Check a VIN

2010 Toyota RAV4 suspension complaints

Page 3 of 5: complaints 41 to 70 of 101, newest first, as owners wrote them.

See the summary of 2010 Toyota RAV4 suspension problems: which part fails, at what mileage and related recalls.

Filed Oct 7, 2016 · Suspension · 5,000 miles · PA

This is in regard to recall #16v596 for the rear suspension arm assemblies. The fix that toyota wants to implement involves encasing the adjustment sleeves in epoxy resulting in the arms no longer being adjustable. These suspension arms are adjustable so that the rear toe-in can be adjusted when an alignment is performed. The fix toyota wants to do is like welding the drivers door shut because the latch broke: it's no longer functional.

Filed Sep 13, 2016 · Suspension · 68,000 miles · CA

When I took my toyota rav4 in for a tire alignment, I was told by the toyota service center that my rear tires could not be adjusted due to a recent recall which epoxied them in place. The service center also explained that my rear tires were out of alignment which was causing them to wear unevenly across the thread. I have contacted toyota directly about this issue, but they feel that the vehicle has been damaged ("perhaps by a pothole" - toyota rep) since the recall was performed and are unwilling to pursue my case. I had this recall performed less than a year ago, and the epoxy has already failed (and I have had no accidents in that time). I would like the nhsta to please look into this recall, as I cannot be the only owner who is facing enormous repair bills just to fix a mandatory recall.

Filed Aug 4, 2016 · Suspension · 129,000 miles · IA

Tl* the contact owns a 2010 toyota rav4. The contact stated that there was an abnormal noise emitting from the rear of the vehicle. The vehicle was not taken to the dealer. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure. The vehicle was not repaired. The failure mileage was 129,000.

Filed Apr 25, 2016 · Suspension · 55,500 miles · IN

Tl* the contact owns a 2010 toyota rav4. While driving approximately 25 MPH and making a turn, there was a loud popping sound. The contact discovered that the rear axle detached from the vehicle without warning. The vehicle was towed to a dealer where it was not diagnosed or repaired. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 55,500.

Filed Apr 11, 2016 · Suspension · 62,000 miles · FL

Tl* the contact owns a 2010 toyota rav4. The contact stated that while at a dealer for service on extreme wear for the tires, the technician stated that the vehicle needed to be aligned. However, the alignment could not be performed because the repair for the federal safety agency campaign number: 13v383000 (suspension) was previously performed. The technician then stated that for an alignment to be performed, the entire rear suspension of the vehicle would need to be replaced. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was notified of the failure and confirmed the technician's statement. The failure mileage was 62,000.

Filed Mar 10, 2016 · Suspension · 50,000 miles · IA

After a recall repair on the rear adjustment arms the adjustment of wheel alignment is prevented by epoxy resin applied to prevent rust. If the wheels are not properly aligned at time of repair or even if the alignment somehow changes there is no way to readjust the alignment.I experienced this and ruined my two rear tires not realizing the alignment couldn't be adjusted. Now I am confronted with a $1000 reapir billto reinstall the recall repair ( which won't be adjustable for alignment) and two new tires at $235 a piece. If a person didn't notice the wear on their tires the result would be a blowout. This recall repair will cause more problems than it solves. Nobody is going to own a car that cannot be aligned without great expense. In additon the safety factor of having an auto that cannot be aligned has many ramifications. The image uploaded shows the tire after 20,000 miles on a 60,000 mile tire.

Filed Sep 23, 2015 · Suspension · 40,000 miles · TN

Tl* the contact owns a 2010 toyota rav4. While driving approximately 35 MPH, there was an abnormal sound coming from the rear of the vehicle. The vehicle was taken to a dealer where it was diagnosed that the inner and outer stabilizer bars were corroded and needed to be replaced. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The failure mileage was 40,000.....updated 11/02/15*bf updated 11/05/15.

Filed Sep 16, 2015 · Suspension · MA

Tl* the contact owns a 2010 toyota rav4. While driving 40 MPH, the rear of the vehicle swerved into an adjacent lane without warning. Two years ago, the vehicle was repaired according to a recall for the same failure. The vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. The manufacturer was not made aware of the issue. The federal safety agency campaign number of the previous repair was unknown. The failure mileage was unavailable.

