Tl* the contact owns a 2001 toyota tacoma. The contact stated that while the vehicle was having routine maintenance performed, the technician noticed that the frame was rusted and corroded. The manufacturer was notified who recommended that the vehicle not be driven. The vehicle was not repaired. The failure mileage was 71,000.
2001 Toyota Tacoma body complaints
Page 6 of 9: complaints 131 to 160 of 228, newest first, as owners wrote them.
Tl* the contact owns a 2001 toyota tacoma. The contact stated that the chassis, the spare tire cable and the holder became corroded. The vehicle was taken to the dealer where the manufacturer advised that the vehicle was not included in the federal safety agency campaign number: 12v542000 (tires). The vehicle was not repaired. The failure mileage was 94,000 and the current mileage 95,200. Kmj updated 7/29/13
My frame was replaced under recall because of the rust. A couple weeks after getting my truck back I was stranded in 100 degree heat because I was unable to get my spare tire out from under bed of truck. Severely rusted bumper no longer allows access to mechanism to lower tire. Fought with dealer and regional mgr. They say it is not a safety issue. I could not disagree more. Why then do we have spare. He did admit that if it was his wife and children stranded on the highway it might be different. But, no..... Now they are recalling the part that hold the spare under the truck because tire may fall off. That would be doing me a favor....
Tl* the contact owns a 2001 toyota tacoma. The contact stated that while the vehicle was being serviced by an independent mechanic, the contact was informed that the frame of the vehicle was rusted and the vehicle was unsafe to drive. The vehicle was taken to the dealer where it was confirmed that the bottom of the frame was completely rusted and needed to be replaced. The manufacturer was contacted about the failure and stated that the vehicle was not included in any recalls. The vehicle was not repaired. The approximate failure and current mileage was 159,000. Updated 2/25/13 *cn the consumer stated the manufacturer refused to offer assistance due to the recall being closed on dec 31, 2011. The manufacturer stated the consumer should have recieved a notice. The consumer changed addresses since purchasing the vehicle, therefore did not recieve any notice. The manufacturer denied any assistance. Updated 03/11/2013
Tl* the contact owns a 2001 toyota tacoma. The contact stated that while at an independent mechanic for unrelated repair the contact was informed the frame was severally corroded. The vehicle was taken to the dealer for diagnostic testing. The technician stated there was a manufacturer recall that was issued the previous year to treat the frame and prevent corrosion. The contact did not receive notification of the recall and never had the vehicle treated. The technician stated there was no repair for the failure and informed the contact they were not liable for the frame corrosion. The mechanic advised the vehicle should not be driven because it was unsafe. The vehicle was not repaired. The VIN was not available. The approximate failure mileage was 230,000. Updated 01/14/13
2001 toyota tacoma. Consumer writes in regards to issues with the vehicle frame. *smd the consumer stated he only took possession of the vehicle six months ago, and was unaware of the problem with the frame and would like to get the issue resolved.
I brake in my driveway at approx. 2 MPH, heard a loud thump in the rear end of my 2001 tacoma. When I checked, I found that the driver side front bracket to leaf spring holding the rear axle was actually sitting 2 or 3 inches into the frame rail. The frame had rusted through in that spot, the rust was so bad, that 6 inches of steel on bottom of frame rail was gone in any direction of the leaf spring bracket attachment point. There isn't enough steel left to even attempt a weld to repair it. On close inspection of the frame overall, there are multiple points where the frame rails have disintegrated. My rear axle is sitting off-center, and the car cannot be driven. If normal force or torque is applied, the axle will break free, and this will cause an accident. I heard that there is a recall on tacoma frame rails, so I called the dealer. Dealer stated my VIN did not have a recall; I called toyota, they told me that I would be contacted in 1 business day. They never called. 2 days later, I called and got transferred to their "truck team," got shuffled around for 6 more phone calls over 3 days, when they informed me that they mailed me a notice that I had to have gotten a frame spraying to qualify for the frame recall. I never received such notice, and toyota did not even have my address; which they stated that they got all information from dmv. My dmv info is current, always has been. Toyota has given my every type of run-around imaginable, ultimately denying my recall. On websites, there are thousands of people in my same situation...exactly the same. Further, there are many people who had the frame spray, which then peeled off within months of application. This seems like toyota deliberately tried to exclude as many people as possible with this frame spray, which wouldn't be necessary in the first place if the frames weren't defective. My truck is dead.
