1999 gmc sierra. Consumer states that when the brakes were applied the pedal did not move causing the vehicle to hit a parked vehicle. Mechanic replaced the ABS control valve. *mc the consumer stated he took the vehicle to the dealership so the recall could be performed on dec 28, 2006, however he experienced a failure 1 month later. The consumer was informed that the front left sensor was damaged which was probably the cause of the control valve failure.
1999 GMC Sierra brakes complaints
Page 3 of 12: complaints 41 to 70 of 338, newest first, as owners wrote them.
1999 gmc sierra pickup truck customer states that after getting car fixed due to a recall on brakes the next day the brakes stop working causing a accident**cc the recall was performed on dec 28, 2006 and on january 3, 2007 when the consumer applied the brakes, the pedal was extremely hard, the consumer was unable to stop the vehicle and consequently hit a parked vehicle. The next day the consumer took the vehicle to a mechanic who said the anti-lock brake valve had burned out. The mechanic stated there was damage to the front left sensor and wanted to know if anyone had been working on the ABS sensors recently. The mechanic stated that someone had pierced inside the sensor and damaged it, which was the probable cause of the control valve failure.
1999 gmc sierra-46000 miles-all brake lines rusted out,3 leaks. Due to design of truck,cab has to be removed to access brake lines-also rear brake calipers rusted out after >4600 miles and had to be replaced. All repairs done at dealers.
Tl*- the contact's 1999 gmc sierra was difficult to stop when applying the brakes. After taking the vehicle to a service center the contact found that the brakes were still not repaired properly. He read in a consumer magazine which stated that the 1999 gmc truck sierra has the worse brakes. There was a recall on the 2000 gmc truck sierra on the brakes, stating that the base brakes would remain fully functional, but the dynamic rear proportioning (drp) system, which optimizes front to rear brake balance would become inoperative. The contact believes that both model years had the same failure. While driving 40-50 MPH and applying the brakes the brakes failed. Due to the brake failure the contact had problems with the tires as well. It felt as if the wheels were coming off when the contact was braking. *ak updated 2/22/2007 -
Dt*: the contact stated while depressing the brake pedal at 25 MPH, there was no brake pressure. The parking brake was engaged to stop the vehicle. The vehicle was taken to an independent repair shop. The shop determined the steel brake system had rusted and should be replaced. The vehicle was located in a salt belt state. Updated 10/17/2006 - the entire steel brake line system had to be replaced. Gm does not sell replacement parts.
Brake warning lights intermittently activate while driving. Brakes appeared to be functional until occasion arose at 65 MPH where hard breaking was required. Right rear tire locked up and severe tire wear resulted. Excessive slowing distance was experienced. Vehicle at non dealer repair shop parts will be available.
Brake line corrosion severed at area where lines pass through frame. Previous recall for a rubbing wear condition at exact location. Dealer claims unrelated. Lost entire brake function at a traffic light just prior to entering a 65 MPH interstate highway. Cost $481.00.
Abs control unit module activated while driving ,causing ABS valve to run continuously & burn up. Dealer stated that cause of failure was due to corrosion getting into module unit. Dealer replaced module,valve & bled brake system. Cost was $1090. Service manager stated that this was a recurring problem that gm knew about but no recall was issued to fix the problem at that time. According to the federal safety agency web site , gm has issued a recall for wheel sensors on this vehicle due to the same cause as the module failure; corrosion. The modules are located just below driver on the inside of the frame rail. How they expected to keep them from a corrosive environment ,I can't figure. It seems to me that if gm acknowledge a corrosion problem on one part of their ABS system that they should do the same on the entire system. I also can't understand how they choose certain states as being in the "salt belt". We use it here in kansas too.
1999 sierra brake pedal went to the floor when depressed. *ts the consumer was able to use the trailer brakes to stop the vehicle. The repair shop was unable to duplicate the problem.
