Check a VIN

2004 Oldsmobile Silhouette problems

The most common problem on the 2004 Oldsmobile Silhouette is tires. It has fewer complaints than a typical Silhouette model year.

Typical yearClose to a typical year
Year score
91/100
Owner complaints
11
Recalls
1
Service bulletins
432
Worst area
Tires
Fuel economy
18-20mpg

The worst 2004 Oldsmobile Silhouette problems

Ranked by number of owner complaints. Mileage and cost come from what owners wrote.

  • Tires
    4
  • Body
    2
  • Electrical
    2
  • Airbags
    1
  • Brakes
    1

Problems by type

Tap a problem to see which part fails, at what mileage and in which other years.

  • Tires
    4
  • Body
    2
  • Electrical
    2
  • Airbags
    1
  • Brakes
    1
  • Locks
    1
  • Seats
    1

Recalls 1

Latches/locks/linkages: doors: latchReported December 22, 2004 · 717,302 vehicles affected
What is wrong
On certain minivans equipped with second-row bucket seats or captain's chairs and a power sliding door on the passenger side of the vehicle, a passenger using the interior handle to open the power sliding door could be injured.
Risk
If a passenger uses the interior handle to open the power sliding door and holds onto the handle while it is being opened by the motor, the passenger's arm may be pushed into the seat back or armrest and a wrist or lower arm injury may result.
Remedy
Dealers will replace the power sliding door interior handle on the passenger-side. If the vehicle is equipped with a power or manual sliding door on the driver-side, the interior handle will also be replaced for appearance reasons. Note: before the vehicle is serviced, gm advises owners to not use the interior door handle to open the door. The driver can open and close the door from switches at the driver's position or by using the remote key fob. The driver should tell passengers to use the switch located in front of the door to open or close it. The driver should use the override switch to prevent operation of the power door by children or by others who are not familiar with its use. The owner notification letter mailing will be conducted in phases with the first phase beginning on may 31, 2005. The second phase mailing began on july 18, 2005. The recall began on may 31, 2005. Phase 2 began on july 18, 2005. Phase 3 (final phase) began on august 24, 2005, to all remaining customers. Owners should contact chevrolet at 1‑800‑630‑2438; pontiac at 1‑800‑620‑7668; or oldsmobile at 1‑800‑630‑6537.

Recall number 04V597000 · Recall details

See all 1 recalls for the 2004 Oldsmobile Silhouette

Defect investigations

Power-sliding doorOpened September 17, 2004, closed December 22, 2004

Subject vehicles are available with an optional power sliding door.the interior handle is oriented in the vertical position in the door panel and lines up at the elbow level when the occupant is seated in the 2nd-row outboard position.if the occupant holds the interior handle in the thumb up position during power-assisted opening, the arm/wrist can be push back with force against the 2nd-row bucket seat or captain's chair seat back creating a risk of injury (other seating configurations have ample seat to door clearance to avoid entrapment of the lower arm).among the 103 total reports, there were 102 alleged injuries including arm/wrist, thumb and shoulder injuries.a count of injuries reveals that 76 injuries were a fractured or a broken arm/wrist requiring an immobilizing cast for four-to-six weeks.all injuries involve the right side power sliding door.the left side power sliding door is on far fewer vehicles, but more importantly, it produces less force.gm notified the agency by letter dated december 21, 2004, that it will recall model year 1997 though early 2005 gm u-van vehicles equipped with a right side power sliding door and with 2nd-row bucket seats or captain chairs (the federal safety agency recall #04v597).as part of the recall remedy, gm will replace the door handle with a flush mounted handle that will prevent an occupant from grasping the handle with the palm between the handle and door panel (thumb up orientation) and thus eliminate the potential for arm/wrist entrapment.this investigation is closed.

PE04064

Technical service bulletins for the 2004 Oldsmobile Silhouette 432

Bulletins tell dealers how to fix known problems. A warranty extension means the manufacturer pays for that repair for longer.

See all 432 bulletins for the 2004 Oldsmobile Silhouette

2004 Oldsmobile Silhouette fuel economy

Official EPA estimates in miles per gallon (MPGe for electric). Ranges cover trims that share the same engine.

