Tl*the contact owns a 1995 ford crown victoria. The contact stated that while driving 25 MPH and attempting to decelerate, the brakes failed. The vehicle was put into neutral in order to stop the vehicle. The failure occurred on an intermittent basis. The vehicle was inspected by a dealer who informed the contact that the brake line was corroded. The brake line was repaired. The failure mileage was approximately 118,000.
1995 Ford Crown Victoria brakes problems
33 complaints (13% of all complaints for this car). Typical mileage when it fails: 98,007. 3 crashes reported.
- owner complaints
- 33
- of this car's complaints
- 13%
- typical mileage
- 98,007
- crashes
- 3
- recalls
- 0
Which part fails
- Antilock/traction control/electronic limited slip9
- Foundation components: hoses, lines/piping, and fittings8
- Foundation components: disc: rotor3
- Foundation components: disc: pads2
- Foundation components: disc: caliper2
- Supply: hoses, lines/piping, and fittings1
- Pedals and linkages1
- Foundation components: disc1
At what mileage
Complaints by mileage at the time of the problem.
0k-25k
25k-50k
50k-75k
75k-100k
100k-125k
125k-150k
150k-175k
175k-200k
200k+
Ford Crown Victoria brakes problems in other years
Specific symptoms reported on the 1995 Ford Crown Victoria brakes
Phrases found in the owners' own descriptions, so one complaint can mention several symptoms.
Related recalls
No recalls on record for this model year.
Related investigations
Rear brake line failure
In a letter dated february 25, 2005, ford motor company (ford) notified odi that it would be conducting a customer satisfaction program (ford no. 04b26) to correct a rear brake line chafing concern in approximately 44,000 model year (my) 1997 ford crown victoria and grand marquis non-fleet vehicles equipped with electronic traction control that werebuilt after march 19, 1997.these vehicles have an additional rear brake line and a mastic patch causing reduced clearance from a stiffening rib in the floor pan.odi?s analysis showed higher complaint and warranty rates related to rear brake line failures in this population than in other subject vehicles and peer mid-sized passenger cars that were evaluated during the investigation.vehicles involved in ford?s program will have the rear brake lines inspected for contact with the floor pan stiffing rib.if there is contact, but no abrasion or leakage, the brake lines will be repositioned.if there is abrasion or a leak is evident the brake line will be repaired.if necessary, both of the rear brake lines will be replaced. Though ford does not admit to a safety-defect in the subject components, odi believes that the facts in this investigation show otherwise because the insufficient clearance in the routing of those brake lines may result in leaks in those lines that may result in increased stopping distances.odi is designating the campaign a safety recall (the federal safety agency recall no. 05v‑086).because of the low rates of brake line failures in the remaining subject vehicles, a safety-related defect has not been identified in those populations and further use of agency resources does not appear to be warranted.the closing of this investigation does not constitute a finding by the federal safety agency that no safety-related defect exists in those vehicles.the agency reserves the right to take further action if warranted by the circumstances.for additional information, see the attached closing report.
EA03012
Rear brake line failure
Odi has received 40 complaints alleging rear brake line failure in the subject vehicles, including 8 that have been received this year.an additional 192 reports and 478 warranty claims have been received from ford.a leak in the rear brake line can cause extended stopping distance.a search of odi's complaint database for peer vehicle complaints, using the same brake line failure criteria as for the subject vehicles and the same model years (1995-97), identified only 1 complaint involving general motors caprice/implala/88/98/regal vehicles and only 2 complaints involving chrysler lh-cars.the investigation has been upgraded to an engineering analysis to further evaluate the frequency, scope, and causal factors related to rear brake line failures in the subject vehicle population.
RQ03004
What 1995 Ford Crown Victoria owners say
Most recent owner complaints, unedited.
First related symptom: few years ago brake lines rusted under the hood. Original remedy: I have painted them to protect them from further rust. Current issue: 12/26/2008 brake light switched on during drive to work. 12/26/2008 brake pedal got soft on the way back to home. 12/27/2008 I have checked the brake fluid. It was low. I have bought and add more fluid (car was not moved this day). While fluid was added I started the engine and in park gear I have pumped the brake pedal. It remained soft. Fluid got low again... There was a fluid on the pavement between rear axle and the fuel tank in the middle of the car. Speed of break deterioration and speed at which car is loosing fluid might lead to an accident. This is definitely a safety issue. Vehicle: crown victoria 1995, with ABS and traction assist. Break lines have corroded several years ago, now first has developed large leak. I will have to repair the car in the next few days, this is first time I will repair the lines. The vehicle has 130k miles. I have never seen other vehicle with such brake line corrosion.
