Tl* the contact own a 2000 toyota tundra. The contact stated that while driving at approximately 10 MPH, the rear fuel tank strap separated from the vehicle. The contact was able to reinforce the fuel tank with a temporary strap. The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The fuel strap was not replaced by the dealer. The failure mileage was 210,000.
2000 Toyota Tundra fuel system problems
22 complaints (2% of all complaints for this car). Typical mileage when it fails: 125,000.
- owner complaints
- 22
- of this car's complaints
- 2%
- typical mileage
- 125,000
- crashes
- 0
- recalls
- 0
Which part fails
- Storage: tank assembly3
At what mileage
Complaints by mileage at the time of the problem.
Toyota Tundra fuel system problems in other years
Related recalls
No recalls on record for this model year.
Related investigations
Frame corrosion
This investigation was opened based on 20 reports of model year (my) 2000 and 2001 vehicles experiencing severe corrosion of the frame, resulting in either under-body mounted spare tire separation or rear brake failure.the failure report counts shown above are for my 2000 and 2001 vehicles only.by letter of november 16, 2009 toyota has notified the agency that it will conduct a safety recall (09v‑444) of approximately 110,000 model year (my) 2000 through 2003 tundra vehicles.the affected recalled vehicles were sold or are currently registered in the district of columbia and the states of ct, de, il, in, ky, ma, md, me, mi, mn, nh, nj, ny, oh, pa, ri, va, vt, wi, wv.toyota alleges high amounts of road salts are used in these areas and excessive corrosion of the rear cross-member (to which the spare tire is mounted) can occur and cause the spare tire to separate from the vehicle and can also lead to rear brake failure.toyota stated: toyota has tentatively concluded that the root cause is a combination of factors, including usage in areas where road salt is applied, inadequate vehicle maintenance (I.e., not following the recommendations in the owner's manual), the design of the rear cross-member, and manufacturing issues.the design of the rear cross-member is such that it is open on the top side and susceptible to accumulation of dirt, water and road salt.manufacturing issues of the rear cross-member related to the coating process also affect its corrosion resistance.toyota also states that owners of my 2000 through 2003 vehicles in states not covered by the recall will be notified on how to obtain the same inspection and repair as the recalled vehicles, free of charge.further toyota states: please note that while toyota has not determined a defect exists in 2004 through 2006 my tundra vehicles, toyota plans on initiating a field action in the near future to prevent future corrosion on those vehicles originally sold or currently registered in the affected region at no cost to the owner.by letter of january 8, 2010 toyota has notified the agency that it amended its defect information report for safety recall 09v‑444 to include the fuel tank mounting system (I.e., fuel tank support straps and fuel tank mounting cross-members) in the safety recall.toyota states: toyota has not decided that the fuel tank mounting system in those vehicles contains a safety-related defect within the meaning of federal motor vehicle safety law.rather, toyota is taking this action at odi's request and to avoid future disagreement with odi with respect to this issue.my 2007 and newer tundra vehicles are not included in any of toyota's actions as the rear cross-member in those vehicles have been redesigned so that it is open on the bottom.the actions taken by toyota are sufficient to resolve the issues raised by this investigation.accordingly, this investigation is closed.the closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by the federal safety agency that a safety-related defect does not exist in the subject vehicles.the agency will take further action if warranted by the circumstances.
PE09049
What 2000 Toyota Tundra owners say
Most recent owner complaints, unedited.
While driving on a country highway, the drive power of the engine stalled, even though the engine continued. Appears to be a repetative problem with this model of truck.
Rohrich toyota replaced the severely rusted frame on my 2000 tundra in 2009, only after the federal safety agency directed them to. Rohrich toyota after telling me that per my VIN I wasn't one of affected owners!? Toyota replaced frame and brake lines as well as cross member in 2009. Toyota then reattached rusted fuel line to new frame and now rust from old frame has caused the fuel line to leak severely. I called rohrich and toyota america and was denied remedy of replacing fuel line! I am a survivor of open heart surgery and my wife is a disabled diabetic amputee and we need our vehicle for dr's appointments and shopping etc... Is there anything you can do to help and soon? [xxx] information redacted pursuant to the freedom of information act (foia), 5 u.s.c. 552(b)(6).
Received a recall notice from toyota 9sm and a0f and took the truck to conklin cars salina, local toyota dealership for the inspection. According to toyota these recalls involve rust and corrosion of the frame, cross members, and fuel tank straps. Conklin cars tech stated no damage, conklin invoice #008916 dated apr 09 2012. Jan 2015 I noticed a hole in the lh frame rail and that the rear fuel tank strap had rusted through and broke. I contacted conklin cars and the service manager looked at it again on jan 30th 2015 and said that he had contacted their toyota factory rep. About the issues. The service manager suggested that I should not drive this vehicle. The service manager called me the following week and told me that the factory rep. Said that the case was closed and toyota would not do anything about the repair. I was also told that this recall was only for trucks that resided in northern states and this truck was sold in missouri and kansas. Looking at the frame it is evident to me that the frame has heavy corrosion, flaking rust and thinning of the frame rails. I have since replaced both fuel tank straps. I contacted toyota customer service "[xxx]" told me that the case number was #1502062938 and that the repair was taken care of on apr 23rd 2012 and was closed. I had explained that allegedly there was no damage according to the dealership in apr 2012 and less than 3 years later the straps had rusted through and there were holes in the frame. At this rate of decay the frame will rust in half in less than 3 more years. E. I contacted toyota and complained on feb 20th 2015 and they opened a new case #[xxx] and she said a case manager would call. [xxx] m., case manager, toyota customer care called feb 26 and told me the vehicle was out of warranty and toyota would not do anything. Toyota needs to stand behind these issue because they are ongoing. Information redacted pursuant to the freedom of information act (foia), 5 u.s.c. 552(b)(6).
