1991 Ford Probe problems

Filed Sep 9, 2018 · Seat belts · 80,000 miles · MT

The driver side seat belt is stuck on the track towards the back of it's track and no longer moves or engages.

Filed Feb 1, 2010 · Acceleration · 113,000 miles · AZ

Tl*the contact owns a 1991 ford probe. Whenever the contact drove the vehicle at various speeds to include approximately 60 MPH, using the cruise control the vehicle speed increased. The vehicle has not been diagnosed by the dealer. The current and failure mileages were 113000.

Filed Apr 10, 2007 · Seat belts · 100,000 miles · NY

Tl*the contact owns a 1991 ford probe. The contact stated that the cable which retracts the buckle assembly jammed and caused the seat belt to fail. The dealer stated that this vehicle was excluded from recall # 96v172001 due to the VIN. The current and failure mileage were 100,000.

Filed Nov 22, 2006 · Seat belts · 174,356 miles · FL

Dt*: the contact stated immediately after purchasing a vehicle, it was noticed the seat belt did not retract and was jammed in the rail rendering the belt inoperative. The contact checked for recalls on the federal safety agency website and found the federal safety agency recall campaign # 96v172001 covered the defect. The manufacturer was contacted who informed the vehicle was not included in the recall due to the VIN. The contact was very concerned because the description in the recall matched exactly the problems, the vehicle's seat belt had.

Filed Aug 1, 2006 · Seat belts · IA

I own a 1991 ford probe. The drivers side auto-retract seat-belt assembly is jammed. Searching on the internet, (autozone recalls and this web-site for two), I find interesting information regarding this issue. Particularly the federal safety agency id # 96v172001 / ford recall 96s48 that describes this. Also the link on your site to this pdf (rc-96v172-nn.pdf), is also of interest. My issue / complaint is that I told my local ford dealer as well as had ford motor co. Run my VIN and they stated my VIN was not part of the recall campaign. I do notice that in the above pdf a statement that all probes starting as early as 1990 with this restraint system are to be covered under the recall. This system on this car is faulty. In iowa there is a seat belt law. Although I am not the original owner, I know 2 of the 3 other owners of this. It has only 88,000 miles. Regardless of age or condition, I understand this should be covered under the ford recall campaign and I should be free of any financial responsibility to repair the problem. Any input?

Filed Oct 28, 2004 · Electrical · 130,000 miles · IL

(1) purchased the vehicle (2) learned the horn did not work (3) purchased a replacement horn, and requested information from ford and 3 dealers where it would be located. All, except 1 dealer, refused to give us any information. The last dealer was not certain. Ford's comment was this was "private company information" or "we don't have that information". Suggested we contact their printing company who would sell us schematics. Printing company had no idea which set of schematics we would need. Vehicles are required to have working horns for safety reasons. Ford wanted to sell us $100 worth of service to install a $15 part.

Filed Jan 15, 2004 · Body, Engine · 15,000 miles · CA

I read your complaint page, have had the car since 91 and I have all the same probs, 1 person said he had 2 inches of water in the car, try 6. The paint wasnt right from day 1. The cv joints/axels went bad after 2 years and ive got by till now but the rattle is annoying. The exhaust sys also rattles. Front tires go yearly. Air conditioner never has blown cold. And the door on the glove compartment is to heavy for the latch, I ride 6 mnths of every year with an open glove compartment.the hatchback leaks, and the paint well, who knows where they got that blend. The car always runs cold which causes the rough idle and start and 14 inch wheels werent sufficient for a car that big. I will say that ford bent over backwards to get the items fixed I just cant leave it there bi-weekly.they did repaint it twice and honored the seatbelt recall this year, 2003.the car now has 200,000 miles and has never failed smog or spent one day on a tow truck or in a shop because it wouldnt start. Its been a long noisy and extremely hot ride, and I hope they learned after those bad years. But just recently I asked a mechanic on his opinion if I should buy a taurus. He pointed to a car in the back of his shop and said that car is paying for his sons college. 6th time this year hes had it and he strongly advised me to never purchase a ford car. All the probs with the probe are same with the taurus. I might get 50000 more miles but doubt it. But I dont think they tried to cheat me, ford worked with me from the day I sat in the dealership and they still are.

Filed Oct 1, 2003 · Seat belts · ID

The consumer was referred to the dealer by an auto repair shop for recalls on the seat belts. The dealer stated the vehicle was in the remedy scope, but the recall had expired. The driver and passenger side seat belts did not retract properly. Recall# 96v172001 and 96v172002 subject: automatic shoulder belt.*ak

Filed Jul 1, 2003 · Seat belts · 144,000 miles · LA

The driver side seat belt buckle assembly became jammed in the forward position and will not retract.

Filed Jun 10, 2002 · Seat belts · VT

I have a seat belt that does not work it is stuck in place and they wont help me at all.