Check a VIN

2003 Toyota RAV4 transmission complaints

Page 3 of 8: complaints 41 to 70 of 209, newest first, as owners wrote them.

See the summary of 2003 Toyota RAV4 transmission problems: which part fails, at what mileage and related recalls.

Filed Oct 21, 2014 · Transmission · 140,433 miles · WV

Part 3 of 3the salesman encouraged my parents to keep it because they wouldn't get much of a trade in, so I had my rav towed to my house. I called the sm of love lexus to inform him of my problem, to see if there was any recourse from him and to also express that I was completely unsatisfied.I reminded him that I had requested that they test drive on the four lane so they could understand my complaint of the hesitation of going in gear.he stated on the phone he did not recall, however they did drive it on the back lot. I asked him can you obtain a speed of 55mph in your lot, his response was ?no?. At that point I decided I would not be dealing with that service department any longer.in 2/2014 I began investigating how to get rid of my rav and stumbled upon the class action lawsuit that was described above.I have only received 50% of the benefits awarded to me by the extended warranty and I don?t understand why I would not have been informed of the whole thing.I didn't get a notice from the corporation of this problem, love lexus also failed to disclose my rights to having my transmission replaced along with the ECM under this extended warranty.

Filed Oct 21, 2014 · Transmission · 140,433 miles · WV

Part 2 of 3 this was at my cost and at that time I expressed my concern that it was an older car and with all these problems occurring, what was his opinion on trading. He didn't show any real interest but did state some have had great longevity and others not so much. After leaving that visit my car still did not shift properly and was still harsh in reverse.within a month or so my check engine light came back on again. While I was extremely reluctant to take it back to love lexus I did. I expressed my complaint once again about it not being quite right and requested they take it out on the four lane so that it could be driven up past 55mph. He diagnostics ran again and informed me that my fuel cap wasn''t on tight enough. I left embarrassed; however, my car still was not driving right.I continued to drive this car with the same issues for the next year and in october 2013 my check engine light came back on. I took my car to a & e service center.they checked my transmission fluid and stated in smelled burnt, their diagnostics stated it was my transmission and the only thing they could recommend in lieu of replacing my transmission was to flush it and replace the filter and fluid. They stated that with the amount of metal shavings they found which they showed me, this was the equivalent of putting a bandaid on a broken bone.this only lasted about a month and on 11-12-13 I had it towed to aamco. The estimate was $2767.19. Due to me being in a financial hardship my parents gave me their 2002 4-runner and purchased a new car for themselves.we originally was trading the rav. .

Filed Oct 21, 2014 · Transmission · 140,433 miles · WV

Primary complaint: purposeful deception regarding full benefits of extended warranty of ECM and/or transmission replacement under class action milligan vtoyota.the events leading to my transmission issues began in 7/ 2012. I had problem getting out of my parents steep driveway so I took it to the garage that had been changing my oil in sissonville wv. Upon diagnostics they reported to me a solenoid code which indicated a possible transmission issue. I was referred to aamco transmissions, however the check engine light had been reset and they were unable to get any codes. After being told it could possibly be something with my exhaust as well, I was referred to quality exhausts but was unable to be seen. Then proceeded barker's in dunbar. After test driving and evaluating he stated I had broken motor mounts. I made an appointment 7/18/12. When the technician placed my car on the rack he stated he was not sure what was wrong but it was not motor mounts and with the symptoms it was having I should have my transmission looked at. I had it towed to love lexus in saint albans.there I was told my ECM was in need of replacement.he explained it was under warranty. I was caught off guard due the age of the vehicle. He went on to say the ravs have had some problems with these computers and an extended warranty was placed and applied to them.the harsh shifting had not been completely resolved. In 9/12 my check engine light came back on.I took it back to love lexus and explained the condition as stated above.I asked if they would please test drive it to make sure they understood my complaint.after the diagnostics were complete I was told a fuel sensor had gone bad and was in need of replacement. Part 1 of 2