Dt*: the contact stated while applying brake pressure at any speed the rear wheels locked causing the vehicle to skid on wet or icy roads. The dealer inspected the vehicle and determined the ABS pump needed to be replaced. There is a the federal safety agency recall, # 05v379000, regarding the antilock brakes. The VIN was not included in the recall.
Dt*: the contact stated the ABS engaged at 8mph and below. The stopping distance was increased as a result. There is a the federal safety agency recall, # 05v379000, concerning the ABS. The vehicle has the same problem as indicated in the recall; however it is not included because of the VIN. The vehicle was not taken to the dealer for inspection.
I started up my 1999 gmc sierra one morning last spring to go to work and when pulling out of the driveway a loud noise started coming from under the cab and the ABS light came on. I had it checked out by an independent garage who found it to be the ebcm. The truck had less than 45000 miles on it and had never been off road so it hadn't been mistreated. The module has stayed on and the ABS light is on always. I tried to get gm to own up to the faulty part but they refused. I think it is shameful that gm puts low quality electronic parts in their vehicles, and charges so much for the parts. The ebcm costs over 900 dollars which is a lot of money. When you pay over 30,000 for a truck you expect it to last a long time. But gm is not interested in making quality anymore. Gm told me that this was a very uncommon problem, wrong, on the web I found many people have had the same problem and in fact there is a rebuild kit for them. I also had my 4wd control module go out at 140 dollars just to replace a push button.
Dt*: the contact stated the ABS engaged at speeds of 16m ph or less in normal driving conditions when brake pressure was applied. The vehicle was seen by a dealer who suggested the front wheel speed sensors should be replaced, but no repairs were made. There is a the federal safety agency recall, # 05v379000, regarding the antilock brakes. The vehicle has the same problems as indicated in the recall; however it is not included in the recall due to the VIN. Updated 04/11/06.
I sent this info to gm customer service and they told me the problem was because I live in ohio where salt is used on the roads in the winter. I did not bother trying to debate this silly response, I am just forwarding same info to your department. I am the original owner of a (gmc sierra z-71, 4x4 which has always been garaged and only has 66,000 miles. While replacing a failed right rear brake caliper, I noticed the brake shield was extremely rusty. During this inspection an approximately 4 inche piece broke off in my hand (see pictures). I perform most repairs myself but since this involved removing the axle it was beyond my capability. The cost of this repair at bob ross gmc was $222.00 which I paid. I am writing gmc because I do not believe a part such as this brake shield should rust so bad as to fall apart and have rusted through holes (see attached photo) in only 6 years. I have inspected the driver's side rear brake shield and although not quite as bad as the passenger side rear brake shield, it is extremely rusty and probably will fail and need replaced in the next year. My position is this is a material design flaw that gm should investigate. Failure of this part, as in my case, will allow the elements (water, snow, dirt, rocks, etc.) to damage the brake rotor and ultimately cause premature brake wear and failure. The brake shields on the front brakes have no rust, as I would expect of a vehicle that is only 6 years old. I can send pictures of failed part but not sure how to do with this form.
Dt*: the contact stated while attempting to apply brake pressure at 5 MPH, the antilock brakes made a grinding noise. There is a the federal safety agency recall, # 05v379000, regarding the service brakes hydraulic antilock. The vehicle has the same problems as indicated in the recall; however it is not included in the recall due to the VIN.
Dt*: the contact stated the ABS activates at low speeds, below 10 MPH. The vehicle was taken to an independent repair shop and the ABS sensor was replaced. A year later, the contact received a recall letter for the ABS, #05v379000. The vehicle was taken to the dealership and the ABS was cleaned.
Dt*: the contact stated a letter was received letter in october 2005 on the federal safety agency recall #05v379000, concerning the anti-lock brakes. The recall remedy repaired the wheel speed sensors; however the ABS light remained illuminated. The module to the ABS was replaced which was not covered under the recall. Updated 2/24/2006 -
Case #05v379000 isn't including virginia residents? I had the ABS pump? Go out in my 1999 gmc sierra which messed up the rear rotors, had all replaced at dealer which cost in excess of $1000.... Will it include virginia or just stop in maryland?
