Check a VIN

2001 Toyota Tundra body complaints

Page 4 of 7: complaints 71 to 100 of 171, newest first, as owners wrote them.

See the summary of 2001 Toyota Tundra body problems: which part fails, at what mileage and related recalls.

Filed Aug 22, 2011 · Body, Fuel system · 40,000 miles · CT

Tl* the contact owns a 2001 toyota tundra. The contact stated that the underside of the vehicle was completely corroded. The contact also mentioned that the fuel tank was corroded and as a result, there was a fuel leak. In addition, the rear differential housing was also affected. The vehicle was taken to the dealer who replaced the differential housing and the fuel tank in order to remedy the failure. The manufacturer was not made aware of the failure. The failure persisted. The failure mileage was 40,000 and the current mileage was 98,000.

Filed Jun 2, 2011 · Body · 117,134 miles · NH

2001 toyota tundra brought to local toyota dealership for concerns with rot holes through cross members that support gas tank. Received toyota recall notice regarding cross member at rear of vehicle supporting spare tire. Dealer states that recall does not cover failing cross members other than one supporting spare tire. Dealer recommends contacting toyota directly and filing complaint. Contacted toyota direct and was told they would only replace failing component if ntsb forced them to even though they are the same part, installed at the same factory at the same time and have the same problem. This is a safety issue!! This failing cross member is just as important if not more than the one toyota is recalling. Isn't a falling fuel tank more of a safety concern than a falling spare tire??

Filed May 11, 2011 · Body · 150,000 miles · MA

Tl* the contact owns a 2001 toyota tundra. The vehicle was being serviced for routine maintenance when the technician noticed a part of the frame was corroded and the steel was chipping. The contact stated that the vehicle was included in the federal safety agency campaign id number: 09v444000 (structure: frame and members:underbody shields) and was repaired prior to the failure. The vehicle was taken to the dealer where the technicians stated the frame was in good condition and was not in need of repairs. The vehicle was not repaired. The approximate failure mileage was 150,000. Updated 6/8/11

Filed Dec 14, 2010 · Body · 119,500 miles · NC

Rusty frame on a 2001 toyota tundra.

Filed Nov 17, 2010 · Body, Steering · 105,000 miles · MA

Toyota's tundra corrosion recall focuses on the frame, fuel tank mounting, and spare tire mounting hardware. If the frame has no perforations and the fuel tank suspension and spare tire mounting are sound, the truck is determined to be safe. My tundra has been so inspected by a dealer, passed their test, and found to be "safe.". My complaint is that the vehicle's undercarriage shows extensive corrosion of frame, steering, and suspension components beyond the scope of toyota's recall. The extent of the corrosion is so great that it calls into question the potential for a suspension or steering component to fail during operation, leading to a loss of control and injury to passengers and others on the highway. I have digital photographs of several corrosion sites on the undercarriage of my truck that illustrate my concern. I have taken my truck to a body shop for evaluation and was told it is not safe. Toyota's recall does not address the full range of safety issues brought on by their corrosion problem. Toyota should be required to inspect all of the critical components subject to the excessive corrosion and either determine they are safe or repair them. If my digital photos would assist you in understanding my concern, I would be happy to forward them to you. Thank you!

Filed Nov 3, 2010 · Body, Suspension · DC

2001 toyota tundra. Consumer writes regarding rusted frame *tgw the consumer stated he only discovered the frame rust when the rear leaf spring broke unexpectedly while driving in august 2009.

Filed Sep 29, 2010 · Body · 110,000 miles · GA

Tl*the contact owns a 2001 toyota tundra. The contact stated that he noticed rust on the frame of the vehicle. The vehicle was taken to an authorized dealership where pictures were taken and sent to a representative; the representative stated that the rust was not serious enough to act upon. Most recently, the spare tire fell off the rear of the vehicle. . The contact called the manufacturer who stated that someone would give him a call back. The vehicle had not been repaired. The current mileage was approximately 112,000. The failure mileage was approximately 60,000. Updated 01/04/11*lj updated 01/10/11

Filed Sep 8, 2010 · Body · WI

2001 toyota tundra. Consumer states rusting and corrosion of the bed truck *tgw the consumer stated the cross-member and frame on his vehicle checked out fine according to the dealer. The problem is with the truck bed that has rusted through. The consumer was informed the truck bed would need to be replaced.

Filed Aug 8, 2010 · Body · 81,000 miles · FL

- 1st 2001 tundra frame rust recall. Took to dealer. Said my spare tire was not in danger of falling off. Did nothing further. -2nd recall expanded. Took to dealer, said they were going to replace the frame. Was told if they broke anything off due to rust, it would be my expense. I objected. Was told frame will not be replaced. Took truck in for brakes on friday. Shop was not able to remove caliper pins, rusted in solid. I cant get brakes replaced. Shocks are rusted, leaking, and shot, cannot replace, nothing to attach them to the frame. This is my only transportation. I must continue driving like this, no brakes, no suspension, completely rusted frame, as there is no solution. There is not a speck of rust on the body, 2001 tundra sr-5 access cab with 81,000 miles.

