Check a VIN

1993 Eagle Vision problems

The most common problem on the 1993 Eagle Vision is fuel and propulsion system, typically around 148,650 miles. It has 162.0 times the complaints of a typical Vision model year.

Typical year162.0x the typical complaints
Owner complaints
162
Recalls
5
Service bulletins
74
Worst area
Fuel system
Fuel economy
19-21mpg

The worst 1993 Eagle Vision problems

Ranked by number of owner complaints. Mileage and cost come from what owners wrote.

Problems by type

Tap a problem to see which part fails, at what mileage and in which other years.

Specific symptoms reported on the 1993 Eagle Vision

Fuel leak 21Stalling 8Headlights 7ABS 6Fire or smoke 5Fuel smell 5

Recalls 5

Power train: automatic transmission: lever and linkage: floor shiftReported January 13, 2004 · 2,315,768 vehicles affected
What is wrong
On certain passenger vehicles, the floor shifter ignition-park interlock may fail and allow the shifter to be moved out of the park position with the key removed. An inoperative interlock may also allow the key to be removed when the shifter has not been placed in the park position.
Risk
Either circumstance may result in the vehicle rolling away without warning.
Remedy
Dealers will install a new load-limiting push rod into the floor shifter lever of the affected vehicles. Owner notification began on june 14, 2004. Owners should contact daimlerchrysler at 1‑800‑853‑1403.

Recall number 04V021000 · Recall details

Suspension: front: control arm: lower armReported August 9, 1999 · 402,830 vehicles affected
What is wrong
Vehicle description: passenger vehicles. The lower control arm attaching brackets can crack due to fatigue and separate from the engine cradle.
Risk
If this occurs, the transmission half-shaft could pull out of the transaxle and result in loss of power.
Remedy
Dealers will reinforce the engine cradle at the point where the lower control arm attaches to it.

Recall number 99V215000 · Recall details

Fuel system, gasoline: fuel injection systemReported August 6, 1998 · 722,600 vehicles affected
What is wrong
Vehicle description: passenger vehicles built with 3.5l engines. The fuel injection delivery system can leak fuel from some of the sealing o-rings or from hair line cracks in the thermoset fuel injection rail.
Risk
Fuel leakage in the presence of an ignition source can result in a fire.
Remedy
Dealers will replace the fuel rail o-rings and reinforce the outlet (passenger) side fuel rail. Vehicles showing fuel leakage on the outlet fuel rail must have the outlet rail replaced which includes changing the upper and lower injector o-rings. However, if a vehicle is leaking fuel from the o-rings or from a cracked fuel line, the vehicle should be taken into a dealer to have this repaired as soon as possible.

Recall number 98V184000 · Recall details

Fuel system, gasoline: deliveryReported June 12, 1998 · 84,600 vehicles affected
What is wrong
Vehicle description: passenger vehicles built with 3.3l engines. The 'o-rings' used to seal the interface of the fuel injector rail supply, return and cross over tubes are not as robust as those used in later model years. Deterioration of the 'o-rings' can cause fuel leakage.
Risk
In the presence of an ignition source, fuel leakage in the engine compartment could result in a fire.
Remedy
Dealers will replace the engine fuel rail.

Recall number 98V130000 · Recall details

Suspension: frontReported September 15, 1992 · 3,000 vehicles affected
What is wrong
The front suspension lower control arm tension strut washers can crack and fall off due to hydrogen embrittlement.
Risk
Loss of a washer will cause a clunking sound, heardduring braking. If left unattended, the loss of the washer will eventuallyresult in tension strut attachment failure that can result in loss of steeringcontrol and an accident.
Remedy
Replace the front and rear strut bar washers and nuts.

