2001 Audi A6 tires problems

Filed Aug 21, 2008 · Body, Engine · 89,000 miles · MD

Hi audi 2001 a6 atq 2.8l quattro. Can you investigate the material used on the coolant and windshield wiper reservoirs as I had them crack twice. Also, I brought my car in asked that all recall work be done, I want to be assured that the sensor warranty work was done on the engine coolant temp sensor, oil leaks in upper engine, 3 way catalyst dtc codes sensor as I am getting a check engine light and have already spent over $900 to repair this. Can I get the vacuum hose and tire information as well. I am concerned there are maintenance items which are on your list that my dealer has not performed that I have requested.

Filed Apr 17, 2008 · Tires · WA

Tl*the contact owns a 2001 audi a6. The contact received a safety recall notice for the federal safety agency campaign id number 03v143000 (tires). He called the federal safety agency to file a complaint regarding the potential for a failure. There had been no failure to date. The purchase date was unknown. The current mileage was 91,000.

Filed Feb 19, 2004 · Tires · IA

Consumer repaired the tires due to recall. The manufacturer stated they won't reimburse for the replacement tire because the damage occurred prior to 12/16/2002. The manufacturer also said that it was the date given by the federal safety agency. *la the consumer stated the tire ruptured while driving and apparently the side of the tire failed and sudden pressure lost caused the wheel to come in direct contact with the pavement, the tire and the wheel had to be replaced.

Filed Feb 9, 2004 · Tires · NY

Consumer experience three tire changes within the first year of the lease.*pr two tire blow outs occurred with mxv4 tire equipment.

Filed Jan 14, 2004 · Tires · CO · crash

This is in reference to the audi recall referencing replacement of tires to meet axle weight of vehicle. The federal safety agency campaign id no #03v143000.tires 225/45 r17 91y were to be replaced by 225/45 r17 94w. In nov 03 took vehicle to the audi phil long dealership in colorado springs to meet compliance per recall letter. Dealership took the performance "all season" tires off the vehicle and replaced three tires with 225/45 94w performance "summer" tires and one tire with a 225/45 91y performance summer tire. First by looking at the specs of the tires they installed they partially met the recall criteria. Secondly, by choosing to take the original performance "all season" tires off the vehicle in the present winter season and replacing them with a performance "summer" tire without telling me (the consumer) of the type of tires they installed and sending me on my way assuring me that my safety concerns with the recall had been met, both audi USA, and audi phil long dealership configured the vehicle to be unsafe for normal operation. The recall criteria was not met, additionally by taking away the all season tires and replacing them with summer tires in winter season without advising the consumer prior to releasing the vehicle generated a new hazard. As a result the vehicle handling characteristics changed, vehicle did not respond as driver was accustomed prior to recall, and as a result during icy road conditions the vehicle slid and suffered damages. Audi USA does not accept responsibility, nor phil long dealership. The recall attempted to meet one hazard, and by the choice of tires chosen as replacement without consideration of vehicle location, and failure to advise consumer of replacement tires specifications and limitations generated a greater hazard.

Filed Nov 12, 2003 · Tires · 14,000 miles · NJ

All four original tires were replaced by the consumer at 14,500 miles. The tire dealer provided 50% on the second set of tires and at 25,000 miles, the tires needed to be replaced again. Pirelli, size# p225/55r17. *ak the consumer noticed that the tires were nearly worn with hardly enough tread remaining. (model/allroad) *scc

Filed Nov 5, 2003 · Tires · OH

Owner is very unhappy with the arrangements that audi is making in reference to a recall involving tires which are the wrong size. Dealership is asking owners to make an appointment first, come in and let the dealership view the tires, then ask them to leave the car for several hours while they order the tires to replace those that warrant an exchange. There is no cost to the consumer. However, time wise it is an inconvenience. *ak the tires were being replaced. *scc

Filed Jan 13, 2003 · Tires · 36,400 miles · TX

While driving 35 to 40 MPH, right front tire went flat. Upon inspection it was observed that sidewall had cracked and separated from tread along the entire inside circumference. This is the second time that this has occurred on this car. The first separation occurred at approximately 26,000 miles (complaint odi 769362) while this one occurred at 36,000 miles.

Filed Nov 6, 2002 · Tires · TX

Tread separation causing tire to fail. (went flat in parking lot)dt

Filed Sep 16, 2002 · Tires · NY

3 blowouts hitting same pothole by three differnet drivers.