Filed Oct 3, 2014 · Acceleration, Transmission · 146,000 miles · CA

On 9/30/2014 was trying to pull out of a parking lot to turn left and my car would not accelerate. I almost got hit by approaching cars that I would have ordinarily had plenty of time to clear. I was able to steer into the left turn lane and stop to avoid collision but had trouble after that picking up enough speed to get to the right lane. I took my car in immediately for inspection and it was noted that the transmission and ECM needed replaced. I have since found information on a recall I never received for defective ECM's that cause transmission failure. Apparently a 10 year or 150,000 extended warranty was issued in 2010, but I was also never informed of that. My mileage qualifies but I bought my car in dec 2002 so I am past the time limit. Since repairs exceed the blue book value of my car, it has no trade in value. This was an unsafe situation (that could have been worse on the freeway)' and an unfair outcome for me financially.

Filed Sep 30, 2014 · Electrical, Transmission · 92,400 miles · NH

Harsh shifting; automatic shifting erratic; lurching, especially when starting from stop. Local garage says transmission is shot and requires replacement ($3100).

Filed Sep 28, 2014 · Electrical, Transmission · 119,600 miles · NJ

This letter is in reference to an issue, namely, harsh shift condition, on our 2003 toyota rav4, the vehicle presently shows approximately 119, 600 miles. According to toyota warranty policy bulletin no. Pol 10-03, dated 07/09/10, page 1, toyota has received reports that certain 2001 through 2003 model year rav4 vehicles equipped with an automatic transaxle may exhibit a harsh shift condition if this condition occurs, the check engine light may illuminate and/or the vehicle may begin to shift harshly. This warranty is being offered for 10 years or 150,000 miles please verify VIN applicability for this csp by performing a VIN inquiry before completing the repair. On page 2 we checked the applicable VIN ranges and observed that our vehicle was included in this customer support program (csp).our respectful request is that toyota honor the warranty enhancement for our rav4. Based on a telephone call to toyota motor sales customer experience center in torrance ca, the company rep. Said toyota would not honor the extended warranty. I believe that the part (ECM) was defective and should be replaced under extended warranty because the vehicle is under 150,00 miles but just over the ten year limit. Thank you.

Filed Sep 5, 2014 · Engine, Transmission · 130,000 miles · GA

I'm the owner of a 2003 rav4, purchased from a toyota dealer in 2011. Last week, I experienced a time lapse of my car shifting into first gear, in my opinion, a safety hazard. This morning I took the car to a mechanic and began searching the web for any recalls for a 2003 rav4, there are none. However, on this site, I discovered that I am one of many who have this complaint, and that we ,the consumer, all share the same results from toyota. You missed the deadline. It was on this website that I learned of a class action lawsuit about the ECM defect with my rav4 (see www.rv4ecmsettlement.com), the letter was supposedly sent to all who own a 2003 rav4. I never received this letter. Nor did I receive any type of notification from toyota re: an extended warranty,or for that matter any type of time sensitive dates to capture any type of recovery from toyota. Toyota claims they work with a company who gathers owners information from the dmv. Toyota calls this issue with the transmission not shifting properly into gear, a "customer malfunction support program"...and the catch is that you only have 10 years from the date of first use to notify them of your "malfunction"...my car missed the deadline by 6 months and again, let me reiterate that I was never notified by anyone about this issue, nor is this issue termed a recall item. My question is why not? Why is this not a recall, when this situation is clearly a safety issue. If you are in a car that will not move into first gear, and then the car unexpectedly jerks into acceleration, is that not a safety concern?? Toyota's term "harsh shift of auto trans axle" " my complaint and opinion is that toyota has been deceptive with their consumers. And these attorneys? Why did I not hear from them?? And furthermore, will I hear back from the federal safety agency ??? How can the consumer make a deadline, if they are not notified???

