Check a VIN

2000 Chevrolet Silverado brakes complaints

Page 17 of 21: complaints 461 to 490 of 607, newest first, as owners wrote them.

See the summary of 2000 Chevrolet Silverado brakes problems: which part fails, at what mileage and related recalls.

Filed Jul 10, 2003 · Brakes · 900 miles · MA

Vehicle has brake system failure. Intermittently while driving below 2o MPH and brake pedal is depressed, pedal goes to floor, but doesn't hold. Dealership has been contacted.

Filed Jul 10, 2003 · Brakes · 370,000 miles · NY

Abs failed prematurely. Dealer notified. *ak whenever the consumer came to a stop, when approaching another vehicle at a stop light, the ABS malfunctioned and caused the vehicle to drift into another vehicle in front. *scc

Filed Jul 3, 2003 · Brakes · 58,000 miles · OH

The vehicle experienced extended stopping distance. *ak when the vehicle had come to a stop, the anti lock brake motor started, the pedal vibrated and pushed back adding the extended stopping distance. This was an ongoing problem but not constant. Recall# 00v055000 *scc

Filed Jun 25, 2003 · Brakes · 30,000 miles · TX · crash · 2 injuries

My brakes failed after accelerating from being stopped at a red light. The light turned yellow before we were into the intersection when the vehicle in front of me stopped, speed was less than 10 MPH. I attempted to stop on a bumpy dry surface while braking the pedal went to the floor and hit the vehicle in front of me. Dealership claims brakes were within specifications set by manufacture. Something needs to be done about this problem, there are too many complaints dealing with the ABS system on the silverado. Please do something to correct this problem.

Filed Jun 24, 2003 · Brakes · NJ

Had to have brakes replaced on 2000 chevy silverado. Rotors were rusted out. Have never had rotors rust out on a vehicle. Vehicle had only approx. 35,000 miles on it. Cost me four times as much as I expected for the brake job.

Filed Jun 12, 2003 · Brakes · 49,000 miles · PA

While pulling into driveway ABS system engaged and brakes failed. Dealer notified.

Filed Jun 10, 2003 · Brakes · PA

While traveling 5 MPH and applying brakes ve ABS system kicked in without any indication ,causing vehicle to flip over.

Filed May 21, 2003 · Brakes · TX

Parking brake (emergency brake) on my 2000 chevrolet silverado will not hold the vehicle. Have discovered through internet web sites that it is not just my vehicle, but thousands have the exact problem. Discussed with the local chevrolet dealer and was told that gm is aware of the poor/faulty design but will not address the problem unless, of course, I want to pay to have it fixed. Do not feel I should have to pay for their mistake. This is a severe safety problem by it not being able to hold the vehicle. Feel the federal safety agency should force gm to inspect and fix any that have a problem before they end up getting sued because someone's child got run over by a rolling vehicle. Should not have to wait for deaths or injuries to occur before something is done about it!

Filed May 16, 2003 · Brakes · IN

While driving the consumer applied the brakes and they failed completely without warning. The dealer diagnosed that all rotors were chipped off and completely rusted through.

Filed Apr 18, 2003 · Brakes · PA

The anti-lock brakes activated at very low speeds. The pedal moved upward and driver pushed the brake pedal with force but the brakes did not respond. *nlm the left front brakes failed 100% of the time and the right front assembly failed intermittently. Both front wheel bearing assembly/sensors were replaced. The brake pedal had become hard as a rock and would not stop until both feet were pushed with maximum force.

Filed Apr 16, 2003 · Brakes · WV

When the brakes were applied, the vehicle vibrated. It was discovered the rotors were worn.

Filed Apr 15, 2003 · Brakes · 29,987 miles · TX

Since purchasing the 2000 silverado z71 ls k1500 truck I had the parking brake serviced two separate times. The first time at 29,987 miles, the parking brake did not work. It required "adjustment" and I was charged $112.50. I was surprised the parking brake required adjustment since it is not used to stop the vehicle, but rather used to keep in place when parked and it was rarely used since we live on flat terrain. I was further surprised to see that this was not covered under warranty but I let this go since I was told it was a wearable part. I did not see the actual parking brake pads but was concerned that I was not able to adjust them and hey required adjustment after such short of mileage. Again at 66,023 miles, the parking brake ceased working for the second time. This is just 36,036 miles after they were adjusted. After looking at the original parking brake pads, the front top of the pad was worn almost completely away while the back pad was worn very little. This cost me an additional $228.84 to have the pads replaced as they could no longer be adjusted. I did notice the new pads were of a different design with a larger clip that holds them in place, applying more pressure over a larger area. According to the technician, this new bracket helps hold the pad in place so that wear, while the vehicle is in motion, does not occur. This would suggest the original pad and retaining clasp was poorly designed causing abnormal wear on the parking brakes. Every chance I get, I speak with people that are driving 2000 series trucks and almost all that I have spoken with, their parking brakes are non-functional. Of those that were working, they had them replaced. I keep meticulous records for the service on my vehicle and it is not driven hard or abused in any manner. I would be happy to make any/all of this information available to you for review.

