Tl* the contact owns a 2006 chevrolet trailblazer 360. The contact received a manufacturers recall notice for exterior lighting in april of 2015. After contacting the dealer and the manufacturer on multiple occasions, the contact was informed that the parts needed to repair the vehicle were still not available and no estimated time for receiving the parts could be given. The contact stated that the head lights failed to function. The failure mileage was unknown. The VIN was not available.
The worst 2006 Chevrolet Trailblazer 360 problems
Ranked by number of owner complaints. Mileage and cost come from what owners wrote.
Problems by type
Tap a problem to see which part fails, at what mileage and in which other years.
- Lights14
- Electrical8
- Fuel system8
- Visibility4
- Airbags1
- Body1
- Brakes1
- Engine1
- Locks1
- Steering1
- Transmission1
Specific symptoms reported on the 2006 Chevrolet Trailblazer 360
Recalls
No recalls on record for this model year.
Defect investigations
Driver's Master Power Window Switch
On August 15, 2012 General Motors (GM) announced a regional recall action (12V‑406) involving model year (MY) 2006-2007 Chevrolet Trailblazer, GMC Envoy, Buick Rainier, Isuzu Ascender and MY2005-2007 SAAB 9-7x vehicles originally sold or currently registered in the salt belt states of Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and the District of Columbia. The recall remedy requires the inspection and repair or replacement of the master power window switch, which GM refers to as a driver door module (DDM). At the same time, GM implemented a special coverage program to replace failed DDMs for vehicles registered outside of these states. ODI was not satisfied with GM's exclusion of non-salt belt vehicles and continued its investigation. On June 13, 2013, GM submitted a related recall notification (13V‑248) to reclassify the initial special coverage program into a safety recall for vehicles that were not previously repaired under special coverage.The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened Engineering Analysis EA12-004 on June 11, 2012 to further investigate allegations of DDM thermal incidents in model year (MY) 2006-2007 Chevrolet Trailblazer vehicles. Thermal incidents involve cases where fire-related events such as smoke and melt are present. ODI has received 170 reports alleging a thermal event occurred. Complainants stated that the DDM melted and in some cases produced odor and/or smoke. Fourteen of these incidents led to a fire where visible flames were reported or the damage extended significantly beyond the DDM. In addition to the 170 reports listed above, ODI received 63 reports alleging the DDM acted erratically or became inoperative. In response to ODI's Information Request (IR), GM provided 619 unique consumer complaints that related to the alleged problem. Seventy-seven of those reports led to a fire with flame, and 4 reported injuries of smoke inhalation and/or slight burns from contact with hot switches. GM also submitted 20,400 warranty claims for replacement of the DDM, most of which involved inoperative switches. The problem condition is caused by fluids, such as rain water, entering the driver's door module and subsequently causing corrosion that could result in an electrical short in the printed circuit board. A short may cause the power door lock and power window switches to function intermittently or become inoperative. However, the electrical short may also cause overheating that could melt components of the door module, producing odor, smoke or in some cases fire with flame. The circuit board was redesigned and GM implemented the new design into vehicle production on May 14, 2007. All failures cited above occurred in vehicles produced before this build date (i.e., with the original design DDM). GM also reported that all MY 2006-2007 GMT360/370 platform vehicles and MY 2005 SAAB 9-7x vehicles utilized the same DDM and therefore ODI expanded the subject population to include these vehicles.This investigation is closed on the basis of GM's announcement of safety recalls 12V‑406 and 13V‑248. The ODI complaints cited above can be reviewed at: http://www-odi.the federal safety agency.dot.gov/owners/Searchreference, see the attached list for ODI numbers.
