Check a VIN

Ford Econoline recalls

There are 26 safety recalls on record for the Ford Econoline, covering 3,506,255 vehicles in total across all the models in each campaign. Newest first.

Ford Econoline recalls by model year

2026 12019 22018 22017 12016 12015 12014 12013 12012 12011 12010 12009 12007 22006 22005 22003 22002 22001 32000 31999 51998 21997 21996 31995 41994 41993 31992 31991 31990 4

All recalls

Visibility: defroster/defogger/HVAC system: fan/motorReported October 24, 2025 · 6,909 vehicles affected
What is wrong
Ford Motor Company (Ford) is recalling certain 2026 Econoline vehicles. The heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) system blower motor may fail, which can cause the defrosting and defogging system to become inoperative.
Risk
An inoperative windshield defrosting and defogging system may decrease the driver's visibility, increasing the risk of a crash.
Remedy
Dealers will replace the HVAC blower motor assembly, free of charge. Owner notification letters were mailed January 30, 2026. Owners may contact Ford customer service at 1‑866‑436‑7332. Ford's number for this recall is 25SB4. Vehicle Identification Numbers (VINs) involved in this recall became searchable on beginning October 28, 2025.

Recall number 25V726000 · Recall details

Back over prevention: sensing system: cameraReported September 3, 2025 · 1,456,417 vehicles affected
What is wrong
Ford Motor Company (Ford) is recalling certain 2015-2019 Lincoln MKC, Mustang, F-350 SD, F-250 SD, F-450 SD, 2015-2017 Lincoln Navigator, Expedition, 2015-2018 Edge, Transit Connect, 2016-2019 F-550 SD, Transit, 2017-2019 Econoline, and 2019 Ranger vehicles. The rearview camera may display a distorted, inverted, or blank image when the vehicle is in reverse.
Risk
A rearview camera that displays an inverted, distorted, or blank image can reduce the driver’s view behind the vehicle, increasing the risk of a crash.
Remedy
Dealers will inspect and replace the rearview camera as necessary, free of charge. Owner notification letters were mailed January 13, 2026. Ford owners will receive letters in phases, beginning January 2026 and June 2026. Owners may contact Ford customer service at 1‑866‑436‑7332. Ford's number for this recall is 25S89. This recall expands previous the federal safety agency recall number 25V270. Vehicle Identification Numbers (VINs) involved in this recall will be searchable on beginning September 8, 2025.

Recall number 25V572000 · Recall details

EquipmentReported June 11, 2019 · 325 vehicles affected
What is wrong
Unicell Body Company Inc. (Unicell) is recalling certain 2017-2019 Chevrolet Express and GMC Savanna, 2018-2019 Hino 155, Ford Econoline and Transit and Isuzu NPR, and 2018 Ram ProMaster-based vehicles equipped with ASA Electronics Voyager monitors used to display the back-up camera image. The affected monitors may revert back to the factory default settings which may cause the camera image to be reversed.
Risk
The driver may inadvertently turn the wrong direction to avoid an object behind the vehicle, increasing the risk of a crash.
Remedy
Unicell will work with ASA Electronics to notify owners and offer a remedy, free of charge. The recall began May 9, 2019. Owners may contact ASA Electronics customer service 1‑800‑384‑4400 or Unicell at 1‑716‑853‑8628.

Recall number 19V428000 · Recall details

Power train: automatic transmissionReported June 10, 2019 · 3,868 vehicles affected
What is wrong
Ford Motor Company (Ford) is recalling certain 2009-2016 Ford Econoline vehicles equipped with a 5R110W transmission, 5.4L engine, and a school bus or ambulance preparation package. A weld within the coast clutch may fail, causing an unexpected loss of drive power.
Risk
A sudden loss of drive power increases the risk of a crash. Transferring occupants of a disabled school bus or ambulance to another vehicle increases their risk of injury.
Remedy
Ford will notify owners, and dealers will replace the single-engaging coast one-way clutch with a new dual-engaging one-way clutch, free of charge. The recall began August 19, 2019. Owners may contact Ford customer service at 1‑866‑436‑7332. Ford's number for this recall is 19S20.

Recall number 19V432000 · Recall details

Equipment adaptive/mobilityReported December 16, 2008 · 169 vehicles affected
What is wrong
Sunset vans is recalling 169 my 2005-2007 econoline, g series and sprinter trucks built on dodge, ford and chevrolet chassis and equipped with ricon platform style wheelchair lifts. These lifts fail to comply with the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 403, "platform lift system accessible for motor vehicles." the anti-stow interlock may not detect the presence of a wheelchair or mobility aid user. The pressure sensing switch that detects the presence of weight on the platform was not adjusted to the necessary sensitivity level. The lift could stow even though someone or something is still on the lift.
Risk
A lift occupant can be injured should the lift begin to stow unintentionally.
Remedy
Sunset vans is working with ricon to correct the wheelchair lifts free of charge (please see 07e097). Owners may contact ricon at 1‑818‑267‑3000 or sunset vans at 1‑888‑280‑8267.

