1993 Lincoln Town Car problems

Filed Aug 23, 2019 · Acceleration, Brakes · 83,000 miles · NH

I was working on doing maintenance on my car. Next thing I know, there's a fire. I got it out quickly enough with the original extinguisher. The speed control harness, which had a recall at one point, is burned and a brake line busted. 9f924 is the number for the part. I do not know for certain if this was ever replaced. But it must have been hot enough to catch brake fluid on fire

Filed Jul 28, 2015 · Electrical, Transmission · 100,000 miles · AL

Tl* the contact owns a 1993 lincoln town car. Once the vehicle was started, it began to make a jerking motion and all of the warning lights illuminated on the instrument panel. The vehicle stalled. The failures recurred multiple times. The vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. The manufacturer was not notified of the failures. The approximate failure mileage was 100,000.

Filed Dec 8, 2014 · Electrical · 100,000 miles · WI · fire

Tl* the contact owns a 1993 lincoln town car. While driving 60 MPH, the contact observed smoke emitting from the driver side of the dashboard and the fuse box. The vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. The VIN was unavailable. The manufacturer was not notified of the failure. The approximate failure mileage was 100,000.

Filed Jul 5, 2011 · Electrical · 139,000 miles · GA · fire

The car had been driven like every other day.the car had been parked in my drive way for about 3 to 4 hours.I was inside my house when I heard someone honking outside.when I looked out the window the car was smoking from under the hood.I got my phone and called 911.by time the fire department showed up the car was already in flames.

Filed Dec 20, 2010 · Electrical · 160,000 miles · MO · fire

I purchased a used 1993 lincoln town car on dec 17. On december 19 the vehicle caught fire in the garage. It had not been driven since purchase or stared. Fire caused severe damage to garage. Completely burned the car. Fire department came and the investigator stated it was speed control , since I just purchased the vehicle I was unaware of the recall.

Filed Jan 29, 2010 · Lights · GA · fire

Brake lights went out so we replaced the bulbs to no avail. Replaced the fuse and fixed the brake lights. Drove car to work and back thursday 1/28/10. Parked car in driveway at 7pm. Awoken at 3am to car engine completely in flames. Researched and found a recall the federal safety agency campaign id #: 99v124000. Damage to surrounding houses and nearby car.

Filed Jan 25, 2010 · Electrical · 60,000 miles · AL

Dash control module that controls vehicle speedometer and odometer causes all the digital dash the flash like strobe lights. Driver can determine speed of vehicle and odometer records intermittently. D car also has a smell og burning wires or plastic.

Filed Sep 14, 2009 · Acceleration · 115,000 miles · TX · fire

My 1993 lincoln town car caught fire and burned up. The car had been parked outside for several hours before he fire started. The ford company claimed (based only on pictures that I sent them) that there was too much fire damage to determine whether the fire was a result of a defective part which had a recall.. The fire department's report, which I also provided to ford, states that the fire appeared to be an under the hood electrical fire. I received a notice from ford that the speed control deactivation switch was being recalled. The recall notice states that ford cannot be confident that over many years in service, the type of scds installed on my vehicle will not leak, posing the risk of an underhood fire. This condition may occur either when the vehicle is parked or when it is being operated, even if the speed control is not used. Yet, when I submitted my claim, I was told that the fire had caused too much damage to determine the cause and was asked to contact my insurance company. To my knowledge, the did not send anyone to inspect the car before making this determination because I had and still have the car in storage. This is a request that my claim be reconsidered and that I be compensated for my losses in this matter.

Filed Jul 29, 2009 · Brakes · 140,000 miles · CA

1993 lincoln town car cruise control would not turn off after applying brakes. While driving the vehicle for approximately 15 miles with the cruise control set at 55 MPH I approached a red light and applied the break and the cruise control did not turn off. To avoid a collision the breaks were applied as hard as possible and I put the automatic transmission in neutral, whereas the engine RPM raced but the vehicle stopped accelerating. After the light turned green I put the vehicle back in drive and preceded to the curb where I again put the vehicle in park and turned off the engine. I inspected the throttle and cruise control linkage and found nothing out of the ordinary. I disconnected the cruise control linkage and was able to start the vehicle and the engine idled normally. When I attempted to put the vehicle in drive the transmission would not shift out of park. The vehicle was towed to a mechanic and upon his inspection his only finding was a blown fuse for the brake lights. He changed the fuse and the transmission would now shift out of park. He test drove the vehicle and used the cruise control without any abnormal anomalies.

Filed May 29, 2009 · Acceleration, Electrical · 75,000 miles · PA · fire

Tl*the contact owns a 1993 lincoln town car. After parking the vehicle, the contact heard a popping noise and noticed flames shooting out from the front passenger and driver's side wheel wells. Seconds later, the entire vehicle was engulfed in flames. The fire and police department arrived and the fire was extinguished. A fire report was filed and there were no injuries. The fire marshall stated that the fire was probably caused by an electrical failure. The contact was advised to call the ford/lincoln manufacturer and file a complaint. The failure mileage was 75,000. Updated 06/10/09 *bf the consumer mailed in recall letter regarding the vehicle speed control deactivation switch and the part was installed march 12, 2008. The fire department stated the fire may have been a result of a fuel leak. Updated 06/11/09.