Filed Jul 15, 2010 · Body · 49,717 miles · MA

Tl* the contact owns 2001 toyota tundra. The contact received notification of the federal safety agency recall campaign id number: 09v444000 (structure: frame and members: under-body shields) on april 10, 2010. The dealer inspected the frame and advised that the frame exhibited slight corrosion and would not need to be serviced under the recall at that time. The manufacturer advised they would contact the dealer to determine why recall repairs were not made to the vehicle. The contact never received a response. The vehicle was not repaired and the contact stated the recall was not being handled within a reasonable time. The failure mileage was 49,717 and the current mileage was 52,447.

Filed Jul 8, 2010 · Body · 158,000 miles · MD

Tl*the contact owns 2001 toyota tundra. While driving approximately 10 to 15 MPH over a bump in the road pieces of his frame fell off of the vehicle. He did not take the vehicle to the dealer. He received a the federal safety agency recall notice, campaign id 09v444000, structure frame and members, underbody shields the second week of june 2010; however, his vehicle was in the dealers possession for approximately three weeks. The dealer had to order a frame for the truck. The contact was unable to provide a VIN. The approximate failure mileage was 158,000 and the current mileage was 160,000.

Filed Jun 9, 2010 · Body · PA

Tl*the contact owns a 2001 toyota tundra. The contact received a recall notification under the federal safety agency campaign id number 09v444000 (structure: frame and members: underbody shields). The vehicle was taken to an authorized dealer on february 23, 2010 for service repair. However, the technician informed that the specific part for the remedy repair was unavailable, and would not be available until two weeks. The authorized dealer was notified on a separate occasion in which the part remained unavailable. The contact continued to wait for the part and it had been over a period of three months. He had not experienced failure regarding the recall defect at the time of the complaint. The current mileage was 91,420. The VIN was unavailable.

Filed May 20, 2010 · Body · 109,000 miles · ME

Tl* the contact owns 2001 toyota tundra. The contact took the vehicle to the dealer for routing maintenance where she was advised that the frame and cross members of the frame were severely rusted and corroded. The dealer advised that the rust was so sever that if he attempted to scrape the rust off the frame, the tool would go straight through the frame. The vehicle was not repaired. The failure and current mileages were 109,000.

Filed May 6, 2010 · Body · 184,000 miles · IN

I own a 2001 toyota tundra. It is my work truck, so I drive it a lot! It has 184k miles. I received a notice of recall for the cross members being corroded, so I went out to inspect my vehicle. What I found was absolutely shocking! Not only were the cross members rusted almost completely in two, but there were very large holes rusted out of the frame of the truck. I drove the truck an hour and a half to the nearest toyota dealership, where the said that it was unsafe to drive and gave me a rental car. Toyota has given us little information about how long the repair will take or what all they will be doing to fix the problem. They have said the parts are not yet available and it will take over a month to get the new frame.

Filed Mar 30, 2010 · Body · 66,653 miles · NJ

Tl*the contact owns a 2001 toyota tundra. The contact noticed that the frame of the vehicle was covered with rust. The dealer inspected the vehicle and deemed it as unsafe to drive. The vehicle was left in possession of the dealer and a rental vehicle was provided for the contact until the manufacturer stated the remedy they would be able to offer the contact. The failure mileage was 66,653 and the current mileage was 66,673. The VIN was not available when the complaint was filed.

Filed Mar 26, 2010 · Body · 100,000 miles · PA

Tl* the contact owns a 2001 toyota tundra. The contact stated that while driving at about 55 MPH, the spare tire fell off the vehicle due to corrosion on the frame. The contact called the manufacturer and referenced recall 09v444000 (structure: frame and members: underbody shields) for which he never received a recall notice. The manufacturer gave him a case number and advised him that someone would get back in touch with him in reference to the failure. The current and failure mileages were approximately 100,000.