Recall number 08V663000 · Recall details

Equipment adaptive/mobilityReported December 15, 2008 · 267 vehicles affected
What is wrong
Sunset vans is recalling 267 my 2005-2007 econoline, g series and sprinter trucks built on dodge, ford and chevrolet chassis and equipped with ricon platform style wheelchair lifts. These vehicles fail to comply with the requirements of federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 404, "platform lift installations in motor vehicles." the threshold warning system may not detect the presence of a wheelchair or mobility aid user in a certain spot within the defined threshold area.
Risk
The user of the lift could be injured should the lift move unintentionally.
Remedy
Sunset vans is working with ricon to correct the wheelchair lifts free of charge (please see 07e095). Owners may contact ricon at 1‑818‑267‑3000 or sunset vans at 1‑888‑280‑8267.

Recall number 08V662000 · Recall details

Vehicle speed control: cruise controlReported February 4, 2008 · 225,000 vehicles affected
What is wrong
Ford is recalling 225,000 my 1992-2003 econoline, my 1993-1995 taurus sho, my 1992-1998 crown victoria, my 1993 bronco, f-series, my 1995-1997 f-series super duty stripped chassis, my 1992-1998 mercury grand marquis, and my 1992-1995 lincoln town car vehicles. The affected vehicles were previously repaired using a wiring harness that is not compatible with the vehicle circuit polarity.
Risk
As a result, the fuse is located in the output circuit rather than in the intended input power feed circuit, and may not offer the intended protection in the event of an electrical short to ground.
Remedy
Dealers will install a new wiring harness, or replace the mating electrical component. The recall began on february 18, 2008. Owners may contact ford at 1‑800‑392‑3673.

Recall number 08V051000 · Recall details

Vehicle speed controlReported August 1, 2006 · 1,200,000 vehicles affected
What is wrong
On certain trucks equipped with speed control, gasoline or natural gas engines, the speed control deactivation switch may overheat.
Risk
Overheating could result in smoke or burn and an underhood fire.
Remedy
Dealers will install a fused wiring harness into the speed control system free of charge. The recall began on august 7, 2006. Owners may contact ford at 1‑866‑436‑7332. (note: also see recalls 05v017 and 05v388)

Recall number 06V286000 · Recall details

Fuel system, gasoline: storageReported August 5, 2003 · 64 vehicles affected
What is wrong
On certain cutaway chassis cab with the school bus option, two brackets and two outrigger members are missing in the area of the fuel tank.
Risk
The brackets and outrigger members are intended to enhance crash performance.
Remedy
Ford will send technicians to the owner's location to inspect and add the brackets and outriggers as required. Owner notification began on september 3, 2003. Owners should contact ford at 1‑800‑392‑3673.

Recall number 03V282000 · Recall details

Child seatReported October 4, 2000 · 12 vehicles affected
What is wrong
Vehicle description: certain crew vans failed to comply with the requirements of fmvss 225, "child restraint anchorage systems." these vehicles, which are designated as trucks, are 5 passenger vehicles with three designated seating positions in the second row seats. They were built without child seat tether anchorage brackets in the center position of the second row seat. Also the owner guides do not address the child seat tether anchorages in the center second row seat position.
Risk
In the event of a crash, the child seat may not be properly attached increasing the risk of injury to the child.
Remedy
Dealers will install the child seat tether anchorages at the center second row seating position, and also replace the vehicle owner guides with new versions providing the required written instructions. Eleven vehicles are at dealerships and assembly plant personnel will repair these units at the affected dealerships. Arrangements have been made for the return of the one unit that had been sold. No other owner notification will be required.

Recall number 00V304000 · Recall details

Equipment: other: labelsReported September 21, 2000 · 4,500 vehicles affected
What is wrong
Vehicle description: bi-fuel cng pickup trucks and bi-fuel cng vans, modified by cfi control systems, inc., fail to conform to the requirements of fmvss no. 303, "fuel system integrity of compressed natural gas vehicles." the label affixed to the fuel filler door by the vehicle modifier contains the inspection date and expiration date of the cng tank. However, it does not contain the statement "see instructions on the fuel container for inspection and service life."
Risk
These vehicles do not comply with the requirements.
Remedy
Owners will be provided a label with the required statement, along with instructions for affixing the label at the fuel filler door. Owner notification began november 2, 2000. Owners who take their vehicles to an authorized dealer on an agreed upon service date and do not receive the free remedy within a reasonable time should contact ford at 1‑800‑392‑3673.

