I have tried to get toyota to replace my frame for about maybe six years. I have taken and had the treatment around the spare tire on the frame treated, and over a couple of year all of the black colored treatment just feel off on my driveway in charleston wv where I lived at the time. I went back to love lexus and toyota to have my frame checked to see if they could replace it according to the settlement of the 2000-2003 tundra trucks.loves said my frame looked ok to them and they could not do anything at that time. This was about a year and a half ago. Now my left front side of my frame has a hole in the under neath side of the frame and the strut bar is ripping away from the frame...I called and talked to alexus, and al , and a higher up man in the company named rob, they would not give me better I.d. Than that, I told him this story as I'm sure his underling al did, that is why rob called me on aug 22nd and told me there were no avenues that he (rob) could see to help me.then I said would he help me trade for a newer truck and he (rob) said that would be up to me to do. My tundra is undriveable and I think toyota should fix it in the deal that was made for the 2000 to 2003 toyoya tundra trucks. What do I do to get some help. Walk to whre I want to go? I am on disability and I have very bad conditions, and I don't make enough money to go buy a vehicle. I think if my vehicle meets their specs for repair my truck should be fixed!!!! I tried to find out the lawyers who won or settled this case and could not find any help in doing this? Help from tony of huntington wv. Thank you.
2000 Toyota Tundra body complaints
Page 3 of 19: complaints 41 to 70 of 529, newest first, as owners wrote them.
Tl* the contact owns a 2000 toyota tundra. While inspecting the vehicle, an independent mechanic diagnosed that the entire frame and rear passenger side wheel had extensive rust and corrosion. The contact was advised that they both should be replaced or the vehicle may fail an inspection. The vehicle was included in a manufacturer recall, but the manufacturer indicated that the statute expired. The manufacturer would not provide the recall remedy for the federal safety agency campaign number: 09v444000 (structure). The vehicle was also included in the federal safety agency campaign number: 01e041000 (trailer hitches/trailer wire harness converter). The approximate failure mileage was 103,000.
Tl* the contact owns a 2000 toyota tundra. The contact stated that the support beams connected to the chassis, which held the bed, plates, spring seat, and rear back end plates were all severely rusted. When these areas were touched, they detached from the vehicle. The vehicle was previously included in and reapired per the federal safety agency campaign number: 09v444000 (structure). The contact took the vehicle to a certified mechanic who stated that the vehicle should have not rusted to that extent the vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was not made aware of the failure. The approximate failure mileage was 130,000. Updated 07/18/17*lj
Vehicle was recalled due to holes in the frame. At 139080 miles toyota junctions inspected it and plugged hole and also sprayed the frame as a cover up, instead of replacing it. After 1000s of dollars of work done to alot of rust. We are now at 152000 miles and it is a total rust and holes thru out.
I have a 2000 toyota tundra sr5 4wd. It was a vehicle that was sold and spent several years in pa. In 2010 my truck was taken into a toyota dealership in pa to have a frame rust inspection performed due to a toyota recall related to rust. At the time they replace fuel tank straps and found no other rust perforation on the frame.in 2014 there was still a growing amount of rust spreading in other areas of the frame. It was taken to toyota in raleigh, nc. Service manager there at the time recommended a frame replacement due to excessive rust. No frame was ever ordered. Now over two years later my truck still have the rust and then some on the frame. I cannot hang a spare tire in the rear due to the rust. The frame have 2 holes in it and is unsafe. Toyota refuses to replace the frame even though it was recommended in 2014 and was still under the warranty period. I have called and called and have opened up a case with toyota for this issue. They still refuse to replace it no matter what I say and the proof of the damage as a result of poor quality on their part. The truck is unsafe and it should have a new frame under it. I was told by my case manager that since it had been inspected previously in 2010 that there is nothing they can do about the excessive rust that appeared in 2014. Ridiculous!!!! The rust appeared. Under warranty. Needed a frame in 2014. Unsafe. Period!!!
Tl* the contact owns a 2000 toyota tundra. While changing the oil in the vehicle, the contact noticed that the entire frame underneath the vehicle was severely corroded. The vehicle was taken to the dealer where the technician pulled the bed off and coated the back. The front was not treated. The failure recurred. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure. The approximate failure mileage was 55,000.
Severe frame rust, purchase truck from toyota dealer in 2015. Toyota recall in nov. 2009 that ended 2012. I was told by the dealer truck was inspected in 2012 and pass. I have plenty of picture's but can't upload here.
My mechanic told me my frame is rusting horribly. There is a hole 6inch by 6 inch near the rear tire. He thought he heard of a recall about this. I only have 44,000 miles on the truck. Purchased new, only had 1 mile on odometer. 12no major highway miles. I live 6 miles from work.
