Check a VIN

2000 Chevrolet Tahoe brakes complaints

Page 3 of 6: complaints 41 to 70 of 136, newest first, as owners wrote them.

See the summary of 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe brakes problems: which part fails, at what mileage and related recalls.

Filed Sep 26, 2010 · Brakes · 179,729 miles · TX

Driving home from church 20 mile trip, about midway pressed on brakes and pedal went all the way to the floor with total loss of braking. Managed to make it through two red lights with horn and hazard lights before coming to a stop with use of parking brake. Immediately I popped the hood to check for brake fluid and reservoir was still half full. Had the wife cycle the brakes so see if there were any problems with the master cylinder or booster. All looked good, walking around the car I found a large puddle of brake fluid inside drivers side rear wheel. Limped car home, and noticed the rear brake line which sits above the frame rail was completely rusted through. I can not replace this line myself so I will be returning vehicle for service to chevrolet dealer.

Filed Sep 23, 2010 · Brakes · 111,092 miles · IL

Tl*the contact owns a 2000 chevrolet tahoe. While driving approximately 5 MPH in reverse the anti lock braking system engaged involuntarily. Once the vehicle reached a complete stop he was able to continue driving as normal. The failure began to recur intermittently so he took the vehicle to an authorized dealer where he was informed his vehicle was not included in the recall associated with the federal safety agency campaign id number 05v379000, service brakes, hydraulic:antilock. The vehicle was not repaired. The failure and current mileages were 111,092.

Filed Sep 14, 2010 · Brakes · 45,000 miles · NY

Tl* the contact owns a 2000 chevrolet tahoe. The contact stated that the ABS system was failing and when driving at a slow rate of speed, the brakes would intermittently fail. The vehicle was inspected by the contact's personal mechanic who advised that the failure was within the braking system and that the contact should have the vehicle inspected by an authorized dealer. The contact stated that the vehicle was repaired in 2003 under the federal safety agency campaign id number: 05v379000 (service brakes, hydraulic:antilock). The dealer advised that the vehicle could be repaired at the contact's expense. The vehicle was not repaired. The failure mileage was 45,000 and the current mileage 150,000.

Filed Apr 29, 2010 · Brakes · MI

Tl* the contact owns a 2000 chevrolet tahoe. The contact stated that when attempting to apply the brakes at various speeds, there was an unusual increase in stopping distance. The dealer made repairs under the federal safety agency recall campaign id number 05v379000 (service brakes, hydraulic: antilock) and the failure continued to occur. In addition, the ABS would abruptly engage after repeated pressure was applied to the brake pedal. The vehicle was not taken back to the dealer for additional repairs or diagnostic testing. The failure and current mileages were unknown.

Filed Apr 9, 2010 · Brakes · 70,000 miles · FL

Tl* the contact owns a 2000 chevrolet tahoe. While driving the vehicle at a speed of 35 MPH, the ABS warning indicator illuminated and the vehicle experienced unwanted antilock brake system (ABS) activation. When the engine was shut off, the antilock braking system would continue to run. The contact confirmed that the only way to deactivate the ABS system was to remove the fuse and the failure had occurred on numerous occasions. The contact believed the failure to be directly related to the federal safety agency campaign id number: 05v379000 (service brakes, hydraulic: antilock). The dealer advised the vehicle was not included in the recall and the recall would only apply to the salt belt states. The vehicle has not yet been repaired. The current mileage was 133,000 and the failure mileage was 70,000.

Filed Apr 8, 2010 · Brakes · 222,400 miles · CO

I own a 2000 chevrolet tahoe. I began having trouble stopping at low speeds, the ABS system is engaging when I drop below approximately 10 MPH, making it very difficult to stop at low speeds. The first time it happened, I almost drove off a cliff on a mountain road because I couldn't stop the truck. The cliff is approximately 1,500 feet down - we are very lucky we aren't dead because we only stopped a few feet from the edge. Through online research, I found a the federal safety agency recall (campaign id number 05v379000), which stated that certain pickup trucks and sport utility vehicles may experience unwanted antilock brake system activation. The condition was more likely to occur in environmentally corrosive areas. The recall was launched only in the "salt belt" states. The chevy tahoe I own was originally purchased in wisconsin and driven there for 5 years before I purchased it and moved to colorado. I called the manufacturer (gm/chevy) to inform them of the ABS issue, and they stated that the VIN was not included in the recall even though the failures were identical. The mileage is 222,400.

Filed Sep 4, 2009 · Brakes · 70,000 miles · NJ

Tl*the contact owns a 2000 chevrolet tahoe. When the contact attempted to engage the brake pedal at low speeds when it rains, she noticed that the ABS brake control activated and disabled the brakes which caused the vehicle to continually move forward. The failure has not been diagnosed by a dealer. The contact also stated that when the vehicle was driven during very cold temperatures that the braking distance would increase greatly. The current mileage was 84,588 and the failure mileage was at 70,000.