Filed Aug 7, 2014 · Engine, Transmission · 75,249 miles · MD

Vehicle driven by elderly widowed mother (josephine beasley, age 70) no more than 6,200 miles per year and began experiencing harsh shift in transmission in march 2014. Aamco informed us that a malfunctioning electronic computer module (ECM) caused the damage to transmission. Aamco technician notified us that the ECM repair claims are covered under a toyota settlement agreement (www.rav4ecmsettlement.com). Repair cost for transmission $2,890 and ECM part $1,227.91 paid for out of pocket. The rav4 was purchased from carmax on april 18, 2009; elderly mother does not have access or understanding of internet. She did not realize that she had to register the vehicle with toyota in order to receive recall notices or any other important information pertaining to her vehicle from the manufacturer. Contacted toyota customer service and they refused to reimburse the cost of repair as the vehicle exceeded the 10 year in service warranty period even though it is within 150,000 miles limit. When she drove the vehicle off the carmax lot it had 44,213 miles on odometer and on august 7, 2014, odometer reading is 75,374. Sad that the elderly are being taken advantage of because of their lack of technical knowledge.

Filed Mar 24, 2014 · Transmission · 113,638 miles · VA

My 2003 rav4 developed a very harsh shift taking off between first and 2nd gear. I took it to our local toyota dealer (berglund oak ridge toyota> lynchburg, va) and they confirmed a diagnosed stored trouble code p0755-shift "b" malfunction. They quoted about $4700.00 to replace the ECM and put in a rebuilt transmission. No financial help from the dealer, even though they were aware this has been a major problem for the 2001-2003 rav4's. Toyota extended the warranty a few years ago to 10 years or 150,000 miles, which ever came first. I purchased the vehicle less than a year ago, not aware that this was a documented and expected problem with this vehicle. The dealer suggested I contact customer experience at 1‑800‑331‑4331 and ask them to consider covering all or part of the cost. The vehicle has a value of $7500.00 per kbb. I called and got case # 1403130959. I spoke to rashine . It took a few days but they got back to me and said because it exceeded the 10 year window (2003-2013) they would not cover any of the costs. I pleaded that I have well under the 150,000 mile mark and that they readily say 80% of all toyota's are on the road for 20 years. This has another 10 years to go. They know this is and has been a factory design fault per all the recorded problems. I don't feel I should have to pay $4700.00 in repairs for their design failure. In their 1.2 billion $ recent settlement,they said" putting customers first", "want to earn our trust", "serve customers" "take responsibilities seriously". Wow, what a lie and let down. How can they get away with this? It has happened to countless 1000's of people. Toyota should be required to make this a recall and fix for 0$. This car is unsafe to drive as is and will stall in traffic and cause accidents. Thank you for listening. Please help me and hold toyota responsible for a terrible design flaw.

Filed Mar 11, 2014 · Transmission · 115,000 miles · FL

I was stopped at a red light for several minutes and upon acceleration my vehicle was extremely sluggish. After a few seconds it seemed to "jump" into gear. I also noticed that when I was slowing down it would almost do the same thing, being sluggish. Fortunately there were no accidents involving my vehicle, but I took it to toyota and they said the computer needed to be replaced. I was not aware of any recall of the vehicle until I looked online and saw several thousand of them had been recalled.

Filed Feb 19, 2014 · Transmission · NY

2003 toyota rav 4. Consumer writes in regards to transmission failure. *smd the consumer stated on may 14, 2013, the vehicle did not respond, when she applied the accelerator pedal. When she attempted to shift gears, a loud noise emitted from the vehicle, and the check engine light illuminated. The consumer was informed, the vehicle needed a transmission computer.

Filed Feb 6, 2014 · Transmission · 100,000 miles · FL

Tl* the contact owns a 2003 toyota rav4. The contact stated that the vehicle failed to respond when the accelerator pedal was engaged and the vehicle stalled intermittently. The vehicle was taken to the dealer who stated that the ECM failed. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was not notified of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 100,000.