EngineDriveCityHighwayCombined
3.4L 6‑cylFWD172420
3.4L 6‑cyl4WD162218

What 2004 Oldsmobile Silhouette owners say

Most recent owner complaints, unedited.

Filed Nov 13, 2018 · Electrical · MN

2004 oldsmobile silhouette luxury. Consumer writes in regards to problems with the electrical system. *ld the consumer stated the radio, locks, sliding doors and instrument panel all malfunction.

Filed Dec 22, 2017 · Body · 188,000 miles · MO

My 10 year old niece attempted to open the power sliding door on the right side of our 2004 oldsmobile silhouette outside the mall. The motor was already running, in park, as I had come to pick up my daughter and niece from the mall. The door appeared to be locked since it would not open, so I pushed 'unlock' a few times as she and my grown daughter tried to open the door. I just heard a clicking sound of the unlock mechanism as if it was locking and unlocking. The door would not open, so my niece entered through the manual side door on the left side of the van. We drove about 3 blocks from the mall to the stoplight of a major city street. About half a block or less after taking a left at the intersection stoplight, the power sliding door on the right side of the van just opened. My niece loudly exclaimed that the door opened and tried to reach across from her buckled position on the left bucket seat. My daughter and I both shrieked and said for her not to get near it. My daughter was seated up front on the passenger seat and reached back to the window ledge of the open sliding door and tried to pull it shut. It shut most of the way, but not fully. I pulled into a parking lot of a business and had my niece use the switch located near the power side door to open it fully and then again to close it fully. We made the next 20 miles without incident. We just bought the vehicle less than a week ago, and we have our 3 younger boys ride in the back, so this incident has been very scary.

Filed Jul 16, 2012 · Tires · 112,963 miles · IL

Tl* the contact owns a 2004 oldsmobile silhouette. The vehicle was equipped with mastercraft strategy tires (n/a), tire size 225/60/16. The dot number was unavailable. While driving approximately 55 MPH, the vehicle began to vibrate excessively. The vehicle was taken to an authorized dealer where the four tires were balanced and the failure continued to occur. The tires had not been replaced. The manufacturer was notified of the defect. The approximate failure mileage was 112,963.

Filed Feb 23, 2010 · Electrical · 178,000 miles · VA

Speedometer in 2004 oldsmobile silhouette malfunctions. Appears to show correct speed some of the time, other times is obviously off.

Filed Dec 10, 2008 · Airbags · 9,815 miles · NJ · crash · 3 injuries

The impact of the crash of my car into the side of the other car as I was going west & he was going north,as his car kept on going, rolled over, my car was pulled nw the bumper pulled off - but the air bag did not blow, why?

Filed Apr 20, 2008 · Tires · 39,000 miles · WI

Goodyear tires on 2004 oldsmobile van defective (safety concern to other owners). Tires developed blisters then rubber split open causing tires to go flat. I had to buy tires immediately. Old tires are not here. I took them to dealer where I purchased the van new. No help from them or tire manufacture or van builder.

Filed Jun 15, 2006 · Body, Locks · 63,000 miles · MO

Dt*: the contact stated the sliding door on the left side opened without warning. Also, the door chime alarm sounded while driving various speeds. The vehicle was inspected by the dealer who determined the fuse to door alarm could not be removed because it was a safety feature. The dealer cleaned the door contacts and replaced the locks. The problems persisted. The manufacturer was not alerted.

Filed Dec 2, 2005 · Tires · 31,500 miles · IN

Almost identical circumstances as in odi 10137234. Big o tires aligned my van in oct 2005 and discovered the tread separation. Alignment was within spec, except camber or caster on the rear were 0.02 degrees out. They referend me to the dealer. At first, over the telephone, the dealership said it was due to neglet and referred me to an authorized goodyear dealer. Goodyear tire dealership discovered tread separation on all 4 tires on my 2004 oldsmobile minivan on the inside edge, under the vehicle. Goodyear saw my rotation/balance records and agreed to warrant the tires. This is why all four tires were worn, due to rotaiton every 6-8k miles. They gave me prorated credit based on tread depth remaining. 50% for two and 25% for the other two credit. Mileage is at 32k. They also explained that we should not drive on them until replaced. Of course I replaced them with another model of goodyear. I was concerned that my wife and kids would be killed in an accident (wife's car). Big o tire also stated they have heard of tread separation on these exact tires, the ls model, on other vans. I demand that both goodyear and oldsmobile should address this situation for a recall. In addition, full reimbursement is necessary for replacement. This needs to be addressed immediately to prevent possible injury and/or death.