Filed Mar 10, 2010 · Body · 100,000 miles · PA

2001 toyota tundra rust frame - first I didn't get the recall notice. Took truck to toyota in greensburg pa and they removed spare tire to back of truck. Also noticed more issues with frame itself and scheduled another appointment with inspector. They wanted this done before they did any repairs. The frame rust is that serious. After this inspection, I was instructed to call the toyota experience center to open a case. So I tried, not too successful. They kept insisting that my case was already closed. The first person I talked to took all my info and then said he had to transfer me. So they did. To me it seemed to be the same place. The second person then again took all the same info and tired to tell me my case was closed. I kept stating what had happened, that the spare tire was in the back of my truck and the frame was not repaired but they kept trying to correct me. Finally after about the 3 or 4th time, he relented and gave me a case number. It was a very disturbing call, I felt as though they just wanted me to go away and live with the rust issue. I went back to the dealer and file a complaint with them. Then a couple of days later, I get a call back from toyota. Again they tried to get me to close the case saying all they can do was done. That is not true, my spare tire is still in the back of the truck. And they didn't even want to hear about the rust perforation of the frame itself. The rep even hung up on me. Extremely rude person. So I went back to the dealership. The next day the dealer ship called me back and said my case was reopened and that I should hear something in 3 or 4 weeks. That was a week ago. In conclusion, all they wanted me to do was go away. All three reps that I talked to at the toyota experience center were very arrogant to me. My truck is broke, and I just get the feeling all they want is for me to go away. They are not backing their product, just like the brakes. The dealership is not the issue here, it is the call center so far.

Filed Mar 10, 2010 · Body, Brakes · 81,000 miles · OR

We own a 2001 tundra with severe rust problems on the frame, brakes, body parts, spare tire, suspension and nuts and bolts all over the vehicle. The spare tire dropped from the rear of the truck due to rust and damaged the rear bumper. We have spent thousands of dollars to repair rusted items on this truck.

Filed Mar 1, 2010 · Body · 99,000 miles · IA

The rear section of the frame is severely rusted. The floor of the truck box has several large holes that are rusted clear through the floor.

Filed Feb 26, 2010 · Body · 143,200 miles · MA

My son was driving home november 24, 2009 from college in rhode island for thanksgiving. It was dark, raining & he was on busy rte 195 heading east when rear cross-member bar w/ spare tire attached hinged down into road. The tire dragged behind my son's tundra. Eventually, my son was able to safely pull over to the side of highway & kick spare off, throwing it into bed of truck & carefully proceeding home. We looked under the tundra & were astonished at how much rust covered the entire underside. We took photos. We were also greatly relieved that my son was not in an accident or the tire falling off did not cause a serious accident on the highway. My son had called the week before coming home to ask to have an appointment made to have the brakes looked at because they seemed not to be working properly, causing the truck to steer oddly when applied. In addition, we had, w/in 1 1/2 mth prior, paid over $750 to have sway bar replaced & new radiator installed. Not only that, but when we purchased the vehicle, it didn't pass inspection until a tie rod was replaced. First thing the following day, we took the tundra to hyannis toyota - where it still sits.after 14 weeks, we had gotten no satisfaction. I was driving a camry loaner; my son was driving my 4runner. We were still paying insurance on a vehicle that was un-drivable; we've had to arrange for a plane ticket to get my son to california; we've lost out on end-of-year car sales and 2009 tax considerations and our 'ownership experience' is waning. Nine (9) weeks after the spare tire rusted off my son's tundra, on january 22, 2010 at noon eastern time, charles zacharie called me and explained that 'although the government hasn't required a recall on the tundra issue, toyota has implemented a 'special service campaign' pertaining to the rear cross-member bar," & that toyota would not be fixing my son's truck because rust damage is so extensive (duh!) and will 'repurchase the vehicle at a "good will offer." bogus!

Filed Feb 26, 2010 · Body, Lights · VA

I own a 2001 tundra. I just learned of 4 recalls: nhsta #09e025000, 09v444000, 06e026000, and 06e065000. We received no notification from the companies required to do so. The truck is registered. We purchased the truck new and have been the only owners. We have not changed address since the purchase. I believe the failure to be notified was deliberate to avoid the cost of compliance with the recall. I have been unable to get any of the 4 companies involved to respond to phone messages.

Filed Feb 25, 2010 · Body · 96,253 miles · PA

2001 toyota tundra failed yearly pa state safety inspection for frame rust. Dealership would not release truck back to drive home because it was "unsafe to drive", so provided a rental to drive at their expense. Per dealerships suggestion, called toyota customer experience center which then opened and assigned a case number. The truck has now been at the dealership almost three weeks awaiting direction from a toyota regional office.

