Check a VIN

2000 Subaru Outback problems

The most common problem on the 2000 Subaru Outback is transmission and drivetrain, typically around 58,500 miles. It has fewer complaints than a typical Outback model year.

Typical yearClose to a typical year
Owner complaints
207
Recalls
1
Service bulletins
76
Worst area
Transmission

The worst 2000 Subaru Outback problems

Ranked by number of owner complaints. Mileage and cost come from what owners wrote.

Problems by type

Tap a problem to see which part fails, at what mileage and in which other years.

Specific symptoms reported on the 2000 Subaru Outback

Tire blowout 13Fuel smell 10Check engine light 8Overheating 8Fuel leak 6Fire or smoke 5Sudden acceleration 5Transmission failure 5

Recalls 1

Suspension: rearReported April 22, 2003 · 170,000 vehicles affected
What is wrong
This recall applies to certain passenger vehicles originally sold in or currently registered in the states of connecticut, delaware, illinois, indiana, iowa, kentucky, maine, maryland, massachusetts, michigan, minnesota, missouri, new hampshire, new jersey, new york, ohio, pennsylvania, rhode island, vermont, virginia, west virginia, wisconsin, and the district of columbia. Certain rear suspension subframe components were produced with poor paint quality which, after continued exposure to corrosive road salts for a period of several years, could result in rust-out of the component and possible breakage of the subframe.
Risk
If such breakage occurs while the vehicle is being operated, control of the vehicle could be affected, increasing the risk of a crash.
Remedy
Dealers will clean and rust-proof the rear suspension subframe. Owner notification began july 14, 2003. Owners who take their vehicles to an authorized dealer on an agreed upon service date and do not receive the free remedy within a reasonable time should contact subaru at 1‑800‑782‑2783.

Recall number 03V153000 · Recall details

See all 1 recalls for the 2000 Subaru Outback

Technical service bulletins for the 2000 Subaru Outback 76

Bulletins tell dealers how to fix known problems. A warranty extension means the manufacturer pays for that repair for longer.

See all 76 bulletins for the 2000 Subaru Outback

What 2000 Subaru Outback owners say

Most recent owner complaints, unedited.

Filed Jan 10, 2018 · 105,000 miles · NY

Rear sub frame rotted out in multiple places and broke loose while I was driving. There was a recall in 2003. The car was never repaired before I purchased it a few years ago. I had the car towed to doyle subaru in webster ny. They offered to cover the expense of the part but I would have to pay them $800.00 to cover the repair labor! They have had my car for 8 weeks now and I'm disable and on ssd without much income. I could have died when the car broke loose on the expressway while I was going 55 MPH. I'm without a loner car and can't make my medical appointments. The car had to be flat bed towed to the dealer. It can't be driven the way it is. My attorney tried to call the dealer but they refuse to call him back.

Filed Jan 6, 2018 · Fuel system · 150,000 miles · NJ

The 2000 subaru outback has a noxious smell from fuel in the cabin only in cold weather,that you must ride with the windows open until this dissipates. I called my local dealer to ask if they would have an idea of what is the problem and what would be an estimate for repair? I, just about got the question out of my mouth,when the service representative said it'll cost around $200 maybe a little more to replace two fuel lines and fittings(screw clamps) on the top right side of the engine. I asked if something this serious was ever covered by a recall and he said no, but I should check with subaru of north america to make sure,being the car is a 2000 his computer may not have it, for that far back? So, I called subaru of na explained the situation and also explained that while I was doing some on-line research it seemed as though this is a well documented and discussed problem with many subaru owners and they are very specific as to what the exact problem is. Subaru of na knows of no problem ever, I guess admission would mean this problem truly exists. This issue only became prevalent with subaru's owned in cold weather areas, southern states or west coast would not see this problem regularly because you need temperatures to be approximately 30 degrees and below. I am just trying to find out why no federal agency has held subaru to a higher standard, especially when it comes to a problem with a fuel line and the fact that this is public knowledge and well documented. I am not a mechanic, and living on a fixed income I don't have the disposable income that I had in the past, subaru knows about this problem, which is evident in the service departments familiarity with the fix? Can someone please enlighten me as to why this has been allowed to go for as long as it has? Subaru knows does the government, I hope not. Concerned, [xxx] information redacted pursuant to the freedom of information act (foia), 5 u.s.c. 552(b)(6).'

Filed Aug 3, 2016 · Lights · 210,000 miles · UT

Unknown component part/system. Drivers side headlight went out. Checked fuse and bulb which was still good; replaced bulb anyway and it still didn't work. Next day the other headlight also went out. Checked the same things. High beams, fog and parking lights still worked. My son jiggled the bulb socket and wires and the lights came on but now the driver high beam went out. High beam bulb and fuse were both okay. The low beams also now appeared to be yellow. Had to drive at night a few days later (I always drive with my fog lights on unless the high beams are used) and it seemed like I could not see virtually anything ahead of me; the low beams were extremely dim and unsafe to use. Was forced to use my single working high beam. In googling the problems online I came across scores of other people with similar problems. Some replaced the drl module with no change in result. It has to be a socket problem or grounding problem of some sort, or perhaps a wiring problem, though some people replaced the wiring harness to no avail, and replaced pins, clips in the bulb socket assembly. This is dangerous.

