2006 Honda Civic: rotors or pads wearing out early

Filed Sep 5, 2019 · Suspension, Wheels · 113,000 miles · MD

Premature wear and cupping of tires resulting in unstable dangerous tire performance and loud distracting noise apparently due to a manufacturing defect in upper control arm design.

Filed Mar 6, 2017 · Wheels · VA

In november 2016, I was informed that my tires had uneven wear and damage due to a defective rear upper control arm kit. I learned for the first time that honda issued a warranty extension for this part, but that it had expired before the honda mechanic pointed out the issue to me. I contacted american honda motor co., at the recommendation of the mechanic, to seek an extended warranty, as I do not believe that I should have to pay for a part that honda acknowledged was defective. The case number is 05759414. Unfortunately, honda declined my request. I am concerned about the dangers of driving with tires that are unevenly or prematurely worn and believe that honda should have to pay for a defective party it was aware of.

Filed Jun 16, 2016 · Wheels · 165,000 miles · CT

Rear tires have premature wear from inside out and wearing fast. Causing alot of vibration as well.

Filed Aug 18, 2015 · Wheels · 94,000 miles · MD

2006 honda civic ex sedan. Approximately 94,000 miles and have worn through 3 sets of tires. Tires get rotated and balanced every 7,500 miles and tires are always goodyear brand. On 8/15/2015 noticed that 2006 honda civic had a flat tire (rear passenger side). After removing wheel and inspecting tire it was noticed that the tire had been completely worn through on interior tread (wire mesh was worn through and actual hole had developed in tire). It was shocking an complete tire failure and blowout had not taken place while driving. Independent garage serviced the vehicle and determined that control arms needed to be replaced/amended (estimated cost of $1100.00) and at minimum a new tire was needed as well as new alignment. New tire put on, balancing and alignment of all tires/wheels - $210.00 as of 8/18/2015. It is likely that the faulty control arm issues are to blame for the premature wear on previous and current set of tires.

Filed Aug 10, 2013 · Steering, Suspension · 41,215 miles · VA

During the years of 2008 through 2011, I brought vehicle to sheehy honda of alexandria for regular service. On several occasions I complained of excessive road noise. Technicians made notations of tires "cupping, noise" and acknowledged uneven and premature wear and recommended replacement of rear control arm. I declined the recommended service on the grounds that I felt like that sounded like a defective part issue for which I should not be required to pay. Upon further research I found that honda had acknowledged a problem with control arms on 2006 civics in service bulletin 08-001. In 2011, I brought this to honda's attention through sheehy honda of alexandria, va and through calls to american honda motor co., inc. Honda refused to replace control arm. In july of 2013, I received a notice, through honda, from the united states district court for the central district of california instructing me to take my 2006 civic in to have the control arm inspected/replaced. In august of 2013, I took the vehicle to sheehy honda of alexandria for the recommended service. They did not look at the control arm. They instead made a notation that the "rear tire wear is okay at this time" and refused to replace the control arm. When I brought it to their attention that there is a record of this issue with them on my car going back to 2011, I was informed that all records are purged after two years and they had no record of interactions with me on this issue.

Filed Sep 9, 2011 · Suspension · 75,000 miles · NJ

Brought vehicle to honda due to loud roaring sound near rear left tire. I thought it was the bearing as there had been a recall and my car was supposedly "ok". Honda calls and wants to charge me almost $800 for 2 new control arms, 2 new rear tires, and an alignment. I do some research and find out there is a tsb: honda designed the control arms wrong causing premature wear of the tires. The fix is to replace them with newly designed control arms. So, honda should pay for it considering they designed a defective product. Honda will not pay for it. Essentially, honda is admitting the product is defective by replacing it with a newly designed product. My purchased an aftermarket warranty from the honda stealership: they refused to replace the control arms claiming "it is a defect caused by honda" and the part is not broken. The consumer loses once again and honda takes the money. This is not the only defective design on this car: the engine block cracks due to improper casting, the cheap visors break: at least honda extended the warranty on this to 8 years. After that, I guess you're out of luck. This is my 6th honda. I also have a honda lawnmower and powerwasher. Honda was the only vehicle I would buy due to their high quality and reliability. They used to build quality products and stand behind them. Now they build garbage at a premium price and refuse to stand behind them. I knew I bought that hyundai sonata for $4,000 less than an accord... Ps: the hyundai has 0 issues and runs great with similar mileage. Sorry honda: I will be purchasing from a company that stands behind their products instead of company riding off of their name legacy from the 80's and 90's. Check out hyundai or even dare I say and american car: the quality is much better.