Filed Feb 5, 2014 · Transmission · 109,000 miles · IA

My 2003 toyota rav4 had a faulty ECM affecting the transmission and had to be replaced. This was causing the transmission to shift very erratically and could have caused an accident/injury. Toyota knew about this faulty part and there was not a public recall; they replaced parts as they failed and extended that warranty because of a class action lawsuit. Now the warranty is 10 yrs/150,000. So I am outside of the warranty by maybe a year and not even close to the mileage. I contacted toyota to inform them that my ECM had failed hoping they would at least apologize (reimbursement would be welcome too) but the lady I talked to said there was no recall related to my VIN number, which I know to be a lie! Toyota put out a faulty part and must be made to replace any that fail no matter the mileage or length of time! This faulty part has also damaged some transmissions and they must be made to replace/reimburse for those as well. My ECM has been replaced and I am not sure but am afraid I am one of the ones with a damaged transmission. Please help!

Filed Feb 5, 2014 · Transmission · 74,500 miles · PA

While driving approximately 0 - 5 MPH, transmission failed. The failure recurred several times and check engine light came on. The vehicle was taken to a independent mechanic, who diagnosed that the transmission computer would need to be replaced. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was not made aware of the failure. The approximate failure mileage was 74500.

Filed Jan 19, 2014 · Transmission · 132,015 miles · CA

I was driving my 2003 rav4, entering a highway when the transmission failed to engage immediately when I accelerated. It hesitated for a few seconds then finally lurched forward. I was very nearly struck by a vehicle on the highway because I was unable to accelerate as expected. Now the rav frequently behaves oddly when shifting, sometimes refusing to upshift, suddenly downshifting at inappropriate times. The dealer advises the problem is likely a defect in the electronic control module (ECM) as covered in a tsb. From research recently I have learned that this ECM defect was a known problem beginning in 2006. I am amazed there has been no recall to repair this very serious safety issue. Now it appears I will be on the hook for a very expensive ECM replacement. Even though I have religiously taken this vehicle to a toyota dealer regularly for maintenance, they never once mentioned this known problem. Yet when I discussed this behavior with one of the dealer's service advisors yesterday, he seemed quite familiar with this issue. Please call for a recall on this issue.

Filed Dec 17, 2013 · Transmission · 67,597 miles · PA

Tl* the contact owns a 2003 toyota rav 4. The contact stated that while driving approximately 5 MPH, transmission failed. The failure recurred several times and without warning. The vehicle was taken to a independent mechanic twice, who diagnosed that the transmission would need to be replaced. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure. The approximate failure mileage was 67,597.

Filed Dec 10, 2013 · Transmission · 96,000 miles · TX

Tl* the contact owns a 2003 toyota rav4. The contact stated that while driving 65 MPH, the vehicle stalled without warning. In addition, the vehicle would sporadically accelerate without warning. The contact took the vehicle to a local mechanic, who stated the transmission needed to be replaced. The contact called the manufacturer and filed a complaint. The failure mileage was 96,000.

Filed Nov 29, 2013 · Transmission · 95,000 miles · AZ

Toyota has known for years that its ECM unit would ultimately fail. This failure has caused transmissions to fail as well. Pulling out into a busy intersection in 3 rd gear, as they are prone to do could cause an accident. Toyota should recall these. My vehicle is exactly 3 months too old to be repaired under their warranty.

