2005 Toyota Sequoia: ball joint or control arm failure

Filed Apr 6, 2015 · Suspension · TX

After 2007 recall of ball joints, toyota dealer stated ball joints need replacing once again.

Filed Jul 6, 2011 · Suspension · 16,753 miles · PA

2005 toyota sequoia - vehicle was recalled in 2007 to have the ball joints replaced. After replacement vehicle goes out of alignment 3 - 4 times per year, tires wearing on the outside on the front two tires. Now front end is vibrating when going 60 MPH or faster and steering wheel is shaking as well. Had it back to the dealer many times complaining that it keeps going out of alignment. I am being told there is nothing wrong and an alignment is performed to correct the problem. I have had numerous alignments performed and tires replaced due to this problem. This problem started back in 2007 and continues to today with the recent vibration in the steering wheel.

Filed Oct 21, 2010 · Suspension, Tires · 28,000 miles · CA

We bought our 2005 toyota sequoia brand new. It has excessive tread wear on the outer edge of the tires. We are going on our 3rd set of tires. The original ones were replaced at 28k and we are having to buy new ones at 66k. We have been diligent in rotating our tires and having the alignments done. In 2007 there was a recall on the lower ball joint for the front suspension. We complained to the toyota dealer at that time about the uneven wear on our tires, and could it be caused by the defective ball joint. They disagreed and said that it was from not taking care of our vehicle. We told them that we had the tires rotated at the recommended times. They said the car was fine, the test for the alignment was fine so it had to be the driver. Since then I have checked out other 2005 sequoia's and noticed the same wear problem. I have also gone on different forums regarding this subject and have found the same complaint from other consumers. At what point is toyota going to do something? Is a car going to have to blow out a tire and kill someone for them to do something about this defect? Our tires are bald on the outer edge of the tread but still have another 25k miles in the middle. I am extremely cautious going around corners because the traction control goes into effect. I am frustrated with the response that I have received from toyota. There is something wrong with the suspension. When I spoke to a representative with toyota, I was told," that it is normal to only get 26k miles out of your tires. You can't compare your sequoia with the tahoe or explorer." I have filed a complaint with toyota in 2010 and the dealership in 2008 and I feel that it is being brushed under the rug.the amount of money we are spending on tires and alignments is frustrating. I just want my vehicle to be fixed so that the tires have an even wear pattern and last longer than 26k miles.

Filed May 9, 2008 · Suspension · 31,000 miles · FL

I am reporting about 2005 toyota sequoia. You are likely aware of the recall of the ball joint for the front wheels. This was official as of january/february 2007. I was informed about this when I took my car in service in november 2007, and then in december I received a postcard. Anyway, my car's all four tires had uneven tread wear, with marked wearing our of the outer half to the extent it is practically smooth with no tread left. As you know the ball joint defect is a common cause for this. I have discussed this issue with toyota dealer and subsequently toyota customer service, without any help. I am concerned that this may lead to pre-mature tire wear and on road tire rupture with crash. I believe, toyota should be made responsible for reimbursing for the tire replacements. At least they should be providing a prorated cost adjustment.

Filed Jul 31, 2007 · Suspension · FL

Tl*the contact owns a 2005 toyota sequoia. The contact received recall notice number 07v013000 (suspension:front:control arm:lower ball joint) in mid-july of 2007. There had been no failure to date. He is concerned because his wife and children are often in the vehicle as well. The dealer stated that there is a three month waiting period for the recall repair to be performed. The current mileage was 18,000.

Filed Jul 24, 2007 · Suspension · 40,000 miles · GA

Tl*the contact owns a 2005 toyota sequoia. The contact received recall notice number 07v013000 (suspension:front:control arm:lower ball joint) in may of 2007. The dealer stated that it would be at least six months or next year before his vehicle could be repaired. The contact believes that the wait time should not be so long, if a recall notice was issued. No failures have occurred at this time. The current mileage was 46,000 and failure mileage was 40,000.

Filed Jul 11, 2007 · Suspension · VA

I received a recall ssc 70b concerning front suspension lower ball joint for the toyota sequoia. I called lustine toyota in woodbridge va ,and was told that they did not have the parts. I asked them when will the parts will come, and was told that they didn't t know, and the parts came in a little at a time.

Filed Jun 22, 2007 · Suspension · 25,000 miles · NC

Tl*the contact owns a 2005 toyota sequoia. On june 11, 2007, the contact received recall notice # 07v013000 (suspension:front:control arm:lower ball joint). The dealer stated that they do not have the parts available to repair the recall. He would have to remain on the waiting list. The contact has notified other dealers in the area and surrounding states and they have given the same response. The current and failure mileages were 25,000.

Filed Jun 1, 2007 · Suspension · IN

Tl*the contact owns a 2005 toyota sequoia. The contact received recall notice # 07v013000 (suspension:front:control arm:lower ball joint). The dealer stated that it will take approximately two months for the part to become available. Presently, no failures have occurred. The purchase date, engine size, and failure mileage were unknown. The current mileage is 36,000. Update 07/03/07.

Filed May 15, 2007 · Suspension · 35,092 miles · NY

Tl*the contact owns a 2005 toyota sequoia. The contact stated that their is a safety recall on the vehicle's lower ball joints and she has made two appointments to have the recall repaired. On each occasion, the dealer kept her vehicle for two days. On the second day of each visit, they informed her that they did not have the safety recall parts to repair the vehicle. The vehicle purchase date and engine size were unavailable. The current and failure mileages were 35,092.

Filed Jan 9, 2007 · Suspension · IL · crash

Tl* - the contact stated that on 06/06/05 vehicle was involved in a crash. The contact stated that in october she receive recall 05v225000 for the lower ball joints. The contact stated that she was driving 15 MPH in the early morning in a residential area and she tried to make a left turn and unexpectedly hit traffic pole. The police were called to the crash site and a report was taken. . The insurance company filed a claim ,stating a mechanical failure was the cause of the damage. The contact stated that the lower ball joints were separated from the knuckle of the lower control arm.