The vehicle experienced the same problem as stated in recall 99 v 340 000, however the dealer stated they would replace only the rotors and not the brake pads.
1994 Jeep Grand Cherokee brakes complaints
Page 2 of 6: complaints 11 to 40 of 131, newest first, as owners wrote them.
The front rotors cracked as a result of rust. The dealer replaced the rotors, however the problem recurred.*jb....
The consumer received a recall notice, 99v34, on brake rotors, but the dealer says other failed parts should also be replaced at the same time the recall parts are fixed. The consumer disagreed.
Consumer states that the rotor crack while driving causing consumer to hear vibrating sound.
Consumer stated the front end makes a noise and the two front tires were replaced due to front axle assembly failed.
Prior to recall notification (99v340000) consumer had the rotors replaced on the vehicle, however when consumer inquired about a possible reimbursement, the dealer stated they were aware of the recall and that it had been in effect for a couple of years, but the work that they performed was necessary maintenance and would not be covered.
Consumer states vehicle has many transmission problems with vehicle in park, it would roll backward, at times the gear shift would not move when the vehicle would continue to roll backward, dealer informed consumer that the vehicle was not safe unless the entire transmission was replaced.
Prior to recall notification(747) consumer was informed that the rotors were in need of replacement, consumer took vehicle back to dealer dealer to have rotors replaced under recall and is now seeking reimbursement for the previous rotors that were installed
Dealer replaced front disc brake rotors per recall 97i002000. After 1550 miles, rotors were warped so badly they had to be replaced again. Dealer mentioned problems with rotors supplied by daimlerchrysler for the recall.
Prior to recall notification (99v340000) consumer had repairs performed and is now seeking reimbursement.
Binding/grinding/poping of front-end when turning @ 3-25 MPH, causing enough resistance to stop the jeep when at lower speeds, along with hum & vibration @ higher speeds. Replaced front halfshafts. Seemed ok. Drove approx. 400 highway miles, started again. Had different shop check drive axles. Axles ok. Replaced frt. Hub bearing assemblys, frt. Brake disc pads, frt. Disc brake anti-sqeal shims,frt. Disc brake rotors, frt. & rear thrid cover gasket,limited. Slip additive & lubricant frt. & rear. Problem contiunes. Advised may have a transfer case linkage problem common to jeep. Would like to know if this is a known problem with the jeep, if not is it possible, and what to do next. Thank you for your assistance.
Front rotors replaced, back brake cylinders replaced because of leakage, recall (99v‑340) completed 1/19/00, pads and rotors replaced prior and after recall at owner's expense (5/13/98 & 11/29/00), owner requesting reimbursement for repairs made on 11/29/00.
No summary listed for above vehicle.
Front rotors recalled and replaced by jeep, replaced rotors warped after about 6 months and 5,000 miles. Dealer says rotors warped and require resurfacing. Chrysler refuses to acknowledge any warranty of their own replacement parts after this short period, claiming that the vehicle is out of warranty. I believe chrysler should warranty their replacemnt parts on a recall of a failed brake component, at least for 12 months.
The jeep looks great but the way it runs sounds horible and nobody gives me a straight answer
While driving and coming to stop about 10 MPH, stepped on brake pedal and brakes popped, making grinding noise like metal to metal. Then,consumer drove to a garage where a technician said that pads and shoes could be worn out. Consumer still had two rotors.
The recall component (99v‑340) brake rotors failed prior to recall notification, consumer is requesting reimbursement.
Vehicle experienced failure of the recall component (99v‑340) prior to recall notification and is being denied reimbursement, consumer is requesting for the second time for reimbursement.
There was an extended warranty on the air conditioning evaporator that I found at an internet site "lemonaidcars.com" the warranty was extended to 7 years and 115km. This jeep would have qualified if the warranty notice had been sent to jeep owners.
Vehicle experienced failure of the recall component (99v‑340) prior to recall notification, owner requesting reimbursement.
Rear brake rotors have corroded, causing extended stopping distance under normal braking, which could lead to an accident. Consumer has contacted dealer. Please provide any further details.
Consumer has replaced recall component (99v‑340) on two occasions prior to recall notification, consumer is requesting reimbursement for both repairs.
Consumer was denied recall repair (00v‑136) by the dealership.
Brakes have experienced numerous problems , prior to recall no (#99v-340000).
The front brake rotors failed prior to recall notice 99v‑340, consumer is requesting reimbursement. Nlm
Reduced strengh of the iron on brake surface, caused brakes to separate from the hub, reducing brake effectiveness. Recall issued for this problem, but virginia not included, although dc and maryland are, owner resides in dc metro area. *ak
Prior to recall corrosion of front brake rotors caused separating of the rotor disc from the center hub (99v‑340) . Yh
Front brake rotors failed prior to recall notice 99v‑340. Nlm
Front brake rotor corroded and failed prior to recall notice (99v‑340)causing the vehicle to pull while braking. Nlm
Vehicle had failure of the recall component prior to notification. (99v‑340)
VIN decoder
See the problems and recalls for an exact car
Buying a used 1994 Jeep Grand Cherokee?
Check the exact car before you pay: accidents, salvage or flood titles, odometer readings and previous owners.
Check its history