Filed Apr 10, 2003 · Brakes · 65,000 miles · TX

Vehicle failed state inspection due to an inoperable parking brake. Inspector claims over 50% of new body style silverado's/tahoe's/suburban's he inspects fail due to the same problem.

Filed Apr 8, 2003 · Brakes, Engine · NY

Consumer complained of defective engine making constant noise. Vehicle also vibrated while driving. In addition, dealer replaced water pump and engine belts.

Filed Mar 27, 2003 · Brakes · MI

The vehicle experienced the same problem as recall (anti lock brake), #00v055000, however the vehicle identification number was not included in the recall.

Filed Mar 18, 2003 · Brakes · 20,000 miles · MA

The parking brake wore out at 20,000 miles. The dealer was notified at repaired the problem but at 53,000 miles the problem reoccurred.

Filed Mar 13, 2003 · Brakes · 20,000 miles · MA

The park brake had worn out, the dealer replaced it, however the problem recurred.

Filed Mar 5, 2003 · Brakes · 63,000 miles · MI

Brakes showing same failure as recall 0 0 v 05 5000. Call chevrolet with questions of recall but was told that my truck was not effected by. My truck has shown the same problems that were summarized with recall listed above. Repair includes replacing brake pressure module valve.

Filed Feb 26, 2003 · Brakes · GA

The emergency brake failed to hold in the upright position.

Filed Feb 26, 2003 · Brakes · 12,000 miles · AL

The parking brake did not hold because the parking brake pad on the drivers side had nothing to hold it in place. It dropped down and drug against the drum until it wore the bottom of the shoe out. *jb

Filed Feb 26, 2003 · Brakes · 37,000 miles · WA · crash · 1 injury

The ABS brakes failed. The ABS braking system caused a resistance behind the brake pedal. Refer to evoq#8021722 scc

Filed Feb 20, 2003 · Brakes · FL

The brake pedal was stuck.

Filed Feb 17, 2003 · Brakes · 39,000 miles · MO

Anti-lock brake light comes on frequently and as a result the anti-lock brakes don't work. After two trips to the dealer, was told two different components could be at fault, each cost between $650-750 to repair and that they weren't sure which component was at fault.

Filed Feb 9, 2003 · Brakes · 75,000 miles · NY · crash

Antilock system activated without cause and disabled the braking system. This happened on dry pavement at speeds below 30 MPH when coming to a normal stop. This happened today and almost everytime I dare to drive the truck.

Filed Feb 4, 2003 · Brakes · NY · crash

There were pulsating coming from the brake pedal causing him to go into a brick wall. Please furnish additional information. Dealer is aware of the problem. Ph

Filed Feb 3, 2003 · Brakes · CA · crash

This involves a 2000 chevrolet silverado. Vin [xxx]. On multiple occasions the truck failed to stop. On the last occasion, it was coasting down a drive way, traveling less than 10 m.p.h. The driver had his foot on the brake the entire time, when, once again, the truck failed to stop and hit a block wall. It was a dry sunny day. Information redacted pursuant to the freedom of information act (foia), 5 u.s.c. 552(b)(6).

Filed Jan 28, 2003 · Brakes · 25,000 miles · CA

Failure of parking brake at 25,000 miles. Brake shoe dropped into drum wearing drum out. Shoes were still intact. Cost to me was $450.00 and denial of dealer of any defects in system. Dealer claimed damage was done due to driving with emergency brake on. Loud bell sounds if vehicle is moved with brake on. No one would drive with bell sounding.

Filed Jan 21, 2003 · Brakes · PA

Consumers front and rear rotors are warning causing extended stopping distance.

Filed Jan 14, 2003 · Brakes · NC

Consumer stated that when applying the brakes the brake pedal would go to the floor causing the vehicle to the floor causing the vehicle to have extended stopping distance dealer notified. Ts

Filed Jan 10, 2003 · Brakes · 57,544 miles · PA

State inspection revealed that the front and rear rotors and front and rear brake pads had rusted out and needed to be replaced. *tt

VIN decoder

See the problems and recalls for an exact car

Buying a used 2000 Chevrolet Silverado?

Check the exact car before you pay: accidents, salvage or flood titles, odometer readings and previous owners.

Check its history