Check a VIN

2002 GMC Sierra brakes complaints

Page 4 of 6: complaints 71 to 100 of 145, newest first, as owners wrote them.

See the summary of 2002 GMC Sierra brakes problems: which part fails, at what mileage and related recalls.

Filed Dec 30, 2005 · Brakes · 30,000 miles · OK

Dt: the contact states there is a the federal safety agency recall, campaign 05v379000 regarding the anti lock brakes. The vehicle has the same problems as indicated in the recall; however, it is not included in the recall due to the VIN. No repairs were made.

Filed Dec 20, 2005 · Brakes · 15,000 miles · TX

Hand brake failure! Hand brake was noticed to not be functioning at 30k warranty service. Service department replaced brake shoes. Brake only functioned for 3 months and began to fail again. I then replaced the brake shoes again myself so that I could pass inspection and have again been worn out in just a few months. I was then made aware of tsb #02-05-26-002 which eventually became tsb# 02-05-002a. It seems that gm is aware that there is a problem with their retainer clip design and have developed a replacement, but I believe that the cost should be theirs and not the consumers. I have placed notes in forums so that others do the same.

Filed Dec 14, 2005 · Brakes · 60,000 miles · TX

My 2002 gmc sierra 1500 ext cab pickup failed safety inspection due to the parking brake not holding. It has 66000 miles on it. I rarely use the brake living on flat land. This is a common problem according to the inspector requiring appx. $180 to repair. Gmc has a service advisory to replace a part that should solve the problem but why does the consumer have to pay for a failed safety item?

Filed Dec 13, 2005 · Brakes · 30,000 miles · AR

Dt: the contact states there is the federal safety agency recall campaign 05v161000 concerning the parking brake. This vehicle has the same problems as indicated in the recall, but it is not included in the recall due to VIN. *ak updated 1/11/2006 - the vehicle's parking brake failed at approximately 30000 miles.

Filed Dec 13, 2005 · Brakes · 14,500 miles · MA

Dt: the contact states had recall work completed, and the dealer discovered the rotors were severely corroded, and the brake pads needed to be replaced. The recall work was completed under the federal safety agency recall campaign 05v379000, concerning the anti-lock brakes. The service dealer suggested the metal contained in the rotors was defective. While the dealer acknowledged the fact that rotors should have a life span of more than 14,000 miles they refused to offer a free replacement. Therefore, the rotors and brake pads have not been replaced. The contact felt the recall should be expanded to include replacement of the corroded rotors. *ak updated 09/05/07

Filed Dec 6, 2005 · Brakes · OH

Consumer complaint regarding 2002 sierra brake rotors were bad and needed to be replaced, this almost caused consumer to go over a hill. *ts the consumer received recall 05v379000 after the repairs were made. The dealer had to replace the hub and speed sensor. The consumer requested reimbursement but the claim was denied.

Filed Nov 29, 2005 · Brakes · 62,000 miles · FL

Dt: the contact states there is the federal safety agency recall campaign 05v379000 concerning the anti- lock brakes. This vehicle has the same problems as indicated in the recall, but it is not included in the recall due to VIN. The vehicle has not been repaired. *ak the failure of the wheel speed sensor occurred at a low speed. Updated 12/27/05.

Filed Nov 4, 2005 · Brakes, Suspension · 63,838 miles · VA · crash

On 01 nov, I was pulling into a parking spot when my brakes totally failed causing me to crash into a parked car. I was entering the parking spot below 5 MPH when the brakes failed. I dropped my truck off at a repair center on 03 nov and they informed me that both the left front hub bearing was shot and the anti-lock brakes sensor was shot. Both items were replaced.

Filed Nov 2, 2005 · Brakes, Wheels · 69,000 miles · PA

Dt: contact stated there was recall 05v379000 concerning the ABS system. A local service dealer performed the recall repairs. After the repairs were done the contact applied the brakes, but the vehicle would not stop. Upon inspection, the dealer stated the front left hub needed to be replaced. The dealer replaced the hub, and this corrected the problem. He had to cover the cost of the repairs.*ak updated 11/29/05.

Filed Oct 26, 2005 · Brakes · NC

Dt:the consumer complained about the ABS braking system at low speeds. The dealer told him that there was nothing else they could do for the vehicle because the warranty expired. This was the second time that the hubs have been replaced at the consumers expense. He heard there will be a recall in november, but they were only going to clean the sensors and not replace the hubs. His vehicle was purchased in pennsylvania. In august of 2004 the first hub was replaced, and in november 2004 he replaced the second hub. On october 26, 2005 the vehicle was taken to the dealership and both hubs need to be replaced again.*ak updated 11/29/05.

