The contact leased a 2025 Chevrolet Blazer. The contact stated that while in drive(D) or reverse(R), the parking brake independently engaged. An audible chime sounded, erroneously detecting nearby objects. The vehicle was taken to a local dealer. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure by telephone. The failure mileage was approximately 107,000.
The worst 2025 Chevrolet Blazer problems
Ranked by number of owner complaints. Mileage and cost come from what owners wrote.
- Electrical12
- Brakes7
- Driver assistance7
- Visibility4
- Engine3
Problems by type
Tap a problem to see which part fails, at what mileage and in which other years.
- Electrical12
- Brakes7
- Driver assistance7
- Visibility4
- Engine3
- Body2
- Suspension2
- Acceleration1
- Fuel system1
- Lights1
- Steering1
- Tires1
- Wheels1
Recalls 1
Latches/locks/linkages: doors: latch
- What is wrong
- General Motors, LLC (GM) is recalling certain 2025 Chevrolet Blazer, Blazer EV, and Equinox vehicles. The door strikers were not properly heat-treated, which can cause them to break.
- Risk
- A broken door striker can cause the door to open unexpectedly, increasing the risk of injury.
- Remedy
- Dealers will replace all four side door strikers and attachment bolts, free of charge. All affected vehicles are still in dealership inventory and therefore no owner notification letters are expected to be mailed. Owners may call Chevrolet customer service at 1‑800‑222‑1020. GM's number for this recall is N242477131.
Recall number 24V737000 · Recall details
Technical service bulletins for the 2025 Chevrolet Blazer 188
Bulletins tell dealers how to fix known problems. A warranty extension means the manufacturer pays for that repair for longer.
- Unknown or other
- • Fixes to help prevent loss of audio • Better connectivity for Bluetooth and CarPlay
- Condition in which the thermal break tabs induce stress into the radiator causing a coolant leak
- PI created to guide technicians through radio restriction process
- Unknown or other
- Unknown or other
- Unknown or other
- This PI provides Diagnostics tips on how the LIN bus works and how to diagnosis it.
- If a vehicle has an issue with super cruise inoperative tech is directed to follow a diagnostic path...
- Unknown or other
2025 Chevrolet Blazer fuel economy
Official EPA estimates in miles per gallon (MPGe for electric). Ranges cover trims that share the same engine.
| Engine | Drive | City | Highway | Combined |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0L 4‑cyl | FWD | 22 | 29 | 25 |
| 2.0L 4‑cyl | AWD | 22 | 27 | 24 |
| 3.6L 6‑cyl | FWD | 19 | 26 | 22 |
| 3.6L 6‑cyl | AWD | 18 | 26 | 21 |
| Electric motor Electric 312 mi range | FWD | 103-114 | 86-95 | 95-104 MPGe |
| Electric motor Electric 303 mi range | AWD | 92-102 | 77-87 | 85-95 MPGe |
| Electric motor Electric 334 mi range | RWD | 106 | 85 | 95 MPGe |
What 2025 Chevrolet Blazer owners say
Most recent owner complaints, unedited.
Driving this vehicle in cruise control at around 70-80 mph, on an empty freeway early in the morning. No traffic but suddenly and for no reason the collision prevention system activated causing the steering wheel to turn all the way to the right and locking in place, the brakes activating, and leaving me no control sending me and two passengers in an embankment and the car on its passenger side.
Failed Component: Service Brakes, Hydraulic / Electronic Brake Control Module (EBCM) / Automatic Emergency Braking (AEB) Description of Incident & Safety Defect: On June 11, 2026, while operating the vehicle, the primary braking system suffered a complete failure of electro-hydraulic power assist. When attempting to slow down, the electronic brake system failed to engage or command hydraulic assist. The brake pedal became extremely hard and stiff to press, rendering the hydraulic braking system completely ineffective. Simultaneously, the vehicle’s integrated Automatic Emergency Braking (AEB) system failed to activate or provide secondary collision mitigation, resulting in a crash with the vehicle ahead. Technical & Telemetry Evidence: An official Bosch Crash Data Retrieval (CDR) report (dated July 29, 2026) confirmed that during the incident, the brake pedal was physically depressed to 16% pedal travel/movement, yet the hydraulic line pressure registered at 0 kPa. This electronic telemetry proves that despite driver pedal application, the Electronic Brake Control Module (EBCM) never engaged hydraulic pressure or commanded stopping authority. Post-Incident & Out-of-Service Timeline: The vehicle was surrendered to an authorized dealership (Classic Chevrolet, Grapevine, TX) following the crash and has remained continuously out of service in dealer custody since June 14, 2026. General Motors Product Assistance Claims (PAC Case #102143673) closed their investigation on September 2, 2026, performing $0.00 in repairs and issuing a complete denial of assistance. The vehicle remains completely unrepaired, unsafe to drive, held in dealer custody, and subject to an active Texas DMV Lemon Law filing.
Headlights Daytime running lights only 50% ? no back up lights no Brites, windshield wash not working then on going 6 dealer trips 9 days in shop for info screen / GPS,Radio&Phone
Was driving on highway and parking break light flashed on - break was not on. Tried to turn off and couldn't - car still driving. Then all these alerts started coming up "break failure", "no AWD" "Break failure cannot accelerate past certain speed". I tried to pull over the stop the car and no breaks would work including parking break. Eventually rolled to a stop without hitting anything. Car under warranty with 11,000 miles, called dealership who had lack of concern for urgency of the issue. This put not only myself and child but also many other drivers on the highway during rush hour. Very concerning and lack of response from dealership even more concerning.
