1995 Ford Crown Victoria: ball joint or control arm failure

Filed Jul 11, 2013 · Suspension · 192,000 miles · OH

Tl* the contact owns a 1995 ford crown victoria. The contact stated that while exiting a residential drive way, the driver's side front suspension ball joint fractured and separated from the vehicle. The manufacturer advised the contact that the vehicle was not included in the federal safety agency campaign id number: 98v322000 (suspension). The vehicle was not repaired. The failure and current mileage was 192,000.

Filed Nov 29, 2011 · Suspension · 93,000 miles · FL

Tl* the contact owns a 1995 ford crown victoria. The contact stated that while driving approximately 5 MPH, the driver side front fell to the ground and the tire buckled inward. The vehicle was towed to an independent mechanic where they advised him that the ball joint had come out from the socket and needed to be replaced. The vehicle was repaired. The manufacturer was contacted and they offered no assistance. The failure mileage was approximately 93,000.

Filed Apr 15, 2011 · Suspension · 83,000 miles · AL

I have a 1995 ford crown victoria with 83,000 miles on it. The control arm dropped and hit the road, causing loss of steering. Lucky for us we were going slow turning into a place of business, if we were going fast it could have been bad news. This car started a squeak on the front a little while ago, I guess it had something to do with it. I have noticed alot of 90's and some 2000's model fords have this same squeak. I contacted ford, and they said there was no recall on my model, I told them there should be.

Filed Aug 16, 2010 · Suspension · 94,000 miles · KY

1995 crown victoria had a blow out on the expressway at 55 MPH at about midnight after picking up our grandson from the airport don't know for sure if ball joint broke first or tire did my husband managed to get the car to the side of the road without hitting any thing. This happened may 24th 2009 the other ball joint just broke today august 16 2010 car was going about 5mph when it happened today. What are the odds this was just a coincidences or this was a defect in manufacturing someone could have been killed. We were lucky.

Filed Oct 28, 2008 · Suspension · 140,000 miles · TX

Tl*the contact owns a 1995 ford crown victoria. The contact was experiencing steering failure. He stated that the ball joints were loose on the vehicle and should be tighter. The VIN was excluded from the federal safety agency campaign id number 96v135000 (steering:linkages). The failure and current mileages were less than 140,000.

Filed Nov 14, 2007 · Steering, Suspension · NC · 1 injury

Front driver ball joint design designed for failure, under normal use lower ball joint rapidly deteriorates and causes an unsafe environment for vehicle. Steering becomes erratic and steering wheel feels loose.

Filed Oct 19, 2007 · Suspension · 140,931 miles · CA

Tl*the contact owns a 1995 ford crown victoria. The vehicle was a fleet. While driving between 5-10 MPH, the front end of the vehicle dropped. The vehicle was towed to the dealer and they stated that the driver side lower ball joint separated. The manufacturer stated that the VIN was not included in the federal safety agency campaign id number 98v322000 (suspension:front:control arm:lower ball joint). The purchase date was unknown. The failure mileage was 140,931 and current mileage was 141,000. Updated 11/15/07

Filed Apr 16, 2007 · Steering, Suspension · 49,200 miles · IN · crash

Tl*the contact owns a 1995 ford crown victoria. The vehicle had the same failure as mentioned in recall # 96v135000. In 2003, the vehicle accelerated, but the contact was unable to turn the steering wheel. The contact shut the vehicle off, and had it towed to the personal mechanic. The mechanic stated that the ball joints were corroded and detached from the sockets. In addition, the pitman arms were not lubricated. The manufacturer stated that there were no recalls on the vehicle. On april 8, 2007, the vehicle was involved in a crash. The insurance company checked the vehicle's history and stated that the vehicle was included in a recall. The contact called the manufacturer again, and was still being informed that there was never a recall on the vehicle. The current mileage was 89,200, and failure mileage was 49,200. *ak the consumer states that there are 2 recalls for this specific car which are 98v322000 and the recall for steering listed above. The consumer states that the car was totaled while running into a ditch. Update 05/04/07

Filed Sep 5, 2006 · Suspension · 197,342 miles · PA

1. I had just backed out of a parking spot, finished turning the car around to face forward and began approaching exit out of parking lot. I estimate speed at the moment of failure was less than five (5) MPH. It is very fortunate that I was not going faster or I could have lost control of the crown vic, been killed, or killed someone else. As I began to approach the exit, I heard a sound of metal dragging on the street. I thought I accidentally ran over a metal shopping cart or someone on a bicycle. This is the type of metallic, dragging sound I heard. 2. Right-front wheel fell off of car while approaching exit. I looked under my car just after the incident occurred, within approximately one or two minutes as it was then disabled in the lot. I observed ball joint had popped out. 3. Ford replaced the following parts: arm asy fmc xw1z 3078 ba, kit-ste fmc f8az 3050 aa, joint asy fmcf7az 3049 aa, link fmc* f6az 5k484 aa, shield fmc* f5az 2k004 a, kit-sho fmc f8az 18124 ha, link spo* f6az 5k484 aa. I do not personally have any of the old parts that were replaced, perhaps ford does.

Filed Oct 14, 2005 · Suspension · 250,000 miles · FL

Dt: the front suspension lower control arm lower ball joints separated. This happened while driving 35 MPH. There was a tiny bump in the road and the vehicle tilted to the right side lane. The vehicle was slanted to that side. There was a loss of steering. The vehicle was immobile at that time. A tow truck towed the vehicle to the contact's house and later to a mechanic. A recall was issued concerning the front suspension lower control arm lower ball joints. The contacts vehicle was not included in the recall due to VIN although the contact's vehicle experienced a similar problem. The mechanic replaced both lower ball joints.

Filed Oct 16, 2004 · Steering, Suspension · 70,000 miles · MA · crash

Sudden failure of ball joints in ford passenger cars.

Filed Sep 17, 2002 · Suspension · OR

First of all I am not sure of the month we bought the car but it was in 1996. This is what happened.my daughter was over at the oregon coast and had just pulled out of a parking lot when the left front lower ball joint came apart and the front wheel collapsed inward. Luckily no one was injured and there was no body damaged. I called the dealership to find out if there was a recall notice for the vehicle. They said that there was not. On your web site I found two (2) recalls summarys: the federal safety agency campaign id numbers : 98v322000 and 96v135000. These deal with the lower control arm ball joints and the pitman arms on the 1995 ford crown victoria. I asked the dealers in newport, or. And junction city, or and they claimed no knowledge of either one. In addition I was given an number for the main customer service office for ford back east. They didn't acknowledge the recalls either. Both dealers I talked to suggested replacing all four of the ball joints (upper and lower) which I did. It cost $561.63. I had a towing bill of $142.00 and a cab bill of $57.75. I asked the dealer to be reimbursed at least of the repair and towing bills. They refused. If my daughter had been driving along at 55 MPH and the ball joint came apart she could have been killed. If I had been driving the car and it came apart, I could have been killed. I have talked to several mechanics and they claim that this shouldn't have happened given the year of the car and miles driven. I feel that ford motor company should pay the repair bill at least. If this happened to me, it could happen to other owners of the 1995 crown victoria's, and it seems to have already since you have recalls summarys concerning them.