2000 Chevrolet Suburban transmission problems

Filed Dec 18, 2025 · Fuel system, Transmission · 100,000 miles · CA

The contact owns a 2000 Chevrolet Suburban. The contact stated that while driving at an undisclosed speed, the vehicle failed to accelerate as intended while depressing the accelerator pedal. In addition, the vehicle jerked. The contact stated that the vehicle failed to move while in reverse(R) and only responded while in drive(D). The contact stated that the vehicle stalled while driving. The vehicle was towed to an independent mechanic who diagnosed that an unknown sensor connected to the transmission and engine had failed. The contact bought the sensor, and when the independent mechanic repaired the vehicle, the failure persisted. The independent mechanic then diagnosed that the transmission had failed. The vehicle was repaired. The contact stated that a year later, on a separate occasion, the vehicle failed to start. The contact replaced the battery. The contact stated that afterwards, an abnormal sound was coming from the vehicle. The contact stated that the vehicle failed to function while in reverse(R) or drive(D). There was an abnormal sound coming from the engine. The contact rebuilt the transmission with a friend who was an independent mechanic. The contact stated that the fuel pump was replaced. The contact stated that three years later, the fuel pump failed to function as intended. The contact parked the vehicle, and the vehicle was no longer being driven. The manufacturer was not made aware of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 100,000.

Filed Aug 24, 2010 · Body, Brakes · 10,000 miles · NJ

From the day I picked up this truck new I complained about the rusty chassis. I was told it was surface rust and that it would not cause any problems. Now the chassis is rusted to the point that I do not think the truck is safe.

Filed May 29, 2007 · Transmission · 79,950 miles · NY

While making a low speed sharp left turn, my power steering suddenly stopped working. I was able to avoid hitting anything. Diagnosis at the dealer was that the shaft on the power steering pump had snapped. While looking around on the internet to see if others had this problem, I discovered the federal safety agency campaign id 05v005000 issued in january 2005 which appears to describe my exact problem. I had been informed of several recalls by chevrolet for other problems but had not received any notice of this particular issue and was unaware of the potential danger. The dealer indicated that the VIN number of my suburban was not on the list of affected vehicles. I contacted general motors customer care (case #71-523372221) and they verified that my VIN number was not part of the population of suburban covered by this action. This is a dangerous matter. If my wife had been driving or if I had been trying to avoid something in the road at high speed, there would have been an accident. I do not know if I just happened to receive an isolated defective pump or if the population of defective suburban is larger than chevrolet currently acknowledges. The pump was replaced.

Filed Mar 8, 2005 · Transmission · 81,869 miles · IL

Consumer placed the vehicle into the garage and transmission felt as if it slipped. The next day the vehicle would not go over 40 MPH. Transmission had to be replaced at a cost to the consumer. The consumer's vehicle was not included in the driveshaft recall 05v005000. *ak

Filed Feb 4, 2005 · Steering, Transmission · NE

The federal safety agency recall campaign 05v005000 concerning a fractured driveshaft. This vehicle was not included in the recall due to VIN. But vehicle had trouble with the steering, making it difficult to control the vehicle.

Filed Jul 14, 2003 · Transmission · MO

Consumer states that the vehicle would down shift without warning. Dealer notified.

Filed Jul 3, 2003 · Transmission · 77,000 miles · MO

I was driving on the highway at 60mph when the vehicle went from 60mph to 30mph all of a sudden. Once I was off the highway the vehicle wouldn't drive over 30mph. I took the vehicle to a local dealer who informed me that the transmission needed to be replaced. The vehicle is maintained properly and the transmission fluid isn't scheduled for changing until 100,000 miles. However, I check it when gasing up. The fluid is never low or burned. So the transmission suffered major mechanical failure before the fluid was even scheduled to be changed. The vehicle has 77,000 miles on it and the manufacture stated they wouldn't replace it. I don't pull trailers or boats with my vehicle. So I beleive there was a flaw with the transmission when it was purchased. When I spoke with other surburban owners with the same model and year they stated that they also had concerns about their transmissions. However, they hadn't yet experienced full system failure as I have. Luckily, when I was on the highway no one was behind me. Had they been that individual or myself could have been injured or killed because the vehicle went from 60 to 30 all of a sudden. I've talked with customer service reps and managers at gm who didn't care about the potential safety hazard on these vehicles even when properly maintained or the fact that thay had a customer who spent 48'000 dollars on a vehicle that would need a new transmission after 3 years.

Filed Jul 24, 2002 · Brakes, Transmission · GA

Transmission would not shift, consumer states that the transmission did not have an external coolant which could have been requested at the time of purchase, the transmission burned itself up.

Filed Feb 14, 2002 · Transmission · PA

Vehicle was placed in park, however while consumer was stepping out, the vehicle began to move down the grade, damaging one vehicle and then coming to a stop against a second vehicle, general motors sent out an engineer to examine vehicle and concluded there was nothing wrong with the vehicle and that they were not at fault.

Filed Oct 19, 2001 · Transmission · PA

Vehicle was placed in park on a slight upgrade, as consumer was stepping out of vehicle and removed the keys, the vehicle began to move down the grade damaging another vehicle before coming to a stop against another vehicle, the vehicle was still in park when it finally stopped, consumer contacted manufacturer and after the inspection consumer was informed by manufacturer that there was nothing wrong with the vehicle and no financial assistance would be given.