Check a VIN

2002 GMC Yukon Denali brakes problems

19 complaints (66% of all complaints for this car). Typical mileage when it fails: 105,000.

owner complaints
19
of this car's complaints
66%
typical mileage
105,000
crashes
0
recalls
0

Which part fails

  • Antilock/traction control/electronic limited slip
    3
  • Foundation components: disc: rotor
    1
  • Conventional
    1
  • Antilock: ABS warning light
    1
  • Antilock/traction control/electronic limited slip: wheel speed sensor/tone ring
    1
  • Antilock/traction control/electronic limited slip: control unit/module
    1

At what mileage

Complaints by mileage at the time of the problem.

0k-25k
25k-50k
50k-75k
75k-100k
100k-125k
125k-150k
150k-175k
175k-200k
200k+

GMC Yukon Denali brakes problems in other years

19992005201020152018

Specific symptoms reported on the 2002 GMC Yukon Denali brakes

Phrases found in the owners' own descriptions, so one complaint can mention several symptoms.

Brake failure 7ABS 6

Related recalls

No recalls on record for this model year.

Related investigations

Parking brake failureOpened December 20, 2005, closed May 31, 2006

Odi's review of complaint data received since the close of ea04-011 revealed no indication that the investigation should be re-opened.more details can be found in the federal register notice enclosed in the dp05-009 public file.odi reserves the right to reopen the investigation in the future should conditions warrant.

DP05009

Unwanted low-speed ABS activationOpened April 28, 2005, closed September 13, 2005

In a letter dated august 29, 2005, gm notified odi that it was recalling certain model year 1999 through 2002 c/k pickup trucks and sport utility vehicles to correct a problem with anti-lock brake system (ABS) wheel speed sensor corrosion that may result in unwanted ABS activation and extended stopping distances during low-speed braking (recall 05v‑379).gm's recall covers approximately 804,000 vehicles currently registered in the following 14 salt-belt states:connecticut, illinois, indiana, massachusetts, maine, michigan, new hampshire, new jersey, new york, ohio, pennsylvania, rhode island, vermont, and west virginia.the recall procedure will involve removing the sensor, cleaning the mounting surface, applying a rust inhibitor (zinc-x) to the surface, and reinstalling the sensor.if necessary, the sensor will be replaced. The population and failure report data given in this resume are for the full region that has been considered by odi as the salt-belt.that includes delaware, iowa, maryland, minnesota, missouri, wisconsin and the district of columbia in addition to the 14 states included in 05v‑379.the states covered by gm's recall have the highest incident rates for the subject condition, accounting for 91% of the incidents, but only 24% of subject vehicle sales in the united states.odi's analysis determined that 840 of the complaints, 244 of the crashes, and 16 of the injuries identified in this investigation occurred in those states.the resulting incident and crash rates are 96.2 and 28.0 per 100,000 vehicles respectively (note:rates are based on vehicle sales, not registered vehicles). The corresponding numbers in the excluded portions of the salt-belt are 399,000 vehicles, 81 incidents (20.3 per 100,000 vehicles), 3 crashes, and no injuries.the statistics in the remaining 30 states are 2,406,000 vehicles, 168 incidents (7.0 per 100,000 vehicles), 31 crashes, and one injury.gm and odi are continuing to monitor the problem experience in states that are not included in the recall.gm will provide odi with updated complaint, field report, and warranty data in november 2005.odi and gm will review that data and assess the appropriateness of the current scope of the recall at that time.

PE05020

What 2002 GMC Yukon Denali owners say

Most recent owner complaints, unedited.

Filed Jul 16, 2016 · Brakes · 128,000 miles · VA

For the second time in an approximate 12 month period, I had to replace a brake line failure. Until now, I didn't know that gm has a "replacement rebuild kit". However, the first time my sister was driving and had a brake failure with a car load of family aboard, in jacksonville fl. A nationally known company replaced the portion of the brake line that ruptured, but they did warn me that rust was rampart because of the salt. Yesterday, I was driving to work on i495, d.c. Beltway at 50 MPH, where thousands of people travel daily and I had another catastrophic brake failure at 50 MPH. That scenario, just thinking about it again, scared me half to death and I just fixed the same thing last year for 600.00+ and unexpectedly it happens again. Only by the grace of god, no one was injured or killed or had substantial property damage. What I found out later after investigating this problem, and the same company who replaced the first brake line said it would be 1500.00 to fix a portion of the brake line. This issue is well known by gm and has been investigated for 5 years and gm did not do a recall because most warranties have expired. However, with the snow-belts states salting the roads have damaged many gm and other vehicles. From 1999 to 2007 gm trucks and suvs were using non-pv coated brake lines. By these brake lines not being coated with protectant, corrosion runs rampart on your brake line system, this is probable in all the aforementioned vehicles. I think that every dealer should do this replacement for the gm recommend price. I talked to my service manager at chevy/gm today and he said gm doesn't own this dealership and the recommended time to install (4.5 hours) @ 100.00 per hour is not realistic. I said you sale and service these vehicles, yet no one wants to step up to fix them until some gets killed, that's ridiculous.

Filed Jul 23, 2015 · Brakes · 200,000 miles · ID

Tl* the contact owns a 2002 gmc yukon denali. While driving approximately 20 MPH, the contact applied the brakes, but the anti lock brakes activated independently. The anti lock brake warning light illuminated. The failure recurred multiple times. The contact independently removed the anti lock brake fuse. The vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. The contact stated that the vehicle experienced the failure listed in the federal safety agency campaign number: 05v379000 (service brakes, hydraulic); however, the VIN was not included. The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The approximate failure mileage was 200,000.