Filed Aug 9, 2015 · Suspension · 37,101 miles · FL

After noticed and r&r on my tacoma, I did a undercarriage inspection to my wifes 2010 rav4,noticed front strut boots cracked and torn, bouncy,wet with oil at struts, checked rear shocks, wet with oil at seals bouncy, doesn't handle very firm as did when bought 2-3 years ago. Florida, ,no road salts, no beach driving or off road driving,this isn't right,I will have to r&r front struts and rear shocks on rav4 next when I have the funds! Asap! Don't feel safe to drive on major roads or highways! New brakes and tuned up, lof, very well tacken cared of vehicles !

Filed Jul 5, 2015 · Suspension, Transmission · 89,000 miles · ME

While driving vehicle began to shake or "wobble" . Upon inspection was found to be tire which was uneven in wear. Replaced tire and after a short time was found not to be the problem. Upon inspection was found seals on rear differential leaking . Closer inspection found rear suspension, tie rod loose. This we believe is due to rear suspension parts being faulty. Parts are original. At this time we are being told that it is not covered under any vehicle warranty or recall. This is a major safety problem as it caused vehicle to loose complete control. At this same time vehicle rear differential also began to give off a "whine" sound. The tires have been worn unevenly due to rear suspension being loose causing this failure. Our concerns are that we are being told there is no warranty or recall to correct or protect anyone owning and driving without knowledge of this problem. It should be known that tires worn uneven were on & from rear of vehicle. No front tires had been worn unevenly with this incident.

Filed Jun 1, 2015 · Suspension · 79,550 miles · MN

Tl* the contact owns a 2010 toyota rav4. While driving approximately 55 MPH, the vehicle drove over an uneven pavement and suddenly began to sway from side to side. After reducing the speed, the driver was able to operate the vehicle normally. The contact stated that the vehicle was previously repaired under the federal safety agency campaign number: 13v383000 (suspension). The vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic who discovered that the rear passenger side tie rod bolt fractured. The vehicle was repaired. The manufacturer was not notified of the failure. The failure mileage was 79,550.

Filed May 8, 2015 · Suspension · MI

Replacement of both rear suspension arms had been performed on 05/30/2014 free off charge as per recall requirement. When the dealer checked the wheel alignment on 04/30/2015, they said that they need to replace the suspension arms at my expense at this time. Are they responsible to replace them free off charge at this time?

Filed Mar 20, 2015 · Suspension · MD

The toyota safety recall #csj was performed yesterday on my car. The recall replaced the rear lower control arms and then were locked in place with epoxy. I purchased a 2010 rav4 that was repairable. When I needed an alignment it would cost about 70. Now when the car needs an alignment, the lower control arms may have to be replaced at major expense because there is no adjustment. Toyota redesigned the lower control arms on the 2012 rav4 and those should have been used in the repair. This repair damages the value of the car because no one would ever buy a car that can't be aligned. If this have been explained to me before the repair, I would never have allowed the repair to have been made. Toyota needs to recall the car again and replace the lower control arms with an adjustable arm as is designed in every car on the road.

Filed Feb 3, 2015 · Suspension · 60,000 miles · AK

To whom it may concern, last spring (march 2014) I received a recall notice for my 2010 rav 4 to come in for an inspection for my rear lower suspension arm. I immediately called and was put on a waiting list to be seen. Every month or so I would call to check the status of getting seen. They would seem confused each time I would call, but would verify that I was on that "list." but over the many months, I have still yet to be seen. A 2nd recall notice was issued this past december or early january. The last I heard, after over 9 months of being on a wait list was that I was still on the list and I was higher on the list to be seen. Upon receiving the 2nd notice, I called kendall toyota and they told me that the list no longer exists and that they will be starting a new list to see people beginning in march. This will now have been around a year of waiting to be seen for the recall. I am concerned, not only that I will not get seen in a timely fashion, but if my car were to get in any sort of accident due to the recall, would the responsibility fall on the company or on myself? Kendall toyota of anchorage also informed me that they are the only location that can do the recall maintenance here in this area. I'm frustrated by the continuing delays and would like to see if there is anything else that can be done to be seen sooner rather than later. Thank you! [xxx] information redacted pursuant to the freedom of information act (foia), 5 u.s.c. 552(b)(6).

