A limited service campaign notified me of possible frame rust problem. Received crc coating 9/10/2014. Noticed rust had advanced through the frame and notified dealer. Dealer checked damage 3/21/16 and gave me a toyota customer service number. Toyota said they couldn't do anything about it since I received the crc coating, which was poorly applied. (see pictures of overspray on bed, indicating it had not been removed to spray the whole frame) punished for being proactive. Stuck with a rusty frame.
2005 Toyota Tacoma body complaints
Page 4 of 10: complaints 71 to 100 of 260, newest first, as owners wrote them.
The toyota dealer in concord, nh inspected my 2005 toyota tacoma on march 17, 2016. They reported that the frame is corroded and that there is a perforation inside the frame by the front body mount. They suggested I called toyota. Three phone calls to toyota. They are aware of frame corrosion issues, but refused to correct this, because "the replacement program no longer applies." clearly the manufacturer is aware of a problem with this model, yet refuses to address an issue that is a safety risk.
Frame recall. I took my frame in to be sprayed with rust protection but 4 months later the vehicle failed the state inpection due to holes in the frame. Toyota said that since they already put the rust protection on they can not do anything. They did not properly inspect my frame. The rust holes did not appear after 4 months. They should of replaced the bad frame.
Please see below. Thank you, [xxx] information redacted pursuant to the freedom of information act (foia), 5 u.s.c. 552(b)(6).
Tl* the contact owns a 2005 toyota tacoma. While the vehicle was at the local dealer, the mechanic diagnosed that the subframe was corroded around the rear of the vehicle and needed to be replaced. The vehicle was not repaired. The vehicle was previously inspected under a voluntary recall by the manufacturer. The VIN was also included in the federal safety agency campaign number: 14v604000 (suspension); however, the manufacturer exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The VIN was invalid. The failure mileage was 155,294. Vin tool confirms parts not available.
Tl* the contact owns a 2005 toyota tacoma. While having the tires replaced, the contact was informed that the frame was corroded. The vehicle was previously serviced under a manufacturer's limited service campaign for corrosion resistant compound application for the frame, but the remedy failed to repair the vehicle. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure. The failure mileage was 104,140.
2005 toyota tacoma. Consumer writes in regards to vehicle frame rust. *smd the consumer stated he took the vehicle to the dealer several times, only to be told there was nothing wrong with the vehicle. In 2014, the dealer was amazed at how bad the rust was.
Tl* the contact owns a 2005 toyota tacoma. The contact stated that the vehicle was at the dealer for routine maintenance, the technician informed the contact that the frame needed to be replaced. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The failure mileage 152,720. Updated 02/12/16*lj the consumer stated the vehicle has frame rust. Updated 02/25/16.
Vehicle's frame is rusting and flaking apart. The vehicle was taken to a toyota dealership per their limited service campaign to apply a corrosion-resistant compound. One year later that compound is starting to fall off as the rust beneath it lets loose. Since there is physically less frame material than when the truck was built I feel that this vehicle would suffer considerable damage in a collision as the the strength of the frame has been compromised. I am also concerend that the vehicle could loose control if the frame fails at highway speed after encountering a large pothole. You can see how the rust has aggressively attacked the many welds on this frame and weekend the joints. While the manufacturer did make an attempt to coat the frame and hide the rust there are several places on the interior of the frame that recieved no treatment at all. You can still see the metal flaking away in those untreated areas. To have some surface rust on a 10 year old vehicle is normal but this problem is way beyond surface rust. While toyota has agreed to replace frames with considerable size holes I think that frames like mine are being overlooked. Rather than have a single point of failure my entire frame is weekend and will continue to weaken as the compound they applied is failing to stop the rusting. While the frame does not currently have a hole it is only a matter of time based on the flaking rust. Toyota is not willing to offer any help with future holes because they sprayed the compound on the frame. Unfortunately the compound doesn't protect the entire frame and it is prone to peeling off. Even if the compound were applied correctly it in no way provides the structural integrity that the frame once had.
