1995 Toyota Pickup problems

Filed Sep 10, 2012 · Tires · 266,000 miles · NY

Tl* the contact owns a 1995 toyota pickup equipped with cooper futura 855 tires (n/a), line sizes (p235/75/r15) dot 3800. The contact stated that while parked he noticed that the front and rear driver and passenger side tires had developed bulges. The tires were not replaced. The contact was no longer driving the vehicle. The approximate failure mileage was 30,000.

Filed Jan 11, 2012 · Body · 200,000 miles · OH

This is concerning another rusty toyota truck frame. My truck frame is rusted completely through with at least one hole the size of a softball. I see that the 95.5 year truck was recalled why wasn't mine too? Mine is a '95 model so I barely missed the cut off which makes it hurt all the more. Why was the cutoff set after my truck? What determined the cutoff point? From what I have read there are a lot of older toyota trucks with frames rusted completely in half and mine is not far behind them. My truck is in good shape except of course for the frame. The body doesn't have any holes although there is some rust. I have taken care of this truck and have had it almost ten years and would certainly be able to drive it quite a few more years if it wasn't about ready to rust in half. It's not safe so what should I do? Continue to drive it and risk my life and the lives of others because of a defect from toyota? I do believe they should be held responsible for this and my truck either repaired or some compensation for me. I would think the frame would have been made out of a heavier gauge steel than the body panels and well out lasted every other metal part on the truck seeing it is the "backbone" of the vehicle so obviously there is a problem that should be a concern of your agency.

Filed Jul 19, 2010 · Steering · 85,000 miles · PA

Tl*the contact owns a 1995 toyota pickup. The contact stated that his vehicle was included in the recall associated with the federal safety agency campaign id number 05v389000 steering linkages, rod relay connecting. The vehicle was taken to an authorized dealer but the contact was informed they could not repair the vehicle since the idler arm was stuck within the steering column. Approximately five years later, the contact attempted to turn the left turn signal but it would not respond. The turn signal would not function because the alignment within the steering column was not correct. The failure was not diagnosed by the dealer. The failure mileage was 85,000 and the current mileage was 103,000.

Filed Oct 19, 2009 · Body · 148,321 miles · NC

Tl* the contact owns a 1995 toyota pickup. A technician from the dealer advised her that the entire frame on her vehicle had corrosion. He then added that the vehicle could no longer be safely driven. Prior to the inspection while driving she heard a peculiar noise coming from the bottom of the vehicle. The current and failure mileages were 148321. Updated 11/10/09 *cn updated 11/16/09.

Filed Jul 9, 2009 · Transmission · 113,000 miles · MA

Toyota rear differential housing cover rust through until leaking. A non replaceable cover on the differential is made of such thin metal that it has rusted out and is leaking.

Filed Mar 10, 2008 · Steering · 63,000 miles · GU

I own a 1995 toyota extended cab pickup. It is a 2wd car, no power steering. There is a recall on the relay rods for other model toyota cars covering my year but not for my year. Recently, steering the car became unsafe (somewhat loose). I jacked the car up and noticed that the relay rod was separating near the idler arm. I took digital photos. Local dealer eventually paid for the relay rod work after claiming it, but would not pay for the parts for the idler arm & steering damper, which are associated with the relay rod & will wear quicker with a relay rod separating like mine was. I request that the federal safety agency please review this matter and assist in having the full parts claim paid. Had I not caught the relay rod failure at the time I did, I am informed by a mechanic that I would have lost all control of the car (catastrophic failure). Toyota initially fully denied my claim as not being part of the 2005 recall, but due to the dealers assistance they covered just the parts & labor on the relay rod. I can email the digital photos of the failing relay rod. Had it not been caught & changed I am informed it would have resulted in a catastrophic failure / loss of vehicle control.

Filed Nov 2, 2005 · Steering, Transmission · MD

Dt:the contact stated there was recall (the federal safety agency 05v389000/toyota ssc 50n) on the steering , but the dealership left fice grips marks all over the tie rod assembly. He stated it looked as if they put old parts back onto the vehicle to correct the problem. Also, the dealership broke the cv boot. The manufacturer would not provide him with any assistance on this matter.

Filed Jun 2, 2005 · Steering · 148,000 miles · TN

Luckily I was going very slow into a parking spot....if this had happened going down I-95 traveling 70+ I wouldn't be here right now. Take care, john c. Groth hi chris, the latest recall reminded me of something. Even though my toyota is a 1995...my drag link snapped in dec 02. The fwd message is one I replied to a friend of mine. And the toyota dealership is not yours....it was one in fayetteville, nc when I was living there while in the air force. Take care, cliff date: fri, 20 may 2005 10:08:14 -0700 (pdt) from: "cliff groth" subject: re: drag link to: [email protected] hi scott!, yeah I had a drag link that just snapped! I was pulling into the shoppette parking lot on pope and soon as I turned left into a spot....bang it snapped. Luckily I was going very slow...because once it snapped I lost steering and was not going where I wanted...headed straight toward a parked car. The steering wheel was free wheeling! I e-mailed toyota and sent pictures...they seemed the least bit concerned. So I went to the toyota dealership...and they accused me of hitting a pot hole...lol after that I gave up....and just tried to notify all my friends who might have a 1995 model. To at least get the drag link checked for cracks. Red line auto shop just down manchester rd. Off pope did my repair work. They said a "drag link" should never snap or break...parts attached to it might wear out, but a drag link is made to outlast the vehicle. Well didn't mean to write a book...nice hearing from you. I thought of my drag link the second I heard about that toyota recall too. My toyota is a 1995. Have attached some pictures...I think I sent them to you before, but if not here are a few.take care my friend,cliff scott wrote:cliff, didn't you have a problem with the drag link on your toyota? I was thinking about the recall and wondered if that was your year? Scott. *jb

Filed Aug 31, 2004 · Engine · CA

While driving 35 MPH, the consumer heard a loud noise coming from the vehicle. The consumer was able to maintain control of the vehicle and pulled over. The consumer noticed that the engine head gasket leaked fluid. The vehicle was towed to a garage and the mechanic determined that the engine head gasket needed to be replaced. *ak

Filed Aug 26, 2004 · Fuel system · 80,000 miles · TN

Drove truck to work. Upon parking noticed gasoline pouring out from under vehicle. Had truck towed to dealer where I was informed that the component going into the gas tank had rusted through. This truck has had very limited exposure to salt here in tennessee. I bought the truck new. Also I recently had to replace both the front rotors due to rusting. I feel this presents a real safety hazard and that toyota should use better materials in their gas lines.