Tl* the contact owns a 2007 jeep liberty. The contact stated that the vehicle was not included in the federal safety agency campaign number 13v252000 (fuel system, gasoline, structure). The contact did not experience the failure; however she was concerned that she could be crashed into from the rear due to fast moving traffic. The failure and current mileage was 34,000. The VIN was not available.
I know about recall on rust corrosion. The same thing has happened to my exhaust system. The front port on both manifolds are leaking. I have already replaced both cat. Converters and the resonator.
On february 13, 2013 I took my truck into springfield toyota in springfield virginia for some repair work,brakes and to have the coil pack replaced. I also asked them to complete the state of virginia safety inspection, during the safety inspection the dealer mechanics found a hole in the frame underneath the passenger door and told me that my truck could not pass the safety inspection because of that,after paying the dealer over $2000 dollars for the repairs that they completed, I took my truck to the bodyshop that they recommended...this bodyshop told me that it would cost me at least $1500 dollars to have them cut the hole out and weld a piece of metal into the frame...after leaving the bodyshop I called toyota corporate headquarters and was informed that there had been a recall for rusty frames and the crossmember for the spare tire carrier and the fuel tank straps but that recall had expired on december 31 2012...later toyota corporate called me back and said that they would fix the spare tire carrier,crossmember and fuel tank straps on 29 march 2013 at bill page toyota in falls church virginia and to get back with them on the frame repairs. My truck has been serviced at springfield toyota on a regular basis and I was never informed of any recalls or tsb's on my truck. I bought this truck in illinios and it was mentioned in the recall for rusty frames, I feel that this condition creates a safety hazard not only for me but for all motorist on the road with me...toyota needs to issues a recall and deal with this problem in good faith. I never received a recall notice for a rusty frame...I wonder how many owner of these vehicles are out here driving an unsafe vehicle and do not know it.
Tl* the contact owns a 2000 toyota tundra. The contact stated that the vehicle was being repaired under the recall associated with the federal safety agency campaign id number: 09v444000 (structure: frame and members:underbody shields). While repairing the vehicle, the dealer stated that the fuel tank was rusted and leaking. Neither the dealer nor manufacturer offered assistance. The failure and current mileages were 108,000.
2000 toyota tundra limited access cab 4wd trd. Fuel line link detected after short trip. Excessive fuel pouring from driver side rear door of extended cab. Leaked was slowed when gas cap was removed. Leaked continued at a much slower pace as due to lower pressure in pressurized fuel line. Leak was limited to the cab area only. Frame was recently replaced in recall campaign. Much of the underbody components - leaf spring, axle, springs, brake covers, etc. - are deteriorating due to rust. These components were not covered under the frame recall. Fuel line appeared to have rust but could not detect perforation and could not determine actual location of leak. Car brought to dealer for repair with an estimate of $850 to replace fuel lines.
Tl* the contact owns a 2000 toyota tundra. The contact was driving approximately 5 MPH over a road hump when he heard a loud popping noise. After inspecting the vehicle, he noticed that the front fuel tank strap was severely rusted and fractured. The vehicle was able to be driven approximately 10 MPH and was taken to the dealer who replaced the fuel tank strap. The manufacturer was contacted and reimbursed the contact for the part. The failure mileage was approximately 100,000. Updated 02/22/12*lj the consumer stated the vehicle had severe frame rust, including the cross member, gas straps, brake lines, proportional valve etc. Updated 03/01/12
Questions about the 2000 Toyota Tundra fuel system
Does the 2000 Toyota Tundra have fuel system problems?
Owners have filed 22 complaints about the fuel system of the 2000 Toyota Tundra, 2% of all its complaints.
At what mileage do 2000 Toyota Tundra fuel system problems start?
The typical (median) mileage in owner complaints is 125,000 miles.
Was there a recall on the 2000 Toyota Tundra fuel system?
There is no recall for this problem on this model year.
What year does the Toyota Tundra have the most fuel system problems?
The Toyota Tundra model years with the most fuel system complaints are 2022 (104 complaints), 2023 (75 complaints) and 2024 (49 complaints).
Other 2000 Toyota Tundra problems
Body 529Brakes 276Suspension 100Engine 53Transmission 51Steering 43Acceleration 20Airbags 19Tires 19Seat belts 18Electrical 11Lights 11Wheels 9Visibility 5Locks 4Driver assistance 2
VIN decoder
See the problems and recalls for an exact car
Buying a used 2000 Toyota Tundra?
Check the exact car before you pay: accidents, salvage or flood titles, odometer readings and previous owners.
Check its history