Filed Aug 21, 2009 · Brakes · 112,000 miles · IL

Abs intermittently came on when I apply the brakes. After several weeks of this happening the brakes became very mushy. Changed both front wheel sensors but didn't fix the problem. Took to repair shop and they said the brake modulator was bad - $1200 to repair. We disconnected the anti-lock brake system at this point. Brakes work fine without it.

Filed Aug 6, 2009 · Brakes · 112,000 miles · WI

Tl*the contact owns a 2000 chevrolet tahoe. Through online research, the contact found the federal safety agency campaign id number 05v379000, which stated that certain pickup trucks and sport utility vehicles may experience unwanted antilock brake system activation. The condition was more likely to occur in environmentally corrosive areas. The recall will be launched only in the "salt belt" states of connecticut, delaware, illinois, indiana, iowa, maryland, massachusetts, maine, michigan, minnesota, missouri, new hampshire, new jersey, new york, ohio, pennsylvania, rhode island, vermont, west virginia, wisconsin, and the district of columbia. The manufacturer stated that the VIN was not included in the recall, although the failures were identical. The current mileage was 118,000 and failure mileage was 112,000.

Filed Apr 21, 2009 · Brakes · 120,000 miles · OH

Tl*the contact owns a 2000 chevrolet tahoe. While driving between 3-6 MPH, the brake pedal pulsated when it was depressed. The contact stated that the sensors failed. The dealer stated that the VIN was excluded from the federal safety agency campaign id number 05v379000 (service brakes, hydraulic:antilock), although the failures were identical. The contact would have to pay $705 to repair the vehicle. The state where he resides is included in the recall. The contact still drives the vehicle and shifts into neutral or turns off the vehicle when needing to brake, in order to avoid crashing into the preceding vehicle. The recall indicates that the failure occurs in corrosive areas. The failure mileage was 120,000 and current mileage was 127,000.

Filed Jan 4, 2009 · Brakes · 152,000 miles · NY

On dec 24th 2008 upon pulling into my driveway at about 5-7 MPH anti-lock brakes activated for no apparent reason causing me to collide with my house after applying brakes for over 20 feet.

Filed Mar 27, 2008 · Brakes, Wheels · 77,000 miles · OH

Tl*the contact owns a 2000 chevrolet tahoe. While depressing the brake pedal and decelerating from 20 MPH, the antilock brake system (ABS) unexpectedly activates. The failure increased the stopping distance. The vehicle was taken to an auto service center and the contact was informed that the front wheel sensors failed. The dealer stated that his VIN was not included in the federal safety agency campaign id number 05v379000 (service brakes, hydraulic: antilock). The purchase date was unknown. The current mileage was 79,000 and failure mileage was 77,000. Updated 04/25/08

Filed Mar 3, 2008 · Brakes · 115,000 miles · PA

Abs activates at speeds below 7mph while braking. Have almost run into a vehicle and person due to this failure. The tahoe was originally purchased in texas but has been in pa. For 3+ years. My vehicle should have been included in the recall but I was told it was not, doesn't make sense.

Filed Feb 6, 2008 · Brakes · 88,000 miles · OH

Tl*the contact owns a 2000 chevrolet tahoe. In an attempt to park the vehicle at 5 MPH, the contact depressed the brake pedal, but the vehicle would not stop. The brakes had to be applied again in order to stop the vehicle. The vehicle was taken to the dealer. The contact discovered the federal safety agency campaign id number 05v379000 (service brakes, hydraulic:antilock), which relates exactly to the failure. The current mileage was 90,000 and failure mileage was 88,000. Updated 03-04-08

Filed Jan 14, 2008 · Brakes · 99,000 miles · TX

Abs and brake warning light comes on randomly.

Filed Dec 4, 2007 · Brakes · 110,000 miles · PA

I have a 2000 tahoe and am having a problem with the ABS as described in the recall. Gm is telling me it was not included in the recall because of the manufacturing location of my vehicle. This is absurd. I live in an area where road salt is used and winter corrosion is possible. This is a dangerous issue and should include all vehicles regardless of where they were manufactured. How does gm know where the vehicle went after it was purchased, they don't. I almost hit a pedestrian in the crosswalk a few days because the ABS came on while I was going very slow.

Filed Mar 12, 2007 · Brakes · 103,000 miles · PA

Vehicle did not stop at intersection when brakes were applied. The ABS sounded as if it had engaged but my wheels did not stop. I had my 2 children in the vehicle and fortunately nothing was coming and therefore no one was hurt or killed. I reviewed the federal safety agency website to investigate and found that campaign number 05v379000 covers this problem and that a recall had been issued to remove corrosion from the speed sensors and apply rust inhibitor. I contacted apple chevrolet in york, pa and on 2/28/07, they found the that my wheel speed sensors had excessive rust build up. I was also informed that my vehicle was not included in this recall. I was charged $241.65 for these repairs and I feel that I should not be responsible for this. How can oer 1.3 million vehicles made between 1999 and 2002 be recalled for this same problem and my vehicle is not included?