Recall number 92V128000 · Recall details

See all 5 recalls for the 1993 Eagle Vision

Defect investigations

Fuel rail, brake fluid, chassisOpened October 13, 2004, closed October 27, 2004

On september 5, 2004, mr. Robert galenty of iselin, nj, petitioned the agency to conduct defect investigations of certain model year (my) 1993-1997 vehicles produced by daimlerchrysler corporation.his petition identified three issues of concern: 1) fuel leaking from the fuel injector rails; 2) brake fluid contamination resulting in brake failure; and 3) susceptibility of the vehicle frame to damage while the vehicle is being towed.mr. Galanty alleged that his 1996 dodge intrepid had each of these three problems.concerning fuel rail leakage, daimlerchrysler commenced a recall (98v‑184) of approximately 722,600 vehicles to address engine fuel rail leaks that could lead to a fire, including those vehicles cited in the petition and the petitioner's 1996 dodge intrepid.on october 7, 1998, the federal safety agency opened a recall query investigation (rq98-018) to evaluate the adequacy of the recall remedy.that investigation was closed on july 8, 2002 without requiring further action by daimlerchrysler.very recently, on june 9, 2004, the federal safety agency denied a petition (rp04-001) to reopen rq98-018 after finding that there was no new information that would indicate any basis for reopening it.this is still the current position of the federal safety agency on this issue.concerning brake fluid contamination and frame alignment, a review of the federal safety agency's database shows no other complaints on either one of these issues on the vehicles cited in the petition.

DP04007

Auto trans ignition-park interlockOpened July 17, 2003, closed January 30, 2004

The manufacturer reports above are based on daimlerchrysler?s (dc) analysis of model year (my) 1998 (population = 356,384) and 1999 (population = 486,948) ja, jx and lh family subject vehicle data (earlier mys excluded).the population number includes all mys.the precise number of duplicates between odi and dc reports cannot be determined due to missing or incomplete information.the fatality incident involved an elderly person who attempted to stop a roll away vehicle and received fatal injuries.odi also gathered information on my 1997-99 prowler vehicles in this investigation. The prowler vehicles were manufactured with a different design shifter mechanism (the shift lever is shorter).there are no complaints of prowler interlock failure in odi?s database, and dc has received no reports either.the prowler is excluded from the recall scope.the investigation involved a condition where the interlock system could fail (or be made inoperative by the operator) during vehicle use, possibly inadvertently.the interlock system is required under fmvss 114.with the transmission in the park position and the ignition key off, the combined action of pressing the shift button and pulling the shift lever rearward may result in the operator overcoming the interlock system and cause the mechanical linkage of the system to disconnect.when this occurs, there is no overt indication to an operator that the system is defeated, and an increased risk of vehicle roll-away exists.under recall 04v021, dc will replace damaged shift mechanisms, and will install on all vehicles a device which inhibits the operator?s ability to overcome the interlock and defeat the system.beginning with my 2000, dc incorporated a brake and transmission shifter interlock (btsi) system into the subject vehicles.introduction of btsi involved design changes to the shift mechanism, one of which resulted in reduced mechanical advantage (rma) of the shift button.the rma shifter requires increased forces to overcome the interlock system, making the shifter less susceptible to damage.

EA03011

Steering column separationOpened May 7, 2003, closed July 22, 2003

Mr. Larry a. Sackey submitted a petition to the federal safety agency by letter dated april 18, 2003, requesting that agencyfurther investigate the defective collapsible steering shaft system on 1987-1995 vehicles manufactured by the daimlerchrysler corporation.in part because of 49 cfr ? 30120(g), the federal safety agency has decided to limit the scope of the petition vehicles to 1993-1995 models, excluding the 1993 jeep grand cherokee and 1994-1995 dodge ram series trucks that were recalled (93v210 & 96v230) for steering column failure.if the analysis of these vehicles had identified a potential problem, the scope could have been expanded in an investigation.a review of odi's data base shows no recent complaints and a lack of a complaint trend concerning the subject issue on the subject vehicles as a whole or by individual models.therefore, the petition is denied.for details, see federal register notice volume 68, no. 130, july 8, 2003.

DP03002

Fuel injection delivery system fuel leakOpened October 7, 1998, closed July 8, 2002

RQ98018

Rear suspension trailing arm/boltOpened April 14, 1998, closed August 31, 1998

Alleged that the rear suspension trailing and/or its attachment bolt may fail, posing a risk of loss of vehicle control and loss of rear service brake operation

PE98022

Fuel injector assembly leakageOpened March 10, 1998, closed February 1, 1999

Nitrile rubber seals used in the fuel rail assemblies of the subject vehicles at the supply, return, and crossover tube fittings, and at the pressure regulator fail, resulting in fuel leakage in the engine compartment.also, the outlet (right) fuel rail may leak from cracks at certain mold gates in the thermoset rail material.chrysler will recall the subject vehicles and stated that it intends to replace the o-rings with fluorocarbon o-ring having greater heat resistance capability and attach reinforcements to the rail in the areas where the cracking concern has been known to occur most frequently.rails that are already cracked will be replaced by new, reinforced rails.