Tl* the contact owns a 2000 toyota tundra. After the vehicle struck a pothole, it made an abnormal noise and the check engine warning indicator illuminated. The vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic where it was diagnosed that the o2 sensor was defective. Upon further inspection, stated that the u-bolt deteriorated. The vehicle was taken to the dealer where it was diagnosed that the vehicle experienced severe corrosion and would need to be replaced. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 124,604.
I was recently doing some routine repairs on my 2000 tundra and noticed the left rear frame rail & spare tire crossover has very severe rust damage. On 9/21/2011 this 2000 tundra was inspected for frame rust by a local toyota dealership. I asked the tech what was the method for inspection, he replied they would hit the frame with a hammer in three to four areas, if they were unable to punch a hole in the frame it passed inspection. The spare tire was not removed to inspect the spare tire crossover. The left rear frame area (where the worst damage is on my frame) is not accessible to hit with a hammer with the spare tire in place. Toyota & the dealership is denying any responsibility in this matter. I believe that if this frame was in good shape in 2011 it should still be road worthy today (it is not) I know that I am not the only tundra owner that is having this problem. Toyota needs to stand behind their products, they knew that these frames were going to continue to fail, I now have a truck with an above average body perfect interior and a well maintained drive train that is basically worthless. Toyota should have been required to replace these frames when they discovered this problem. What will it take to resolve this problem injury or worse death? I have been driving toyota's since 1984, this is first time the frame failed before the rest of the vehicle. And now I hear the are having frame rust problems with later model tundra's & tacoma's.
Tl* the contact owns a 2000 toyota tundra. While the vehicle was undergoing routine service, the contact observed that the subframe was severely corroded. The vehicle was taken to the dealer, but was not diagnosed or repaired. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 108,315.
Rear brake line and proportioning valve failed causing the braking of the vehicle to be unsafe while driving on a local interstate roadway. The corrosion of the rear cross member is a known recall (see attached) the federal safety agency campaign id: 09v444000 recall date: 2009-11-18 which I just found today while searching for a proportional valve replacement part! Our VIN is showing 0 recalls, but this cannot be ignored due to a VIN! Due to the corrosion, special steps will need to be taken by the repair shop to even fix this problem. Living in pennsylvania, driving on winding, steep hills is even more of a reason that this recall should not be VIN specific. I am asking that the repairs needed to my vehicle (brake linings and proportional valve must be replaced!) be covered by the manufacturer recall that is still in place until 2019. Component affected in this recall: structure: frame and members:underbody shields how can a specific VIN be excluded when it poses a risk factor and possibility of a fatal crash! Please help us reach out to the manufacturer to include this VIN in the recall.
Tl* the contact owns a 2000 toyota tundra. While the vehicle was undergoing service, the technician noticed that the entire frame was rusted out. The vehicle could not be driven. The failure occurred without warning. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure, but did not return the contact's call. The vehicle was not repaired. The contact received notification of the federal safety agency campaign numbers: 09v444000 (structure) and 01e041000 (trailer hitches). The failure mileage was 143,481.
Tl* the contact owns a 2000 toyota tundra. The contact stated that the vehicle was towed to the dealer and the technician stated that the frame was rusted and the vehicle should not be driven. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure. The failure mileage was 90,000. The VIN was not available.
Tl* the contact owns a 2000 toyota tundra. The contact stated that the vehicle was leaning on the driver side. After inspection, it was discovered that the cross member spare tire holder was corroded through the frame. In addition, the spring fractured the frame and caused the rear axle to move on the driver side. The vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. The VIN was included in the federal safety agency campaign number: 09v444000 (structure). The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The failure mileage was 288,437. Updated 08/02/16*lj updated 08/08/16.
The total frame is rusted with holes, was taken to local dealership due to recall of frame, and was told there is nothing they could do because toyota does not supply them with the chemicals nor the equipment to fix the issue, if I wanted it fixed to take it back to new jersey were it was originally purchased. This is a hazard to my teenage driver as well as others due to at any point the vehicle may break apart causing a crash/collision injuring someone potentially death. Toyota has completely ignored all my concerns stating there is nothing they can do.
