have brakes problems?
Owners have filed 39 complaints about the brakes of the 1992 Chrysler Imperial, 80% of all its complaints, more than any other problem.
At what mileage do 1992 Chrysler Imperial brakes problems start?
The typical (median) mileage in owner complaints is 123,000 miles.
Was there a recall on the 1992 Chrysler Imperial brakes?
Yes, 1 recall: 96V099000. Check your VIN to see if your car still needs the free repair.
What year does the Chrysler Imperial have bad brakes?
The Chrysler Imperial model years with the most brakes complaints are 1990 (92 complaints), 1991 (56 complaints) and 1992 (39 complaints).
Other 1992 Chrysler Imperial problems
Suspension 4Transmission 4Fuel system 3Engine 2Lights 2Steering 2Electrical 1
VIN decoder
See the problems and recalls for an exact car
Buying a used 1992 Chrysler Imperial?
Check the exact car before you pay: accidents, salvage or flood titles, odometer readings and previous owners.
Check its history