Rear subframe retainers rusted out causing engine/transaxle to drop and steering shaft to separate causing loss of control where the vehicle ended up in the on coming lane of traffic. The retainers have been replaced at least once before. Replacement parts have the same defect as the original parts. I don't believe that is a solution. One gm dealer (don miller in madison) denied any knowledge of a recall. Another gm dealer said gm will offer a couple hundred dollars and take the car, but there is no repair option. Your person I spoke with at the (888) phone number directed be to a gm (800) number who could not find any information even though I gave them the recall number. In addition to the bolts and retainers that are "covered", the rubber cushions and top retainers were unable to be found and will require replacement. I have ordered the parts at a cost of about $110 and a $60 tow bill plus any labor charge I incur. Looking over the number of these failures on your site, it is amazing to me that no accidents have resulted that have been reported. I wonder how many have occurred and the cause was not discovered. It seems to me that the recall should be continued to inspect vehicles that have been "repaired" with the same defective parts.
1990 Pontiac Grand Prix body problems
25 complaints (14% of all complaints for this car). 1 crash reported.
- owner complaints
- 25
- of this car's complaints
- 14%
- crashes
- 1
- recalls
- 2
Which part fails
- Frame and members11
- Frame and members: underbody shields2
- Body: bumpers1
At what mileage
Complaints by mileage at the time of the problem.
Pontiac Grand Prix body problems in other years
Related recalls
Structure
- What is wrong
- Vehicle description: passenger vehicles originally sold or currently registered in the states of connecticut, delaware, illinois, indiana, iowa, maine, maryland, massachusetts, michigan, minnesota, missouri, new hampshire, new jersey, new york, ohio, pennsylvania, rhode island, vermont, west virginia, wisconsin, and the district of columbia, where road salt use is heavy. A condition where one or both front engine cradle bolts can pull through the retainers due to corrosion of the retainers.
- Risk
- If both bolts pull through, the front of the cradle would no longer be supported at the mounting locations and the steering intermediate shaft could separate from the steering gear.
- Remedy
- Dealers will replace the front and rear frame/cradle bolts and retainers.
Recall number 00V189000 · Recall details
Structure
- What is wrong
- Vehicle description: passenger vehicles and mini vans originally sold or currently registered in the following states: connecticut, illinois, indiana, maine, massachusetts, michigan, new hampshire, new jersey, new york, ohio, pennsylvania, rhode island, vermont and wisconsin. The rear cradle bolts pull through the retainers due to corrosion of the retainer. If both bolts pull through, the rear cradle would not longer be supported at these mounting locations and the steering intermediate shaft can separate from the steering gear.
- Risk
- If this were to occur while the vehicle was in motion, a vehicle crash could result.
- Remedy
- Dealers will replace the rear cradle bolts and retainers.
Recall number 97V058000 · Recall details
Related investigations
Structure
There is no summary currently available
RP01001
Cradle bolt failures
There is no summary currently available
RQ97017
What 1990 Pontiac Grand Prix owners say
Most recent owner complaints, unedited.
Recall campaign, having some problems with recalls never received. *bf the rear cradle bolts pulled through the retainers due to corrosion. Recall# 00v189000. *sc
Consumer stated that while waiting at an atm engine fell out of vehicle. Consumer had vehicle towed to the mechanic, who said that the cradle bolts rusted. Consumer indicated he never received a recall notice. But when he called gmc he was told that this vehicle was included in the recall.
Rear left and right carriage bolts pulled through retainers, causing the steering shaft to split and the engine cradle to drop to the ground. Pontiac admits responsibility and also agreed to provide work according to "warranty" I.e. Pontiac will absorb the cost of repair. Work done by russ at woburn, mass. Pontiac. The gm rep spoke with my husband several times, indicating pontiac's responsibility and that the work was being done as a recall. However, when the work was completed and the car was ready to be picked up, gm's final word was handed down and they refuse to absorb the cost (800‑762‑2737 file #s19313957). The cost of the repair is $620.00 (which includes an inflated tow charge of $115.00 -- the actual cost of the tow according to the driver is $65.00). My normal driving habits take me 15 miles to and from work on the highway, if this had happed on a weekday and I was travelling at my usual average rate of speed of 70 MPH I would be have been seriously injured or dead. I expect to be fully compensated for this failure as a good faith gesture that pontiac stands behind their vehicles even after 10 years. It appears that the bolts loosened themselves from the carriage. This is a serious safety defect, which pontiac is responsible to correct both professionally and financially. Prior to the engine falling onto the ground, this was a dependable, excellent running vehicle. I can only hope that there was no damage to the engine when the bolts failed. Your intervention is appreciated.
Engine cradle had rotted out underneath frame. There is recall 10946 00 v 189 000. Please provide any further information.
Retainer and insulater that hold engine cradle had to be replaced due to rust. Manufacturer will be notified.*ak three of the four retainer rusted out compeletely. Eventhough there was a recall, this vehicle was not in the list.
Consumer received recall 00v189, however in 1999 the repair was completed by someone other than gm, consumer submitted bill for refund and was denied due to the replacement parts were not gm parts.
While driving 30mph hit a tree and front was in a v shape after accident. Air bags did not deploy. Radiator and hood were no good. *ak the bumper was split in half and the hood buckled in a 45 degree angle.
Consumer paid for the repairs for the frame mounts for recall 00v189, consumer requests reimbursement.
Consumer received recall #00v189000/ front engine cradle bolts which was postmarked 9-27-00. Consumer contacted tulley buick /pontiac and made 2 appointments which dealer cancelled . Dealer advised consumer that no parts were available, and would have to wait about 3 weeks or longer. In meantime consumer should not drive vehicle . Consumer felt this recall was not being done in a timely manner.
Questions about the 1990 Pontiac Grand Prix body
Does the 1990 Pontiac Grand Prix have body problems?
Owners have filed 25 complaints about the body of the 1990 Pontiac Grand Prix, 14% of all its complaints.
At what mileage do 1990 Pontiac Grand Prix body problems start?
Not enough complaints include the mileage to tell.
Was there a recall on the 1990 Pontiac Grand Prix body?
Yes, 2 recalls: 00V189000, 97V058000. Check your VIN to see if your car still needs the free repair.
What year does the Pontiac Grand Prix have the most body problems?
The Pontiac Grand Prix model years with the most body complaints are 2004 (33 complaints), 1991 (30 complaints) and 1990 (25 complaints).
Other 1990 Pontiac Grand Prix problems
Brakes 95Electrical 17Engine 16Suspension 13Steering 11Lights 9Transmission 5Seat belts 4Acceleration 3Wheels 2Airbags 1Fuel system 1Seats 1
VIN decoder
See the problems and recalls for an exact car
Buying a used 1990 Pontiac Grand Prix?
Check the exact car before you pay: accidents, salvage or flood titles, odometer readings and previous owners.
Check its history