I was told today while I was getting the oil changed on my vehicle that the front lower ball joints were very loose, and that I was lucky that my front tired hadn't fallen off yet. After speaking with the manager he referred me to ford because of the recall on the suspension that he knew about. He though that my car should qualify considering the severity of the condition that they were in. After speaking with several people at ford I was informed that even though I was having the same problem as described in the recall that my car 's VIN number did not qualify. I don't understand that at all. My car is the same year, make , and model, with the same dangerous situation.
2001 Lincoln LS suspension complaints
Page 2 of 5: complaints 11 to 40 of 110, newest first, as owners wrote them.
We own a 2001 lincoln l.s.. While making a right hand turn in a curve last night I heard a loud cracking sound come from the drivers side front suspension. Instantly the drivers side front end dropped causing me to lose control of the steering. Snatched the steering wheel hard to the left out of my hands causing me to cross opposing traffic into a ditch sliding into the front of a concrete pipe leading under the street. While applying the brakes in the grass car smashed into the edge of the concrete pipe. Had car brought to our home. Jacked up drivers side front this morning and found the lower ball joint had came out of the lower control arm it is busted as well as the tire, rim, front steel cross member that mounts the lower control arm is bent. Wiped out the oil pan causing all the oil to leak out also damaging the rear lower control arm mount which is aluminum. Plus busting the front bumper cover/ lower air dam. Driving lights. Cannot find if our car was recalled and fixed per your recall concerning improperly tightened lower ball joints. Unable to find any information from ford motor company north america. Now we are without a car to get to work. Now we have no idea how to proceed. Luckily there were no on coming cars avoiding a head on crash. This is my wife's car which my children ride in. Looked at passenger side lower ball joint and it looks to be coming out of the lower control arm as well. Car is in drive way with both front tires removed sitting on jack stands.
I am a 66 yr old widow, owner of a 2001 ls purchased june 2001, a recall fix was to have been done before my purchase in march of 2001 to correct a problem with ball joints. I read online that many of these vehicles have the damage that was suppose to be corrected for when they get to about 67000 miles, I am at 67000 miles, took my car in for inspection and need an 1800 dollar fix to correct the issue that was suppose to be avoided by the recall. Ford said, too long ago, no warranty beyond the norm for recall fixes. I can not believe with the amount of evidence that these cars all require a fix at 67000 miles that ford isn't forced to address this dangerous condition. I also don't know if it's safe to drive a while longer, I just don't know how they got away with a recall that did not provide the fix.
I was driving my car, after driving home from work (approx. 70 miles round-trip). While turning I heard a loud crunch and then felt a hard thud, my vehicle was difficult to steer, felt another crunch. I pulled into a parking stall, after parking my vehicle, another loud crunch, the driver's side wheel had fallen off and was wedged into the wheel well. On march 12th, 2012 my repair facility informed me about the items that need replaced: upper and lower left front ball joints, front outer tier rod ends, new fuel filter- damaged in the incident, two new tires & an alignment. I realized how lucky I was that this did not occur while driving down the road. I conducted google search on 2001 lincoln ls suspension problems, I was stunned on the amount of safety related hits out there (suspension related), I realized that this was not isolated to just my vehicle, there were pages-of-pages of people that experienced similar suspension problems with their 2001 lincolns. There was a suspension related recall: lincoln / ls 2000-2001, ford motor company, date: nov 01, 2000 the federal safety agency campaign id number: 00v359001 n/a the federal safety agency action number: n/a component: suspension: front: control arm: lower ball joint, number of affected: 82,300 summary: vehicle description: passenger vehicles. The front suspension lower ball joints were not tightened to specifications when they were attached to the lower control arms. Consequence: if the ball joint attaching nuts are not adequately tightened, they can loosen and, ultimately, result in fracture of the ball joint stud. If the ball joint fractures, control of the vehicle could be affected, increasing the risk of a crash. Remedy: dealers will inspect the torque on the two ball joint attaching nuts. Vehicles with loose ball joint attaching nuts will either have the fasteners tightened to specification, or if necessary, the ball joints will be replaced.
We purchased a lincoln ls on 2/24/12 and a I was driving the car home I heard a loud noise that sounded as if the wheels were going to fall off especially as I went over bumps. I took the car to midas and they diagnosed that the ball joints were bad, along with the struts, and gasket cover. I did some research and I found that the car had been recalled in 2000 for the ball joints.