I sent a letter (attached) to the toyota dealership and to toyota motor corporation. This is toyota corporate's response. It is unbelievable that a major car company able to sell and service cars in the u.s. Would respond in this fashion. There is a known issue. They didn't accept the required resultant action from the corrosion recall and remedy. They simply passed by treating the frame (path of least cost and effort) and did not act in good faith now they have a callous disregard for the safety and satisfaction of their patrons. The case manager did not see the vehicle himself or view the damage or have pictures prior to his response. Below is their response: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ thank you for contacting toyota. Below is a summary of your most recent email message received and our response. We appreciate the continued opportunity to be of service to you. Subject 2000 tundra - severe frame concern discussion thread response via email (tiffany h.)02/15/2016 06:21 am dear o'dea: thank you for contacting toyota motor sales, u.s.a., inc. We are sorry to learn of your concerns regarding the frame on your 2000 tundra. We have confirmed your concerns were reviewed with a case manager and you were provided with toyota's position on 02/08/2016. Your email has been documented at our national headquarters under case#1602050676. If we can be of further assistance, please feel free to contact us. Sincerely, tiffany h. Toyota customer experience center customer by web form (david o'dea)02/12/2016 02:28 pm
Tl* the contact owns a 2000 toyota tundra. The contact stated that while at an inspection location, the mechanic stated that the sub frame had corroded and needed to be replaced. The vehicle was taken to a dealer, who confirmed that the sub frame needed to be replaced. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The failure mileage was 177,000.
Mechanic where it was diagnosed that vehicle brake line was severely corroded, the tire's rear well was corroded, and the steeering colomn needed to be replaced. In addition, the vehicle also made an abnormal sound. The vehicle's check engine light had illuminated and remained illuminated. Prior to being notified of the failure the vehicle was remedied under the federal safety agency campign: 09v444000 (structure). The manufacturer was made aware of the issue. The failure mileage was approximately 200,000.kh
Hello, can you provide some direction regarding frame rust on my 2000 toyota tundra, ( VIN# [xxx]) ? I have contacted the dealer where I purchased the vehicle (friedrick's located in lebanon , pa). This dealer has since changed ownership and thus their store name. The new dealer refused to help me with my recall. I cannot get my truck inspected due to extreme frame rust. My inspection mechanic found this rust damage and cannot by pennsylvania regulations, pass this truck for inspection. He alerted me to the fact that there is a recall from toyota, to repair such rust damaged frames. However in speaking with the dealer (formally frederick's of lebanon, pa), they refused to help me in this matter. My truck has less than 150,000 miles on it, in good condition except for the rust. If possible, please provide info where to have this recall work completed. Regards. [xxx] information redacted pursuant to the freedom of information act (foia), 5 u.s.c. 552(b)(6).
Tl* the contact owns a 2000 toyota tundra. While the vehicle was being inspected, the inspector observed that the rear driver and passenger side of the frame were corroded. The vehicle was taken to a dealer where it was confirmed that the rear frame was severely corroded and needed to be replaced. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was not made aware of the failure. The VIN was included in the federal safety agency campaign number: 09v444000 (structure). The failure mileage was approximately 108,716. Updated 2/4/16 *cn the consumer was informed by two toyota dealers, the vehicle was too old repair. The consumer then received a call from another dealer, who stated they would repair the frame. However, there was a possibility it could take three months or longer. As of 1-6-16 the dealer still had the truck in their possession. Updated 04/6/16.
Tl* the contact owns a 2000 toyota tundra. While driving, the spare tire separated from the tire holder due to corrosion. The vehicle was taken to the dealer where it was diagnosed that the fuel tank straps and the subframe corroded. The dealer advised that the subframe repair was no longer available. The dealer replaced the fuel tank straps and the spare tire holder. The manufacturer was not notified. The failure mileage was 113,000.
The frame was seriously rusting. Toyota had a recall for this which was not notified to me via mail. One of the argument from toyota not to do this recall is that time window is over (at the same time one of their associate told that there is no time limit for a safety recall). The inspection department at the dealership was not including the damage on the frame in the inspection. In the recall for frame replacement, what I got replaced is the cable holding the spare tire only (safety issue that the tire may fall down) ignoring the serious hole and rust in the actual frame. Here is the picture of my frame which the condition is clearly visible.
Purchased 2000 tundra in 2005. Was made aware of a recall by toyota corp regarding rust issues with vehicle frame, gas tank strap, and spare tire fastener. I brought the vehicle to a local dealer december of 2012 for the frame inspection (tank strap and spare tire issue repaired on a separate date). I was told that a full inspection took place to include disassembling the bed of the truck. I was told that no perferations were found in the frame. A spray foam kit was used to treat the frame. On 8/25/15, I was attempting to sell my truck when a prospective buyer noticed (2) significant holes in the frame located just in front of the driver side tire. The entire frame appears to have significant rust considering it is only 15 years old. Needless to say, a sale did not take place. I was fortunate to not be driving the truck with my family when a potentially catastrophic accident could have taken place. I contacted a local dealer (not the one that treated the frame). I spoke with the service manager. He stated that he would contact toyota corp but also stated that they may not replace the frame as it is 15 years old. He contacted me 2 days later stating that toyota would not replace the frame or buy the vehicle back. The frame recall I referred to was not a recall according to toyota. Rather, it was a, "good will gesture" to consumers affected by the situation. The service manager did suggest to look into finding a welder to see if they could repair it. Really?? Mechanically, the vehicle is sound. I am left with scrap and out at least $4500 because I cant sell it the way it is. The important thing is that my family is still alive. What a sham. This is not right and they should be held accountable.
