Tl* the contact owns a 2002 chevrolet silverado. The contact stated while braking from speeds of 5 MPH the antilock brakes engaged, increasing stopping distance by approximately seven feet. The dealer advised him that the rotors, brakes and speed sensor would need to be replaced. The contact was able to locate a recall for the failure but was advised that his VIN was not included in the federal safety agency campaign id number: 05v379000 (service brakes, hydraulic: antilock). The contact stated he had experienced the failure before and repairs were made by the dealer. The failure mileage was 72,000 and the current mileage is 153,847 updated 08/17/10. *lj the cv boot was leaking. Updated 09/28/10
2002 Chevrolet Silverado brakes complaints
Page 5 of 13: complaints 101 to 130 of 350, newest first, as owners wrote them.
Tl* the contact owns a 2002 chevrolet silverado. The contact received repairs to the vehicle under the federal safety agency campaign id number: 05v379000 (service brakes, hydraulic: antilock) in december 2005. Most recently, while braking from relatively low speeds of 5 MPH, the ABS began abnormally vibrating and the brakes would not engage. The contact was unable to stop the vehicle and proceeded to crash into the rear of a preceding vehicle. The dealer confirmed the vehicle was previously repaired under the recall and advised the manufacturer was only liable for one free repair. The vehicle was repaired at the contact's expense. The failure mileage was 106,800 and the current mileage was 106,914.
Tl*the contact owns a 2002 chevrolet silverado. While driving 45 MPH, the contact placed his foot on the brake pedal and the speed failed to decrease. The vehicle was driven onto the emergency lane. The contact inspected the vehicle and noticed that the brake line was leaking fluid. The contacted found two related the federal safety agency recalls, 05v379000 (service brakes, hydraulic, antilock) and the federal safety agency campaign id number 05v161000 (parking brake). The vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic for diagnostic testing. The mechanic stated that the brake lines were rotten and that the brake sensor was corroded. The dealer would not offer any assistance. The road conditions may have been a factor due to salt on the roads. The failure mileage was 140,000. The current mileage was 142,000.
Tl* the contact owns a 2002 chevrolet silverado. The contact stated while braking from speeds of 5 MPH, the brake pedal fell to the floorboard. The contact was able to stop the vehicle and upon further inspection, found brake fluid leaking from the drivers side. The dealer advised the brake line had corroded causing the leakage. The dealer replaced the rotors, brakes, and the caliber at the owners expense. The manufacturer was not informed of the failure. The VIN was not available. The approximate failure mileage was 83,980 and the current mileage was 84,000. Updated 05/18/10.
Tl*the contact owns a 2002 chevrolet silverado. While driving approximately 5 MPH, the anti-lock brake system unexpectedly activated. The vehicle was taken to an authorized dealer where the electrical contacts were cleaned. The failure mileage was 10,000. The current mileage was 38,000. Updated 5/17/2010 * cn the consumer stated the cleaning of the contacts was a temporary fix. Updated 06/04/10
The 2002 silverado (standard) was recalled due to defective parking brake id 05v161000 dated 4/22/05. I own a 2002 silverado truck with only 35,000 but it is automatic and the gm dealer in hawaii will not fix my hand brake because it was not involved in the recall. My hand brake does not work and I am due for a safety check soon. I called my local dealer several months ago and they will not fix this problem - they say they will service it but it will cost $400+.
The ABS is engaging at low speeds when on dry pavement making my stopping distance longer. It has occurred approx 3-4 times over the last 5 days. This is the same problem that was addressed under the federal safety agency campaign id number : 05v379000. When that recall came out the issue was addressed by the dealer but now the same issue is occurring and general motors is refusing to service the vehicle w/o any cost, saying they did what the recall required. I feel this is a safety issue that was not properly fixed when the recall came out. Thank you
On my way home from work at about 11:30 am on tuesday july 28, 2009, I stopped at a light. The truck came to a complete stop and suddenly I felt the ABS kick in. The truck went forward, without my taking my foot off of the brake, into the intersection. It finally came to a stop in the middle of the intersection. A car had to serve to avoid hitting me. I called the dealership and they said there are no recalls on my 2002 chevy silverado truck. There was one on the 1999 silverado for ABS failure.
Tl*the contact owns a 2002 chevrolet silverado. The contact stated that the ABS was not functioning correctly. The ABS engages every time the vehicle stops. The failure was noticed after driving 25 MPH. He took the vehicle to the dealer for repair, but the failure recurred three days later. The contact feels that the ABS activation could cause a crash. The VIN was unknown. The current mileage was 60,000 and failure mileage was 55,000.
Tl*the contact owns a 2002 chevrolet silverado. The contact experiences unwanted antilock brake activation while driving at relatively low speeds. He took the vehicle to a repair facility and the hub bearing assembly was replaced. He is in the process of notifying the manufacturer in reference to the federal safety agency campaign id number 05v379000 (service brakes, hydraulic:antilock). The failure mileage was 65,000 and current mileage was 68,000. Updated 7/23/09 *cn updated 07/30/09.