Filed Nov 13, 2013 · Acceleration, Transmission · 136,000 miles · MA

Hi I own a toyota rav4 2003 since 2009 this is a serious safety issue. I am asking the federal safety agency to order a recall to have toyota fix this problem before someone gets killed or seriously injured. The problem is that the car often does not accelerate as it should. When headed up and accelerating from a stop, the car sputters before jerking into gear and accelerating. And then about 5-8 seconds later the car would jolt into gear. Also, when already moving and going up even a slight hill, when I press the accelerator to maintain speed, the car sputters as it shifts from second to third gear before jerking into third gear. Through the internet,I almost got hit a few times. I learned that the ECM is a computer (electronic control module) that controls the transmission and other components, that toyota has known about this ECM manufacturing defect on 2001 to 2003 rav4s now I have to spend lots of money that it wasn't in my budget,..the toyota knew about this problem, why they never had a recall? Can someone do something about it?

Filed Nov 8, 2013 · Transmission · 103,000 miles · MD

My husband and I purchased our 2003 toyota rav4 with an automatic transmission in june 2003. The car now has 103,000 miles on it. It recently began to have a serious safety problem. Aside from the issue of fairness to the customer, this is a serious safety issue. I am asking the federal safety agency to order a recall to have toyota fix this problem before someone gets killed or seriously injured. The problem is that the car often does not accelerate as it should. When headed up even a slight hill and accelerating from a stop, the car sputters before jerking into gear and accelerating. I was making a left turn in that situation and almost got broadsided when my car sputtered and an oncoming car barely slowed down in time to avoid hitting me. Also, when already moving and going up even a slight hill, when I press the accelerator to maintain speed, the car sputters as it shifts from second to third gear before jerking into third gear. The toyota dealer to whom I took the car said the problem is the ECM and the cost to repair it is about $1,000. Through the internet, I learned that the ECM is a computer (electronic control module) that controls the transmission and other components, that toyota has known about this ECM manufacturing defect on 2001 to 2003 rav4s since at least 2006, that toyota has issued service bulletins to its dealers on how to fix the problem, and that toyota has even extended the warranty to 10 years or 100,000 miles to cover this manufacturing defect. The federal safety agency website shows other complaints from people like me where the problem surfaced just after the extended warranty period ended. To reiterate, this is a known widespread problem with 2001 to 2003 rav4s, it is a manufacturing defect, it affects the car?s ability to accelerate properly when needed, and as such it represents a serious safety issue. Please recall these rav4s before somebody gets killed!

Filed Nov 7, 2013 · Acceleration, Body · 65,507 miles · AK

Experience a hard shift jerking motion when driving my car and almost got hit twice due to the car jerking and immediately slowing down. I took it in to kendall toyota of anchorage right away and then read online that there was a class action lawsuit and enhanced warranty of 2001-2003 toyotas because of the malfunction of the ECM and transmission. This car is not safe to drive! Toyota kendall said it would be $6,000 to replace both the ECM and transmission and that toyota would only pay half because the car was 10 years old. This car only has 60,000 miles on it and the enhanced warranty has been extended twice due to complaints with the court. I did not get my car fixed because I could not afford it and I think toyota should pay the full 6k to fix it. I'm amazed at how many other people have had this issue and toyota first issued a recall and was sued in court because they refused to acknowledge the serious malfunction of their vehicles.

Filed Oct 20, 2013 · Acceleration, Engine · 76,970 miles · GA

2003 rav4 with automatic transmission started having trouble accelerating from a stop. There seemed to be hardly any power when the gas pedal was pressed, and then about 5-8 seconds later the car would jolt into gear. This problem would happen also when increasing speed, or any time the gas pedal was pressed down. The car was taken to an auto shop where they said the transmission was broken and needed to be replaced. I am a very conservative driver (I never try to accelerate too quickly), and this trusty toyota hasn't ever had any engine problems... Ever! There are less than 77,000 miles on the vehicle.