Filed Jan 30, 2015 · Suspension · 43,598 miles · WI

Vehicle hit curb and required front suspension component replacement, and a 4 wheel alignment. Vehicle previously had recall #agency13v383000 which it had both rear lower (adjustable) control arms replaced and the adjuster area sealed with an epoxy rendering them non adjustable after recall completion. Toyota's service bulletin (t-sb-0042-14 dated june 30-2014) title "rear suspension toe adjustment out of specification after sr csj". It states in this bulletin (under paragraph b) "if the rear toe alignment is still out of specification on either side replace the rear suspension arm no.1 and complete the campaign csj again for any replaced rear suspension arm. American family insurance denied payment for the re-epoxy of arms so I called toyota customer assistance and explained the situation and the statement in their service bulletin, the case #is [xxx] phone 800‑321‑4331, the rep was [xxx] and he stated that technical information must be obtained through an authorized toyota dealer, I then contacted the service manager at our local toyota dealership (andy %ballweg midwest toyota 800 3rd street s. La crosse wisc. 54601 608‑793‑7000) [xxx] then contacted technical assistance and they refused to re-apply epoxy as stated in service bulletin. I then contacted customer assistance again and spoke with [xxx], she listened to my concerns and asked if she could review the situation with corporate and call me back, I agreed. [xxx] called and left a message stating that toyota was unable to assist in the application of epoxy but stated that toyota recommends the epoxy to be applied to the #1 arms after the alignment. I took the vehicle to ballweg and had the epoxy applied at my expense as I didn't want to return the vehicle without the safety recall provisions being met. I also filed a complaint with the ftc reference # [xxx]. Information redacted pursuant to the freedom of information act (foia), 5 u.s.c. 552(b)(6).

Filed Jan 26, 2015 · Suspension · TX

Tl* the contact owns a 2010 toyota rav-4. The contact stated that the federal safety agency campaign number: 13v383000 (suspension) had exceeded a reasonable amount of time for repair. The dealer stated the part needed was not available for repair. The manufacturer was made aware of the delay. The vehicle was not repaired. The contact had not experienced the failure.

Filed Jan 20, 2015 · Suspension · TX

Tl* the contact owns a 2010 toyota rav4. The contact received notification of the federal safety agency campaign number: 13v383000 (suspension) however, the part to do the repair was unavailable. The contact stated that the manufacturer exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The manufacturer was made aware of the issue. The contact had not experienced a failure.

Filed Jan 9, 2015 · Suspension · 58,413 miles · NJ

On a lovely saturday afternoon, my husband and I were returning home from a family picnic. We had just exited the highway and were traveling on a two-lane road in dover, nj. Suddenly, the car was violently thrown into the left lane with on coming traffic. I thought we had a blow out but was proven wrong. My husband just missed a car by inches as he wrestled the car back into the right lane all the while more cars were coming at us. He was able to direct the car to a side street. When we got out of the car we found that the right rear suspension arm was detached and hanging loose off the car. This necessitated calling for a tow truck from the toyota dealership. Our anguish and palpable terror was caused by the failure of numerous recalls to this toyota rav 4 for rear lower suspension arm to be properly & safely repaired. My husband works around the corner from the toyota dealership and upon the receipt of numerous recall notices, responsibly took the vehicle in for service each time. The most recent service visit was only a week prior to the incident. The dealership service manager called us and apologized and told us he took complete responsibility for the improper repairs. We could longer feel safe in this vehicle and traded it in immediately.

Filed Nov 11, 2014 · Suspension · 45,120 miles · CA

When driving at about 45-50 MPH lost control as vehicle starting shaking up and had a near miss crash on I 5 n driving to la. Decided to pull over and exit out and took an internal road driving at 30 MPH and returned home. Upon investigation found that last safety call repair for rear suspension repair was performed adding some epoxy to tighten up and did not fix the issue. Looks like free of charge repair done by dealer is not working. I hope thorough investigation is performed as the fix seem to not work and still can cause crash. Looks like the problem still persists: background the original problem involved a wobbling rear suspension arm that could, over time, rust out. That could lead to a suspension failure and, in a worst-case scenario, a crash. The maker has since discovered that the nuts it used to adjust the alignment of the rear wheels on the two vehicles during the august 2012 recall were not tightened properly. The maker has notified the federal safety agency it will now have to recall the same 780,000 vehicles to inspect for damage. The nuts will now be properly tightened and toyota will take the additional step of sealing the rear lower suspension arms with an epoxy coating designed to prevent corrosion.

Filed Oct 1, 2014 · Suspension · PA

Tl* the contact owns a 2010 toyota rav4. The contact received a notification for the federal safety agency campaign number: 13v383000 (suspension) that supersedes recall the federal safety agency campaign number: 12v373000 (suspension). However, the parts needed were unavailable. The dealer was uncertain when the parts would become available to service the vehicle under the recall. The manufacturer was not notified of the problem. The contact had not experienced a failure.