EA98007

Fuel rail leakageOpened March 6, 1998, closed June 15, 1998

Alleged gasoline leaks from the fuel rail cross-over tube fittings

PE98014

Underhood fuel leaksOpened September 22, 1995, closed February 24, 1997

A safety-related defect trend has not been identified at this time and further use of agency resources does not appear to be warranted.the closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by the federal safety agency that no safety-related defect exists.the agency reserves the right to take further action if waarranted by the circumstances.an engineering analysis clossing report is included in the public file.

EA95028

Water in defroster systemOpened August 31, 1995, closed December 31, 1996

A safety-related defect trend has not been identified at this time and further expenditure of agency resources does not appear to be warranted.the closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by the federal safety agency that a safety-related defect does not exist.the agency will take further action if warranted by the circumstances.see the engineering analysis closing report (ea95-023)

EA95023

Technical service bulletins for the 1993 Eagle Vision 74

Bulletins tell dealers how to fix known problems. A warranty extension means the manufacturer pays for that repair for longer.

See all 74 bulletins for the 1993 Eagle Vision

1993 Eagle Vision fuel economy

Official EPA estimates in miles per gallon (MPGe for electric). Ranges cover trims that share the same engine.

EngineDriveCityHighwayCombined
3.3L 6‑cylFWD182621
3.5L 6‑cylFWD162419

What 1993 Eagle Vision owners say

Most recent owner complaints, unedited.

Filed May 31, 2006 · Electrical · OH

The engine cuts off for a few seconds while driving at high speeds (60 MPH). The vehicle lurches as a result. Luckily, the engine starts up again without needing to crank and the vehicle proceeds. On one occasion, when driving at slower speed (25 MPH), the vehicle stalled. I lost the power steering, and had to stop and restart the ignition using the key.

Filed Sep 9, 2005 · Suspension · GA

Dt: consumer owns a 1993 eagle vision. Consumer received recall 99v215000 about a year ago concerning lower control arm. He took vehicle to dealer to get repairs done . Dealer did not do anything to vehicle and charged him $1020 for repairs. He took vehicle to another dealer on august 3, 2005 because it started shaking again. They did not do any repairs. He contacted the manufacturer, and was told to take vehicle back to dealer. *ak

Filed May 20, 2005 · Fuel system · 65,785 miles · IA

Campaigns 98v184000 and 98v130000 concern fuel leakage on the 1993 eagle vision. On may 13, 1999 the o rings were replaced on my eagle by the previous owner. On march 31, 2000, after purchasing the car I had to take my care in to a garage due to the strong smell of gasoline. The repair shop found a gas leak. They replaced the fuel rail gasket which cost a total of $214.02. I believe the cause of this problem was caused by the leakage of the o rings. The replacement of the fuel rail gasket should be covered under campaign no. 98v130000. I am requesting reimbursement for the $214.02. Also, I would like to know if there is anything alse I should do to make the car safer such as having the engine fuel rail replaced, which it appears wasn't done when the o rings were replaced by the previous owner.

Filed Mar 8, 2005 · Seats · 119,000 miles · UT

The driver's side front seat back wouldn't stay in the upright position. It kept falling back down. Please provide any further information. *ph

Filed Oct 14, 2004 · Wheels · 30,000 miles · VA

The consumer had an on going concern that every year when rotating the front tires, a broken stud has to be replaced. Dealer was contacted. *jb ...not just when rotatin gtires. Nearly every time that fron ttires are removed, a stud breaks off. I m sure to inform the servic eprovider not to use an air wrench and to hand torque the lug nuts.