Tl* the contact owns a 2000 toyota tundra. While the vehicle was in park, the contact noticed that the subframe was corroded around the rear driver side wheel well. The vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The failure mileage was 176,000.
S10 direct reply- letter to the secretary re requesting assistance with the recall of a 2000 toyota tundra. *smd the consumer stated the vehicle clearly exhibited rust inside the steel which was supposed to have been repaired at the original dealership. The consumer stated toyota issued a recall. However, they did not repair it, they just painted over the problem. The consumer stated due to the rust, the wheels fell off the vehicle.
Tl* the contact owns a 2000 toyota tundra. While driving at approximately 10 MPH, the steering wheel was turned but the wheels would not turn. The vehicle was towed to an independent mechanic, where it was diagnosed that the steering housing separated from the frame and needed to be replaced. The vehicle was not repairable because the frame was rusted. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 170,000. Updated 7/14/15*cn updated 10/16/217
Rohrich toyota replaced the severely rusted frame on my 2000 tundra in 2009, only after the federal safety agency directed them to. Rohrich toyota after telling me that per my VIN I wasn't one of affected owners!? Toyota replaced frame and brake lines as well as cross member in 2009. Toyota then reattached rusted fuel line to new frame and now rust from old frame has caused the fuel line to leak severely. I called rohrich and toyota america and was denied remedy of replacing fuel line! I am a survivor of open heart surgery and my wife is a disabled diabetic amputee and we need our vehicle for dr's appointments and shopping etc... Is there anything you can do to help and soon? [xxx] information redacted pursuant to the freedom of information act (foia), 5 u.s.c. 552(b)(6).
I received a notice from toyota to have my frame reviewed for rust damage. This occurred in 2012, so I took the truck to my toyota dealer and was told after inspection that my truck showed no rust. I retained the paperwork indicating such. On 12/30/2014 I took my truck for an oil change and when the truck went up on the lift it actually broke in half. The shop had never seen anything like this and was amazed at the volume of rust internally and externally. I contacted my toyota dealer because I heard of these trucks being recalled for frame problems. They said they would not help me? Please help me. I can't do anything with this truck?
Received a recall notice from toyota 9sm and a0f and took the truck to conklin cars salina, local toyota dealership for the inspection. According to toyota these recalls involve rust and corrosion of the frame, cross members, and fuel tank straps. Conklin cars tech stated no damage, conklin invoice #008916 dated apr 09 2012. Jan 2015 I noticed a hole in the lh frame rail and that the rear fuel tank strap had rusted through and broke. I contacted conklin cars and the service manager looked at it again on jan 30th 2015 and said that he had contacted their toyota factory rep. About the issues. The service manager suggested that I should not drive this vehicle. The service manager called me the following week and told me that the factory rep. Said that the case was closed and toyota would not do anything about the repair. I was also told that this recall was only for trucks that resided in northern states and this truck was sold in missouri and kansas. Looking at the frame it is evident to me that the frame has heavy corrosion, flaking rust and thinning of the frame rails. I have since replaced both fuel tank straps. I contacted toyota customer service "[xxx]" told me that the case number was #1502062938 and that the repair was taken care of on apr 23rd 2012 and was closed. I had explained that allegedly there was no damage according to the dealership in apr 2012 and less than 3 years later the straps had rusted through and there were holes in the frame. At this rate of decay the frame will rust in half in less than 3 more years. E. I contacted toyota and complained on feb 20th 2015 and they opened a new case #[xxx] and she said a case manager would call. [xxx] m., case manager, toyota customer care called feb 26 and told me the vehicle was out of warranty and toyota would not do anything. Toyota needs to stand behind these issue because they are ongoing. Information redacted pursuant to the freedom of information act (foia), 5 u.s.c. 552(b)(6).
VIN decoder
See the problems and recalls for an exact car
Buying a used 2000 Toyota Tundra?
Check the exact car before you pay: accidents, salvage or flood titles, odometer readings and previous owners.
Check its history