Tl* the contact owns a 2005 toyota tacoma. The contact stated that the vehicle was taken to a dealer for a manufacturer's recall where the frame was replaced; however, the muffler was removed and was not reattached to the vehicle. The manufacturer was aware of the issue. The contact was concerned for his safety. The contact had not experienced a failure.
In reference to u.s. District court for the western district of arkansas case number: 1:14-cv-02208 I currently own a 05 tacoma that has the frame rusted completely, I've contacted toyota repeatedly about this issue and they are denying to fix this because this vehicle is no longer in the USA. My argument here is that toyota has known about this problem and has had may complaints about it yet did nothing about it, they should fix this the vehicle regardless of where it is because it poses a major safety risk to my life and others on the road.
Tl* the contact owns a 2005 toyota tacoma. The contact stated that the frame of the vehicle was rusted. The vehicle was taken to a dealer where the mechanic spray painted the frame, but the failure recurred. The contact stated that the remedy did not repair the vehicle. The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The approximate failure mileage was 80,000.
2005 toyota tacoma. Consumer writes in regards to vehicle frame excessive rusting recall notice issues. *smd the consumer stated toyota determined there was a problem with the steel used on the frames of the toyota tacoma trucks. The consumer stated he was misled about the length of time it would require to complete the recall. The dealer informed the consumer it would be months before the truck would be finished.
Less than one year after purchase the rear leaf springs failed on both sides. Two dealers plus toyota headquarters refused service, so I had to pay for a private spring shop to replace them. They have since been recalled but to date I have not received reimbursement. In 2014 the steering shaft had to be replaced and at the same time the frame was determined corroded beyond repair. Toyota made promise to replace the frame under recall in nov 2014 but to date has not delivered and has not indicated when I can expect the repair to be made. For over six months now I have been left with an unsafe vehicle that I can't sell or replace.
2005 toyota tacoma. Consumer writes in regards to vehicle frame corrosion recall problems. *smd the consumer received a recall notice. He took the vehicle to the dealer for an inspection, which revealed there were rust holes in the frame. The consumer was informed it would take three months, for them to receive the frame.
Tl* the contact owns a 2005 toyota tacoma. While the vehicle was undergoing an oil change, the technician noticed that the frame on the front driver side was severely rusted and stated it needed to be replaced. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was not notified of the failure. The approximate failure mileage was 151,000.
Tl* the contact owns a 2005 toyota tacoma. For an extended period of time, there was premature rusting on the frame and the underbody which progressed to the point that the framing may fracture without warning. The contact stated that the vehicle was taken in for routine repairs. Upon the vehicle being placed on a lift, the contact noticed extensive rust on the underbody framing. The vehicle was taken to an authorized dealer who diagnosed that the frame needed to be replaced. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was notified of the failure and did not provide a remedy. The failure mileage was not available.
Tl* the contact owns a 2005 toyota tacoma. The contact stated that the hitch and subframe of the vehicle was rusted. The vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. The manufacturer was not made aware of the failure. The approximate failure mileage was 20,000.
Took my tacoma into dealer for noise coming out the back of truck turn out that my truck had 2 active recalls on it one was the frame and the other was rear spring. They told me that the frame had to be replace because there was significant rust and had made a hole on it. My problem is that toyota still has my truck with no ata on repair. They said that I can have my truck back if I sign a waiver if my truck is not safe why would I want to sign a waiver. The did provide a loner car but its only good for 30 day after that I am on my own. As you can see it been 6 week since they took my truck.
Frame falling apart!
The vehicle has significant frame rust. There are several areas on the frame where large sections of metal have delaminated. This presents a structural integrity issue in key supporting areas of the frame assembly for major components to include drive train, braking and suspension. The overall crash worthiness is in question due to the structural integrity issue presented by the frame design, metal composition and premature rusting and metal fatigue. Toyota has started a limited service campaign to apply a corrosion resistance protection, but this issue should be a safety recall. Based on the magnitude of damage from rusting in my case the only resolution would be a full frame replacement. I have pictures of the frame damage and rust available. I will also be sending toyota a letter requesting an inspection by the regional factor representative prior to any repairs.