Filed Jun 24, 2009 · Suspension · 24,000 miles · NM

Tl*the contact owns a 2006 honda civic. The contact stated that there was a defect with the suspension, which causes difficulty steering and prematurely wears the tires down. The dealer stated that they would not make repairs. The failure mileage was 24,000.

Filed Jun 4, 2009 · Suspension, Tires · 24,000 miles · NM

Tl*the contact owns a 2006 honda civic. The vehicle has bridgestone turanza t tires. The contact stated that there was a suspension issue with his vehicle. In addition, the tires became worn after 12,000 miles. The manufacturer stated that there was a technical service bulletin for the suspension repairs, but no recalls. The manufacturer stated that they were not responsible for the tires and that the suspension did not affect the tire wear. Bridgestone disagreed and stated that they could replace the tires for $650 at the contact's expense. The tire failure mileage was 12,000. The vehicle current and failure mileages were less than 24,000. Updated 07/14/09. *lj the dealer offered to correct the suspension problem at their expense, but they were not willing to pay for the prematurely worn tires. Updated 07/15/09.

Filed Jul 8, 2008 · Suspension · 64,365 miles · KS

Cupping of rear tires caused by rear control arm premature wear. Parts not covered by a recall, car out of warranty, cost to replace faulty control arm, $453.00, cost to replace ruined tires, $200.00. Due to the fact that this part is not on a recall at this time, no action has been taken, the faulty part is still on my car. The replacement part is on back order because of high demand for replacement on other cars like mine.

Filed Mar 20, 2008 · Suspension · 35,000 miles · WI

I purchased my 2006 honda civic new. At 18 months it started making a roaring noise from the rear end. It also started vibrating badly at 65mph. When I got the oil changed in it, I asked the honda motorwerks dealer in la crosse, wi to check the tires for rotation. I was told the tires were fine. Two months later at 37,800 miles I am taking the car back for louder roaring and more vibration. My search on the internet revealed that honda issued a technical service bulletin on 8feb08 stating that the rear control on all 2006 and 2007 honda civics were effected and need to be repaired. I contacted american honda and was told that each case would be handled by the dealer on a case by case basis. I asked about the tires that were ruined by the defective control arms, and I was told that I they were covered under the tire manufacturer warranty. I said that the tires were not defective, rather they were prematurely worn because of a honda defect. She gave me the same answer again. If this defect applies to all 2006 and 2007n civics, then it applies to several hundred thousand vehicles. I feel honda should recall all of the civics and not wait until the owners complain or get hurt because the tires wear out early and cause a crash.

Filed Nov 8, 2007 · Tires · 30,000 miles · VA

I bought a new 2006 honda civic ex and took delivery in july 2006. From the time of delivery of the vehicle, it was noticeable that the rear end or rear tires of the honda civic were very noisy. I rotated my tires at each factory recommended oil change. At 30k miles, they were worn out. My service person showed me the uneven wear (flat spots). The road noise is unbearable. I was able to locate a service bulletin from acura - a division of honda. The service bulletin 05-076 dated january 19, 2007 stated that the acura 2004 & 2005 had an issue with "premature rear tire wear". The problem was described as: "the rear tires are wearing prematurely (unevenly across the tread). Probable cause: the rear toe increases when the vehicle is loaded" the description and pictures of tire wear in this service bulletin exactly match what I found in my 2006 honda civic. I frequently check the air tire pressure to ensure even wear. There are multiple internet postings noting an issue with the camber/toe adjustments. I believe such premature wear constitutes a definite safety hazard. Honda should do the "right thing" and correct this problem. Putting on new tires will yield the same results without some correction.

Filed Jun 14, 2007 · Brakes · 12,525 miles · CA

Premature disc brake pad wear on 2006 honda civic at 12,525 miles. Dealer says worn to metal. Claims normal wear is 10,000-18,000 miles. This is unheard of! Suspect sub-standard pads installed during manufacturing and an increasing lack of overall quality controls at honda.