Filed Sep 25, 2014 · Suspension · NY

Tl* the contact owns a 2010 toyota rav 4. The contact received a notification for the federal safety agency campaign id number: 13v383000 (suspension), however, the parts needed were unavailable to perform the repairs. The manufacturer was notified of the issue. The contact had not experienced a failure.

Filed Sep 15, 2014 · Suspension · VA

Letter from congressman forbes on behalf of constituent regarding a recall by toyota on the toyota rav 4 (mail reply to chesterfield, va office - attn: joan fallon). *smd toyota received reports from dealers indicating that some consumers experienced symptoms of the recall issue after being inspected or repaired. Upon investigation, it was discovered that some inspections were not adequate and portions of the repair procedure may not have been performed correctly. Toyota developed a revised inspection and remedy procedure. The consumer stated he had issues with the tires, that required several wheel alignments.

Filed Sep 5, 2014 · Suspension · AK

Tl* the contact owns a 2010 toyota rav4. The contact received notification of the federal safety agency campaign id number: 13v383000 (suspension) and stated that the part was not available. The dealer did not give a specific date for when the part would become available. The manufacturer was also contacted and could not provide an estimated date for when the contacts vehicle would receive the recall repair. The contact did not experience a failure.

Filed Aug 6, 2014 · Suspension · 40,000 miles · CT

I received an urgent safety recall notice from toyota in december 2013, (safety recall #coj), affecting the rear lower suspension arms (no. 1) on january 2, 2014 I had an appointment to replace tires, and made an appointment for the next available date to do the recall on june 6, 2014. On arrival for the appointment on june 6, greentree toyota in danbury, ct told me they did not have parts for the recall and would let me know when the parts came in (should be a few weeks according to the service tech) to do the recall repairs. Since then I have not received any information as of today august 6 2014. I want to file this complaint because I believe that toyota has failed or is unable to remedy the defect within a reasonable time.

Filed Aug 5, 2014 · Suspension · CA

Tl* the contact owns a 2010 toyota rav4. The contact received recall notices for the federal safety agency campaign numbers: 12v373000 (suspension) and 13v383000 (suspension); however, the parts needed for the repair were unavailable. The dealer placed the contact on a waiting list behind hundreds of other consumers. The dealer did not know when the parts would arrive. The manufacturer was notified. The contact had not experienced a failure.

Filed Jul 28, 2014 · Suspension · KS

2010 toyota rav 4. Consumer writes in regards to the rear lower suspension arms recall notice. *smd the consumer was informed, the parts were on national back order.

Filed Jul 14, 2014 · Suspension · MD

Many months ago, toyota had a safety recall related to the rear lower suspension arms... Supposedly, toyota repaired the problem, when in actually the problem was not repaired so there was a second safety recall. That was months ago. I have repetitively contacted the dealership and I am not receiving any type of communication from toyota... How can I get this fixed because I'm concerned about this problem especially since I have a one year old son. [xxx] information redacted pursuant to the freedom of information act (foia), 5 u.s.c. 552(b)(6).

Filed Jul 3, 2014 · Suspension · VA

Received a recall notice in april 2014 stating problem with rear lower suspension arm. Trying to get it fixed but local dealers having trouble getting part and epoxy sealant. Recall notice indicates possibility of loss of vehicle control and a crash if the arm separates. Is it safe to continue to drive the car?

Filed Jul 2, 2014 · Suspension · MA

Tl* the contact owns a 2010 toyota rav4. The contact received a notification of the federal safety agency campaign id number: 13v383000 (suspension). The contact stated that she had contacted the dealer and the manufacturer numerous times and there was no date available for when the parts will be available for the repairs. The contact felt that the repair had exceeded a reasonable amount of time. The contact had not experienced a failure. The manufacturer was not made aware of the issue.

Filed Jul 2, 2014 · Suspension · VT

Tl* the contact owns a 2010 toyota rav4. The contact received a notification of the federal safety agency campaign id number: 13v383000 (suspension) however, the part to do the repairs was unavailable. The manufacturer was made aware of the issue. The contact had not experienced a failure.

VIN decoder

See the problems and recalls for an exact car

Buying a used 2010 Toyota RAV4?

Check the exact car before you pay: accidents, salvage or flood titles, odometer readings and previous owners.

Check its history