Recall number 00V284000 · Recall details

Wheels: lugs/nuts/bolts/studsReported April 19, 2000 · 3,300 vehicles affected
What is wrong
Vehicle description: cutaways and stripped chassis with single rear wheels. The lug nuts can potentially bottom out on a shoulder on the studs.
Risk
If this occurs, there can be an inadequate clamp load to attach the wheel to the axle, resulting in noise, damage to the wheel and hub, or in extreme cases, loss of a rear wheel while the vehicle is being driven.
Remedy
Dealers will replace the rear wheel attaching studs.

Recall number 00V115000 · Recall details

Latches/locks/linkages: doors: latchReported March 15, 1999 · 2,893 vehicles affected
What is wrong
Vehicle description: utility vans equipped with the "60/40" hinged side cargo doors. The strikers for the 60/40 door single latch system were found to contain stress cracks at the striker wire lower stake joint. Strikers with stress cracks may not meet the requirements of fmvss no. 206, "door locks and door retention components."
Risk
In the event of a crash, the door strikers may not hold the door, increasing the risk of personal injury or property damage.
Remedy
Dealers will replace the door striker.

Recall number 99V046000 · Recall details

Power train: manual transmissionReported October 14, 1998 · 350 vehicles affected
What is wrong
Vehicle description: pickup trucks built with single rear wheels and equipped with 3.55:1 and 3.73:1 axle ratio. These vehicles were built with incorrect speedometer driven gears, resulting in a lower speedometer reading than the actual vehicle speed being driven.
Risk
This can result in the vehicle being driven at an unsafe or illegal speed should the driver not realize that his vehicle road speed is greater than the speedometer indication.
Remedy
Dealers will install the correct speedometer gear.

Recall number 98V257000 · Recall details

Fuel system, gasoline: delivery: hoses, lines/piping, and fittingsReported March 19, 1998 · 20,000 vehicles affected
What is wrong
Vehicle description: light duty passenger vans and stripped chassis. There is interference between the parking brake cable and the fuel line which, over time, can result in damage to the fuel line causing fuel leakage.
Risk
If there is fuel leakage in the presence of an ignition source, fire could result.
Remedy
Dealers will replace the fuel supply line. In addition, a piece of anti-abrasion insulation will be installed to prevent abrasion of the fuel line.

Recall number 98V062000 · Recall details

Parking brake: conventionalReported October 28, 1996 · 53,400 vehicles affected
What is wrong
The parking brake systems may not hold the vehicles on a 20% grade with foot pedal efforts of 125 pounds or less. This does not meet the requirements of fmvss no. 105, "hydraulic brake systems."
Risk
The vehicle may roll after being parked increasing the risk of a vehicle accident.
Remedy
Dealers will adjust the parking brake system on the affected vehicles.

Recall number 96V214000 · Recall details

Electrical system: 12v/24v/48v battery: cablesReported October 2, 1996 · 5,000 vehicles affected
What is wrong
The battery cable harness does not have adequate protection from contacting and being damaged by the right engine mount.
Risk
If the battery cable or starter wire insulation is damaged by such contact, a short to ground can occur resulting in overheating of the wiring and possible ignition of surrounding components.
Remedy
Dealers will inspect for chafing of the cable and will add insulation and a tie strap to the battery cable harness.

Recall number 96V193000 · Recall details

Parking brake: conventional: mechanical: linkage and cableReported March 22, 1995 · 290 vehicles affected
What is wrong
The parking brake front cables were built longer than appropriate that reduces the performance of the parking brake in certain circumstances, and fails to fully comply with all the requirements of fmvss no. 105, "hydraulic brake systems."
Risk
Consequence of non-compliance: the effectiveness of the parking brake system on a severe grade may be diminished.
Remedy
Dealers will repair the parking brake system on the affected vehicles.

Recall number 95V058000 · Recall details

Interior lightingReported July 11, 1994 · 6,088 vehicles affected
What is wrong
The transformer used to power the neon center lightbeam can overheat and catch on fire.
Risk
The overheating and fires caused by the neon transformer can result in damage to the lightbeam assembly, the roof of the vehicle, and could result in a vehicle fire.
Remedy
Mark iii dealers will modify the assemblies to eliminate the neon lighting fixture in the vehicle and replace it with incandescent lights operating directly from the vehicle 12-volt battery.