Filed Sep 30, 2013 · Acceleration, Engine · 80,001 miles · CA

I purchased the rav4 in late july, 2013. The rav4 had 78,000 miles on the odometer. I paid $9,000+ for the rav4. At 80,000 miles the automatic transmission began having shifting problems such as jerking between gears, very sluggish response during acceleration and horrendous gas mileage. I get about 8 miles per gallon. Took it to the dealer, they ran diagnostics on my car and discovered that the problems fall "within the parameters" of the service bulletin no.: tc-10-034 except the "in service" date of my vehicle was march 8, 2003 thereby making me ineligible for the 10 year warranty by 4 months. This is ridiculous!!! This is a toyota screwup and has nothing to do with road conditions or owner neglect. I bought this car so my daughter can continue her daycare. She shuttles pre-school age children to various recreation facilities and my wife, who has terminal cancer, often accompanies her so she can spend as much quality time with her before the eventuality. Now I'm reading that this particular rav4 problem can be extremely dangerous. If toyota "cares for it's customers", how can this be a service bulletin and not a recall. This defect should be addressed regardless of mileage or date of service. I just spent over $9,000 for a 10 year old car because it was a toyota. "it'll last forever". I called the toyota customer complaint phone number and all I got was contempt. Her name was [xxx] and her argument was "toyota was very kind in extending the warranty for you", it's your fault for not reading it". Yeah right, it's my fault for not following your screwups for the past ten years. I want my car fixed!! I can't afford $5,000 for a transmission, ECM and computer reboot. This is a toyota problem and I, the customer, demand to be heard. If toyota truly "cares for its customers", they have an obligation to do the right thing. Information redacted pursuant to the freedom of information act (foia), 5 u.s.c. 552(b)(6).

Filed Aug 20, 2013 · Engine, Transmission · 93,900 miles · NJ

Tl* the contact owns a 2003 toyota rav4. The contact stated that while driving approximately 5 MPH, the vehicle was jerking violently as the check engine warning light illuminated. The check engine warning light would illuminate intermittently. The vehicle was taken to a dealer where it was diagnosed that the computer and the power transmission needed to be replaced. The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The vehicle was not repaired. The approximate failure and current mileage was 93,900.

Filed Jul 16, 2013 · Transmission · 133,796 miles · MI

I started experiencing a transmission shifting problem on 7/2/13. It has been intermittent since that date. On 7/10/13 the problem became more pronounced and frequent. When proceeding forward from a stop the vehicle would start to advance, then shift out of gear. It has resulted in near miss rearend and side crashes. I made an appointment with my mechanic for 7/15/13. Diagnostic testing showed the problem to be a faulty engine control computer. Research turned up a toyota service bulletin (tsb 015610) describing the problem I was having. Even though they were aware of a safety issue, they chose not to do repairs until the problem manifested itself.

Filed Jul 2, 2013 · Fuel system, Steering · 80,048 miles · AR · crash

I was at a stop sign no gas, turned down hill in snow car accelerated going straight into downed tree. My vehicle is not on the recall list and has had sticking accelerator, rear end clunking noise and power steering has made it where I am afraid to drive vehicle. My service animal hit the windshield that shattered when vehicle accelerated and had to slam on brakes at another time. I've had other near misses and two left of center tickets with power steering issues. I have taken into toyota for steering and check engine light and they will not even write service ticket. They filled power steering fluid said no problem. They keep resetting check engine light stating its gas cap. This car is a lemon, transmission problems, electrical system, computer. This is the first new vehicle I ever bought and wish I would have stuck with used.

Filed Jul 1, 2013 · Acceleration, Transmission · 127,000 miles · MA

The car would engage 2nd and 3rd gears at the same time causing temporary lock up of the rear wheels and loss of control. Found out about a tsb and class action suite regarding this issue affecting the ecu while researching the problem. Contacted toyota regarding the issue and they informed me that my 2003 rav4 was not covered because it had been put in service june of 2003. I am appalled this is not a recall as it is clearly a safety issue if loss of control of the vehicle is possible. This could be fatal if it were to happen to on a slippery road or going around a corner.

