Check a VIN

1996 Chevrolet Suburban brakes problems

137 complaints (38% of all complaints for this car). Typical mileage when it fails: 174,231. 10 crashes reported.

owner complaints
137
of this car's complaints
38%
typical mileage
174,231
crashes
10
recalls
0

Which part fails

  • Antilock/traction control/electronic limited slip
    89
  • Foundation components: disc
    12
  • Foundation components
    11
  • Foundation components: disc: pads
    10
  • Foundation components: disc: rotor
    7
  • Foundation components: master cylinder
    5
  • Power assist: vacuum
    4
  • Foundation components: hoses, lines/piping, and fittings
    4

At what mileage

Complaints by mileage at the time of the problem.

0k-25k
25k-50k
50k-75k
75k-100k
100k-125k
125k-150k
150k-175k
175k-200k
200k+

Chevrolet Suburban brakes problems in other years

19901995200020052010201520202024

Specific symptoms reported on the 1996 Chevrolet Suburban brakes

Phrases found in the owners' own descriptions, so one complaint can mention several symptoms.

ABS 36Brake failure 30Grinding brakes 10

Related recalls

No recalls on record for this model year.

Related investigations

Poor brake performanceOpened September 20, 1995, closed September 20, 2001

Poor performance of ABS brakes

EA95026

What 1996 Chevrolet Suburban owners say

Most recent owner complaints, unedited.

Filed Sep 20, 2013 · Brakes · 185,000 miles · MI

November 2010, I went to stop, the brake pedal went to the floor. I was able to stop using the parking brake, but was very close to rear-ending a carload of people. I had the truck towed to a repair shop. The mechanic told me that the front brake line had rusted out because it was mounted at the factory to the front axle on this 4-wheel drive truck causing it to vibrate and collect debris on it leading to a premature failure due to rust. In december 2012, again when I went to stop from about 55 MPH on the freeway, the brake pedal again went almost completely to the floor, but again I was able to stop before hitting another vehicle by using the parking brake and running up on the shoulder of the freeway. The mechanic told me that this time the rear brake line had rusted out at the "t - intersection" where the brake line runs from the front master cylinder to the rear axle and splits into 2 lines at the t intersection. The mechanic told me that this was a very common problem on these trucks as it was a bad design, because the t lays in a recessed holder attached to the rear axle, allowing dirt, salt and wetness to accumulate in this area and cause premature rust and failure of the brake lines. Third, last week, while driving, I noticed a raw gas smell and stopped the vehicle. Again I had to have it towed as gas was pouring out of the fuel line by the gas filter on the driver's side rear wheel. This was towed to a different mechanic's repair shop who again showed me that the metal fuel line had rusted out due to its being mounted to the frame rail, causing salt, dirt and debris to accumulate there also. He warned me that these trucks frequently catch fire when these high pressure fuel injection lines rust out. He said he had seen 5 of these trucks burned in just the last 2 years at his small shop.please help. These trucks are inherently dangerously designed to fail.

Filed Sep 11, 2011 · Brakes · 174,231 miles · PA

While driving through the neighborhood at 35 MPH, the posted speed, we lost brake control of the vehicle when the service brake was applied approaching an intersection with a stop sign. We were unable to stop the vehicle which entered the intersection and passed all of the way through it. The brake pedal was to the floor and not working properly. Fortunately for all there were no other vehicles ( or pedestrians) in this intersection as we would have certainly hit them. It appears the brake line(s) on the k2500 suburban have rusted through in an area that is difficult to see where they go through the frame and blew out at this critical moment. The dealer is unwilling to take any responsibility for the repair as the vehicle is out of factory warranty. When we purchased the vehicle they did not tell us the brakes could only be relied upon for the time the truck is under warranty. This could have been a serious, possibly deadly outcome since we tow a trailer with the truck on the highway. I understand this is actually a common occurrence with these chevrolet and gmc trucks. Why is there no recall given the potential deadly possibilities? Toyota was in the news about their unexpected acceleration issue but we have heard nothing about this unexpected loss of braking issue? Why is that? Is not being able to stop not a problem for the federal safety agency?

