Check a VIN

2005 Toyota Tacoma body complaints

Page 3 of 10: complaints 41 to 70 of 260, newest first, as owners wrote them.

See the summary of 2005 Toyota Tacoma body problems: which part fails, at what mileage and related recalls.

Filed May 8, 2017 · Body, Suspension · 84,500 miles · VA

Tl* the contact owns a 2005 toyota tacoma. The vehicle was taken to an independent dealer where the contact noticed that the entire frame was fractured. It was diagnosed that the entire frame needed to be replaced. The vehicle was not repaired. The contact received notification of the federal safety agency campaign number: 14v604000 (suspension). The part to do the repair was unavailable. The contact stated that the manufacturer exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The manufacturer was not made aware of the failure. The failure mileage was 84,500. Updated 06/21/17

Filed Apr 3, 2017 · Body · 150,000 miles · MS

Paint peeling from rood.

Filed Apr 3, 2017 · Body · 190,000 miles · UT

The frame is rusting and has perforations which could lead to frame failure. The vehicle has been kept in immaculate condition over its life. The level of corrosion on this vehicle did not happen in two years. Toyota needs to notify their customers that these vehicles are corroding faster (because they fought the same issue in court and won). They need to point that they are not legal to drive despite the inspections approved.

Filed Feb 17, 2017 · Body · VT

I all ready have a complaint in odi- 10915902 I have pictures I would like to send.did my complaint in oct 2016 still waiting for paperwork.I have more pictures not sure how to send them all.

Filed Dec 27, 2016 · Body · 108,000 miles · VA

I purchased my 2005 toyota tacoma used with 108,000 miles on it on 12/8/2016. It failed virginia inspection on 12/20/2016 due to rust in the frame. The truck is not safe or legal to drive. Toyota will not cover the damage under lsc e0d, which expired in march 2016, despite that the vehicle was in a toyota dealer twice during the service campaign.

Filed Nov 16, 2016 · Body, Suspension · 90,000 miles · WA

I purchased this truck about a year ago. I recently heard of a settlement regarding rusty frames. My truck has one, very bad and I need to know how to proceed to get this fixed or traded in.

Filed Nov 16, 2016 · Body · 150,000 miles · MA

Toyota truck recall on frame rust and corrosion. I brought truck to prime toyota lancaster ma the frame was coated with an undercoat paint. The truck went in for repairs when it was on the lift the mechanic said there were holes and corrosion in the frame and it was a safety issue to drive. I asked the dealer about having it fixed I was told to contact corporate. Corporate told me the recall has been closed out and that did what was necessary to fix it. They just covered up the rust and corrosion. I'm afraid to drive my truck for fear I might get seriously injured. I need help thank you!

Filed Nov 15, 2016 · Body · 110,000 miles · MD

Frame defect with rust and corrosion. Not sure when the corrosion started, but I discovered nov 11, 2016 - while doing a transmission fluid change. The major rust and corrosion appear to be concentrated near the catalytic converters on both sides of the vehicle affecting the integrity of the frame. See attached photos for left side (driver side) and right side (passenger side).

Filed Nov 7, 2016 · Body, Suspension · PA

Tl* the contact owns a 2005 toyota tacoma. The contact was included in the federal safety agency campaign number: 14v604000 (suspension). The contact stated that the vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic for routine servicing and was informed that there was extensive rust, corrosion, holes, and cracks in the frame. The vehicle would not pass an inspection unless the parts were replaced. The manufacturer was notified of the failure and indicated that the recall remedy statute expired in march of 2016, but refused to provide a recall repair solution. The contact was informed to take the vehicle to a dealer for diagnostic testing. The contact was uncertain of when the vehicle would be repaired. The failure mileage was not available. Parts distribution disconnect.

Filed Oct 13, 2016 · Body · 142,000 miles · VT

Tl* the contact owns a 2005 toyota tacoma. The contact took the vehicle to be serviced for the federal safety agency campaign number: 14v604000 (suspension). The campaign expired in march of 2016 and the undercoating, performed by another dealer, failed to stop the corrosion. It was diagnosed that either the frame needed to be repaired or the entire vehicle needed to be replaced. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 142,000.

