Tl* the contact owns a 1993 jeep grand wagoneer. While in park with the emergency brake engaged, the vehicle would disengage and shift into reverse independently. Also, the contact mentioned that while attempting to start the vehicle, the key would not engage the ignition. In addition, the contact stated that while having the muffler replaced, the technician found that a bolt was missing from the motor mount. The vehicle was serviced under the federal safety agency campaign numbers: 02v053000 (power train), 93v210000 (steering), 93v051000 (suspension). However, the remedies failed to repair the vehicle. The contact mentioned that the vehicle would continue to move inadvertently after the recall repair and that the steering failed. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure. The failure mileage was 169,000.
The worst 1993 Jeep Grand Wagoneer problems
Ranked by number of owner complaints. Mileage and cost come from what owners wrote.
- Brakes2
- Transmission2
- Acceleration1
- Airbags1
- Steering1
Problems by type
Tap a problem to see which part fails, at what mileage and in which other years.
- Brakes2
- Transmission2
- Acceleration1
- Airbags1
- Steering1
- Suspension1
- Tires1
Recalls 6
Power train: automatic transmission: lever and linkage: floor shift
- What is wrong
- On certain sport utility vehicles, if a driver has not placed the shifter lever fully into the "park" position and leaves the vehicle running, the vehicle may unexpectedly move rearward after seeming to be stable.
- Risk
- Inadvertent movement of the vehicle could result in a crash.
- Remedy
- Dealers will install a secondary detent system to the floor shifter assembly. Daimlerchrysler sent interim notices to owners concerning this problem on march 22, 2002. Owner notification began september 23, 2002. Owners who take their vehicles to an authorized dealer on an agreed upon service date and do not receive the free remedy within a reasonable time should contact daimlerchrysler at 1‑800‑853‑1403.
Recall number 02V053000 · Recall details
Service brakes, hydraulic: foundation components: disc: rotor
- What is wrong
- Vehicle description: passenger and multi-purpose vehicles originally sold or currently registered in the states of connecticut, illinois, indiana, maine, maryland, massachusetts, michigan, new hampshire, new jersey, new york, ohio, pennsylvania, rhode island, vermont, or wisconsin, and the district of columbia. The front disc brake rotors can experience severe corrosion if operated for an extensive period in the "salt belt." if the rotors are not replaced, the corrosion can eventually compromise the structural integrity of the stamped steel center hub section of the rotor.
- Risk
- The reduced strength can allow the cast iron wear surface to separate from the hub, reducing the brake effectiveness of the vehicle.
- Remedy
- Dealers will replace these rotors with rotors that are coated with a corrosion protection.
Recall number 99V340000 · Recall details
Steering: steering wheel/handle bar
- What is wrong
- The molded plastic pin which connects the upper steering column shaft and the lower column shaft may have been sheared prior to installation of the steering column assembly into the vehicle. If this occurred, the upper steering shaft will separate from the lower steering shaft.
- Risk
- If the upper and lower steering shafts separate, completeloss of steering control will occur, which could result in an accident.
- Remedy
- A restraining sleeve will be added to the intermediate shaft to limit the amount of steering shaft movement available.
Recall number 93V210000 · Recall details
Structure: body: hatchback/liftgate
- What is wrong
- Grease applied to the liftgate latch rubber bumpers to ease component assembly caused the bumper to swell, interfering with the movement of the liftgate latch pawl. This prevents the liftgate latching when closed and difficult to open when latched.
- Risk
- An unlatched liftgate can open while the vehicle is inmotion, and could result in an occupant falling out.
- Remedy
- Replace the liftgate assembly on affected vehicles.
Recall number 93V055000 · Recall details
Suspension: front
- What is wrong
- The eccentric cam adjuster bolts in both front lower suspension arm-to-front axle bracket attachments may fail due to assembly misalignment.
- Risk
- Cam bolt failures cause the vehicle to pull to oneside when the brakes are applied, resulting in a possible loss of vehiclecontrol and an accident.
- Remedy
- Replace the front suspension cam bolts, cam washers, and nuts with components of a different design.
Recall number 93V051000 · Recall details
Service brakes, hydraulic: pedals and linkages
- What is wrong
- The retainer clip which secures the master cylinder input rod to the brake pedal was not installed properly, and could work loose.
- Risk
- Disengagement of the retainer clip will allow free playin the attachment and can allow the input rod to separate from the brake pedalcausing complete loss of brake application which could result in an accident.
- Remedy
- Improperly installed retainer clips will be removed and new retainer clips will be properly installed.
Recall number 92V181000 · Recall details
Technical service bulletins for the 1993 Jeep Grand Wagoneer 33
Bulletins tell dealers how to fix known problems. A warranty extension means the manufacturer pays for that repair for longer.
- Valve Body
- Flash programming failure recovery
- Subject regarding airbag / clock spring service for various models including 2002 model year jeep liberty
- Automatic transmission fluid usage ATF+4
- Subject regarding wire splice repairs
- Subject regarding child seat tether anchors
- Subject regarding non-deployed airbag handling procedures
- This bulletin provides a revised wire splice procedure and related parts
- Daimlerchrysler corporation is now offerinb airbag on / off switches for selected vehicles
- Subject on the child seat tether anchors
What 1993 Jeep Grand Wagoneer owners say
Most recent owner complaints, unedited.
I am complaining about a service agent for all the jeep recalls that are in effect airpark chrysler will not help to get these fixed and have been very hurtful, and disrespectful to anyone trying to verify the issue. Its safety and urgent issue I am a single mother and cannot believe they are being so hard to deal with.
Different brand of tires in the front than in the rear with a 1 inch differnece in circumference caused pressure to build up in the differential unit resulting in several damages due to overheating, vehicle fire on third incident.
Front brake rotors failed.
No deployment of airbag during accident.
Abs brake failure, continually replacing disc rotors and pads. Tt
When shifting into drive, jeep took off quickly, unwanted acceleration, hitting (3) parked vehicles.
Left rear axle came out of housing. Tt
Compare the 1993 Jeep Grand Wagoneer
Other model years
Questions about the 1993 Jeep Grand Wagoneer
Is the 1993 Jeep Grand Wagoneer reliable?
Owners have filed 8 complaints about the 1993 Jeep Grand Wagoneer, fewer than a typical Grand Wagoneer model year.
What is the most common problem with the 1993 Jeep Grand Wagoneer?
Brakes, with 2 complaints. Next is transmission (2).
How many recalls does the 1993 Jeep Grand Wagoneer have?
6 recalls, covering power train, service brakes, hydraulic and steering.
Was there a recall on the 1993 Jeep Grand Wagoneer brakes?
Yes, 2 recalls: 99V340000, 92V181000. Check your VIN to see if your car still needs the free repair.
VIN decoder
See the problems and recalls for an exact car
Buying a used 1993 Jeep Grand Wagoneer?
Check the exact car before you pay: accidents, salvage or flood titles, odometer readings and previous owners.
Check its historyJeep Grand Wagoneer in the news
- Jeep recalls 2022-2025 Wagoneer, 2022-2026 Grand Wagoneer and 2023-2025 Wagoneer L and other models over roof and pillars problem (97,349 vehicles)
- Jeep recalls 2024-2026 Grand Cherokee, 2026 Cherokee and 2024-2025 Wagoneer and other models over pressure monitoring and regulating systems problem (201,975 vehicles)
- Jeep recalls 2026 Grand Cherokee, 2026 Wrangler and 2026 Cherokee and other models over back over prevention camera problem (844,028 vehicles)