Filed Apr 20, 2004 · Fuel system · 148,650 miles · MI

Amendment to the federal safety agency odi complaint number 10066149. Fuel rail/injection system fuel line o-ring leak. Reference the federal safety agency 98v184000/chrysler recall 790. 1) 1 incident of recall notice and attempted recall service. After recall service performed on march 18 1999 there were 2 incidents of fuel rail/o-ring leak confirmed as follows: 2) right (passenger) side fuel rail cracked and leaked (october 17 2002) 3) left (driver) side fuel inlet line o-ring failed and leaked (april 13 2004). Customer was made to pay for repairs of 3rd incident for $583.00 to replace entire fuel rail assembly chrysler part number 5015231aa. Inspection of parts returned to customer show that fuel inlet o-ring is defective (hardened and shrunken) and is black in color (recall replacement o-ring is supposed to be blue in color). It has been confirmed that 2nd incident of fuel leak was due to recall service repair of march 18 1999 not properly performed as fuel inlet o-ring was never replaced (village motors chelsea mi-mechanic mistake). It should also be noted that recall service procedure to "reinforce right (passenger) side fuel rail did not prevent fuel leak incident of october 17 2002. Customer is seeking reimbursement for $583.00 from chrysler due to improper recall service of defective o-ring. The federal safety agency assistance would be appreciated.

Filed Apr 19, 2004 · Fuel system · 150,000 miles · GA · fire

Fuel was leaking from the fuel rail. Consumer had vehicle towed to the dealership. Vehicle caught on fire while being towed to the dealership, and dealership refused to honor the fuel leakage recall 98v184000 because of the fire. Vehicle had been at the dealership for a month.

Filed Apr 14, 2004 · Fuel system · 148,700 miles · MI

Fuel rail/injection system leak. Reference the federal safety agency 98v184000 and chrysler recall number 790. 3 incidents of fuel system leak due to defective fuel rail system leak. The federal safety agency 98v184000/chrysler recall 790 is for supposedly fixing right (passenger) side injection rail but fails to acknowledge and address fixing left (driver) side fuel injection rail which has same problem. Note: root cause of fuel leak is that the fuel injection rail is made of a plastic which eventually shrinks or cracks.

Filed Mar 3, 2004 · Airbags · 145,000 miles · GA · crash

Air bag failure in 1993 eagle vision tsi. After full frontal impact with guardrail that probably should have deployed airbags, the airbag warning light was on but airbags had failed to deploy. Occupant was bruised by seatbelt but otherwise uninjured.

Filed Jan 15, 2004 · Body · 159,562 miles · VA

The body and frame problem is that when it snows, snow is found inside my vehicle on the front passenger side. This vehicle has not been in any accidents. What can I do besides going to a body and frame shop? The second problem is that the clear coat on the vehicle is coming off. I have gone to 3 paint shops. All three have told me it is caused by a defect in the clear coat and have told me I should contact the manufacture. Who do I contact since eagle was bought out in regards to this problem.

Used buying checklistWhat to check on a 1993 Eagle Vision before you buy

Compare the 1993 Eagle Vision

Other model years

19921993199419951996199720002003

Questions about the 1993 Eagle Vision

Is the 1993 Eagle Vision reliable?

Owners have filed 162 complaints about the 1993 Eagle Vision, 162.0 times a typical Vision model year.

What is the most common problem with the 1993 Eagle Vision?

Fuel and propulsion system, with 53 complaints, typically around 148,650 miles. Next is engine (21).

How many recalls does the 1993 Eagle Vision have?

5 recalls, covering power train, suspension and fuel system, gasoline.

What gas mileage does the 1993 Eagle Vision get?

Official estimates for the 1993 Eagle Vision range from 19 to 21 mpg combined. The most efficient version (3.3L 6-cyl, FWD) gets 18 city and 26 highway.

Share your experience with the 1993 Eagle Vision

Tell other buyers what went wrong and what it cost. We review every report before it appears, and we never publish names, emails or VINs.

No names, contact details or links. Reports about a dealer or a person are not published.

VIN decoder

See the problems and recalls for an exact car

Buying a used 1993 Eagle Vision?

Check the exact car before you pay: accidents, salvage or flood titles, odometer readings and previous owners.

Check its history
Is this car on a recall?Check VIN