Filed May 27, 2013 · Driver assistance, Electrical · 188,400 miles · DC

On or about may 5, 2013 I noticed my car started to hard shift, though I was driving as usual. The problem happens off and on and is most noticeable when waiting at a stop sign, red light or drive thru at a restaurant. The shift jolt is most noticeable when needing to accelerate or shifting into drive--it doesn't happen when I go into reverse. The shift jolt sometimes is accompanied by a thud noise. On may 7, 2013 I contacted toyota headquarters and discuss this with a customer service representative at 1‑800‑331‑4331. She transferred me to a rude and cantankerous woman who seemed to have heard the story before. She stated I need to go to a dealership and get a diagnostic, which costs $100 in my area. She then stated that if any of the following codes appear: codes: p0750, p0753, p0755, p0758 or p0760 that I would need to replace ECM module first, if still problem the faulty module could've messed up the transmission. She conceded that toyota issued a bulletin to the dealerships and apparently it is a widespread problem. At some point I received a toyota internal case number. She said there was nothing she could do for me as I am not under warranty. I have 188,000+ miles on my car and apparently if it is not under 150,000 mile warranty. I take very good care of my car and it is not my fault the problem did not appear within a randomly selected mileage they chose. Toyota admitted they knew of the problem and they are liable for any manufacturer's defect of the ECM/transmission. I request your assistance in getting my car repaired for free as it is toyota's faulty/defective part that is now causing my car problems. *tr the consumer stated after getting the repairs done, toyota refused to reimburse her for the repairs. They wouldn't even consider partial payment. Even though, a customer service representative initially told her she would need to get the repairs done and ten toyota would reimburse her. Updated 12/16/13

Filed May 16, 2013 · Transmission · 1 miles · CO

I purchased my veh in jan 2003.next day, I noticed my veh was not able to drive uphill. At 50k miles in 2010, I went to dealer with a recall letter. My complaint:cust having difficulty driving uphill-won't accel-get stuck at 45-50 MPH. Veh is shifting harsh & cust stated that she is having problems with trans.cust thinks that this is part of the ztl letter she got in mail. Their response was:test drove veh & duplicated the lack of power found veh had 3 floor mats under the accel pedal not allowing full travel removed mats & veh ran & shifted fine. I left disappointed & they charged me. Problem grew & my car started acting strange even though I was keeping up with maintanence. In march 2013, my car wouldn't even start & I thought it must be the battery, & got it towed & had battery replaced.when I was driving, it started shaking. It was strange but I didn't read into it until late april 2013, I was waiting for green light to make l turn & my car resisted & pulled back harshly. Since then I was scared of driving my veh. One day it was fine mostly but another day similar issue, stopping & driving was scary & it couldn't go higher than 20 MPH. The last time I drove, I could hardly put my car in the garage. I had it towed again to toyota for service. My car has 65k miles & they told me ecu has to be replaced & if doesn't work, I should pay for a new trans. I contacted manufacturer, they said they will pay for the ecu but not for transmission (if necessary) nor for labor cost. I'm frustrated with this issue, they should replace my trans even if new ecu makes it look like my car is repaired but I don't believe it. The defect shortened the transmission's life.I will never feel safe again in my car with the existing trans. The manufacturer should take full responsibility, pay for damages, not demand on warranty, inform customers & apologize for acting like nothing is wrong.

Filed May 2, 2013 · Transmission · NJ

2003 toyota rav 4. Consumer writes in regards to transmission failure. *smd the consumer learned toyota knew there was an issue and extended the warranty on the transmission to 10 years/150,000 miles in 2006. The consumer had a 110,000 miles on his vehicle, but was five months over the extended warranty. The consumer stated it cost $800 plus tax, to locate the problem and would cost $4,000 to replace the transmission.

VIN decoder

See the problems and recalls for an exact car

Buying a used 2003 Toyota RAV4?

Check the exact car before you pay: accidents, salvage or flood titles, odometer readings and previous owners.

Check its history