Check a VIN

2002 Chevrolet Camaro brakes problems

22 complaints (32% of all complaints for this car). Typical mileage when it fails: 10,000.

owner complaints
22
of this car's complaints
32%
typical mileage
10,000
crashes
0
recalls
0

Which part fails

  • Foundation components: disc: rotor
    13
  • Antilock/traction control/electronic limited slip
    2
  • Foundation components: drum: shoes/linings
    1
  • Foundation components: disc: pads
    1
  • Foundation components: disc: caliper
    1
  • Disc: rotor
    1

At what mileage

Complaints by mileage at the time of the problem.

0k-25k
25k-50k
50k-75k
75k-100k
100k-125k
125k-150k
150k-175k
175k-200k
200k+

Chevrolet Camaro brakes problems in other years

199119952000201020152023

Related recalls

No recalls on record for this model year.

What 2002 Chevrolet Camaro owners say

Most recent owner complaints, unedited.

Filed Mar 2, 2010 · Brakes · 55,000 miles · CA

My 2002 gm chevrolet camaro's ABS brake system has failed.there were no incidents that LED up to the failure of the component. As to date 03/02/2010 my ABS braking system is inoperable,I have no ABS. Only a warning light telling me I have no ABS. The failure occurred approx. 11/2 years ago,and since it was not under warranty gm will not fix this problem.again I believe that gm knows of this failure in their systems(ABS..anti-lock braking system)the cost to repair or replace this ABS components is apprx.$2,500.00. My inquires with other gm owners of other models ie;corvette state the same problems as the camaros. Failure of this components is very critical for safety in preventing wheels from locking up and causing a skid leading to a very dangerous accident.(the main reason consumers want anti-lock brakes!)

Filed Mar 13, 2006 · Brakes · 46,000 miles · CA

Dt*: the contact stated while driving at various speeds and applying the brakes the front end vibrates. When the problem first occurred at 12,000 miles the dealership resurfaced the brake rotors. The problem reoccurred at 19,000 miles and again the dealer resurfaced the rotors. While the vehicle was at the dealership for the brake pads, it was determined the brake rotors need to be replaced. The brake rotors were not replaced.

Filed Feb 17, 2006 · Brakes · OH

In august 2002, I produced brakes in 542 dept. At delphi chassis systems, dayton, ohio. The department was scheduled to cease work 2 months after the end of gm f-car production I was placed in inspection behind brake assembly. I inspected all brakes produced as service parts. Before I arrived, there were problems with porosity in the brake castings. Instead of requiring the castings producer to bring in an x-ray machine, general foreman sam hanakeri, on orders from vp guy hachey, installed an air gun driver and water tank to check parts as they ran. The air gun would shoot a special screw connected to a compressed air connection, and the part was dunked while the compressed air was attached to the brake casting. The problem: the compressed air attachment cross threaded about 5% of the connection holes in the casting. Since these connections have to withstand hydraulic pressure when the brakes are in use, cross threading causes leaks and potential brake failure. A gm assembly plant had issued a prr for the cross threading, but only for one side of the brakes delphi management only wanted to inspect the threads on the brakes mentioned in the gm prr, not mirror images. They knew that the inspection process damaged both sides, but wanted to ignore the problems on the non prr side. Sam hanakeri, gf, ordered me to inspect only the prr sides. He stated that the inspection process came from guy hachey, and could not be changed or improved. I inspected these parts 60 days. Sam hanakeri objected to the scrap resulting from my finding bad threads, stating that previous inspectors had found less. I told him that I signed the forms, and as long as my name was on the forms, they would reflect what I saw. These service parts are still on shelves. The assembly parts have been in use since 2002. The inspection forms are still in existence, maintained by bill englund at delphi need more brake plant.