Recall number 94V128000 · Recall details

Parking brake: conventionalReported November 23, 1993 · 106 vehicles affected
What is wrong
These vehicles do not comply with fmvss 105, "hydraulic brake systems." the parking brake application force for a foot operated control system should not exceed 125 pounds to hold the vehicle on a 30% grade. Interference between the parking brake pedal and a wire harness may increase the needed pedal force to greater than 125 pounds to set the parking brake to hold the vehicle on the 30% grade.
Risk
The interference between the foot pedal and the wireharness may not allow the parking brake to fully set. If this occurs when thevehicle is parked on an incline, it may roll, causing a crash.
Remedy
Final stage manufacturers will be informed of this condition and provided with parts and instructions necessary to correct this situation.

Recall number 93V194000 · Recall details

Fuel system, gasolineReported June 8, 1993 · 1,235 vehicles affected
What is wrong
The fuel filler hose or fuel filler vent hose was damaged by a drill bit used to install the dso package attaching hardware onto the floor pan.
Risk
If either of the hoses was penetrated by the drill bit,fuel leakage could result, particularly during fueling of the vehicle. In thepresence of an ignition source, this could result in fire.
Remedy
Replace the fuel filler and vent hoses and relocate the mounting hardware in the floor pan.

Recall number 93V100000 · Recall details

Suspension: rear: shock absorberReported April 27, 1993 · 25,000 vehicles affected
What is wrong
The rear shock crossmember of the frame can crack and separate from the frame.
Risk
Separation of the rear shock crossmember from the framecan result in loss of vehicle control and an accident.
Remedy
Replace the rear chock crossmember with a shock crossmember made of high strength steel.

Recall number 93V073000 · Recall details

Equipment: other: labelsReported August 24, 1992 · 29,052 vehicles affected
What is wrong
The tire certification labels incorrectly identify the vehicle tire requirements as p235/75r15 sl (standard load), rather than as p235/75r15 xl (extra load).
Risk
The certification labels on the affected vehicles do notcomply with fmvss 120, "tire selection and rims for motor vehicles other thanpassenger cars." incorrect tire selection could result in sudden failure ofa tire while the vehicle is in motion, and result in a vehicle accident.
Remedy
Correct tire information labels and installation instructions will be mailed to the owners of these vehicles. Owners will be instructed that dealers can install the label provided if they prefer.

Recall number 92V123000 · Recall details

Seat belts: front: anchorageReported May 4, 1992 · 1,010 vehicles affected
What is wrong
The safety belt anchorage for the rear bench seat failed to comply with the standards of fmvss 210.
Risk
Failure to meet the load requirements of fmvss 210 placethe seat occupants in increased risk of injury in the event of a sudden stopor accident.
Remedy
The manufacture will replace the non-complying safety belt anchorage with a new anchorage that meets the requirements of fmvss 210.

Recall number 91V172000 · Recall details

Fuel system, gasoline: storage: auxillary tank: selector devicesReported September 4, 1991 · 350,000 vehicles affected
What is wrong
The dual fuel tank selector valve may malfunction and cause an overfill condition in one of the fuel tanks, resulting in an overflow of fuel past the filler cap.
Risk
The overflow of fuel past the filler cap causes a fuelleakage, which can result in a fire when exposed to a source of ignition.
Remedy
Replace the dual fuel tank selector valve.

Recall number 91V146000 · Recall details

Power train: automatic transmission: gear position indication (PRNDL)Reported June 1, 1990 · 111,000 vehicles affected
What is wrong
Under certain conditions, the snap ring that locates the park gear on the output shaft of the transmission may fracture.
Risk
When the gear is placed in park, the park gear would notengage, allowing the truck to roll freely if the parking brake is not properlyset. This could result in an accident.
Remedy
Install improved snap ring and revised transmission extension housing.

Recall number 90V101000 · Recall details

Questions about the Ford Econoline recalls

How do I check if my Ford Econoline has an open recall?

Enter your VIN in the VIN decoder on this page to see the recalls for your exact model and year, then confirm with any dealer of the brand or the manufacturer, who can tell you whether the repair was already done on your car.

Do I have to pay for a recall repair?

No. Safety recall repairs are free at any authorized dealer of the brand, even if the car is out of warranty or you are not the first owner.

How many recalls does the Ford Econoline have?

26, covering visibility, back over prevention and equipment.

VIN decoder

See the problems and recalls for an exact car

Buying a used Ford Econoline?

Check the exact car before you pay: accidents, salvage or flood titles, odometer readings and previous owners.

Check its history