Filed Sep 23, 2016 · Body · 30,000 miles · NC

Tl* the contact owns a 2005 toyota tacoma. The contact noticed that the subframe was rusted. The vehicle was taken to a dealer, but was not diagnosed or repaired. The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The approximate failure mileage was 30,000.

Filed Sep 15, 2016 · Body · 80,000 miles · NY

My truck frame is severely rusted. Toyota had a voluntary frame exchange program, for which I qualified. I first took my truck to the local dealer (penn toyota in greenvale, ny) for inspection as per toyota's program in october 2015. Dealer confirmed that a new frame is needed and advised me that it is on order. Since oct 2015, I followed up with dealer several times, and in january 2016, dealer advised that they do not have the documentation in their system. So I brought my truck back in again, and service manager jimmy confirmed that I am entitled to a new frame under toyota program and they will place the order for me. Again, I continued to follow up several times each month and was told that frame is on order. In march 2016, I followed up again with dealer because the toyota program was about to expire. Dealer again reassured me that my case is in the system but it will take some time to receive new frame. In april 2016, I followed up again but this time I was told that there is no data in their system about having ordered a new frame for my truck. I immediately contacted toyota corporate office and they opened a case number (160‑422‑2525). I was told by toyota representative handling my case that they are getting a new frame for me. It is now september 2016 and I still have not received any new updates. Due to the large rust holes in my frame and having read reports of other owners having similar issues (and toyota's acknowledgement of the problem as evidenced by the frame replacement program), I have not been able to fully make use of my truck since I first learned about the rust because I do not feel safe driving it.

Filed Sep 15, 2016 · Body · 215,000 miles · MA

The frame on this truck had been replaced due to excessive rust. The rear bumper support bc and factory installed tow hitch were re installed. That was november 2014. In august of brad 2016 while towing a small camper on the mass turnpike, the hitch to frame attachment failed on the driver's side of the frame. Pulled over when I heard the thump.

Filed Sep 15, 2016 · Body · 160,000 miles · CO

The tacoma is susceptible to unusual amounts of frame rust and while underneath mine, changing the oil in the truck I found holes in the truck frame large enough to fit my fist in. So far I've received the run around from toyota. They had a limited service campaign and replaced many truck frames. That stopped in march of 2016. Now they aren't doing anything about this problem and leaving it on the shoulders of americans to deal with. In addition to that, after their own admission, one could only suspect that the frames that weren't replaced have a high likelihood of failure on the highways, especially in states where they (the states) don't do rigorous inspections to get vehicles licensed. After the research that I've done I've discovered a few things; the trucks have a fundamental frame problem. Toyota admitted that there is a problem. Many of us, (tacoma owners) can't afford to replace the truck frame or purchase another vehicle to replace it with potentially making the highways and toyota drivers unsafe because of a known manufacturing defect that toyota won't rectify. Additionally, I'm sure based on forums and other reviews I've uncovered online, that many of the vehicle owners are completely unaware of the defect and the threat to their own safety, and the safety of those around them on the roadways due to said defect.

Filed Sep 6, 2016 · Body · 126,000 miles · VA

While underneath truck investigating noise from vibrating metal I noticed the frame badly rusted near the catalytic converter to the point where a large hole formed. Rusted pieces of the frame fall off when lightly tapped with a hammer. A quick internet search made it apparent this is a very common problem. Truck was bought and always registered in a southern state but was driven in illinois for 3 years while on military orders. There is surface rust everywhere but I haven't done a complete inspection yet to find other holes.

Filed Aug 24, 2016 · Body, Fuel system · 59,000 miles · MI

Tl* the contact owns a 2005 toyota tacoma. After pumping ten gallons of fuel in the vehicle and driving home, the contact noticed that the front strap holding the fuel tank fractured. The vehicle was not diagnosed nor repaired. The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The approximate failure mileage was 59,000. Updated 010/04/16*lj

Filed Aug 8, 2016 · Body, Steering · 158,000 miles · CA

Major rust damage on frame after only 8 years of vehilce being released, a 2 by 4 inch wide hole on both sides for the trucks frame causing warping and bending as well as unsafe driving conditions. When taken to toyota dealership repairs took 9 months, and upon completion was send back to owners possession without test driving or verifying project completion.

