1995 Ford Taurus body problems

Filed Dec 19, 2015 · Body, Engine · MN

Sub frame.

Filed Jul 13, 2015 · Body · 239,000 miles · IN

Tl* the contact owns a 1995 ford taurus. The contact stated that the front subframe mounted bolts fractured when driving over an unleveled road. In addition, the contact stated that the subframe, the front mount bolts, the reinforcement plates, and the engine cradle fractured causing the vehicle to be unable to be driven. The vehicle was not included in the federal safety agency campaign number: 98v323000 (structure). The vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. The approximate failure mileage was 239,000.

Filed Jun 23, 2013 · Body · 135,267 miles · TX

My 1995 taurus experienced a failure of the lower sub-frame mount retainer plate. The retainer plate had become severely corroded over time and this corrosion had weakened the retainer plate enough to allow the bolt head to pull through the retainer plate. This failure was caused by long term exposure to moisture from normal precipitation and consistent with the failure detailed in the reasons for recall section of service recall bulletin 98s36. The ford recall bulletin states the retaining plate nut becomes severely corroded from long term exposure to road salts and retention of moisture in the mounts. Due to corrosion, my 1995 taurus experienced that same failure but the corrosion was not caused by road salts. Although this failure occurred at slow speed, steering was affected. Had this failure occurred at high-speed or while crossing a slight bump or dip in road surface, steering could have become difficult, potentially leading to an accident. This is a cause of concern for other 1986-1995 taurus and sable vehicles still in service. Because my vehicle had not been registered in any of the states included in the recall, my request to ford motor company to include my vehicle in the recall was denied. The federal safety agency recall 98v323000 was designed to prevent this type of failure from occurring. Had this vehicle been included in this safety recall, this failure would not have occurred. It is clear that this failure is also caused by corrosion due to long term exposure to moisture from normal precipitation and not exclusive to road salts. Thus, the federal safety agency campaign id 98v323000 should not be limited to only states where road salts are used. Therefore, I am requesting ford motor company be required to expand the federal safety agency campaign id 98v323000 to cover vehicles registered in states where long term exposure to moisture from normal precipitation is a factor.

Filed Sep 23, 2011 · Body, Steering · 128,000 miles · MN

Tl* the contact owns a 1995 ford taurus. While accelerating, the contact stated that the steering wheel would abnormally turn at a 45 degree angle. The dealer stated that there was corrosion and a detachment of bolts in the rear corners of the subframe. The manufacturer was notified but denied any assistance with repairs to the failure because the vehicle was not associated with the federal safety agency campaign id number: 98v323000 (structure:frame and members) recall. The vehicle was not repaired. The failure mileage was 128,000 and the current mileage was 130,000.

Filed Aug 19, 2011 · Body · 124,000 miles · PA

Tl* the contact owns a 1995 ford taurus. The contact stated the rear passenger side sub-frame mount dropped causing a clanking sound while driving 30 MPH. The contact notified the manufacturer of the federal safety agency recall campaign number 98v323000 ( structure:frame and members) who stated the vehicle was inspected in 2001. The contact stated the recall repair was never performed on the vehicle since there were no new bolts underneath the vehicle. The contact stated the vehicle was unsafe to drive. The failure mileage was 124,000.

Filed Jun 2, 2010 · Body · KY

Tl*the contact owns a 1995 ford taurus. Upon purchasing the vehicle from an independent party, the contact was informed that the front passenger side strut was broken. The vehicle was taken to be examined by an independent mechanic where the contact was then informed that the front passenger subframe was broken. The vehicle was not taken to an authorized dealership for inspection. The failure and current mileages were 1,412,622.

Filed Mar 31, 2010 · Body, Engine · 74,000 miles · FL

Information redacted pursuant to the freedom of information act (foia), 5 u.s.c. 552(b)(6). 1995 ford taurus,fan motor froze, ford said they will only replace circuit breaker but not the fan which is now froze up again due to mileage (142,000). I've replaced motor no less than three times since 1997 before finding out about recall. Also I've replaced a rear motor mount two to four times since 1997. A recall on this vehicle bought or built in certain other states have recalls on what sounds to be this same problem causes engine and transmission to fall causing accident. Ford will not fix. Could I get help from you in order to get ford to repair their defective products. [xxx]

Filed Mar 22, 2010 · Body · 134,600 miles · ND

98v323000 this is the recall id I have this car and the rear subframe mount is broke the nut that holds the bolt broke

Filed Dec 4, 2009 · Body, Steering · 138,000 miles · IN

Tl*the contact owns a 1995 ford taurus. While driving 5 to 10 miles per hour there was a loud banging noise and within a few minutes the engine fell on the ground. He was able to continue driving a short distance as the parts began to fall off of the vehicle. The vehicle was towed to an auto body shop. A mechanic stated that the engine mounts on the rear corner of the sub frame fell off and the repair cost was $617 . He contacted ford and they stated that they wouldn't offer any assistance since the VIN was not included in recall 98v323000, structure, frame and members. The failure and current mileages were 138000. Updated 12/30/09. *lj also, the power steering was inoperative. Updated 12/30/09.

Filed Sep 10, 2009 · Body · 79,331 miles · MI

Tl*-the contact owns a 1995 ford taurus. The contact stated that while driving 40 MPH the body mounts at the rear corners of the sub frame detached, which caused the sub frame to drop.as a consequence the steering became very difficult, thus affecting vehicle control and increasing the risk of a crash. He contacted the manufacturer in reference to recall# 98v323000 (structure; frame and members). Upon contact a representative stated that because his vehicle identification number was excluded from the range he was ineligible for a free remedy. No repairs have been made. The failure and current mileages were 79,331.