Tl* the contact owns a 1999 chrysler 300m. The contact stated that the headlights would intermittently illuminate at night. The contact had to continue driving the vehicle to correct the failure. The vehicle was taken to a local mechanic, who could not find the failure. The contact then took the vehicle to the dealer, but would not pay for the diagnostic test to be performed. The vehicle had not been repaired. The failure mileage was 71,000.
1999 Chrysler 300M: headlights failing or too dim
13 of the 351 complaints about the 1999 Chrysler 300M describe headlights failing or too dim.
- owner complaints
- 13
- of this car's complaints
- 4%
- typical mileage
- 45,000
- recalls
- 0
Headlights failing or too dim by model year
- 20044
- 20031
- 20023
- 20005
- 199913
What owners say
I recently purchased a used 1999 chrysler 300m. I had no problems with the car for the first couple of months. After about 3 months I noticed the interior lights began to turn on and off by themselves. Shortly after that my factory stereo went out. The next thing I noticed was the transmission slipping. After that my driver and passenger side speakers went out. After that my headlights began turning on and off by themselves when the car was parked and turned off. After that my heating unit would come on automatically whenever I would start the car. I've noticed a slight burning smell inside the car once I've started it up. My heated seats work when they want to. There's a whistling noise underneath the hood. My engine sounds loud now. There's a strange noise coming from the rear wheel on the driver side. It sounds like something electrical is shorting out. Its has a dense high pitched sound. Sometimes when I'm driving at night and I have my headlights on they will flicker on and off. When I try to start the car the engine struggles to turn over. It seems as if either my battery is dying or my alternator has had it. The car has died on me before while I was driving it. There is a mysterious electrical problem with these chrysler 300m cars. I've taken my car to several mechanics and none of them could pinpoint the exact cause of all these problems I'm having with the car. I guess I'm '!@#$%. I can't afford to pay for all of these defects and I no longer have a warranty on the car. Yeah, I'm really !@#$%.
Headlight lens (both) have become very cloudy and is reducing brightness of lights. Will need to be replaced soon. Over $300 each plus labor.
Dt: contact stated the plastic covering on the headlights fogged up and became dirty . They are no longer effective during use. The service dealer stated there was nothing that they could do about it because it was not covered under the warranty, they could replace the covering of the lights at the consumers expense. *ak. The consumer stated she must use the high beams at times.
Headlight lens is very cloudy. Oxidation appeared on the lens. Consumer found it difficult to drive at night. Manufacturer offered no assistance.*ak
There is a film that covers the headlights. Consumer states that it is hard to see while driving at night. Took vehicle to the dealer, and was told that he could replace the lens for a total of $1,000.
Our 1999 chrysler 300m (VIN #2c3-he66g2xh-622721) has plastic aerodynamic head lamps that have developed a "haze" that severely reduces the illumination of the road at night. I am not an engineer and do not purport to offer a professional opinion on this issue, but can report as a consumer that the illumination appears to be about half of what it was when the car was new. This haze began appearing somewhere in the three to four year of age range. It took a while to figure out what was going on but by five years of age the deterioration was at a point where we believe it is a lighting safety issue. I discussed this situation with ted vogalie who is the district level representative for chrysler on january 16, 2004 at the ancira chrysler dealership in san antonio, tx. I requested that chrysler treat this as a defective part and replace the headlights. Mr. Vogalie refused to offer this assistance. In our conversation he made much of the fact that the haze appeared to be on the outside of the headlight and cited this and the age/mileage of the car (5 years/ 57,000 miles) as reasons for not offering to replace the headlights. I explained to him that this car's usage can be characterized as "coddled" since it is routinely parked in a garage and has no unusual road conditions or other unusual usage. This condition is dangerous enough that I have ordered replacement headlights and am going to replace these defective parts even though the retail cost of doing this replacement is around $800. It is unconscionable that chrysler is allowed to equip an automobile with a defective part like this that poses a safety issue so early in the automobile's life and unload a very expensive repair on the consumer. I have an extended warranty issued by chrysler on the car and this part is not covered.
I have a chrysler 300 m VIN # [xxx]. The aerodynamic head lights on the car developed a haze that severely reduces the illumination of the roadway at night. I have complained to the dealership and they say that the problem is not covered warranty. It seems to me that there is probably a government standard or engineering standard for the required amount of road illumination needed to make operation of a vehicle safe at night. I wonder how many cars are driving in substandard lighting conditions due to having these plastic lenses that do not hold up to road conditions and are so hazy as to make safe driving visibility questionable. I know that all the modern cars have these type lenses but how can the federal safety agency not require that these devices be made to endure the expected life of the vehicles they are installed on. When they are new they look good. Beyond 2 years they begin to deteriorate rapidly. And here is the real customer rip off: the dealer tells me that for a mere $700 plus dollars they can replace these fixtures. They also come with no guarantee!. What was wrong with the earlier model cars that had glass head lamps and could be replaced for less that $ 10.00 total. They did not haze up like this expensive cheap plastic. It would be interesting to know how many night time accidents really happen because of poor visibility, yet do not get attributed to such simply because the drivers did have their lights on and that is all that was considered necessary. Again if you drive very much you probably have been stopped by the road patrol at night due to having a head lamp out. Seems to me that this problem is just as significant as driving with a head lamp out. What are we missing here? Is it against the law for me to drive at night without any lights? There must be some requirement to ensure that manufacturers design with adequate lighting for driving at night, and that should mean that the lighting be serviceable for the expected life of the vehicle. *la information redacted pursuant to the freedom of informa
The headlights on the vehicle are made of plastic which has faded into a yellow color, making it very hard to see at night. Took to dealer. Problem has not been resolved.
Consumer states that after a long period of time the headlight lenses start to turn from clear to a white cloudy color, consumer can barely see the road.
Dash lights blink on/off when head light switch is in the automatic position. The automatic head light switch is no longer reliable. Lights need to turned on/off manually. At the dealership I was told this was a common problem with the 300m, this faulty switch is not covered under warrenty. One year later, interior dash lights now blink on/off causing distraction. Drivers seat position button is now starting to move up and back during incorrect times. At times seat power doesn't work at all. Totally electrical???
The headlights on the vehicle are made of plastic, which has faded into a yellow color which makes it very hard to see at night. Took to dealer. Problem has not been resolved. Please provide any further information.
Service bulletins that may apply
Related recalls
No recalls on record for this model year.
Questions about the 1999 Chrysler 300M headlights
Is headlights failing or too dim a common problem on the 1999 Chrysler 300M?
13 of 351 owner complaints about the 1999 Chrysler 300M (4%) mention headlights failing or too dim. The model year with the most reports is 1999.
Is there a recall or service bulletin for this on the 1999 Chrysler 300M?
There are 0 recalls and 5 service bulletins for the same area of the car. Check them below with your VIN.
Other symptoms on the 1999 Chrysler 300M
Stalling 19No deployment 12Ball joint 8Fire or smoke 8Steering lock-up 8Pulling 8Power windows 7Won't shift 7Tire blowout 7Power steering loss 6Engine failure 5
VIN decoder
See the problems and recalls for an exact car
Buying a used 1999 Chrysler 300M?
Check the exact car before you pay: accidents, salvage or flood titles, odometer readings and previous owners.
Check its history