Filed Aug 4, 2016 · Body, Brakes · 91,213 miles · VT

Tl* the contact owns a 2005 toyota tacoma. While the vehicle was stationary, it was discovered that there were holes in the frame of the vehicle. The contact also stated that there was a brake line failure that occurred in the vehicle. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was made aware of the failures. The failure mileage was 91,213. The VIN was not available.

Filed Jul 28, 2016 · Body · 100,000 miles · MT

Tl* the contact owns a 2005 toyota tacoma. The contact received notification of the federal safety agency campaign number: 14v604000 (air bags); however, the dealer refused to perform the recall repair for free due to excessive corrosion. The manufacturer was not made aware of the failure. The approximate failure mileage was 100,000.

Filed Jul 27, 2016 · Body, Suspension · MD

The owner of the toyota tacoma received a safety recall notice informing the owner that certain toyota vehicles from the year 2005 -2011 has had a defect with rear leaf spring . The owner immediately went to toyota of bowie , maryland he informed them the notice he received in march . He has called the manager several times during the last 4 months to give an update of the parts . It's been 4 months the car hasn't been fixed.

Filed Jul 24, 2016 · Body · 129,000 miles · NJ

I am writing to you in reference to my 2005 toyota tacoma. As you may be aware, tacomas have been having problems in the states with harsh winters, and with corrosions of the frame from road salt. The problem has been so evident that toyota has admitted to not having adequate corrosion resistant protection. The first time I became aware of this issue was at the end of june 2016. I called my toyota dealer about two other recalls and inquired about the frame issue as well. The service technician told me that the frame in fact had a 'limited service campaign' issued by toyota which expired march 31, 2016. He said to bring in my truck for the other two recalls (one was for the leaf spring) and he would inspect the frame (see page 2 of service invoice). After inspection, the technician said he did not think the truck would hold up in an accident. I called toyota customer service experience, in california, and asked for their help and explained the situation above. They gave me a case number (1607110805) and said they would get back to me. When I received the call back, they declined my request do to missing the deadline. If this problem is a known situation with tacomas (enough for a 'limited service campaign'), one would think to ensure the safety of their customers, they would send a certified letter. Not only is my safety in jeopardy, but I cannot even trade my vehicle in for one that will ensure my safety due to financial limitations and the decreased value of my truck not having this issue resolved. If toyota really cares about their product and the safety of their customers, they would do the right thing and replace my truck frame (especially since one of their own certified mechanics determined the truck has been effected by the very same campaign). Thank you for taking the time to read this and hopefully you can help me resolve this issue.

Filed Jul 8, 2016 · Body, Seat belts · 189,000 miles · OH

Tl* the contact owns a 2005 toyota tacoma. After the vehicle was taken to be serviced for the federal safety agency campaign number: 13v337000 (seat belts), the technician stated that the frame of the vehicle was severely corroded and needed to be replaced. The vehicle was not repaired due to the frame and recall parts being unavailable. The contact stated that the manufacturer exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The manufacturer was not notified of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 189,000. Parts distribution disconnect.

Filed Jun 22, 2016 · Body · 171,000 miles · CT

Tl* the contact owns a 2005 toyota tacoma. The contact stated that the frame of the vehicle, near both front tires and the rear driver's tire, had rust that created holes. The vehicle was not diagnosed nor repaired. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure and stated that the vehicle was no longer under warranty to receive a recall repair. The approximate failure mileage was 171,000.