EA12004
Driver's Master Power Window Switch
The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this investigation on February 9, 2012 in response to complaints alleging driver door module melting and/or burning in MY 2006-2007 Chevrolet Trailblazers. In response to ODI's Information Request letter, General Motors presented 167 reports and 698 warranty claims that related to the alleged problem. ODI has received a total of 83 complaints, 66 alleging the door module had melted or burned, and the remaining 17 stating that the window switches acted erratically or were inoperative. Twenty-eight of the reports received have led to driver door fires, some of which allege the vehicle was keyed off and unattended. Based on the agency's current analysis, ODI has upgraded its investigation to an Engineering Analysis (EA12-004) to determine whether the subject vehicles contain a defect that presents an unreasonable risk to safety.The vehicle models and production dates of affected vehicles will be evaluated, particularly other GMT360 vehicles. The ODI reports cited above can be reviewed online at www-odi.the federal safety agency.dot.gov/owners/Searchreference under the following identification (ODI) numbers: 10247838, 10260600, 10274337, 10275626, 10284010, 10396958, 10406203, 10409023, 10414691, 10417938, 10423865, 10426281, 10434446, 10445657, 10447754, 10447757, 10447770, 10447788, 10447813, 10447831, 10447865, 10447880, 10447892, 10447938, 10447994, 10447996, 10447997, 10448028, 10448086, 10448138, 10448176, 10448201, 10448337, 10448455, 10448464, 10448478, 10448540, 10448900, 10448941, 10449150, 10449166, 10449169, 10449236, 10449722, 10450055, 10450202, 10450284, 10451584, 10451878, 10451918, 10452197, 10452301, 10452586, 10452743, 10452895, 10453161, 10453227, 10453261, 10453578, 10453746, 10453951, 10454196, 10454211, 10454539, 10454673, 10455122, 10455150, 10455279, 10455469, 10456285, 10456529, 10457116, 10457644, 10457811, 10458224, 10458485, 10458599, 10458743, 10458846, 10460062, 10460141, 10460732, 10460843
PE12003
Fuel level gauge system failure
The office of defects investigations (ODI) analyzed complaint data provided by General Motors (GM) as well as complaints submitted to ODI from consumers.In total, there were 5,089 unique reports indicating an inaccurate fuel level reading while driving.General Motors stated that this condition occurs when the contacts of the fuel sensor wear prematurely.Most of the complaints indicated an empty fuel gauge reading after filling the tank.Less than 10 percent of theODI complaints involved an engine stall incident.During this investigation, GM developed a remedy procedure and issued special coverage bulletin instructing dealers to install a new design fuel level sensor.The bulletin was sent to dealers on August 10, 2011 and the owner letter mailing began on August 15, 2011.See the investigative file for copies of GM's bulletin and owner letter.This preliminary evaluation is closed.
PE11014
Fuel Level Gauge System Failure
The Office of Defects Investigation has received 668 complaints alleging inaccurate fuel gauge reading while driving in model year 2005-07 Chevrolet Trailblazer, GMC Envoy, Buick Rainier, and Saab 9-7x vehicles.Of the 668 complaints, 58 incidents were alleged to result in a vehicle stall.Of the 58 stalling incidents, 43 complaints reported stalling because the fuel level reading indicated more fuel availability than what is actually in the fuel tank. One complaint alleged a vehicle crash after the vehicle stalled while exiting the interstate, became disabled, and was struck from behind.Summarily, the complaints show an apparent increasing trend, with most complaints received within the past year.A Preliminary Evaluation has been opened to assess the scope, frequency and potential safety consequences associated with the alleged defect.
DP10001
Technical service bulletins for the 2006 Chevrolet Trailblazer 360 132
Bulletins tell dealers how to fix known problems. A warranty extension means the manufacturer pays for that repair for longer.
- This PI communicates the requirement to provide a pico file to receive diagnostic assistance from TAC.
- Unknown or other
- This service bulletin provides information for dealers/technicians on When and How to Submit a Field...
- Unknown or other
- Vehicle Wide Programming (VWP) is a new process to update software on GM Vehicles
- This service bulletin provides guidelines and diagnostic/repair information to technicians regarding...
- GM is receiving damaged (cracked or broken) transmission cores returned to the reman facilities
- This service bulletin advises of a new fuel injection cleaner kit used for decarbonizing the intake valves...
- This bulletin provides information for use on a Product Assistance Claim (PAC), which is formerly known as...
- This service bulletin provides information for dealers/technicians on Service Programming System (SPS)...
See all 132 bulletins for the 2006 Chevrolet Trailblazer 360
What 2006 Chevrolet Trailblazer 360 owners say
Most recent owner complaints, unedited.
Tl* the contact owns a 2006 chevrolet trailblazer 360. While driving approximately 55 MPH, both headlights dimmed without warning. The contact purchased and replaced the relay. The failure recurred two months later and the relay was replaced again. The contact called a local dealer and scheduled an appointment for diagnostic testing. The manufacturer was not made aware of the failure. The failure mileage was 130,000.
Tl* the contact owns a 2006 chevrolet trailblazer 360. The contact stated that the vehicle stalled numerous times without warning after being taken to the dealer for a manufacturer's recall on the driver side door module. The dealer was notified and had not diagnosed the vehicle after the recall repair. The vehicle was taken to an independent repair shop multiple times to diagnose the vehicle and the mechanic(s) provided various remedies that did not prevent the failure. The contact mentioned that the vehicle continued to randomly stall and was not repaired. The manufacturer was notified of the failures. The federal safety agency campaign number was unknown. The approximate failure mileage was 110,000.