Filed Oct 18, 2005 · Brakes · 53,000 miles · CO

Dt: contact stated the parking brake bands dragged on the hub of the rear wheel even though the parking brake was not being used. Consumer heard a grinding noise, and when he took the car into the service dealership, they told him the hubs needed to be replaced. Gmc investigated trucks with manual transmissions but not with automatic transmissions. Had to replace the hubs on 7-25-05. Had 53,000 miles on this vehicle and bought it brand new. Consumer felt this was a defect and would like to file a safety complaint. This was the first time he had this problem. *ak

Filed Oct 7, 2005 · Brakes · 28,570 miles · WI

My 2002 gmc sierra 4wd p/u with 28,570 miles had "ABS brake" failure. I came close to going through my garage door because of this and am glad it didn't happen at a busy intersection!! There is a recall on my vehicle for this problem, however it only applies to the "salt belt" states and wisconsin is not included!! Unbelievable!! The dealership (von holzen) in ashland wi. Replaced ABS sensors p/n 15112379 ($225) also they had to replace both front brake rotors which could not be refaced as they would have been below specs. The whole bill came to $513.61!! I can't believe gmc doesn't have a recall for all states on the ABS problem before there are ABS caused fatalities!! Von holzen dealership phone # 8003415440 has the old part.

Filed Sep 29, 2005 · Brakes · 39,092 miles · NY · crash

Dt: 2002 gmc sierra. The consumer states the ABS brakes started pulsating, and consumer's vehicle hit another vehicle. This caused the brakes to go out. The vehicle was taken to the dealership, they told him the ABS sensors failed. They were cleaned and now they seem to be okay. This problem has not happened since. There was no warning light on when this happened. *ak

Filed Sep 29, 2005 · Brakes, Suspension · 39,000 miles · OH

Dt: the contact states the ABS system is bad. It almost caused an accident on 8-20-05 because brakes went to the floor. There was no braking power. Had to shift the car into park to get the vehicle to stop. The contact was going very slowly when this happened. This was the first incident of this kind. The dealer repaired the vehicle. They replaced the wheel bearings, the hub, the rotors, and a cable that was attached to the wheel bearing on 8-22-05. It seems to be fixed as of now. *ak

Filed Sep 20, 2005 · Brakes, Steering · 40,000 miles · VA

Dt: 2002 gmc sierra. The consumer states the steering shaft bounced up and down, it was not correctly put in. This caused the front end bounce from the steering box to the steering wheel. This problem has been corrected, but the dealership stated they were having a lot of these problems. This has been happening since the purchase of the vehicle. The consumer thought the vehicle was out of alignment. Also, the rotors a had to be replaced because of the shaft bouncing up and down. The right tie rod was also replaced. The problem was constant with the vehicle.

Filed Sep 15, 2005 · Brakes · 57,000 miles · PA

Dt: the brake rotors are warping. There is rusting in the brake area. The consumer first noticed the problem on september 10, 2005. The consumer had the rotors cut to take off the bad metal. There have been no accidents.

Filed Sep 14, 2005 · Brakes · 53,000 miles · OH

Have 2002 gmc sierra and the anti lock brakes are freezing or working at a slow speed or a stop. Have called garages and they don't have the recall numbers. So I have to wait until released. How long must I wait!!!

Filed Sep 8, 2005 · Brakes · 50,000 miles · NY

1. Loss of brakes at low speeds, which caused me to back into a ditch while backing out of my driveway. It feels like the ABS is kicking in, but you loose all control of the brakes. 2. Have had to replace the brakes -- pads and rotors twice at my own expense in 46,000 miles.

Filed Sep 1, 2005 · Brakes · 68,000 miles · NJ

Dt: the consumer complained about the ABS system engaging at low speeds of 5-10 MPH, and when coming to a stop , the braking would go away completely. The consumer had it temporally repaired. The consumer had not contacted the dealer where it was bought, but was planning to do that. The manufacturer has not been contacted. The vehicle is a 2002, gmc sierra pickup. The consumer has not checked with gm about recall information.

Filed Aug 31, 2005 · Brakes · 90,000 miles · MO

My truck is a 2002 gmc sierra, and is having the same problems as the antilock braking system recall. I was told that since I don't live in the eastern states that I don't fall into the recall. It is having purging problems on the antilock, and is having problems with stopping at different speeds, the brakes don't seem to want to stop it.