What component or system failed or malfunctioned, and is it available for inspection upon request? On September 12, 2026, while parked at the top level of a parking garage, the vehicle unexpectedly began rolling forward after being parked and exited. The vehicle subsequently struck a concrete wall. The vehicle is available for inspection upon request. How was your safety or the safety of others put at risk? On September 12, 2026, my son parked the vehicle on the top level of a parking garage. He exited the vehicle while I remained seated in the rear seat and his girlfriend remained in the front passenger seat. I later moved to the driver's seat to speak with her. As I exited the vehicle to meet my son, the vehicle unexpectedly started rolling forward on its own. Nothing was touched or intentionally activated prior to the vehicle moving. Because the vehicle began moving while I was exiting, I fell and suffered injuries including a scraped knee, swelling and injury to my foot, pain in my hands, and abrasions on my arm. The vehicle continued rolling and struck a concrete wall, causing damage to the front of the vehicle. The unexpected vehicle movement placed me, the passenger, and other nearby individuals at risk of serious injury. Has the problem been reproduced or confirmed by a dealer or independent service center? I am reporting these incidents for investigation. The vehicle is available for inspection by Chevrolet, the dealer, the federal safety agency investigators, insurance representatives, or other authorized parties. No warning lamps, messages, or other alerts were observed prior to the Rear Automatic Braking events or the vehicle roll-away incident. The braking events and vehicle movement occurred unexpectedly and without warning. I no longer feel safe operating this vehicle. Between the multiple false activations of the Rear Automatic Braking system and the incident on September 12, 2026, where the vehicle unexpectedly rolled forward and caused injury
The contact owns a 2025 Chevrolet Blazer. The contact stated that a GM inspector had inspected the vehicle due to phantom braking. The contact stated that while her husband was driving approximately 35 MPH, with her daughter in the front passenger’s seat and the contact seated in the rear seat, the brakes independently engaged, and the vehicle came to an abrupt stop. The failure had occurred three times. The contact had undergone cervical spine surgery six months before the failure, and the failure caused the injury to return. The contact's husband reviewed the Owner's Manual and discovered that the vehicle was equipped with the Automatic Emergency Braking (AEB) system and associated the failure with the AEB feature. The manufacturer was notified of the issue, and a GM inspector inspected the vehicle. The vehicle was also taken to a local dealer; however, the dealer was unable to repair the vehicle and suggested that the feature was deactivated.
Rear bumper sagging issue. The internal clip fixing rear bumper is weak then the bumper is sagging. The rear bumper might be detached from the car during driving. There are many similar issues among the owners. [XXX] INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
3 Times, while travelling at highway speeds, infotainment module and driver display went dark for at least 3 minutes. While in this state, there were no visual controls such as speed, turn signals, etc. - the entire dashboard was dark. Recurring codes are: U11FD(00) Raw code: D1FD00 ECU: 40[Archive (inactive)] Status: Confirmed, Test failed since last DTC clear
The contact owns a 2025 Chevrolet Blazer. The contact stated that the Forward Collision Avoidance system had erroneously activated on several occasions. While driving very slowly, the braking system suddenly activated while leaving a dealer. Additionally, while driving approximately 30 MPH, the braking system erroneously activated, causing the vehicle to abruptly stop. The automatic braking system was turned off, and the vehicle was later driven to the local dealer. The local dealer was unable to determine the cause of the failure and advised to deactivate the Collision Avoidance System. The contact sustained a neck injury during the failure while seated in the driver’s side rear seat. Medical attention was required. The failure mileage was 7,000.
Compare the 2025 Chevrolet Blazer
Blazer vs Jeep Grand CherokeeBlazer vs Ford EdgeBlazer vs Subaru OutbackBlazer vs Hyundai Santa FeBlazer vs Nissan MuranoBlazer vs Toyota 4RUNNERBlazer vs Honda Passport
Other model years
199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820192020202120222023202420252026
Questions about the 2025 Chevrolet Blazer
Is the 2025 Chevrolet Blazer reliable?
Owners have filed 35 complaints about the 2025 Chevrolet Blazer, fewer than a typical Blazer model year.
What is the most common problem with the 2025 Chevrolet Blazer?
Electrical system, with 12 complaints. Next is brakes (7).
How many recalls does the 2025 Chevrolet Blazer have?
1 recall, covering latches/locks/linkages.
What year does the Chevrolet Blazer have the most electrical problems?
The Chevrolet Blazer model years with the most electrical complaints are 1997 (90 complaints), 2020 (78 complaints) and 1998 (71 complaints).
What gas mileage does the 2025 Chevrolet Blazer get?
Official estimates for the 2025 Chevrolet Blazer range from 21 to 25 mpg combined. The most efficient version (2.0L 4-cyl, FWD) gets 22 city and 29 highway.
VIN decoder
See the problems and recalls for an exact car
Buying a used 2025 Chevrolet Blazer?
Check the exact car before you pay: accidents, salvage or flood titles, odometer readings and previous owners.
Check its history