Filed Feb 20, 2010 · Body · 45,000 miles · VA

I own a 2001 toyota tundra and the spare tire winch mechanism which is attached to the rear cross member is very rusted. To minimize the risk of a crash from the spare tire falling from the underside of the truck while moving, I took the recommendations of the federal safety agency website and removed the spare tire and placed it in the bed. I then noticed that the rear brake proportioning valve was extremely rusty as well. I took the truck to the dealership for a frame rust inspection and they said everything was fine. I am very concerned with this because if the proportioning valve rusts and brake fluid leaks out then I will have no rear brakes on the truck. This is a potentially lethal issue and I would like immediate action to be taken by toyota. I am also not satisfied with this because when I took the truck the truck to the toyota dealership they knew nothing about the undercoating that I am entitled to. In a letter from the federal safety agency to mr. Chris santucci, assistant manager of technical and regulatory affairs, toyota motor north america, inc. Dated november 25, 2009, on page 2 under the heading 'remedy' it states that 'dealers will inspect the rear cross member and related components, including the brake lines, and replace them if necessary. If the cross member does not need to be replaced, it will be sprayed with a corrosion protection compound. These services will be performed free of charge...' to this date, february 20th, 2010, I have received nothing from toyota stating that there is a recall on my truck or instructions as to what to do. Here is what I am asking for: 1.a letter from toyota that states the following: a.I am entitled to a free inspection b.my brake lines and proportioning valve will be replaced free of charge due to rust c.my spare tire winch and bracket mechanism will be replaced free of charge due to rust d.my truck will be sprayed with a corrosion protection compound free of charge (as stated in the letter dated november 25, 2009).

Filed Feb 18, 2010 · Body, Suspension · 119,000 miles · OH

2110 toyota tundra with rusted, corroded, broken leaf springs, rear cross member, drive shaft looks rusted and corroded. Brakes are broken, rotors broken. Car is not drivable.

Filed Feb 10, 2010 · Body · 50,000 miles · RI

Toyota tundra truck, 2001. Spare tire fell off on road; dealer stated that frame shows extensive rust. First stated it would cost $400.00 to attach tire, then stated they must wait for part to come from toyota. Dealer stated truck should be checked yearly to check for frame compromise. Truck pulls 4000 lb. Camper.

Filed Jan 19, 2010 · Body · 75,000 miles · GA

Rust on frame and crossmember near spare tire. I'm second owner, registered in ky 01 thru 07. Now in ga. Contacted local toyota dealership last week. Asked if there were any recalls for my truck, supplied VIN. Service agent said no.

Filed Jan 8, 2010 · Body, Suspension · 95,000 miles · ME

2001 toyota tundra. I have replaced front left lower control arm, rear brake parts and other parts attached to the frame of this truck. I have sanded, scraped, primed and painted the frame of my truck. I wash the frame at least once a week in the winter time. The frame is still rusting away. The rear of the frame is rusted around the spare tire mount and rear frame rails. The front of the frame does not appear to have much rust looking from the outside, however if you look inside the frame there is heavy rust. I have two large chunks of rust that have been retrieved from the inside of the front frame. I have saved these two large chunks needed. I have contacted toyota many times on this matter, dating back to 2008. I have been told there is a recall, yet this recall is only for the rear cross member. I was also told that there was only a recall for rust perforation (hole). This seems strange to me knowing that as the metal in the frame deteriorates from corrosion it is weakened. I don't believe there has to be a hole in the frame to make it weak. I am not looking for a new truck. I would just like to have my truck last as long as advertised in toyota tv commercials. "legendary reliability" my truck is not that old and only had 80k miles on when I first filed a complaint with toyota. The body on my truck is almost 100% rust free. If I had not cleaned and painted my frame the truck would have been junk along time ago. I would just like to see toyota take care of this problem with more than a anti corrosion spray and hitting it with a hammer.

Filed Jan 7, 2010 · Body · 111,000 miles · MA

Tl*the contact owns a 2001 toyota tundra. While driving approximately 35 MPH in october 2009, the spare tire fell off of the rear of the truck which he believed was caused by corrosion. The contact called the manufacturer and was informed of recall 09v444000 and that the repair would be free of charge. The vehicle had not been repaired at the time of the complaint. The current mileage was 114,500. The failure mileage was approximately 111,000.

Filed Jan 6, 2010 · Body, Tires · 97,000 miles · NH

The spare tire separated from the cross member on my 2001 tundra. Fortunately I was at slow speed. I now know you have opened an investigation but wanted to be sure to log the issue. My truck is no longer drivable and toyota has told me that they do not have the parts to fix it yet. I think it is time that you require toyota to replace the frame and all associated components. This is not isolated to just the rear crossmember, there is rust throughout the whole underside of the vehicle.

Filed Dec 18, 2009 · Body · KS

2001 toyota tundra rust recall. *nj the consumer stated a few weeks ago he had a flat tire and discovered a substantial amount of rust on the frame. The consumer learned of a recall, however the recall didn't cover toyota tundra's that were originally sold or registered in the state he lives in.

VIN decoder

See the problems and recalls for an exact car

Buying a used 2001 Toyota Tundra?

Check the exact car before you pay: accidents, salvage or flood titles, odometer readings and previous owners.

Check its history