Filed Sep 10, 2014 · Brakes · 89,740 miles · MD

While approaching a stop sign I attempted to apply the brakes. The brakes went to the floor. I pumped them repeatedly which did not help much at all. I was not able to slow down, much less stop at the stop sign. With no choice, I rounded the turn at a high rate of speed. Thankfully the approaching vehicle was able to avoid me. Had I arrived at the intersection a few seconds later the result would have likely been different. As this occurred late at night with almost no traffic, I was able to get the vehicle home at a slow rate of speed with heavy brake pumping. Upon inspection in my driveway I was able to determine that a corroded brake line that leads to the rear brakes had burst. The placement of this part on top of the frame rail prevents inspection by owners.

Filed Aug 24, 2014 · Brakes · 105,000 miles · MN

While driving our 2002yukon denali with 105,000 miles we had brake failure for the second time. We were towing our 21 foot gulf stream amerilite travel trailer and when the vehicle in front of us stepped on their brakes my husband attempted to begin slowing down. The brake pedal went all the way to the floor, we had no brakes. It is a miracle that we were not killed. This is the second brake line rupture within the past two years since we have owned this vehicle. The vehicle is extemely well maintained. We could have been killed. It has been very expensive to have our vehicle towed twice and repaired. I will be contacting gmc and asking for reimbursement. Our lives and the lives of many others have been put in danger here. Why is their not a recall with so many postings of the this problem? All of the brake lines should be replaced with stainless steel lines that will not rust. I am looking forward to your response prior to contacting an attorney. Thank you.

Filed Jul 17, 2014 · Brakes · 131,506 miles · OH

During routine maintenance on my 2002 yukon denali, heavy rust/corrosion was first identified on the brake line that runs under the radiator. As I followed it back, more rust/corrosion is visible. They are rusting/corroding in exposed as well as protected areas. Concerned for safety and a potential failure I started to investigate, on line, and found that this issue has affected many trucks and SUV's in and around my model year. I also found that gm is aware of the issue but has failed to initiate a recall. Vehicles of this size are purchased for large families, towing and hauling heavy loads. All the more reason for gm to recognize the potential danger and act accordingly.

Filed Feb 16, 2014 · Brakes · 160,000 miles · AZ

Rear brake line failed while driving. Car towed to van chevrolet in scottsdale, az. Dealer only replaced one failed line. Approx. 1 year later, front left line failed, again while driving, and was replaced. After inspection all hard brake lines are severely corroded and need replacement.

Filed Sep 27, 2013 · Brakes, Fuel system · 135,000 miles · NY

Tl* the contact owns a 2002 gmc yukon denali. The contact stated while driving approximately 15 MPH, the brakes were depressed and the vehicle failed to slow down until the brake pedal was applied repeatedly. The contact stated that prior to the failure while shifting from park into reverse, the pedal traveled to the floorboard upon engagement. The technician informed the contact that the entire brake and fuel lines were severely corroded. The vehicle was in the process of being repaired. The manufacturer was not notified of the problem. The approximate failure mileage was 135,000.

Filed Jul 29, 2013 · Brakes · 113,706 miles · OH

I was exiting the freeway and started to brake and then the pedal went to the floor. I had the stand on it to slow down enough to keep from hitting the car in front of me. Upon examination of the vehicle I found a ruptured brake line. Further review found all 4 lines 8 inches below the master cylinder and lower seriously corroded. Fluid reservoir was still full of fluid. The line broke out under the carriage, front driver side, just behind the front wheel well. Pictures are available of the corroded lines.

Filed Mar 9, 2012 · Brakes · 103,000 miles · NY

Brakes failed due to corrosion of the brake line. Braking was not existent as the pedal travels to the floor. Thank god for not being in a busy street and being able to coast to a stop. This is a heavy vehicle and without braking ability it could easily kill people. After adding some brake fluid (most of which leaked through the broken line) there's not even a warning light on to alert of a braking problem despite the fact that the pedal goes to the floor. The other important point to note is that the failure in the line appears to have happened in a part of the line that appears to be inside the car frame which makes it the most protected line from the outside elements. If that's the first line to fail, it would suggest sub standard materials being used in manufacturing these lines.

Filed Jul 6, 2011 · Brakes · 167,000 miles · IN

Tl* the contact owns a 2002 gmc yukon denali. The contact stated that while braking, the ABS system would engage and cause the brakes to lock up. The contact stated that this occurs at low speeds and could cause a crash. The contact has not taken the vehicle to a dealer or local mechanic. The contact stated the vehicle was unsafe to drive. The failure mileage was 167,000.

Questions about the 2002 GMC Yukon Denali brakes

Does the 2002 GMC Yukon Denali have brakes problems?

Owners have filed 19 complaints about the brakes of the 2002 GMC Yukon Denali, 66% of all its complaints, more than any other problem.

At what mileage do 2002 GMC Yukon Denali brakes problems start?

The typical (median) mileage in owner complaints is 105,000 miles.

Was there a recall on the 2002 GMC Yukon Denali brakes?

There is no recall for this problem on this model year.

What year does the GMC Yukon Denali have bad brakes?

The GMC Yukon Denali model years with the most brakes complaints are 2002 (19 complaints), 2003 (18 complaints) and 2001 (16 complaints).

Other 2002 GMC Yukon Denali problems

Airbags 3Electrical 3Body 1Engine 1Fuel system 1Seat belts 1Steering 1Suspension 1

VIN decoder

See the problems and recalls for an exact car

Buying a used 2002 GMC Yukon Denali?

Check the exact car before you pay: accidents, salvage or flood titles, odometer readings and previous owners.

Check its history