Filed Sep 21, 2005 · Tires · 24,700 miles · TN

Took car to be serviced. Techs saw the tire separation and stated it was very dangerous and not to drive on them. Reported to dealership&gmac. Goodyear and firestone dealers say it was tread seperation due to faulty manufacturing. Tires are goodyear p225/60r16 ..... Both front tires are separating on the inside. Dealership blamed it on nonrotation (I do that myself so no records.) when that didnt work they tried to blame it on bad allignment. This also was not the case. The car stayed saturday night and sunday at the dealership after they so thoughtfully lent us a safe vehicle after threatening to have us arrested for refusing to drive the unsafe vehicle that was still under warranty. I arrived appx 7 am at the dealership and they looked at the tires and stated it was our fault and they only cover tires for 7500 miles. They also did some other warranty and recall work. I did not let them touch the tires or allignment because of they have a habit of acting in ill will and I do not trust them any longer. Mileage out-24706 I drove to the nearest firestone dealer (milelage in 24708 time 8:49 am) and explained to them the situation. They pulled the tires off and said it looked like faulty tires. I bought new ones because the old ones were too dangerous to drive on and the dealership wasn't going to do the right thing any time soon. Firestone checked the allignment. Data was as follows: lf camber -0.6, rf camber -1.0, cross camber .4, lf caster 2.9, rf caster 2.9, cross caster -0.1, (all within spec) lf toe .18, rf toe .11, total toe .29 (minorly out of spec...but positive toe would have caused wear on the outside of the tires and was very obvious to anyone within 10 feet that there was something wrong with them. Tires failed on the inside under the car and its possible they could have killed us all before we ever noticed them) we still have the front tires if you need them. (typed by wife)

Filed Jul 18, 2005 · Brakes · 20,700 miles · IL · crash

Dt: last week while in park the vehicle rolled backwards. The vehicle was parked on flat ground. The car was parked outside of home.there are no warning lights to indicate a problem. The vehicle rolled down and imbankment.the parking brake was not set. . It showed that the vehicle was still in park when the owner got back in it. There was damage to the vehicle. The dealership was contacted, who was consulting gm to see if they were able to work with owner. Owner has not spoken with gm. The owner iwas not aware of whether or not there will be costs incurred by this incident. Owner found an old recall on internet, but has already checked, and there was no recall on this vehicle. The old recall number was not available.

Compare the 2004 Oldsmobile Silhouette

Other model years

199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004

Questions about the 2004 Oldsmobile Silhouette

Is the 2004 Oldsmobile Silhouette reliable?

Owners have filed 11 complaints about the 2004 Oldsmobile Silhouette, fewer than a typical Silhouette model year.

What is the 2004 Oldsmobile Silhouette year score?

The 2004 Oldsmobile Silhouette scores 91 out of 100 (good). The score compares it with the other model years of the Oldsmobile Silhouette: 75 is a typical year, 50 means twice the usual complaints, and serious complaints and recalls lower it.

What is the most common problem with the 2004 Oldsmobile Silhouette?

Tires, with 4 complaints. Next is body (2).

How many recalls does the 2004 Oldsmobile Silhouette have?

1 recall, covering latches/locks/linkages.

What gas mileage does the 2004 Oldsmobile Silhouette get?

Official estimates for the 2004 Oldsmobile Silhouette range from 18 to 20 mpg combined. The most efficient version (3.4L 6-cyl, FWD) gets 17 city and 24 highway.

Share your experience with the 2004 Oldsmobile Silhouette

Tell other buyers what went wrong and what it cost. We review every report before it appears, and we never publish names, emails or VINs.

No names, contact details or links. Reports about a dealer or a person are not published.

VIN decoder

See the problems and recalls for an exact car

Buying a used 2004 Oldsmobile Silhouette?

Check the exact car before you pay: accidents, salvage or flood titles, odometer readings and previous owners.

Check its history
Is this car on a recall?Check VIN