Filed Jun 2, 2016 · Suspension, Transmission · 147,138 miles · MI

I was advised by a mechanic on 4/20/15 that the rear cradle is very rusty, enough that I should avoid carrying heavy loads. I just noticed on this website that there was a recall in 2003 for inadequate rustproofing of that part; however, we never received notice of a recall. Can this be repaired or replaced now? There was no incident associated with this problem.

Filed May 4, 2016 · Electrical, Fuel system · 124,400 miles · MA

While driving at low speed on a town street the check engine light came on, followed by the odor of gas fumes. Subsequent inspection by experienced subaru mechanics revealed a simultaneous failure of the A/C compressor, catalytic converter, a headlight bulb and finally, a damaged fuel line that was spraying a mist of gasoline over the entire engine compartment. The mechanics had never seen a situation like this before, and had no explanation for how these components could have failed at the same time. The fuel line and bulb were replaced.

Filed Feb 20, 2016 · Suspension · 240,000 miles · PA

The rear sub-frame is rotted and about to break. While driving the sub-frame is shifting causing loud banging. When starting, stopping and driving the loud banging is heard from the shifting of the rotted sub-frame.

Filed Oct 23, 2015 · Body · 154,000 miles · ME

Due to heavy corrosion, we had to replace the rear subframe on this vehicle. Obviously the 2003 recall on this part was inadequate. I would like the rear subframe to be recalled as it should have been in the first place, rather than just undercoating the part and having it rot away anyway.

Filed Jan 22, 2015 · Engine, Fuel system · 120,000 miles · AK

In cold weather (usually 25 f and below) there is a strong fuel smell. Worse the colder it gets. I am worried for my baby's health and also worried I was inhaling this leaking fuel throughout my pregnancy. It is obviously not something that should be happening and is unhealthy. I reported this to a mechanic shop and they rebuilt the engine because of other issues. They said this rebuilding would fix the fuel leak/smell also. It lessened it, but it is still there every time it is cold out. It dissipates after driving it for a while. I have come to understand this is a widespread issue and there really should be a recall.

Filed Dec 16, 2014 · Fuel system · 224,000 miles · MT

During cold weather when the climate control system is set to fresh air, a gasoline odor enters the cabin. There is apparent fuel line leak that only occurs during cold weather.

Filed Oct 4, 2014 · Engine · 81,098 miles · NV

Cylinder head gaskets replaced at 81,098 miles. Due to the low mileage, the vehicle was not under warranty because 8 years had passed (8 years or 100,000), whichever comes first. August 2014 vehicle would take several seconds to engage into drive from reverse. Eventually, the problem became worse and I was afraid that it could cause an accident because it was taking too long to engage into drive. I took the car to aamco who installed a rebuilt transmission at 83,695 miles. These problem have been reported by subaru owners, but I have yet to see a recall. So, in the last two years, I have spent $5,055 in car repairs. I'm retired so I can't afford to buy a newer vehicle. Although this car handles well in snow and rain, due to the expensive repairs I have had to make and subaru corporation's lack of acknowledgement of these issues, I doubt that I will ever purchase a subaru again.

Used buying checklistWhat to check on a 2000 Subaru Outback before you buy

Compare the 2000 Subaru Outback

Outback vs Jeep Grand CherokeeOutback vs Ford EdgeOutback vs Chevrolet BlazerOutback vs Hyundai Santa FeOutback vs Nissan MuranoOutback vs Toyota 4RUNNEROutback vs Honda Passport

Other model years

19951996199719981999200020012002200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026

Questions about the 2000 Subaru Outback

Is the 2000 Subaru Outback reliable?

Owners have filed 207 complaints about the 2000 Subaru Outback, fewer than a typical Outback model year.

What is the most common problem with the 2000 Subaru Outback?

Transmission and drivetrain, with 42 complaints, typically around 58,500 miles. Next is engine (38).

How many recalls does the 2000 Subaru Outback have?

1 recall, covering suspension.

Share your experience with the 2000 Subaru Outback

Tell other buyers what went wrong and what it cost. We review every report before it appears, and we never publish names, emails or VINs.

No names, contact details or links. Reports about a dealer or a person are not published.

VIN decoder

See the problems and recalls for an exact car

Buying a used 2000 Subaru Outback?

Check the exact car before you pay: accidents, salvage or flood titles, odometer readings and previous owners.

Check its history
Is this car on a recall?Check VIN