Filed Aug 31, 2005 · Brakes · 10,000 miles · WV · crash · 1 injury

Low speed application of brakes on mixed traction surface ( bare road on left side ice and snow on right side). Lead to unwanted activation of anti-locks. Resulting in loss of control of truck and subsequent crash with personal injury and substantial property damage. Police were notified but no report because it was in a subdivision.

Filed Aug 24, 2005 · Brakes · 40,000 miles · NY

Brake ABS system is activating at low speeds. Often when I come to a stop from 5-20mph the ABS system activates for no reason on dry, clean roads. Several times I've narrowly exscaped an accident. The truck doesn't want to stop at all when the ABS activates.

Filed Aug 22, 2005 · Brakes · 54,000 miles · NY

When you are going 3 to 6 miles per hour going slow or coming to a stop the ABS system fails causing the brakes not to work, you have to push really hard on the pedal just to get it to slow down. I,ve talked to other people who have gmc and chevy pick-ups and they have had the same problem.this is something the should be repaired by gm before someone is killed.I also found out today that canada has issussed a recall for this problem. Does it take someone to get killed or injured be the federal safety agency does something?

Filed Aug 16, 2005 · Brakes · 36,000 miles · PA

At slow speeds (below 10 MPH) the anti lock brakes mess up and truck can not be stopped. Would happen once in a while, now it happens every time I try to stop. Almost ran into several people. I can not believe this problem has not been a recall considering that all the people I have talked to that have had the same problem and that I am sure there has had to been several accidents involving this. A dealer told me to pull the anti-lock fuse until I get it fixed which I have. Truck now stops but I no longer have anti-lock brakes.

Filed Aug 15, 2005 · Brakes · 48,000 miles · NY · crash

I have a 2002 gmc sierra with ABS which falsely activates at slow speeds. Many friends have had similar complaints, one of which connected me to you folks. The situation is as known in pe05020. The "fix" is temporary and typically lasts 9 - 12 months.

Filed Aug 12, 2005 · Brakes · 47,348 miles · IL

Dt: the front and rear rotors fell apart. The mechanic had to replace the rotors at 47,000 miles. He said it was a common problem. The consumer went to the dealer and they said it was normal. The consumer sent letters to gmc and they are returning letters. *ak

Filed Aug 1, 2005 · Brakes, Lights · 9,000 miles · OH

Dt: consumer stated brake failure resulted in extended stopping distance. Took to a dealer for this issue 3 times. Dealer's general manager said there was some type of problem but he did not know what caused it. No repairs or parts replaced. *ak on oct 18, 2004 the rear rotors were turned. Even after the rotors were turned the brakes still performed poorly. The right fog light fell off while driving.

Filed Jul 28, 2005 · Brakes · 40,000 miles · NY

This complaint is to support investigation pe05020 1 - events leading to failure: my truck has been driven in ny state since it was purchased in late 2001. It has been properly maintained and serviced. 2 - failure and its consequences: after 40,000 miles, every time I came to a stop the anti-lock brakes would kick in (under 10 MPH in completely dry conditions). This made the vehicle extremely difficult if not impossible to stop. I almost became involved in an accident on 3 or 4 separate occasions until I pulled the fuse for the ABS system. Pulling the fuse disables the system so I'm now driving without anti-lock brakes. Certainly better than the alternative. 3 - corrective measures and availability of parts I brought the vehicle in for service to patrick gmc in rochester, ny. Paid $85.73 to have it diagnosed. They indicated both front speed sensors were bad and both hub assemblies would need to be replaced at a cost of $432 per side plus tax. The sensor itself is not available - it must be purchased with an entire hub assembly. I did not have the work done and continue to drive the vehicle with the ABS fuse pulled. The vehicle is unsafe to drive in any other condition (except if the hubs were replaced). The defective parts are still on my truck.

Filed Jul 19, 2005 · Brakes · 51,000 miles · NH · crash

Anti lock brakes would activate for for no reason at all once and a while at slow speeds condition got worse until I could not stop for a stop sign and also hit a curb I had to remove the fuse to disable the anti lock brakes to avoid a bad crash.

Filed Jul 8, 2005 · Brakes · NH

Gmc sierra 2002 the vehicle's antilock braking system engaged while being driven on dry pavement. *sc as a result I took the truck considerable time and distance to come to a complete stop. This braking problem had been occurring repeatedly over the past 6 months.

VIN decoder

See the problems and recalls for an exact car

Buying a used 2002 GMC Sierra?

Check the exact car before you pay: accidents, salvage or flood titles, odometer readings and previous owners.

Check its history