Tl* the contact owns a 2001 lincoln ls. While driving approximately 25 MPH over a roadbump, the contact lost slight control because the vehicle began to abnormally sway from left to right. In addition, the four wheel rims installed on the vehicle were corroded near the hub. The dealer was notified of the failure and they informed the contact that the VIN was not included in the recall associated with the federal safety agency campaign id number 00v359001 (suspension: front: control arm: lower ball). There was also a manufacturer voluntary recall on the wheel rims but the VIN was ineligible. The vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. The manufacturer was made aware of the problem. The approximate failure mileage was 148,000.
Tl* the contact owns a 2001 lincoln ls. The contact stated that while driving approximately 45 MPH over a manhole cover, he heard a loud screeching noise coming from the outside of the vehicle. There was a slight loss of steering control and the vehicle was cautiously maneuvered to the side of the road. The contact noticed that the front drivers side lower control arm completely fractured, which caused the tire to turn in on a 90 degree angle. The vehicle was towed to an independent mechanic and repaired. Most recently, the identical failure occurred with the front passenger side lower control arm. There was a recall associated with the failure under the federal safety agency campaign id number 00v359001 (suspension: front: control arm: lower ball joint). The VIN was not included in the recall. The vehicle had not been repaired. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure. The approximate failure mileage was 99,000. The VIN was unavailable.
Tl*the contact owns a 2001 lincoln ls. The contact stated that he took his vehicle into the dealer who diagnosed that the lower ball joints were loose and needed to be tightened. The contact referenced nhsta campaign id number 00v359001 (suspension:front:control arm:lower ball joint), but the VIN was not a part of the recall. The failure mileage was 103,244 and the current mileage was 103,376.
Tl* the contact owns a 2001 lincoln ls. The contact stated that while driving 20 MPH, the front passenger tire suddenly separated from the vehicle. He managed to get the vehicle off the roadway in which the vehicle was then towed to his home. The vehicle has yet to be inspected or diagnosed. The manufacturer was contacted and offered no assistance. The failure and current mileage was approximately 170,000.
Tl* the contact owns 2001 lincoln ls. The contact stated that the check engine warning light was illuminated and the vehicle was taken to the dealer for inspection. The dealer replaced the spark plugs and the failure seemed to be remedied however, the vehicle then began to backfire and drive abnormally rough. In addition, the engine would exhibit abnormal noises and an overpowering oil odor. The vehicle was taken back to the dealer where the contact was informed that the head gasket and coil springs would need replacing. The failure mileage was 105,000 and the current mileage was 108,000.
Tl*the contact owns a 2001 lincoln ls. While driving in reverse 1 MPH, the front control arm and lower ball joint suddenly fell off the vehicle. The failure caused the rim to crack. The vehicle was towed to the contact's residence. The contact called the dealer and was told that the vehicle was not included in recall 00v359001 (suspension: front: control arm: lower ball joint). The vehicle had not been repaired. The current and failure mileages were approximately 130,000.
Tl* the contact owns a 2001 lincoln ls. While traveling 45 MPH the contact noticed a clunking noise coming from the front end driver side of the vehicle and that when traveling over a bump the vehicle will begin to sway left and right. The vehicle was taken to a local mechanic where the contact was informed that the lower ball joints needed to be replaced. There were no prior warnings and the vehicle had not been repaired. The current and failure mileages were 104000.
Tl*the contact owns a 2001 lincoln ls. While driving approximately 35 MPH making a turn, she heard a loud noise coming from the front end of the vehicle which made the steering wheel non responsive. She had to turn the steering wheel continuously in order to keep the vehicle centered. She has had to make adjustments in order to steer the vehicle because of the failure. The vehicle was taken to dealer. The dealer repaired the vehicle but the contact was not sure what was done. Whatever the dealer repaired caused the vehicle to function normally for a limited time. She stated that the failure with the steering had recurred. She referenced recall 00v359001, suspension:front:control arm:lower ball joint and was advised by the manufacturer that her vehicle was not a part of the recall. The approximate failure mileage was 100,000 and the current mileage was 102,000.
Tl* the contact owns a 2001 lincoln ls. While driving 45 MPH, there was a loud, abnormal noise coming from the front end. Within seconds, the entire front end dropped to the ground and the contact was unable to maintain control of the vehicle. The contact crashed into a row of bushes. He was not injured. The contact discovered that the front ball lower joints were fractured. The vehicle was towed to a local repair facility. The mechanic confirmed that the ball lower joints were fractured and had also damaged the radiator. The vehicle was not repaired. The failure and the current mileage was 112,000.
