2007 Chevrolet Silverado 2500: tire blowout or tread separation

Filed Oct 1, 2020 · Tires · 191,000 miles · CA

Purchased pantera at super track lt 2651 70r16 121/1185 tires oct 2019, in jan or feb of 2020 drivers left front bubbled was replaced by big brand tire, in sept. 2020 on the 30th, right. Back tire bubbled, then blew out as I was driving. As I purchased four I want the other two replaced.

Filed Jan 14, 2016 · Tires · 76,000 miles · CA

Tl* the contact owns a 2007 chevrolet silverado 2500 equipped with a toyo tires, tire line: open country h/t tuff duty, tire size: lt245/75 r16 120r, and dot number: fw5ttyl0215. The contact stated that while driving at approximately 70 MPH, the rear drivers side tire blew out. The rear of the vehicle was swaying and went across two lanes. The contact was able to stop the vehicle and it was towed to an independent mechanic. The tire was a replacement tires. The approximate vehicle failure mileage was 76,000 and the tire failure mileage was 3,000.

Filed Aug 18, 2014 · Tires · 180,000 miles · WI

We were traveling east on interstate 94 near camp douglas, wi. We experienced a complete tire failure. It appears to be ply-separation. We contacted the tire dealer by phone, but they said the tire was not on recall. I wrote the company directly, but did not even get a response.

Filed Jun 28, 2012 · Tires · 59,347 miles · NV

We purchased a set of bf goodrich tires on 5-16-2009. The 1st incident occurred 7-11, driving home noticed a bad thumping sensation in the right rear tire. Pulled over and noticed the tire had a bubble in the center of the tread, so pulled over and changed tire. So on 7-29-11 I purchased 2 new tires to replace this bad one. The 2nd incident took place on 5-11-12 was a blow out and no warning. So I changed this tire as well.on the same day I felt a thumping sensation so pulled over and noticed the left rear tires had a bubble. So of the 4 tires purchased 3 of them went bad. I pulled the other tire of my truck and purchased 2 new tires on 5-12-12. I submitted a complaint to bf goodrich to see if they would either cover the cost of the new tires or the damage to my truck. Needless to say the claim was denied. I provided them with all of the maintenance paperwork showing the tires were rotated on a regular basis and the pressure was checked on a regular basis. Their answer was the tires were run on a 'runflat" condition. That the tires were run on in a flat condition. Now how could anyone possibly drive down the freeway with no air in their tires. And how would 3 tires so far go bad.

Filed Sep 9, 2011 · Tires · 33,005 miles · CA

Within a few hundred miles of purchasing these nitto trail grappler tires abnormal wear began to appear. This abnormal wear is best described as crumbling. There are certain areas or the tire that the tread is crumbling apart. As mileage on tire increases the crumbling gets worse. After first rotaion of tires at approx 3500miles the tires are steadily degrading. This could result in blowout or tread/tire seperation causeing a sever vehicle accident. Two months of trying to get this resolved with the shop and nitto have resulted in no replacement of tires. Company has claimed these tires aren't meant for the vehicle and the owner has abused the tires. The tires have been well taken care of and not abused in anyway. Vehicle that wears these tires are under the recommened application according to specs. The vehicle is a 2007 chevrolet silverado 2500hd 4x4. Tires are nitto trail grappler 35x12.50r20 load range "e" 10 ply. Rims are 20x8.5 mb motorsports. Pressure in tires 60psi.