Filed Feb 12, 2008 · Brakes · 190,000 miles · NH · crash

Tl*the contact owns a 1996 chevrolet suburban. While driving 20 MPH and attempting to stop the vehicle, the contact crashed into another vehicle. Both vehicles were damaged, but there were no injuries. A police report was filed. The mechanic stated that the ABS sensors were corroded and advised the contact to disable the ABS. There were no warning lights present. The contact does not plan to have the vehicle repaired. The approximate failure mileage was 190,000 and current mileage was 191,700. Updated 4/2/08 *cn the consumer stated can provide a list of with other consumers with similar defects. Updated 04/02/08

Filed Jul 27, 2005 · Brakes · 64,635 miles · TX

Dt: 1996 gmc suburban , while pulling out from the post office consumer applied the brakes and the brake pedal would not go down. Consumer pushed down very hard, did not pump the brakes. Finally, the brakes started working, the brake pedal jerked/ went down to the floor, and vehicle stopped. The brake indicator light came on . Heard a real strange noise, and brakes malfunctioned again. Took vehicle to the dealer, and they could not find any problem with the brake pedal. The dealer had never heard of this happening. This only happened this time and has not happened again. There were no accidents or injuries.

Filed Jul 15, 2005 · Brakes, Engine · WI

1996 chevrolet suburban developed problems with the brakes, intake manifold, engine cooling, transmission, tires, fuel injectors, fuel consumption and wipers.*mr consumer stated that the dealer did not do anything but take the battery cable off to reset the computer and the brakes were never looked at.

Filed Feb 11, 2005 · Brakes · OK

Abs failure. While applying the brakes coming to a stop, the ABS starts engaging making the vehicle pull to one side and making it almost impossible to get vehicle stopped in time because of the ABS engaging. This is happening sporadically. And has happened many times with my wife driving. Very unsafe. I have heard of this happening to a lot of other suburbans.

Filed Jan 20, 2005 · Airbags, Brakes · 174,000 miles · MO · fire

Driving from work-snowy/icy conditions. Smelled a strange odor in vehicle going from I-270s to I-370w ~ 1/4 mile from ramp. Traffic moderate. Traveling 45 MPH I tapped brakes, they went all way to floor. Turned off electrical equipment. Used engine braking selecting 3-2-1 to slow vehicle. Vehicle slowed, applied emergency brake - drove to brake down lane. Vehicle stopped-white smoke coming around edges of hood. Lower portion of windshield had couple of heat discoloration marks about 1/4 size of a penny in the middle lower portion. Air bag light came on. Dash did not feel hot, nor the instrument panel - no smoke inside vehicle. Hood would not open by hood release. Power windows worked. Egressed vehicle and driver sdie air bag inflated. Called 911 awaited fire/polcie dept. Opened driver's and passenger doors. Flames coming from steering column where it enters fire wall. Flames underneath vehicle from engine near skid plate/transfer case. Used small fire extinguisher on flames in cabin and under vehicle to no avail. Front driver's side from center console to driver's side door melted away at about 45 deg angle from top to bottom of console. Inside engine the thydraulic drive unit and barke master cyclinder had melted. Significant burn damage from fire in engine. Vehicle-total loss. Very fortunate to recognize bad smell, id brake malfunction, use engine braking to control vehicle; use emergency braking to stop - moderate traffic. Minimized potential hazard to single vehicle-no injuries or fatalities.

Filed May 8, 2004 · Brakes, Tires · OH

Anti locks system kicks in at almost every stop. Starts to vibrate at 4 to 5 MPH. At diagnostic before we couldn't get a reading period, it was on lift standing still. *ak ABS was readind moving at 3mph.

Filed Oct 29, 2002 · Brakes · UT

Don't believe the ABS system works and the front disc pads need replacement every 3k miles. Chevy didn't want to address problem. Dt

Filed Jul 18, 2002 · Brakes · MA

No summary listed for above vehicle.

Questions about the 1996 Chevrolet Suburban brakes

Does the 1996 Chevrolet Suburban have brakes problems?

Owners have filed 137 complaints about the brakes of the 1996 Chevrolet Suburban, 38% of all its complaints, more than any other problem.

At what mileage do 1996 Chevrolet Suburban brakes problems start?

The typical (median) mileage in owner complaints is 174,231 miles.

Was there a recall on the 1996 Chevrolet Suburban brakes?

There is no recall for this problem on this model year.

What year does the Chevrolet Suburban have bad brakes?

The Chevrolet Suburban model years with the most brakes complaints are 1994 (581 complaints), 1993 (382 complaints) and 1999 (246 complaints).

Other 1996 Chevrolet Suburban problems

Electrical 47Visibility 42Transmission 40Tires 39Engine 36Fuel system 23Airbags 16Steering 15Suspension 10Seat belts 9Lights 8Body 7Seats 7Acceleration 5Locks 2Wheels 2

VIN decoder

See the problems and recalls for an exact car

Buying a used 1996 Chevrolet Suburban?

Check the exact car before you pay: accidents, salvage or flood titles, odometer readings and previous owners.

Check its history