2002 chevy silverado (1500 2wd) parking brake failure. See/reference manufacturer campaign #: 05042 or the federal safety agency campaign #: 05v161000. Should be extended to automatic transmission vehicles. Defect summary: the parking brake friction linings may wear to an extent where the parking brake can become ineffective in immobilizing a parked vehicle. Consequence summary: if the parking brake does not hold, unintended vehicle movement could occur, which could result in a crash. Corrective action: dealers will install a low-force spring clip retainer for vehicles equipped with a pbr parking brake system. On vehicles equipped with the trw parking brake system, dealers will install a redesigned parking brake cable assembly. The recall began on july 29, 2005.
Tl*the contact owns a 2002 chevrolet silverado z71. While driving approximately 15 MPH in normal conditions, the vehicle lunged without warning when the brake pedal was depressed. The vehicle was taken to an authorized dealer for inspection and they stated that the failure was related to the speed sensor. The speed sensor system was replaced in the vehicle. The failure recurred on a separate occasion. The contact received a recall notice and the vehicle was repaired for the recall defect; however, the failure recurred. The recall remedy has not corrected the failure. The vehicle has not been repaired. The VIN, the federal safety agency campaign id number, and failure mileage were unknown. The current mileage was 94,000. Updated 03/04/09. *lj updated 03/06/09.
Tl*the contact owns a 2002 chevrolet silverado. After having the vehicle repaired according to the federal safety agency campaign id number 05v379000 (service brakes, hydraulic:antilock), it is currently beginning to fail. When approaching a stop, the contact must apply extreme pressure to the brake pedal in order to stop the vehicle. The vehicle has not been diagnosed by the dealer. The current mileage was 50,229 and failure mileage was 46,000.
Tl*the contact owns a 2002 chevrolet silverado. The contact stated that the brake lines and drums corroded several times. The dealer replaced them after the first failure; however, the issue recurred. The manufacturer stated that they would extend the warranty for the lubrication and oil change only. The failure mileage was 40,000 and current mileage was 45,000.
Tl*the contact owns a 2002 chevrolet silverado. The parking brake malfunctioned while the vehicle was parked. The brake would not activate when shifted into neutral and the vehicle drifted without warning. The vehicle was not taken to an authorized dealer and has not been repaired. The current mileage is 75,000. Updated 09/15/08 *bf the consumer stated he heard a scrapping noise coming from the rear of the vehicle. He was informed the differential needed to be serviced. No one informed the consumer there was a problem with the parking brake. Updated 09/24/08.
2002 chevrolet silverado 2500 hd speed sensor problems not addressed by chevrolet saw recall for this campaign 305v379000 which states salt zone states including pennsylvania having problems that a not being met.
Tl*the contact owns a 2002 chevrolet silverado. The vehicle failed inspection because the parking brake did not operate. The mechanic replaced the rear parking brake shoes. The current and failure mileages were 69,500. The consumer stated vehicles with automatic transmssions should have been included in the recall. Updated 09/26/07.
Tl*the contact owns a 2002 chevrolet silverado. While driving between one to two MPH, the vehicle failed to stop unless the contact pumps the brakes three or four times. The vehicle was repaired according to the federal safety agency campaign # 05v379000 (service brakes, hydraulic:antilock). The dealer replaced one speed sensor and cleaned the other. The vehicle did not have any brake failure prior to the recall repair. The current mileage is 144,000 and failure mileage was 142,000.
I have a 2002 chevrolet silverado $wd extended cab short bed truck. This vehicle was purchased new by me. Currently the vehicle has 39,950 miles on it. Since approx 12,000 miles I noticed longer stopping distances. I took it to selling the dealer & was told everything was normal. This weekend I installed new AC delco front brake pads & installed new wagner rotors. Upon removing the rotors I couldn't help but notice that there was a issue with the old original never cut rotors. The rotor surface was deteriorated hence causing the problem with loss of stopping distance. Note: the brake pads were the original gm. I am a state certified inspection mechanic. After surfing the internet & seeing al of the complaints from other silverado owners I couldn't help but to file a complaint. If this was addressed earlier maybe I would of felt more comfortable driving this vehicle more. As you will see the usual low miles we drove other vehicles instead.
2002 chevy silverado . I bought this vehicle brand new, I am the only driver. For as long as I can remember the parking brake never worked. I took in the dealer after about a year and didn't have it inspected. They wanted to adjust or perhaps replace the brake shoes. I never heard of a parking brake needing adjustment after a year, and how could it possibly be wore out? I never used the thing. I figured , it wouldn't be long before they had a recall on it. Now it is about 4 years later, I call g.m. To find out if there is a recall or if they would help out with the costs. I also have the 100,000 mile 5 year g.m. Warranty. Of course they admitted nothing and didn't help at all. I took it to the dealer and had it diagnosed like they asked me to. The dealer wanted $855 to replace the shoes and drums which somehow destroyed themselves over the last 4 years that I had a non operational parking brake. How is that possible? I know a little about cars. That doesn't happen unless there is something defective. It wasn't a fun day dealing with people who won't listen to reason, or shall I say won't admit to it.