Nov 17, 2014, I brought my tacoma in for recall frame inspection. It failed. I was told they would order replacement frame. I was told it would be in mid january '15. I called the dealer today. They said no frame arrived and no eta when it would arrive. They guessed mid march, another two months away, but no assurance it was true. I don't drive my truck due to the weak frame. I still pay insurance on it. Why can toyota offer free frame replacement and not deliver a new frame in a timely manner?
Toyota sent me a recall notice (that was not listed on your site) for rust on the frame. I had the dealership inspect it and they said that it is bad and toyota will replace the frame. The dealership is telling me that specific parts (the power steering rack and lines) that are rusty will not be able to be put back when the frame is replaced (and the truck assembled again) but I have to pay the cost. I had those specific parts looked at by my mechanic and although a portion (the lines are bad and I am having replaced) the ps rack is not in bad condition. I contacted toyota to see what they will cover and was told they will not cover parts that are not the frame. My truck is 10 years old. It is in great condition and runs great and I planned to keep it for a long time. My concern is that when you try to disassemble a whole vehicle (which is 10 years old) some of the parts that are in good working condition, once banged around trying to remove them, will break. I am concerned that I have to pay for these parts. If toyota is replacing the frame due to safety issues, isn't it their responsibility to replace other parts that were fine prior to making the recall fix?
2005 toyota tacoma. Consumer stated issues with frame of vehicle and brake lines leaking. The dealer informed the consumer the frame had rusted through and needed to be replaced. He was informed, it would be two months, before the parts were available to fix the frame. The consumer stated the brakes were fine, when arrived at the repair shop. The consumer believed the repair shop damaged the brake lines, when they checking the frame. After two months passed, the consumer called the repair shop and was informed the parts had arrived. However, they did not have the kits.
Tl* the contact owns a 2005 toyota tacoma. The contact stated that the spare tire could not be removed from the vehicle due to rust under the vehicle. Additionally, there was rust on the steering column that required frequent lubrication. The vehicle was taken to the dealer, who diagnosed that the spare tire was rusted to the frame of the vehicle and there was no remedy available at the time. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure. The approximate failure mileage was 30,000.
I took my tacoma to the local dealership for leaf springs and a check of corrosion of frame on december 7, 2014 and found out I had two holes in the frame. The wouldn't let me take my truck, because of safety issues. The dealer gave me a rental care for now at toyota's expense. They said toyota wants to just replace the frame? Then my truck will have a salvadged title in pa. I need to help, I want the same deal other tacoma owners got the last time for the same problem.
The catalytic converter shield on my 2005 tacoma fell off while driving and almost caused an accident. After picking up the large metal parts and inspecting under the vehicle, I noticed that near to where the catalytic converter sits, that there was extensive corrosion on the truck's frame and even a large hole. I am extremely worried about the safety of the vehicle and am afraid that the frame may crumple while driving causing an accident or death. Toyota is aware of the issue. I contacted the corporate offices, but was told that toyota is only replacing the frame on vehicles registered in what they have designated as a "snow state". I purchased my toyota at a dealership in illinois (a "snow state") and have done a lot of traveling within the "snow states", yet because I live 25 miles away on the missouri side, toyota is refusing to cover the repair. The woman from toyota corporate did not seem to care when I told her that I was worried about the safety of the vehicle and that it could result in an accident or death. I offered to email the photos of the frame corrosion, but was rejected. Toyota needs to cover this repair on all vehicles with frame corrosion regardless of the state they live in.
The frame is rusting. There are hole starting to form.
I live in ne pennsylvania and was just informed by my mechanic that my truck may not pass another inspection due to frame rust. Specifically along side the catalytic converter. My dealer said there is a limited recall in the new england states but not pa. Will toyota expand the recall?
Corrosion on frame rails affecting structural integrity of frame. Rust holes are present.
VIN decoder
See the problems and recalls for an exact car
Buying a used 2005 Toyota Tacoma?
Check the exact car before you pay: accidents, salvage or flood titles, odometer readings and previous owners.
Check its history