2001 lincoln ls, lower ball joint failure while driving!!!, there is a recall related to this issue 00s39, but my vehicle according to ford, by VIN did not fall under the current recall? My real question is why? Some back ground on my incident I was driving on the freeway at 65 MPH, heard and felt a change in the steering, pulled over and as I was coming to a stop the right lower ball joint stud broke in half, if this would have happened 30 seconds sooner (going 65 MPH) I could have easily lost control of the vehicle at freeway speeds, I had the vehicle towed to my shop, I am a owner of a repair facility for the last 10 years, and am a ase certified master technician, with over 23yrs of experience working on vehicles. I inspected the vehicle and found the holes (both right and left sides) in the aluminum lower control arms over sized from the ball joint stud being loose and moving inside the lower control arm. This is an obviously dangerous engineering/manufacturing error, steel ball joint studs passing through a aluminum control arm without a steel reinforced sleeve in the control arm? With the constant movement and dissimilar metals, keeping a proper torque on the ball joint stud is almost impossible. They have a nylock/self locking nut on the ball joint stud so it won't back off all the way, but coming loose/losing torque and moving inside the lower control arm until it snaps off is inevitable. My professional opinion from my years of experience is the current recall needs to be expanded before someone gets killed or seriously injured. To repeat after performing my own inspection and as a professional in the automotive industry, this is a serious safety defect that needs to be recalled and repaired by ford. Please take this report seriously as I feel my life was in real danger and I know others are in danger as well... Jim oldham, owner automotive solutions, ase master technician.
The ball joints to my lincoln ls v8 have on the safety recall since 2000. I have register my vehicle with ford since I purchased it. I have been contacted by ford since last year. Why hasn't anybody made contact with me. I'm afraid to drive my car long distance, expect to my doctor's appt at the va hospital and my work area since I was released from the hospital in fort lewis, wa. Madigan army medical center ofr injuries that I received in iraq. Please help with this matter, please I need your help. I don't know were else to go from here. I am contacting before a major incident/accident occur? [xxx] p.s. I have bad dreams about this, not knowing the unknown just being over seas again. Help me please.
Tl* the contact owns a 2001 lincoln ls. The contact stated that the vehicle began to squeak at any speed. The contact looked under the vehicle and noticed that the lower ball joints in the front were defective. The contact referenced recall the federal safety agency campaign id number: 00v359001, component: suspension:front:control arm:lower ball joint. He checked with the dealer and they stated that his VIN was not included in the recall. The failure and current mileage is approximately 90,000. The VIN was unavailable at the time of the complaint.
Tl* the contact owns a 2001 lincoln ls. The contact stated when attempting a turn in either direction, there was an unusual squeaking coming from under the vehicle. The vehicle was taken to a local repair facility where the mechanic advised that the drivers side ball joints would need to be replaced. The manufacturer informed the contact that the vehicle was not included in recall: 00v359001 (suspension: front: control arm: lower ball joint) and would not provide any assistance. The vehicle was not repaired. The failure mileage was 99,000 and the current mileage was 101,000.
2001 lincoln ls--front passenger wheel- there was alot of squeaking noises coming from the wheel before incident occurred. Yesterday, going through a drive-thru, I heard a pop. I got out and inspected the vehicle. The fender was resting on the tire. I called a tow truck and as he was trying to put the car on the tow truck, he showed me the damage. The bolt that holds the ball joint and control arm to the wheel came off. Please investigate this for me, and contact me when you find something out! Thx
Tl* the contact owns a 2001 lincoln ls. The contact stated while driving at approximately 3 MPH and approaching a driveway, the lower ball joints fractured from the vehicle causing the front passengers side tire to collapse outward. The vehicle was towed to an independent mechanic where repairs were made accordingly. The manufacturer advised there were no recalls or complaints pertaining to this issue. The failure mileage was 89,300 and the current mileage was 89,400.
1.spouse complained of significant controllability (loss of steering) 2. Car examined by frame shop to find lower passenger ball joint loose (securing nut) 3. Nut tightened by shop and controllability restored 4. Spouse starts on trip and significant loss of steering returns within 30 miles 5. Gave VIN to woody anderson ford approx may/jul of 2009 and again mar 2010; no outstanding campaigns noted. 6. Research reflects safety campaign for ball joints but my vehicle not included via ford.
