In april 2000 my vehicle was taken to triboro in response to the recall that called for the rotors to be replaced. In september 2000 I returned the vehicle to triboro a unrelated repair and was informed that the brakes and rotors needed replacement. Upon returning home we realized that the rotors were "alledgedly new" however a brake repair shop related that the rotors appear to be old and not the new coated rotors required under the recall. Upon contact with triboro and having them check their computer to confirm the "new rotors" we were told that we probably wore them out with bad pads. We tryed to reason with them in regards to the unlikelihood of new rotors needing replacement after only 10,000 miles, but they were un yielding. In contacting the chysler corporation recall division, we were instructed to take the vehicle to another dealer and get a estimate on the replacement of brakes and the condition of the rotors, at our expense. We are very concerned now about having to put out money to confirm that the recall replacement was not performed. In contact with our local congressional office has informed us that it is best to contact this office and that the necessary action would be taken to correct this matter. Thank you for your time and anticipated cooperation in this matter.
1995 Jeep Cherokee brakes complaints
Page 2 of 4: complaints 11 to 40 of 90, newest first, as owners wrote them.
Brought jeep into lawless for recall they said the rotors were ok on aug 28,2000.after 2 weeks and 400 miles the front left rotor split during a stop at intersection which made vehicle not stop. Luckily for my wife and daughter the other car was able to stop.the mechanic who inspected rotors 2 weeks prior should be reprimanded.
When driving and upon depressing brake pedal consumer noticed pulstation in brake pedal, causing poor braking ability. Consumer has contacted dealer, dealer has replaced both frontal and rear brakes.
Vehicle experienced failure of the recall component (99v‑340) prior to recall notification, owner requesting reimbursement.
Recall99v340000, front brake rotors; received recall in december, able to finally get an appointment in august 9, 2000. Went to dealer @ luchetti jeep, wyoming avenue, west pittson, pa, 570‑655‑1433, and let two persons in front of him at 8:00am. Got into an argument, and dealer did not remedy recall, which may cause a crash.
Vehicle experienced failure of the recall component (99v‑340) prior to recall notification, consumer is requesting reimbursement.
While vehicle was parked on a slight hill with the gear in the park position and the emergecny parking brake on, vehicle rolled forward. After vehicle came to a stop after hitting a parked car, parking brake was still on and the gear was still in park. Please give any further details.
Vehicle experienced failure of the recall component (99v‑340) prior to recall notification, consumer is requesting reimbursement.
Vehicle experienced failure of the recall component prior to recall notification and is having trouble receiving reimbursement from the manufacturer. (99v‑340)
Consumer contacted dealer in reference to recall 99v340000/manufacturer's recall 747. Dealer stated that recall work has already been done in january. Consumer noted the last contact with that dealer was in november. Please provide any further details.
While driving and attempting to apply brakes, found out that he did not have any brakes because rotors had separated. Consumer was traveling approximately 30 MPH, no injuries.
Structure, door : both doors have cracked welds where top & bottom hinges attach to chassis. Engine : bolts attaching right side motor mounts to engine sheared off (dealer implied factory support, demanded payment after work completed). Brakes disc : brake rotors rusted out well before 3 year, 36,000 warranty, dealer denied coverage. Brake rotors later subject to inspection & replace as needed recall, except owner repairs prior to recall not covered!
Front brake rotors failed prior to recall notice 99v‑340. Nlm
Vehicle experienced failure of the recall component prior to notification, request reimbursement. (99v‑340)
Vehicle experienced failure of the recall component prior to recall notification (99v‑340).
Vehicle experienced failure of the recall component prior to recall notification, however denied reimbursement due to failure problem.
Catalytic converter failed causing a rattling noise under the vehicle. Nlm
Consumer received recall (99v‑340) for brake rotors. Vehicle was taken to durocher jeep eagle dealership. Consumer received invoice saying work was done. Took vehicle to mechanic to have new pads put on, and they pointed out that there was cracking around the hub. Consumer called jeep manufacturer to complain, and was told to talk to the service manager & if that didn't work, to call the owner of the durocher dealership.
I would like to know why the state of minnesota is not included in campaignid#99v340000. I just had to have my rotors and pads replaced at only 54,000miles because of rust damage.
Vehicle experienced failure of the recall component prior to recall notification, damage to other brake components due to defect, owner request reimbursement. (99v‑340)
Consumer vehicle is not included in selective recall for the disc brake rotor problem, because they do not considerd deleware to be a part of the salt belt, 99v‑340.
Brake rotors failed prior to recall notice, due to rust. (99v‑340)
Front brake rotors found to be corroded but not worn, imho not safe to reuse. Minnesota not considered in the rust belt to be covered under current recall, you've got to be kidding! The problem is that people in minnesota are driving around on corroded front rotors like I found on my jeep and are not being notified of the danger.
Front brake failed. Yh
Vehicle experienced failure of the recall component prior to recall notification, requesting reimbursement. (99v‑340)
Prior to recall notice, rusted rotors separated from the hub (99v-34). Yh
I have been having numerous problems with front end, tried numerous cures, and am still having same problem. While driving, the front end will begin to shake, when I slow down to 30-35mph, it will go away. It is not a constant problem, but will happen at least once a day. I have replaced front rotors due to excessive vibration while driving. The dealer has replaced several times, had an independent change this time. Now am experiencing a constant noise from front end.
Vehicle experiencing rust on both rear rotors. Manufacturer contracted.
Vehicle experienced failure of the recall component prior to recall notification, requesting reimbursement (99v‑340).
Vehicle experienced failure of the recall component (99v‑340) prior to recall notice.
VIN decoder
See the problems and recalls for an exact car
Buying a used 1995 Jeep Cherokee?
Check the exact car before you pay: accidents, salvage or flood titles, odometer readings and previous owners.
Check its history