Dt*: the contact stated the ABS activated at low speeds causing an increased stopping distance. Due to the inability to stop at low speed, the vehicle gently tapped another vehicle in the rear bumper. No damage or injuries were sustained. The police were not contacted regarding this incident. There is a the federal safety agency recall, # 05v379000, regarding the anti-lock brakes. The vehicle has the same problems as indicated in the recall; however it is not included in the recall due to the VIN. *nm updated 02/21/06.
Dt: the contact stated the ABS did not activate . There was the federal safety agency recall,campaign 05v379000, regarding the antilock brakes. The vehicle had the same problems as indicated in the recall; however , it was not included in the recall due to the VIN.*ak the ABS control module malfunctioned, causing tne ABS system to fail. The contact wants gmc to expand their recall or pay for a new module.
E.b.c.m. Shorted ABS pump runs constantly chevy dealer wants $ 1200 to fix it. 1999 gmc 2500 pickup.
Seems to be a recall on the manual transmisson for 1999 gmc pick up but the automatic has the same issue , the parking brakes do not engaged. I know three people with gmc pick automatic transmission they to do not have working parking brakes.
Dt: contact stated while pulling over to a curb he pressed the brake pedal and it went all the way to the floor. Also, it was making a humming noise. He took the vehicle to the dealership to have recall repairs done on the ABS brakes, and they found the anti lock:control unit/module ( ebmc) busted. Repairs will be made at the contact's expense.*ak the consumer was told it would cost 900 to fix the problem completely. Updated 01/11/06.
1. Antilock brakes activate at low speeds 2. Being unable to stop it could lead to rear end collisions or car pedestrian accidents 3.replaced 2 front end wheel speed sensors.
Antilock brakes kickedin at low speed, less than 10 MPH in parking lot. Took a lot ofdistance to stop. If this happened at an intersection I would be in big trouble.
Dt: the contact states there is a the federal safety agency recall campaign 05v379000 concerning anti lock brakes. This vehicle is experiencing the same problems as indicated in the recall, but is not included in the recall due to VIN. The contact repaired the vehicle at his own expense.
Dt: the contact stated all four brake rotors rusted, resulting in damage to the brake pads. The vehicle had a free remedy performed on the brakes, the federal safety agency recall campaign 05v379000 concerning anti lock brakes. However the rotors and pads were not covered by this recall. He contacted the manufacturer, and they suggested replacing the old rotors with after market rotors. The rotors and brakes have not been replaced at this time. *ak updated 12/27/2005 - the rust on the surface of the disc was so deep that it tore the lining off the pads.
Dt: the contact stated while driving vehicle made a jerking motion when stopping or slowing down .vehicle was taken to the dealership on 8-23-05. The dealership found the hub was defective. Also, the front left side wheel sensor needed to be replaced.*ak the consumer was told his vehicle was not a part of the recall. Updated 01/04/06.
Dt: the contact stated there was the federal safety agency recall 05v379000 concerning anti lock brakes. This vehicle experienced the same problems as indicated in the recall, but was not included in the recall due to the VIN. The vehicle has not been repaired.*ak updated 1/25/2006 - the ABS engaged at low speeds.
Dt: the contact states there was problem with the ABS activating at low speeds. There was the federal safety agency recall 05v379000)for this problem, but the manufacturer said that this vehicle was not included due to VIN. The first time the problem occurred the dealership replaced the ABS sensor. The problem recurred.
VIN decoder
See the problems and recalls for an exact car
Buying a used 1999 GMC Sierra?
Check the exact car before you pay: accidents, salvage or flood titles, odometer readings and previous owners.
Check its history