Tl* - the contact has a 2002 chevrolet silverado 2500 hd. The contact stated that when he stops at a stop light the ABS system engages. The contact also stated that the vehicle presently has an odometer reading of 41,000 miles. The parking brake failed at 40,000 miles. The contact stated that there is a safety recall on these two features for the 2002 chevrolet silverado 2500 hd. However, his VIN was not included under the safety recall.
Dt*: the contact stated while traveling 40 MPH on normal road conditions, a vibration was felt and extended stopping distance occurred when the hydraulic brakes were applied. The brake lights did not illuminate prior to the incident, and the failure occurred under normal braking. The brake design was wheel antilock. The nature of the problem was worsening. The vehicle was examined by a local dealer who determined that the problem was unwanted activity with the antilock brakes. The vehicle was not included in any recall due to the VIN. No repairs had been made. A the federal safety agency recall # 05v379000 pertaining to the service brakes, hydraulic: antilock related to this matter.
2002 chevy silverado pick up truck with ABS activation at low speed. Causes increased vehicle stopping distance that almost resulted in several crashes. Active recall under # 05v379000. Work was performed at pasadena goodyear due to a week delay inservice appointment at jba chevrolet in glen burnie maryland. Complaint and request for reimbursement of expenses was files with gm under thier case number of 1-441050950. Dave miller, 1‑866‑790‑5600, advises that even though our VIN number falls under those captured for recall and is within the recall states and the problem is characteristic of hte recall they are denying reimbursement because I never received a recall notice. I advised them that I just bought the truck two weeks prior and would not have received a notice. I also requested that they send me a formal written denial of claim and they will not as they do not have authority to do so. I paid $1300 to have this safety defect repaired and they will not reimburse me for my expenses. All tsb's were followed and failed to correct the poblem. The only resolve was the replacement of both front wheel hubs. Removed , defective parts are available for inspection
Dt*: the contact stated while traveling various speeds, the brakes squeaked and when the brake pedal was depressed, the vehicle shimmied. The dealership determined the rotors were rusted from the inside out, and needed to be replaced.
Consumer complaintabout recall 05v37900.. The consumer was told that his 2002 silverado was not one of the models that they were looking into. *ts the consumer experienced unwanted ABS activation at low speeds. The consumer's vehicle was not included in the wheel speed sensor recall due to VIN.
Brakes failed during emergency stop, nearly causing serious accident. Chevrolet dealer cited rusted brake rotors. Chevrolet refused to pay for repair, claiming (according to dealer) low mileage (17,031) indicated truck "sat" too much, promoting rust. Rear rotors replaced in june, 2005. Front rotors were repaired but have now been identified as rusted and in need of replacement (august, 2006). Two dealers have acknowledged that parts (composite rotors) are of inferior quality and have expressed their frustration that gm has not recalled. Chevrolet refuses to acknowledge the problem or to assist in repair cost, calling the situation a "maintenance issue" caused by the environment (case # 1-427-765-013). Chevrolet claims this is the dealer's diagnosis, although the dealer clearly stated to me that the parts are inferior. I requested a copy of my file and was refused (chevrolet calls it "proprietary" information).
2002 chevy silverado was being driven and a steel brake line popped while braking for a downhill grade, causing loss of braking. If we had been towing our horse trailer an accident would certainly have occurred. The brake line is severely rotted and rust flakes off easily. The line is held to the frame, under the cab and not in a location where damage or wear should occur. The vehicle is too new and has low miles (55k) and this failure should not have happened.
Dt*: the contact stated while applying brake pressure at 10mph, there was an increased stopping distance. The vehicle was inspected by a dealer who determined the wheel speed sensor needed to be replaced. There was a the federal safety agency recall, # 05v379000, regarding the antilock brakes. The vehicle was not included in the recall due to the VIN. The manufacturer was contacted.
Dt*: the contact stated a manufacturer recall letter # 85068 was received for corrosion of the vehicle speed sensors. The corrosion made them inoperative. The vehicle was taken to the dealership who determined the sensors could not be removed without damaging the rotors. The repair was offered at cost,
2002 silverado k1500 brake pedal failed to stop the vehicle. *ts ***nar*** the consumer was told all of the brake lines between the master cylinder and electro hydraulic control unit were rusted and some were leaking fluid.
VIN decoder
See the problems and recalls for an exact car
Buying a used 2002 Chevrolet Silverado?
Check the exact car before you pay: accidents, salvage or flood titles, odometer readings and previous owners.
Check its history