1992 Ford Taurus suspension problems

Filed May 18, 2007 · Suspension · 14,526 miles · IA · 1 injury

I bought 3 ford taurus wagons in 6 months and the springs broke in all of the 3 latest cars. Both springs broke wile I was driving ,puncturing 1 tire. No repair made yet.

Filed Jan 12, 2006 · Suspension · 120,000 miles · MA

Dt*: the contact stated while driving a snapping noise was heard in the front left side. The vehicle was driven home where it was determine d the left front tire was flat. The sway bar bracket tore away from the strut and punctured the tire. The repair personnel suggested replacing the shock absorber and strut. There was the federal safety agency recall campaign 94e036000. However ,this vehicle was not included included due to the VIN.

Filed May 20, 2005 · Suspension · 129,000 miles · NY

Ford taurus, 1992, front k-frame broke loose from chassis resulting in a lock-up of the steering, fortunately at a low speed, thereby endangering the driver and passenger of the vehicle. The vehicle was towed to a local repair shop where we learned that this was not unusual in the 1989-1994 ford taurus cars. The failure of the structural member was caused by normal rust damage to the front a-frame. I would have expected to find this design defect on this site.*ak

Filed Feb 3, 2005 · Suspension · 43,689 miles · IA

The vehicle is a 1992 ford taurus wagon. On july 26, 1996 the coil springs broke puncturing the front tire while backing out of the service department of midas for an oil change. Ford at the time said there were no recalls on the vehicle so therefore it was repaired at midas. This morning, february 3, 2005 the coil springs again broke puncturing the driver's side front tire and will again need necessary repairs totally approximately $450.00. Called ford said there were never any recalls on this year vehicle but information from the internet indicated that ford motor company recalled nearly 900,000 ford taurus and mercury sable 1999, 2000, and 2001 sedans stating in cold weather states salt from roads could corrode and fracture the cars' front coil springs and they were installing protective shields in the recalled vehicles. My concern is that even though this model is older and there were no recalls what is the safety of driving this vehicle? I wonder what the outcome would be had this vehicle had the coil spring break while on the freeway...would you be able to maintain control of the car? The safety of this vehicle greatly concerns us.

Filed Mar 23, 2004 · Suspension · MI

I have owned this taurus since, 1993-1994, it had 43,000 miles on it, from a dealer (flannery ford). I have had motor mounts replaced, water pumps (2) (almost $1,000), brakes and calipers(too many to remember), struts (too many to remember), ignition. This past saturday, while my mother was driving the car to the repair shop, because the inside door lights would not go off and the alarm bell (that dings when you leave the key in or lights on), the right rear wheel fell off the car. The entire tie rods had to be replaced, struts and springs (that was $1,000). I have had to have the oil pan replaced because it rusted out and had engine mounts replaced again during this procedure (that was almost $1,000). I can only remember receiving 1 recall notice and the car was taken in for repair.

Filed Jan 6, 2004 · Suspension · NJ

After the vehicle was serviced for recall 94e036000 for front shock absorber, vehicle experienced the same problem . Consumer bought a used vehicle. Dealer stated nothing they could do. Computer showed the struts were replaced.

Filed Jul 30, 2003 · Suspension · MA

While a mechanic was inspecting the vehicle both rear mount are warp and corrode on the driver side. Please fill in additional information dealer is aware of the problem.

Filed Mar 21, 2002 · Body, Brakes · OH

Consumer states recall repairs were done, however on one occasion while driving consumer could hear a crunching noise and was told that the front subframe bolts were bad, consumer was informed that because of the recall with the rear bolts being bad it caused stress to the front since the frame is all one piece, ford stated that this was not part of the recall and repairs would be at the consumers expense. Brakes were replaced. Front wheel bearings were replaced.

Filed Jan 13, 2002 · Brakes, Engine · CO

For a car with such low mileage, have had to replace or fix significant number items (serious safety items included!!) that failed. Hope manufacturer can help reimburse costs. Per research, these items should not break down at this mileage level! No safety defect mentioned.

Filed Aug 2, 2001 · Suspension · MI

Left front strut coil spring broke, causing end of broken coil spring to slice open tire, causing a tire blowout and suspension of car dropping, resulting in damage to front tie-rod end as weight of vehicle fell on steering mechanism. Speed at break around 5 MPH as daughter was pulling away from stop. This is daughter's vehicle; and, she paid bill from her college savings. Considering mileage & age, I think ford should at least pay for 50% of total bill ($618). Ford customer serv. Rep. Told me there was in fact a recall, but my VIN # doesn't qualify me for a refund. Judging from your other logged complaints, there seems to be a major fault with ford's reasoning on who's elegible and who's not. Thank you for having this site for these defect investigation and checking into this complaint.