Filed Dec 19, 2005 · Brakes, Engine · 40,000 miles · CA

Camaro bought november 2002, brakes and tires replaced six months later. Engine had sounded like a diesel within that same six months time. Within three years rear end producing an ever increasing howl. Had contacted dealer two times within first year about high oil consumption. Was told it was normal for a quart to be lost within 3000 miles. I have to drive this car to work and I really don't know when one of my rear axles is going to fall off. I cannot afford a new rear end and my warranty expired by mileage. I don't know if this is going to do much good but it feel good to be able to write about what a 33,000 black camaro piece of crap can do to a man who has always been loyal as possible to chevy and had a dream to own such a car only to find out he would have been better off with a hyundai. I will tell you one thing and maybe this will tell you what I really think of chevy and their cars. I wouldn't wish this purchase on my worst enemy. Biggest mistake of my life was believing in chevy.

Filed Mar 7, 2005 · Brakes · 7,153 miles · CA

Intermittently the brake pedal shuttered/shimmied and pulsated when depressed. This was due to a failure in the brake rotors. The failure has occurred at 7000, 12419 ,18830,26754, and 27310 miles, the rotors were resurfaced/replaced/turned. And brake shims had been added. In addition the brake pad and shoes were replaced 4 times.*ak the consumer was advised to purchase a higher quality off the market rotor at $500.00 per rotor.

Filed Feb 28, 2005 · Brakes · 14,000 miles · CA

The front right rotor warped. When driving at approximately 40 MPH and the brakes were applied there was shutter/vibrated, and vehicle pulled to the right. Owner took vehicle to the dealer on two occasions, and dealer replaced the rotors. Also, informed owner the front right rotor is warped. After about 10,000 miles vibration returned. Vibration was felt when vehicle was driven at 40 MPH or greater.

Filed Oct 22, 2004 · Brakes · FL

While applying the brakes pedal went to the floor. Abs braking light appeared on the dashboard and remained on. Consumer drove the vehicle to the dealer for inspection, and dealer was not able to duplicate the problem.

Filed Oct 21, 2004 · Brakes · 18,870 miles · PA

The dealership informed the consumer that when the vehicle pulsated, the problem was due to warped rotors. Please provide more information.

Filed Oct 15, 2004 · Brakes, Wheels · MD

While driving and applying the brakes the steering wheel vibrated uncontrollably. A loud clanking noise was heard coming from the driver's side and passenger side wheels. The consumer was able to maintain control of the vehicle, and drove it to the dealer. The mechanic determined that the wheel rims were not the correct rims. The mechanic replaced the rim spacer for the front. But the rear rim spacer were on back order. *ak the wheel studs were broken and the lug nuts were working themselves loose, the wheel centering spacers were not installed when the rims were replaced, the studs weren't long enough for the rims.

Filed Aug 11, 2004 · Brakes · 24,000 miles · CA

My 2002 camaro has had excessive vibration in the steering wheel cased by warped front rotors. Rotors were turned but 8k miles later they were so warped again that they had to be replaced. Put new pads and aftermarket slotted rotors to redue warping.

Questions about the 2002 Chevrolet Camaro brakes

Does the 2002 Chevrolet Camaro have brakes problems?

Owners have filed 22 complaints about the brakes of the 2002 Chevrolet Camaro, 32% of all its complaints, more than any other problem.

At what mileage do 2002 Chevrolet Camaro brakes problems start?

The typical (median) mileage in owner complaints is 10,000 miles.

Was there a recall on the 2002 Chevrolet Camaro brakes?

There is no recall for this problem on this model year.

What year does the Chevrolet Camaro have bad brakes?

The Chevrolet Camaro model years with the most brakes complaints are 1998 (92 complaints), 1995 (64 complaints) and 1999 (32 complaints).

Other 2002 Chevrolet Camaro problems

Engine 11Visibility 11Electrical 8Transmission 7Body 5Fuel system 5Seat belts 4Suspension 4Lights 3Tires 3Airbags 2Steering 2Acceleration 1Driver assistance 1Wheels 1

VIN decoder

See the problems and recalls for an exact car

Buying a used 2002 Chevrolet Camaro?

Check the exact car before you pay: accidents, salvage or flood titles, odometer readings and previous owners.

Check its history