Toyota tacoma 2001 in great shape other than the frame is rusting out. Took it to my mechanic for routine maintenance oil change; he saw some heavy corrosion on the frame. In several places, it has eaten through and has perforations. He says it is getting to be unsafe. I just bought this truck about a year ago at a dealership in ohio and was not made aware that this was a huge problem in the 1996-2003 models, but this issue is apparently very common as toyota did not provide acceptable undercoatings for these models. Next step is to take it to the toyota dealership and see what they say. At this point, I would take a buyout but would prefer to have the frame/chassis replaced at their expense. I love this truck and use it everyday. Very scared to drive it right now and hope they come through to fix their mistake. This should be a public recall since it is a huge safety concern and people should be made aware that this is a time-bomb accident waiting to happen. These trucks are everywhere on the road. Thanks
I just purchased this truck for my sons first vehicle. 1 day after I purchased it, I was informed of a recall issue toyota had with these frames rusting excessively creating a safety issue while driving. I took to my toyota dealer they confirmed and inspected my truck. They told me it was unsafe to drive. I called toyota customer care they told me my vehicle was not covered and there was nothing they would do. I can't believe they won't cover this failure. If they are only building vehicles to last 11 years, they should be shut down. Now my son has a truck he can't drive! Great first car huh? I think it's toyota doesn't care center. Any help would be appreciated.
Tl* the contact owns a 2001 toyota tacoma. The contact inspected the vehicle and noticed that the frame was rotten. The vehicle was taken to the dealer for diagnosis, where the dealer advised that they would have to replace the frame of the vehicle. The manufacturer was contacted and provided no assistance. The vehicle was not repaired. The failure mileage was 80,000 and the current mileage was 90,000.
Tl* the contact owns a 2001 toyota tacoma. The contact stated the vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic for an inspection and they detected that the rear frame was damaged due to rust and corrosion. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer issued a voluntary recall pertaining to the frame and the VIN was not included. The manufacturer was notified of the defect. The approximate failure mileage was 100,000.
Tl* the contact owns a 2001 toyota tacoma. The contact stated that while driving, the rear of the vehicle began to swerve from side to side. The vehicle was taken to the dealer where the dealer inspected the vehicle and found that the rear frame and wheel were severely corroded. The dealer advised the contact that the vehicle was unsafe to drive. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was not made aware of the failure. The failure and the current mileage was 144,000.
Tl* the contact owns a 2001 toyota tacoma. While at an independent mechanic for unrelated repairs, the contact was advised by the mechanic that the the frame was corroded. The mechanic also stated the entire frame would have to be replaced. The vehicle was not repaired. The approximate failure mileage was 110,000.
Tl* the contact owns a 2001 toyota tacoma. The contact stated that the vehicle was being examined by an authorized dealer when he was informed that there was a hole rusted through the frame. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure and offered no assistance. The vehicle was not repaired. The failure mileage was 113,000.
I frequently check the stability of the spare tire that is stored on the underside exterior of the bed. Recently I noticed that the tire was loose and moving back and forth. This prompted me to lower the tire by using the provided crank handle. After it was lowered to the ground I was shocked to see that the retaining bracket and cable spring were severely rusted. I felt that this could pose a potential safety hazard to me while operating the vehicle on the highway if that bracket fails. It could possibly cause the vehicle to roll over and the tire to fly off and cause danger to other motorists. I promptly removed the spare tire from the vehicle and went to my local toyota dealer. They seemed to look past the safety hazard it poses and were more interested in charging me ore $600.00 to install a new retaining bracket. I inquired to the service consultant as to why this problem was not brought addressed to me when my truck was in there a few months earlier for the frame rust perforation recall. He replied that if they notice any issues they present the customer with a list of recommendations. At that time they had the entire cab and chassis off to install a brand new frame. I can't imagine how something as crucial as this potential deadly problem could go undetected. I recently spoke with 2 individuals who had personal experiences pertaining to this issue. One witnessed a deadly rollover due to this problem and the other had his spare fall off and roll down the road. I feel this issue should be presented to the proper officials and action should be taken soon. I hope to hear from you regarding this serious issue. Thank you. [xxx] information redacted pursuant to the freedom of information act (foia), 5 u.s.c. 552(b)(6).
