Tl* the contact owns a 1996 mercury sable. The contact took the vehicle to an independent mechanic for routine maintenance and the mechanic discovered that the engine cradle and the subframe were severely rusted and corroded. The vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The failure mileage was 95,000.
1996 Mercury Sable body problems
29 complaints (10% of all complaints for this car). Typical mileage when it fails: 108,000.
- owner complaints
- 29
- of this car's complaints
- 10%
- typical mileage
- 108,000
- crashes
- 0
- recalls
- 0
Which part fails
- Body: door12
- Frame and members7
- Frame and members: underbody shields3
- Body3
- Body: trunk lid2
At what mileage
Complaints by mileage at the time of the problem.
Mercury Sable body problems in other years
Related recalls
No recalls on record for this model year.
What 1996 Mercury Sable owners say
Most recent owner complaints, unedited.
Tl* the contact owns a 1996 mercury sable. While driving at approximately 5 MPH the contact heard a popping sound coming from the under the vehicle. The vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic for diagnostic. The mechanic stated the rear lower subframe was fractured due to corrosion and could detach from the vehicle. There was a recall under the federal safety agency campaign id number: 98v323000 (structure:frame and members) that may be related to the failure but did not include 1996 models. The vehicle was not repaired. The approximate failure mileage was 93,000.
The sub frame on my son's 96 mercury sable suddenly broke loose and nearly caused him a serious accident. The steerinmg of the vehicle became very eratic and as such lost control of the vehicle. Luckily no one was hurt.the area where the frame attaches to the body had literaly rusted away and the subfram had shifted. I checked the complaint databases and found ford had a recall on sables and tauruses for subframe failures from 89 to the 95 model in saltbelt states. The same type of failures listed in the recall informatioin are also endemic to the 96 model. Other than the subframe failure the car was in excellent shape and well maintained. The major concern I have is how many other 96' sable and tauruses are still on the roads in the saltbelt states with the potential for a very serious and life threatening accident to occur due to this defect. I seriously believe that ford or some governmental agency should require warnings to be issued to owners of these cars to have them inspected before people who are driving these cars find themselves in a serious accident.
Tl* - the contact has a 1996 mercury sable with an odometer reading of 60000 miles; the subframe was rusted. The contact heard a cracking noise when making left turn at 5 MPH under dry conditions. When the contact looked under the car he found that the subframe rusted off of the vehicle. This failure is addressed under recall 98v323000 frame and members. The contact called the manufacturer, and was told that the car was too old for them to take any action. The contact said that he would have pictures and a repair order. *ak updated 02/22/07.
Dt*: the contact stated while driving various speeds, the left front wheel stabilizer arm wobbled from side to side. The vehicle was inspected by an independent repair shop and it was determined, the front undercarriage and engine mounts were rusted. The vehicle was exposed to extreme winter weather and corrosive road salts. The repair shop concluded that due to the extensive corrosion, the problem could not be corrected. The manufacturer was not alerted.
Dt*: the contact stated while driving various speeds, the steering wheel was difficult to turn. The vehicle was inspected by an independent repair shop who determined the engine mount and carriage frame rusted which caused the engine to slip from the mount. The vehicle was exposed to extreme winter weather and road salts. The repair shop concluded that a piece of steel needed to be added to each side of the engine mount to correct the problem. The manufacturer was not alerted.
Dt:contact states the body of the car corroded from inside out,where the frame bolts were located. Contact called a ford dealer, who stated there was no a recall on this vehicle. *ak
While driving engine collapsed due to rusting. This caused the frame to break. Also, when the engine collapsed the ball joints broke, causing the tires to disengage from the vehicle.
The vehicle will shut down without prior warning. And the slidding door will unexpectly open while traveling.
The door panels have been a problem on this vehicle since my ownership of the car. I keep taking it back to the dealership where I have my car serviced and they keep charging me for putting them back together. The never seem to last longer than 6 months.
Questions about the 1996 Mercury Sable body
Does the 1996 Mercury Sable have body problems?
Owners have filed 29 complaints about the body of the 1996 Mercury Sable, 10% of all its complaints.
At what mileage do 1996 Mercury Sable body problems start?
The typical (median) mileage in owner complaints is 108,000 miles.
Was there a recall on the 1996 Mercury Sable body?
There is no recall for this problem on this model year.
What year does the Mercury Sable have the most body problems?
The Mercury Sable model years with the most body complaints are 1993 (35 complaints), 1992 (29 complaints) and 1996 (29 complaints).
Other 1996 Mercury Sable problems
Transmission 69Engine 62Steering 35Visibility 26Brakes 20Electrical 20Acceleration 17Airbags 15Lights 15Suspension 11Fuel system 10Seat belts 10Locks 5Tires 5Wheels 3Driver assistance 1Seats 1
VIN decoder
See the problems and recalls for an exact car
Buying a used 1996 Mercury Sable?
Check the exact car before you pay: accidents, salvage or flood titles, odometer readings and previous owners.
Check its history