Filed Feb 21, 2007 · Brakes · 80,000 miles · MN

There is the federal safety agency recall campaign 05v379000 concerning the anti lock brakes. This vehicle has the same problems as indicated in the recall, but it is not included in the recall due to VIN. Dealers have been telling me that this recall does not cover 2000 tahoe with the old body style (ie. As indicated by the VIN).

Filed Oct 9, 2006 · Brakes · MI

No brakes at low speed on my tahoe. The truck was recalled in 2006 for anti-lock brake issues.

Filed Sep 26, 2006 · Brakes · 77,000 miles · MI

Dt*: the contact stated after having a recall performed in october 2005, the ABS and brake light continued to stay illuminated. The front end shook very badly. When the brake was depressed, the pedal pulsated. The dealership inspected the vehicle numerous times and could not find the problem. The recall was campaign id #05v379000, regarding service brakes, hydraulic: antilock.

Filed Sep 8, 2006 · Brakes · VA

2000 chevrolet tahoe brakes failed to stop the vehicle. Upon inspection mechanic determined rear brake shield was rusted all the way out. *kb the consumer discovered a recall on internet, however he was told his vehicle was not included in the recall.

Filed Jul 15, 2006 · Brakes · 80,000 miles · WI

General motors and dealer refuse to recall and fix hydraulic anti-lock brake problem on my 2000 chevrolet tahoe. Recall date was aug 29, 2005.

Filed Jul 4, 2006 · Brakes · 100,001 miles · MI

I own a 2000 chevy tahoe. For the past 2 years, I experienced occasional problems stopping under 10 MPH due to the faulty activation of the ABS. On several occasions I barely avoided a dangerous crash. I called art moehn chevrolet in jackson, michigan about the problem and was told I could make an appointment to have the problem repaired. No mention was made of the possible recall. I took the vehicle to art moehn chevrolet in jackson, michigan on april 7, 2006. The problem was repaired at a cost to me of $241.60. I did research on the internet about the ABS problem and located a recall for 1999-2002 gm trucks (see nhsta recall campaign number 05v37900). I contacted the dealer and was told that my VIN # was not part of the recall. The brake work done on my 2000 tahoe is the exact repair sent to chevy dealers by gm for the recalled vehicles (see gm bulletin # 05068b). I am seeking full reimbursement of my costs for repair under the recall notice. Thank you.

Filed Jan 27, 2006 · Brakes · 105,000 miles · PA

Dt*: the contact stated the ABS activates at low speeds or when the roads are icy or wet. This caused the contact to rear end 2 vehicles. There is a the federal safety agency recall, # 05v379000, regarding the anti-lock brakes. The vehicle has the same problems as indicated in the recall; however, it is not included in the recall due to the VIN. There was no damage to either of the vehicle. Updated 02/27/06.

Filed Jan 17, 2006 · Brakes · 107,000 miles · FL

Dt*: the consumer stated the ABS activated at low speeds. There is a the federal safety agency recall, # 05v379000, regarding the anti-lock brakes. The consumer experienced the same problem as indicated in the recall; however, the vehicle identification number was not included in the recall.

Filed Dec 29, 2005 · Brakes · VA

Dt: the contact stated while driving ABS activated at low speeds without warning. This occurred on normal road conditions under normal braking, and this problem occurred repeatable. The wheel sensors were replaced. There was the federal safety agency recall campaign 05v379000 concerning the antilock brake system, but the state of virginia was not included. He contacted the dealership, and the manufacturer ,and they indicated more states were going to be added to the recall list.

Filed Dec 22, 2005 · Brakes · WA

Parking brake is junk on my 2000 chevrolet tahoe. Issue a recall please - I already had it replaced once.

Filed Dec 12, 2005 · Brakes · 79,000 miles · WI

Dt: the contact states there is the federal safety agency recall campaign 05v379000 concerning anti lock brakes. This vehicle has the same problems as indicated in the recall, but it is not included in the recall due to VIN.

Filed Nov 29, 2005 · Brakes · MI

Dt: the contact states there is the federal safety agency recall campaign 05v379000 concerning the anti lock brakes. This vehicle has the same problems as indicated in the recall, but it is not included in the recall due to VIN.

Filed Nov 22, 2005 · Brakes · 56,000 miles · MN

Anti- lock brakes activate when I am below 10 MPH causing near rear end collisions due to excessive stopping distances.

VIN decoder

See the problems and recalls for an exact car

Buying a used 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe?

Check the exact car before you pay: accidents, salvage or flood titles, odometer readings and previous owners.

Check its history