Tl*the contact owns a 1995 ford crown victoria. While pulling out of the driveway at an unknown speed, the brake line exploded. The manufacturer stated that his VIN was not included in the federal safety agency campaign id number 98i001000 (service brakes, hydraulic:foundation components:hoses, lines/piping, and fittings). The vehicle has not been repaired. The failure and current mileages were 125,000.
Ford crown victoria rusted oil pan and brake failure. Customer states the brakes failed while backing out of a parking space. The oil pan rusted and was removed and replaced on a maintenance service. *kb updated 12/12/07 *bf when the brakes failed, fluid was dripping from under the left/center body. The dealer informed the consumer the brake line was enclosed in the frame channel and the body would have to be lifted in order to make the repair. *jb updated 12/12/07
The brake fluid in my 1995 ford crown victoria had to be topped off last week. The red brake light came on indicating the fluid was low. After filling the fluid and driving the car, the pedal felt a little on the soft side, but no light. On my way to work today, I was 2 miles from home and went to apply the brakes. I had no brakes whatsoever. The pedal did have some feel to it, but there was absolutely no brakes. Luckily, I veered off the road avoiding a collision with a car, and had to downshift the car to get it to slow down. After getting the car to 5 or so MPH, I shifted into reverse to stop the car, then park. The red brake light never came on and I had no warning of the failed brakes. After inspection, I found both brake lines to be rusted out on the drivers side frame rail. All brake lines on the car were inspected and are extremely rusty. The car is inoperable and has not been repaired as of yet.
Brake line rusted through causing rear brakes to fail. The brake line piping should either be made of stainless steel, or coated with a rust preventative, or shielded in some way so water/snow/road salt can not get between it and the frame of the car, causing it to rust through. This isn't rocket science !!!!!!!!
Dt*: the contact stated while driving the vehicle at 8 MPH, the brake light illuminated. The contact depressed the brake pedal. There were no brakes; the vehicle was driven home without any brakes. Upon inspection of the master cylinder the brake fluid was 3/4 empty. The vehicle was inspected further and the problem was the tubing that holds the brake fluid was corroded and cracked, causing the fluid to leak out. The manufacturer was alerted. Updated 2/13/2006 -
1995 crown victoria right rear brake line failed and resulted in fluid leakage because of corrosion on line and line fitting. *ts *nm (12/01/05)
Constant ABS failure caused by sensor and steel ring rust in brake system. Problem causes activation of ABS system without regard to speed, conditions or any braking effectiveness. Abs pump may run at any time the brakes are applied causing increased stopping distance on smooth dry roads.
While the vehicle was in the repair shop to have its tires rotated the mechanic informed and showed the consumer that all the metal brake lines were corroded, and needed to be replaced.
Questions about the 1995 Ford Crown Victoria brakes
Does the 1995 Ford Crown Victoria have brakes problems?
Owners have filed 33 complaints about the brakes of the 1995 Ford Crown Victoria, 13% of all its complaints.
At what mileage do 1995 Ford Crown Victoria brakes problems start?
The typical (median) mileage in owner complaints is 98,007 miles.
Was there a recall on the 1995 Ford Crown Victoria brakes?
There is no recall for this problem on this model year.
What year does the Ford Crown Victoria have bad brakes?
The Ford Crown Victoria model years with the most brakes complaints are 1992 (74 complaints), 1997 (57 complaints) and 1995 (33 complaints).
Other 1995 Ford Crown Victoria problems
Steering 99Suspension 36Acceleration 16Electrical 16Fuel system 15Transmission 14Engine 12Airbags 11Lights 9Visibility 8Seat belts 5Body 2Locks 2Seats 2Tires 2Wheels 2
VIN decoder
See the problems and recalls for an exact car
Buying a used 1995 Ford Crown Victoria?
Check the exact car before you pay: accidents, salvage or flood titles, odometer readings and previous owners.
Check its history