Left front hub, bearing assembly and drive axle corroded. Nlm. Nlm
1995 Jeep Grand Cherokee brakes complaints
Page 3 of 5: complaints 41 to 70 of 113, newest first, as owners wrote them.
Consumer was in for recall repair and denied additional work, when having the additional work performed at another location it was found that the recall repair was not completed as stated on the invoice (99v‑340), consumer is requesting reimbursement for repairs completed.
Airbag failure on impact twice, brake component failure 10 separate times, water pump failure at 50,000, differential noise and failure at 65,000, manifold cracked, motor mount, and transmission mounts failure at 74,000
Vehicle experienced failure of the recall component (99v‑340) prior to recall notification, which resulted in vehicle collision due to loss of brake control.
Rear brakes rotors corroded which caused extended stopping distance and may result in a crash. Owner received a recall for the front rotors which have the same problem as the rear rotors. *ak consumer did not understand that if the front brake rotors needed to be repaied due to corrosion why the rear brake rotors are not being recalled. Front cv boot was broken, during the process of changing the boot the mechanic broke the hub.
Consumer is not able to have recall repair (00v‑136) completed, there is no dealership in the area of residence, owner is requesting information regarding lack of service.
When vehicle was put in gear engine idled high, and when brake pedal was depressed vehicle tooke off. Please provide further information.
Had recall repairs done on front disc brake rotors. However, rear rotors are rusting & disintergrating. Also, brake drums disintegrate when touched or when brakes are applied.
Front brake rotors failed prior to recall notice 99v‑340. Nlm
R/r front brake pads and rotors failed prior to recall notice 99v‑340. Nlm
Rusted, defective disc rotors compromised the brake's performance in an emergency situation. In heavy traffic, on a two lane road, there was an accident ahead, drivers slammed on their brakes, but my son was unable to stop quickly enough and hit the '84 volvo ahead of him. My son was cited for following too closely, although he does not think he was following too closely. Vehicular damage appeared very minor, but the other driver is claiming that his '84 volvo is totaled. The impact was at very low speed. My son received no injuries, and his airbag did not deploy. The other driver complained of a headache and backache, saw his doctor, was treated with naprosyn (alleve), and is fine. We had received no information from chrysler about the recall on the front brake rotors. We found out about the recall the next day (1/21/2000) when it was announced on cnn. I called chrysler and had the recall performed. (our jeep was affected because it had been housed in ohio prior to 8/99 when we bought it). The receipt from the dealer for the recall work says the rotors were defective. After the new rotors were installed we noticed a very signigicant difference in stopping ability. I reported this to chrysler, requested that a test of stopping time/ability with the old rotors and with the new rotors be done, but chrysler refused. If we had been informed of the recall, we could have had the rotors replaced and avoided the accident. I understand that rotors are a wear item, but obviously, rust causes metal to wear and thin more quickly. We believe the rusted rotors adversely affected the ability of the brakes to stop our jeep quickly enough in an emergency situation.
While driving vehicle began to shake- this happened right after the recall was done on the brake rotors.consumer is afraid to drive because she may lose control.
Consumer was told the day before scheduled repair that there were no parts available for front brake rotor recall 99v‑340 called later to find out when they would be in and was told they were in and had to rescedule because the original appointment was given to another customer. Nlm
Drivers seat belt binding. Nlm
Vehicle experienced failure of the recall (99v‑340) prior to notice, owner replaced all rotors and pads as well.
Recall 99v340000 concerning front brake rotors were not sent to consumer. Also, she has been the only owner of this vehicle. Consumer contacted manufacturer. Manufacturer noted that vehicle was included in the recall. However, they neglected to send the information to consumer. *ak
Front brake rotors are on recall, manufacturer's recall 9845. Consumer is having the same problem with the rear brake rotors, they are warped, and the surface is rusted. Owner feels rear rotors should be recalled also. *ak
While putting on brakes consumer got a shuttering feeling through the car and steering wheel. Consumer feels that he may lose control of wheel.
Brake rotors failed prior to recall notice (99v‑340).
Vehicle experienced severe failure of the recall component (rotors) prior to notification, resulting in additional repairs and charges, requesting reimbursement for all charges related to the defective rotors. (99v‑340)
Recall component failed three times prior to receiving notification. (99v‑340)
Vehicle recall repair completed, however additional repairs necessary to completely repair vehicle, these additional repairs were not included in the recall (99v‑340).
Recall component (99v340) failed prior to recall notice and were replaced.
Recall component replaced and failed prior to notice (99v‑340), consumer would like to be reimbursed for prior repair.
Total front brake failure caused by breakage of the rotors, causing separation of the center hub from the rotor. Vehicle lost control, resulting in a crash/injury. Dealer has been contacted.
The front calipers seized causing damage to the pads and rotors as well. Yh
Upon application of the brakes vehicle started jumping.driver managed to get vehicle to stop when entering the driveway. Dealer contacted, and cannot remedy problem. Vehicle also accelerated when driving 50 MPH and below. Problems still exists. Provide further information.
When turning the wheels rear wheels lock up, causing vehicle to stop running.
Abs system has failed a number of timess (no pumping on hard braking), once caused me to skid into the rear of a vehicle due to uncontrolabilty (person in other car said she heard skidding. People at dealership sounded like they have heard this before (they said that all they had to do was reset the ABS system). After resetting ABS system it worked for a while and then stopped functioning again. Couldn't afford the $50 fee for bringing it in a lot (100k warranty.) so I drove it as a non ABS car, but still no pumping feeling when pedal is depressed, any more questions please e-mail at [email protected].
Water pump failed/replaced.
VIN decoder
See the problems and recalls for an exact car
Buying a used 1995 Jeep Grand Cherokee?
Check the exact car before you pay: accidents, salvage or flood titles, odometer readings and previous owners.
Check its history