Tl* the contact owns a 2001 toyota tacoma. The contact stated that the vehicle was parked when she noticed that the undercarriage frame was severely corroded. The vehicle was taken to an authorized dealer where the contact was informed that the entire frame needed to be replaced. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure and informed of an expired voluntary campaign they issued that addressed the failure. The vehicle was not repaired. The failure mileage was 144,233. Updated 08/31/2011
The frame of my 2001 toyota tacoma was replaced in 2010 because of severe rust problems. The rear axle assembly has the same rust problem , the axle is leaking. Should toyota have replaced the rear axle also.
Tl*the contact owns a 2001 toyota tacoma. While the vehicle was at the dealer to have a corrosion resistance product applied to the frame, the technicians stated the frame was rusted. The manufacturer had a voluntary recall which extended the warranty for the vehicle to be inspected yearly for corrosion. The dealer stated the frame would have to be replaced. The manufacturer was contacted and stated the frame would be replaced free of charge but if there were other parts that may be damaged due to the corrosion that the contact would have to cover the costs. The vehicle was not repaired. The approximate failure mileage was 109,000.
This is about my 2001 toyota tacoma in massachusetts on june 6 2008 went in for frame inspection report from dealer no rot condition is excellent brought it in today november 23, 2010. Total rot replacing the frame, up to 3 month wait for frame.
The 2001 toyota tacoma truck I owned was recalled for rusting frame. At the time I received the recall notice the frame on my truck was almost 90% rusted. On may 7, 2010 I took it to fox lake toyota dealership for the said recall and application for a corrosion preventative compound was performed by the dealer service department. On early october of this year I notice that large amount of the applied compound are peeling. I took it back to the same dealership on october 20 for inspection related to the peeling issue. The dealership called back october 22 informing me that they can't do anything since almost all of the compound are now gone. The service personnel claim that upon speaking to toyota, it was noted that they are researching it. I was told to take my vehicle back. I have the vehicle with me now but I am afraid to drive not knowing if the frame has rusted throughout. I inquired to the service personnel if the vehicle is safe to drive but did not get a straight answer. With winter approaching the vehicle will be again subjected to the corrosive environment. To date I have not receive a call back from the dealership or toyota as to what action they need to perform. No claim number was also provided by the dealership for me to use in case I call toyota directly.
I own a 2001 toyota tacoma doublecab that I purchased used in 2008. I recently received a letter from toyota stating that I should make an appointment to have the frame checked out for corrosion and rust. I did and it failed inspection. It was perforated on both sides of the frame and had excessive rust. Toyota offered to replace the frame rather than buy the truck back. I do not feel safe in this vehicle anymore. The rear bumper is rotted through, the frame , and by doing research I've found several recalls that I was unaware of. They want to break down the truck to the frame and replace and rebuild it with the same old parts in a dealership, not a manufacturing plant. I was told that toyota does not buy back 2001 tacomas and refuses to negotiate to get this vehicle off the road. This vehicle was not rebuilt when I bought it and think that it is very unfair that I only have one option. This vehicle is unsafe and I will no longer drive it even if they replace the frame. The consumer should have an option to have the vehicle bought back for what it is worth at least.
While driving on rt 24 north of nashville, the hood on our 2001 toyota tacoma flew completely open. The result was a smashed front windshield, a dented cab roof and a severely bent hood. The vehicle was able to be pulled over without anyone being hurt or killed. We replaced the windshield and tied down the hood.
The frame my 2001 toyota tacoma was built on is rotting and has a whole in it. Toyota wants to replace the frame, but the cost exceeds the value of truck. I do not think this is legal. The first customer service rep I spoke to said "she would not feel safe in a truck in similar circumstances".
