Truck has no spare tire, totally missing the assembly and bracket originally used to hold the tire (have a junk one in the bed). The crossmember under the truck is about 50% intact is getting ready to fall off. Brake lines and rocker panals rotted out as well. Holes in the frame starting and a patch was already needed on the frame (drivers side rear). As well as a loose bed. The truck is very clean on top but underneath is rotting away like it has 200000 miles on it(truck is at 77,000). I want to remove the rust and coat it but im scared of punching through cause spots are brittle.
2003 Ford Ranger brakes problems
35 complaints (14% of all complaints for this car). Typical mileage when it fails: 56,000. 6 crashes reported.
- owner complaints
- 35
- of this car's complaints
- 14%
- typical mileage
- 56,000
- crashes
- 6
- recalls
- 0
Which part fails
- Pedals and linkages3
- Foundation components: disc: rotor3
- Antilock/traction control/electronic limited slip3
- Foundation components: disc: pads2
- Foundation components: master cylinder1
- Foundation components: disc1
At what mileage
Complaints by mileage at the time of the problem.
Ford Ranger brakes problems in other years
Specific symptoms reported on the 2003 Ford Ranger brakes
Phrases found in the owners' own descriptions, so one complaint can mention several symptoms.
Related recalls
No recalls on record for this model year.
What 2003 Ford Ranger owners say
Most recent owner complaints, unedited.
The vehicle was riding very rough as though some one was knocking on the engine with a hammer. I took it to the dealer ( gene evans ford ) which is where I purchase it from, all I was told was that is what a truck suppose to sound like. I continue to complain about the roughness of the truck, no one was concern about my complaints. Now here it is september 2010, I take my truck for a oil change and tire rotation in new jersey and the repair shop writes up a invoice stating my rear axle needs an adjustment. The ford dealerships has service my vehicle all this time and to me they made sure this would not be detected. I had an accident on january 4,2014 and my axel is now bent from a small impact because it was no good from the day I bought the truck. Auto nation was going to repair the vehicle and when [xxx] the manager saw the invoices with the diagnosis about the adjustment of the axel and the 2010 date on it, someone there told state farm that I did not want them to fix the truck. In all honesty they are the only one I wanted to handle this repair so they could give me a brand new axel or a brand new vehicle instead they lied to everyone and walked away from the problem. I had and have submitted correspondents to ford also I had ask to speak to ford representatives at several dealerships, I was told because of the high mileage there is nothing they can do. The most peculiar thing is that all the dealership made sure that no one address the problem with the axle although they had been rotating the tires and all and any other kind of repairs they as professionals knew the truck needed. Being a woman needed your vehicle properly maintained as to enjoy the longevity of something you depend on day to day just to have someone to take it for granted to pretend they have done your truck a viable service to keep you safe and on the road at all time. Help!!!! Information redacted pursuant to the freedom of information act (foia), 5 u.s.c. 552(b)(6).
Lost all brakes while driving. Found all brake lines rotted and in need of replacement. While replacing lines, noticed excessive frame and cross member deterioration from rust. Bed cross members completely rusted away and rear spring hangers rusted so bad they are ready to break off.
Bought truck used at 66018 miles truck needed front rotors turned on 2/27/10 @ 79730 miles (rotors warped) replaced front rotors on 12/31/11 (rotors warped) truck again needs front rotors turned on 7/18/13 @103055 miles (rotors warped) to date at approximately every 12,500 miles the front rotors need to be turned. The same brake pads are on from when I bought the truck with 37,037 miles on them.
Tl* the contact owns a 2003 ford ranger. The contact stated that the ABS warning light illuminated. The vehicle was taken to a private mechanic however, the failure was unable to be diagnosed. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure. The vehicle was not repaired. The approximate failure mileage was 78,000 and the current mileage was 96,000.
Tl* the contact owns a 2003 ford ranger. While driving approximately 5 MPH the consumer's son depressed the brake pedal and his foot unintentionally depressed the accelerator pedal due to the close proximity of both pedals. The driver crashed into a fence. The vehicle was not taken to the dealer for diagnostic testing. The vehicle was not repaired. The approximate failure mileage was 18,000. Updated 02/14/12*lj updated 02/22/12
The right rear brake drum had a 2" piece rusted out, the left rear brake had rusted so bad it had broken loose in the drum and the shackles had rusted completely off. The vehicle has never been left outside always garaged, never been in high water or exposed to a high level off salt. The under carriage is always washed after road salt has been applied. The under carriage has more rust than normal for a vehicle taken care of as this one. The mechanic even commented on it. In 2010 the rear shocks had to be replaced because they had been rusted through.
Brake rotors sold by advance auto parts as an "exact fit" for this vehicle were installed without any problems and all associated components for a brake repair (pads, calipers, bearings, seals, ABS rings) were also installed and seemed to fit perfectly. After assembly I noticed that the brake pads were only partially bearing on the brake rotor, with the pads overlapping the edge of the rotors. I did not notice this condition until both new front rotors had been replaced and all components except the tires/wheels had been replaced. Upon further research, the rotors sold as an "exact fit" (selected for me by the counter man at my local advance auto parts store) were approximately 1 inch smaller in diameter as the original equipment rotors. I contacted advance customer service to inform them of this problem and they denied any responsibility for installation of improper parts. Several reviews posted on the store's website indicate that other people have installed these rotors and are driving around with them despite the fact they are not the proper rotors for this 4 wheel antilock brake vehicle (they do fit rangers with rear wheel antilock brakes). This is a murphy's law situation in which a consumer can install these parts and drive around with them, unaware of the potential for brake failure. The final installation looks normal and I would not have noticed unless I had made a close inspection and found that the brake pads were not in full contact with the rotor surface because of the smaller than specification diameter. This is a serious safety hazard because the advance auto parts website and store computer system list them as an exact fit for the vehicle when, in fact, they are not. They can be installed and driven without the installer realizing that they are the wrong size. This requires an immediate notice and recall and advance should be sanctioned.
2003 ford ranger steel brake line rotted and failed. 26,000 miles well maintained vehicle. Cause brake failure. Fortunately no accident incident. Steel line rotted at fitting over rear axle where it attaches to flex line to the axle housing. Other rust and corrosion issues plague this vehicle.
This problem has appeared all of a sudden without warning. Brakes fade at low speeds. The pedal sinks to the floorboard. This condition occurs randomly. I have topped off the brake fluid reservoir. This has not changed the situation. I've reviewed the internet for potential remedies and have discovered many others with the same or similar problem.
Questions about the 2003 Ford Ranger brakes
Does the 2003 Ford Ranger have brakes problems?
Owners have filed 35 complaints about the brakes of the 2003 Ford Ranger, 14% of all its complaints.
At what mileage do 2003 Ford Ranger brakes problems start?
The typical (median) mileage in owner complaints is 56,000 miles.
Was there a recall on the 2003 Ford Ranger brakes?
There is no recall for this problem on this model year.
What year does the Ford Ranger have bad brakes?
The Ford Ranger model years with the most brakes complaints are 1994 (115 complaints), 1999 (88 complaints) and 2000 (78 complaints).
Other 2003 Ford Ranger problems
Body 43Acceleration 40Engine 27Airbags 25Suspension 23Fuel system 18Electrical 17Transmission 16Tires 10Seat belts 9Steering 7Lights 6Locks 5Wheels 4Seats 2Visibility 1
VIN decoder
See the problems and recalls for an exact car
Buying a used 2003 Ford Ranger?
Check the exact car before you pay: accidents, salvage or flood titles, odometer readings and previous owners.
Check its history