Tl* the contact owned a 2006 chevrolet trailblazer 360. While driving approximately 5 MPH, the rear seat air bags deployed without warning or impact. The contact took the vehicle to be inspected by the insurance company. The vehicle was deemed destroyed. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure and was unable to assist. The contact stated that there were no failures found on the vehicle. The approximate failure mileage was 100,000. Updated 04/07/16*lj consumer stated, after coming to a complete stop, and after turning to the right to go wb, vehicle side curtain airbags deployed while accelerating to residential speeds. Updated 05/31/18
Tl* the contact owns a 2006 chevrolet trailblazer 360. The contact stated that while driving at approximately 75 MPH, the headlights failed without warning. The contact activated the high beams in order to view the road. The failure recurred numerous times. The vehicle was taken to a dealer where it was diagnosed that the head lights failed and needed to be replaced. The vehicle was repaired. The manufacturer was not made aware of the failure and the VIN was included in the federal safety agency campaign number: 15v519000 (exterior lighting) however, the part to do the repair was unavailable. The contact stated that the manufacturer exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The failure mileage was approximately 100,000. Vin tool confirms parts not available.
Tl* the contact owns a 2006 chevrolet trailblazer 360. The contact stated that the low beam headlights failed to work. The high beam headlights were the only lights functioning correctly. The contact received notification of the federal safety agency campaign number: 14v755000 (exterior lighting); however, the part to do the repair was unavailable. The contact stated that the manufacturer exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The manufacturer was made aware of the issue and were willing to provide a temporary remedy; however, the parts for the remedy were unavailable. The VIN was invalid. The approximate failure mileage was 90,000. Vin tool confirms parts not available.
Tl* the contact owns a 2006 chevrolet trailblazer 360. The contact received notification of the federal safety agency campaign number: 14v755000 (exterior lighting); however, the part for the repair was unavailable. The contact stated that the manufacturer exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The "check vehicle lighting" warning light illuminated. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure and stated that they would notify the contact when parts become available. The approximate failure mileage was 160,000. Vin tool confirms parts not available.
Tl* the contact owns a 2006 chevrolet trailblazer 360. The contact stated that there was a progressing failure in which the low beams failed to illuminate. The contact had to apply the high beams each time the failure occurred. The instrument cluster lights failed to illuminate and the gauges were not visible when the vehicle was in operation. The contact later received notification of the federal safety agency campaign number: 14v404000 (visibility) and was to schedule the recall repair. The vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The failure mileage was not available. Parts distribution disconnect.
Tl* the contact owns a 2006 chevrolet trailblazer 360. While the vehicle was parked, the front and rear driver side door windows failed to operate and the front driver door could not be locked. The failure recurred intermittently. The vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. The VIN was not included in the federal safety agency campaign number: 15v599000 (visibility). The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The approximate failure mileage was 120,000.
Tl* the contact owns a 2006 chevrolet trailblazer 360. While driving various speeds, the headlights seized without warning. The failure occurred randomly. The vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. The VIN was not included in the federal safety agency campaign number: 15v519000 (exterior lighting). The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 90,000.
Compare the 2006 Chevrolet Trailblazer 360
Other model years
Questions about the 2006 Chevrolet Trailblazer 360
Is the 2006 Chevrolet Trailblazer 360 reliable?
Owners have filed 34 complaints about the 2006 Chevrolet Trailblazer 360, 3.1 times a typical Trailblazer 360 model year.
What is the 2006 Chevrolet Trailblazer 360 year score?
The 2006 Chevrolet Trailblazer 360 scores 34 out of 100 (poor). The score compares it with the other model years of the Chevrolet Trailblazer 360: 75 is a typical year, 50 means twice the usual complaints, and serious complaints and recalls lower it.
What is the most common problem with the 2006 Chevrolet Trailblazer 360?
Lights, with 14 complaints, typically around 124,500 miles. Next is electrical (8).
How many recalls does the 2006 Chevrolet Trailblazer 360 have?
No recalls on record.
What year does the Chevrolet Trailblazer 360 have the most lights problems?
The Chevrolet Trailblazer 360 model years with the most lights complaints are 2006 (14 complaints) and 2007 (11 complaints).
VIN decoder
See the problems and recalls for an exact car
Buying a used 2006 Chevrolet Trailblazer 360?
Check the exact car before you pay: accidents, salvage or flood titles, odometer readings and previous owners.
Check its history