Filed Jun 20, 2016 · Body · 170,000 miles · CT

Tl* the contact owns a 2005 toyota tacoma. While the vehicle was parked, the contact noticed that the subframe underneath the vehicle was corroded and had holes. The vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The vehicle was included in an extended warranty campaign, but the campaign had expired. The failure mileage was 170,000. Updated 09/06/16*lj toyota's main hq stated it was out of his hands nothing he can do and for the consumer to pay for it. Updated 06/15/18

Filed Jun 3, 2016 · Body · 109,450 miles · DE

Tl* the contact owns a 2005 toyota tacoma. A mechanic found large holes, approximately five inches in diameter, in the frame that held the vehicle together. The dealer confirmed the failure. The manufacturer was notified. The contact was informed that many vehicles were repaired with the similar failure. The dealer refused to repair the vehicle because the service bulletin expired on 3/31/2016. The VIN was unknown. The failure mileage was 109,450.

Filed May 4, 2016 · Body · 225,000 miles · VA

Tl* the contact owns a 2005 toyota tacoma. The contact stated that when the vehicle was taken to the dealer to be serviced for the federal safety agency campaign number: 14v604000 (suspension), the technician stated that the frame of the vehicle was rusted and needed to be repaired. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The failure mileage was 225,000. The VIN was not available.

Filed Apr 20, 2016 · Body, Suspension · 76,000 miles · MA

Tl* the contact owns a 2005 toyota tacoma. The contact received notification of the federal safety agency campaign number: 14v604000 (suspension). The vehicle was taken to a dealer where it was diagnosed that there was corrosion around the attachment area of the leaf springs. The technician diagnosed that the subframe needed to be replaced. The vehicle was not repaired. The subframe was previously sprayed with an anti-corrosion agent under an extended warranty campaign by the manufacturer. The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The failure mileage was 76,000.

Filed Apr 18, 2016 · Body · VA

I purchased a 2005 toyota tacoma in august of 2015. I took my vehicle to a toyota dealer to remove a wheel lug nut in september of 2015. I was advised by a toyota service representative that there was a recall on the frame of my truck but when the service records were checked, the service representative advised that the recall service had been performed on my truck by treating the frame. On march 17 2016 my son took the truck to our local toyota dealer in reference to the leaf spring recall. The service representative advised the same information to my son in reference to the frame recall and that the service treatment had been performed. My vehicle was never inspected on these two occasions at the toyota dealer for possible frame damage. My son and I inspected the vehicle and located what appeared to be rust near the leaf spring hangers which was coming under the protective coating that had been applied by toyota. I scheduled an appointment with my local toyota dealer to inspect the frame. On april 15 2016 the service representative advised me that the frame had a hole in the frame on the drivers side near the part of the frame where it starts to go towards the motor. The service representative advised that in his opinion the hole had been there for awhile and that the hole could not have gotten that large in a year since being treated.I contacted toyota and was advised this was not a recall but a service campaign and that it expired on march 31 2016 and that they could not give any assistance with the rusted frame.I advised the toyota case manager that I could understand if it had never been inspected or treated but that's not the case with my vehicle. I also advised the case manager that it was apparent that the frame treatment did not stop the problem with rust in the frame. She just kept advising that toyota could not assist me with this matter.

Filed Apr 15, 2016 · Body · 175,000 miles · CO

10 - 12 inch long vertical rust and cracks in the frame. Located on both sides of the frames interior. Locations are both opposite of the catalytic converters. I was told by a friend there was an issue and toyota was replacing the frames due to inferior quality of production causing a safety issue in which the frames were rusting from the inside out. I made an appointment with the local dealer on 4/4/2016, I had to wait until 4/13/2016 for the first available appointment. Upon arriving at the dealer I was informed the "recall" expired march 31st and they can do nothing for me. They refused to even look at the issue. I called toyota to ask if there was any recourse as I had never received notification of this issue let alone a deadline. I was told this was not a recall and the time had expired and there was nothing they would do for me. I am afraid the truck is not safe to drive.

Filed Apr 13, 2016 · Body · 70,000 miles · NE

2005 toyota tacoma frame rust recall. Toyota rep inspected the frame and stated it has failed due to rust and corrosion. Toyota refuses to offer any remedy for this problem. Frame could break and cause personal or vehicle damage.

VIN decoder

See the problems and recalls for an exact car

Buying a used 2005 Toyota Tacoma?

Check the exact car before you pay: accidents, salvage or flood titles, odometer readings and previous owners.

Check its history