On Thursday, [XXX], I took my vehicle to the authorized dealership Alberic Chrysler Jeep Dodge, located on Kennedy Avenue in San Juan, Puerto Rico, for routine maintenance. While handling the vehicle, the service personnel lifted it using the shop's lift equipment, raising it all the way to the ceiling, which caused severe structural damage to the vehicle's roof. The dealership contacted the Puerto Rico State Police, who filed report number [XXX]. Additionally, I was asked to complete a written damage claim at the dealership. The vehicle was under full manufacturer's warranty at the time of the incident. However, the structural damage has now compromised the vehicle's integrity, specifically: - The rear doors became misaligned. - The roof suffered a visible crack, which exposed the interior of the vehicle to weather conditions. - The damage potentially affects warranty coverage, especially related to corrosion protection. We requested that the dealership retain the vehicle on-site to allow for inspection by the manufacturer's technical team. The dealership refused to do so unless I agreed to pay a $25 daily storage fee. We also requested substitute transportation, which they denied. Additionally, according to the federal safety agency database, this vehicle currently has an open safety recall. I was never informed of this recall by the dealership at the time of the maintenance appointment, which is a serious failure in the dealership's responsibility to notify the owner and address potential safety risks. The vehicle is used for both personal and professional transportation, and at the time of the incident, it had 8,402 miles. This incident raises significant safety concerns regarding the vehicle's structural integrity, the open recall, and the dealership's handling of the matter. I respectfully request the federal safety agency's assistance in investigating this situation to ensure that both the safety standards and consumer protections are upheld. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
The worst 2024 Braun Ram Promaster problems
Ranked by number of owner complaints. Mileage and cost come from what owners wrote.
- Body1
Problems by type
Tap a problem to see which part fails, at what mileage and in which other years.
- Body1
Recalls 1
Structure: emergency: escape/egress/exit
- What is wrong
- Braun Corporation (Braun) is recalling certain 2023-2024 Ram ProMaster vehicles. The installed window may have the wrong type of glass for an emergency exit. As such, these vehicles fails to comply with the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) number 226, "Ejection Mitigation."
- Risk
- A noncompliant emergency exit can increase the risk of ejection and injury during a crash.
- Remedy
- Dealers will replace the window, free of charge. Interim owner notification letters explaining the safety risk were mailed by May 26, 2026. Owners will receive another notice once remedy becomes available. Owners may contact Braun's customer service at 1‑800‑488‑0359.
Recall number 26V171000 · Recall details
What 2024 Braun Ram Promaster owners say
Most recent owner complaints, unedited.
Compare the 2024 Braun Ram Promaster
Other model years
20232024
Questions about the 2024 Braun Ram Promaster
Is the 2024 Braun Ram Promaster reliable?
Owners have filed 1 complaint about the 2024 Braun Ram Promaster, fewer than a typical Ram Promaster model year.
What is the most common problem with the 2024 Braun Ram Promaster?
Body and structure, with 1 complaint.
How many recalls does the 2024 Braun Ram Promaster have?
1 recall, covering structure.
Was there a recall on the 2024 Braun Ram Promaster body?
Yes, 1 recall: 26V171000. Check your VIN to see if your car still needs the free repair.
VIN decoder
See the problems and recalls for an exact car
Buying a used 2024 Braun Ram Promaster?
Check the exact car before you pay: accidents, salvage or flood titles, odometer readings and previous owners.
Check its history