Tl*the contact owns a 2001 lincoln ls. Whenever the contact drove the vehicle and began to decelerate, the front end of the vehicle pulled to the left which was followed by a grinding sound. The vehicle was taken to a local mechanic where the contact was informed that the front wheel hub/axle bearing and hub assembly needed to be replaced. There were no prior warnings. The current and failure mileages were 65000. Updated 5/12/10 *cn the left window regulator was replaced. Updated 05/14/10.
Tl*the contact owns a 2001 lincoln ls. While driving 35 MPH, the drivers side lower ball joint broke while making a turn and the vehicle began making a squeaking noise. The contact spoke with ford and was advised that his vehicle was not a part any related recalls. The contact stated that his vehicle demonstrated the same traits listed in another recall. The VIN was not available. The failure and current mileages were not available.
Lincoln ls 2001 lower ball joint were not tightened to specifications.
Ford issued a recall on the front suspension (recall id # 00v359001 - suspension:front:control arm:lower ball joint) on the 2001 lincoln ls. However, ford recall web site and dealers do not acknowledge the recall. Ford is not honoring recalls for all vins even though its the identical vehicle--2001 lincoln ls. Our lincoln ls has the same problem described.
1. Driving down the highway. 2. Nut attached to lower front left ball joint became loose causing a fracture in ball joint stud. Left front tire came completely detached from vehicle causing extreme high danger while trying to maneuver the vehicle off the highway and avoiding other vehicles. 3. This happened once on left front side, was repaired and now joint on right front is coming loose. Recall 00v359001: ball joint stud fractures was put in effect to rectify this issue and was referencing specific vehicles based on VIN numbers. Our VIN number is not included in this recall and should be. This is exactly the issue that we are having.
Tl*the contact owns a 2001 lincoln ls. While driving approximately 5 MPH on normal road conditions proceeding to make a left turn. There was a loud sound outside of the vehicle. Suddenly the front end of the vehicle collapse and fell to the ground. The front driver side tire turned in at a 78 degree angle. Roadside assistance was called to the scene. The vehicle was towed to an independent mechanic for inspection. The technician stated the failure was contributed to a fracture in the ball joint stud. There was a recall under the federal safety agency campaign id number 00v359001 (suspension;front,control arm; lower ball joint). The contact experienced the identical failure as mentioned in the recall. However, the VIN number was excluded from the recall defect. The vehicle was repaired for the failure. The failure and current mileages were 130686 bl updated 09/23/09 *bf upated 09/30/09.
Tl*the contact owns a 2001 lincoln ls. After making a left turn from a stop sign. The vehicle started to shake and wobble. He pulled the vehicle over and he noticed that the front passenger side wheel was turned in the opposite direction that it should have been. He also noticed that the bolt joints have completely sheered off. He left the vehicle on the side of the road. He found a recall for the same defect ( manufacturer: ford motor company mfr's report date: nov 01, 2000 the federal safety agency campaign id number: 00v359001 n/a the federal safety agency action number: n/a component: suspension:front:control arm:lower ball joint ) he contacted the manufacture and they stated that the failure on his vehicle had been repaired bythe previous owner. He states that the failure was not repaired correctly and should be repaired under the recall again. The vehicle is still in the location in which it failed. The current and failure mileage was 140,000. Bl
Tl*the contact owns a 2001 lincoln ls. While driving approximately 25 MPH and proceeding to make a turn, the steering wheel vibrated excessively. The vehicle began to pull to the right without assistance. The driver pulled the vehicle over to the side of the road. The contact made several attempts to maneuver the steering wheel, but was unsuccessful. The vehicle was immediately taken to an independent mechanic for inspection. The technician stated that the failure was contributed to the lower ball joint and lower control arm. The vehicle was not repaired. The VIN was excluded from the federal safety agency campaign id number 003359001 (suspension:front:control arm:lower ball joint). The failure mileage was 90,000 and current mileage was 106,000.
Tl*the contact owns a 2001 lincoln ls. While driving 45 MPH, the vehicle began to smoke, a loud noise was heard, and the front passenger side of the vehicle fell to the ground. The vehicle was towed to a repair shop and the mechanic stated that the front lower control arm bolt failed. The manufacturer stated that the VIN was not included in the federal safety agency campaign id number 00v359001 (suspension:front:control arm:lower ball joint); therefore, they would not assist. The contact will have the vehicle repaired. The current and failure mileages were 66,700. Updated 08/28/09 *bf updated 08/31/09.
VIN decoder
See the problems and recalls for an exact car
Buying a used 2001 Lincoln LS?
Check the exact car before you pay: accidents, salvage or flood titles, odometer readings and previous owners.
Check its history