Just paid top dollar for a 2001 toyota tacoma only to find on the inside of the frame is completely rotted away and is very unsafe with any weight loaded in it. Have found numerous accounts of premature frame failure due to faulty materials documented on the internet. New frame would need to be replaced along with new fasteners.
My 2001 toyota tacoma has a perforated frame. I was issued a letter from toyota explaining the options. One option was to replace my frame. The other option was for toyota to buy back my vehicle at 1.5 % of excellent kelly blue book. I was not given the buy back option and they are trying to force the frame replacement on me. I am not happy with the remedy they have selected for me. This vehicle may never be the same after the frame is replaced. This is not any easy fix . To many parts are involved and I was informed it will take about 2 months to complete these repairs.
Toyota refused to fix dangerous rust defect on 2001 tacoma, which caused a rear differential gear oil leak.
My 2001 toyota tacoma has dealer verified frame rust perforation. When the first letter from toyota came to my door in early 2009 I went directly to my local dealer who did not know anything about this issue and stated to me that they would get back to me with more information as it became available to them. Several months later, I was told by the dealer that wisconsin was asking toyota to provide more data on the propose solutions to this issue and had not approved toyota to make any repairs. I was also told that they would contact me when I could get my truck inspected. Many more months passed and finally I had enough and called toyota direct. I was assigned a case manager and she said she would help me get my truck inspected. This finally happened on april 27, 2010. Now they tell my only option is a replacement frame, which to me is not acceptable. Then lucky 2001 owners who were able to get quick inspections were offered the buy back option. In various forums the ones with the replacement frames are seeing issues with leaking gas tanks, and up charges for incidental items.
2001 toyota tacoma-pass nj state inspection. A friend looked and said your frame is rusted. Took it to my local toyota saturday 4/17/10 and they said the truck was unsafe to drive. They will have to replace the frame. I said I needed a truck for a rental they said by monday or tuesday they should have one. It is thursday 4/22/10 and can not get in touch with anyone... I need a truck that is how I put food on my table.. Called corporate and they are giving me the run around too... My other concern is after they remove everything and put it back together other things are going to break. Also, the resale value of my truck has decreased...
Tl*the contact owns a 2001 toyota tacoma. She took the vehicle into the dealer to inspect the frame, which she had observed was slightly rusted. The dealer stated that the vehicle was thoroughly rusted and would not allow her to drive the vehicle off of the lot. The entire frame was replaced under the manufacturer's warranty enhancement for frame rust perforation on model trucks in severe cold climate areas with high road salt use (the federal safety agency item number : 10027968: service bulletin number : tcs-08-018). After the repairs were made to the vehicle, she noticed black smoke coming from the exhaust, the vehicle was using more gas than before and she could literally watch the fuel gauge moving closer to empty as she proceeded. The vehicle would not idle properly and was exhibiting a "bucking" gesture as if it was not getting enough fuel. While inspecting the vehicle, a personal mechanic noticed that the 02 sensor was hanging from the vehicle and caused the vehicle to exhibit the failures. The vehicle was taken back to the dealer where they stated the sensor was in the same place as when she first brought the vehicle. No further repairs were made to the vehicle. The failure and current mileages were approximately 126,000. Updated 4/30/10 *cn the o2 sensor needed to be replaced. Updated 07/15/10.
Tl*the contact owns a 2001 toyota tacoma. While the contact was driving 15-30 MPH the vehicle suddenly accelerated causing the RPM's to redline. The contact turned the vehicle off in order to stop it from accelerating. The vehicle was taken to the dealership where the contact had the idle air control valve replaced at 29,060 miles. There were no prior warnings. The current and failure mileages were 34000. Updated 4/7/2010 *cn the check engine light illuminated. The dealer replaced the mass air flow sensor. Also, the frame had severe rust. Updated 08/24/10
VIN decoder
See the problems and recalls for an exact car
Buying a used 2001 Toyota Tacoma?
Check the exact car before you pay: accidents, salvage or flood titles, odometer readings and previous owners.
Check its history