Check a VIN

1992 Jeep Cherokee problems

The most common problem on the 1992 Jeep Cherokee is brakes. It has fewer complaints than a typical Cherokee model year.

Typical yearClose to a typical year
Owner complaints
113
Recalls
1
Service bulletins
23
Worst area
Brakes
Fuel economy
15-19mpg

The worst 1992 Jeep Cherokee problems

Ranked by number of owner complaints. Mileage and cost come from what owners wrote.

Problems by type

Tap a problem to see which part fails, at what mileage and in which other years.

Specific symptoms reported on the 1992 Jeep Cherokee

Brake failure 9Sudden acceleration 5

Recalls 1

Service brakes, hydraulic: foundation components: disc: rotorReported December 13, 1999 · 334,047 vehicles affected
What is wrong
Vehicle description: passenger and multi-purpose vehicles originally sold or currently registered in the states of connecticut, illinois, indiana, maine, maryland, massachusetts, michigan, new hampshire, new jersey, new york, ohio, pennsylvania, rhode island, vermont, or wisconsin, and the district of columbia. The front disc brake rotors can experience severe corrosion if operated for an extensive period in the "salt belt." if the rotors are not replaced, the corrosion can eventually compromise the structural integrity of the stamped steel center hub section of the rotor.
Risk
The reduced strength can allow the cast iron wear surface to separate from the hub, reducing the brake effectiveness of the vehicle.
Remedy
Dealers will replace these rotors with rotors that are coated with a corrosion protection.

Recall number 99V340000 · Recall details

See all 1 recalls for the 1992 Jeep Cherokee

Defect investigations

Sudden accelerationOpened April 25, 2002, closed September 10, 2002

There is no summary currently available

DP02005

Brake roter disc/hud separationOpened June 28, 1999, closed March 28, 2000

There is no summary currently available

EA99014

Brake rotor disc/hub separationOpened November 13, 1998, still open

Chrysler conducted a safety recall, 98v‑005, on january 5, 1998, involving approximately 225,000 1993 grand cherokee, 1990-91 cherokee, wrangler and comanchee, and 1989-91 eagle premier and dodge monaco.the front disc brake rotors of these vehicles may experience severe corrosion if operated for an extensive period in the salt belt states.owners in connecticut, illinois, indiana, maine, massachuset, maryland, michigan, new hampshire, new jersey, new york, ohio, pennsylvania, rhode island, vermont, wisconsin, and the district of columbia will receive replacement rotors that are coated with a corrosion propotection.chrysler began owner notification on march 9, 1998.odi has received 15 complaints from owners of model year 1992-95 jeep cherokee vehicles alleging that one or both of the front brake rotor disc had separated from its hub, causing the vehicles to severely pull to one side and/or significantly extended its stopping distance.twelve of 15 complaints originated from within the recalled states.

RQ98023

Brake disc/hub separationOpened January 13, 1997, closed January 9, 1998

Consumer complaints indicate that corrosion of the brake rotors have caused separation of the brake disc from its hub, resulting in brake failure.

EA97001

Brake disc/hub separationOpened September 5, 1996, closed January 13, 1997

consumer complaints indicate that corrosion of hte brake rotors have caused separation of the brake disc from its hub, resulting in brake failure.

PE96053

Vehicle sudden accelerationOpened November 17, 1995, closed December 5, 1995

There is no summary currently available

DP95007

Rear axle shaft separationOpened August 17, 1995, closed January 26, 1996

This investigation was opened to examine the failure mode and the risk to motor vehicle safety posed by allegations of rear axle separations.the rear axle shaft and housing design is typical of those in which the weight of the vehicle is carried on the axle housing.the left and right axle shafts, supported by roller bearings, are situated inside the axle housing.the inboard splined end of the axle shaft receives power transmitted from the differential assembly, providing torque to the rear wheels.the allegations are that the axle shaft fails, resulting in the separation of a wheel and axle hub assembly or the entire axle shaft and wheel assembly, depending on the location of the axle shaft failure.as identified by chrysler, the subject rear axles are dana 35c and 35cm models, which have been used on the subject vehicles since the 1990 model year.a safety defect trend with respect to the subject axle shafts has not been identified.see hard copy resume for full text of summary.

PE95049

Driveshaft/univ.joint failOpened June 14, 1993, closed October 29, 1993

There is no summary currently available

PE93057

Brake performanceOpened October 5, 1992, closed February 12, 1993

There is no summary currently available

PE92080

Technical service bulletins for the 1992 Jeep Cherokee 23

Bulletins tell dealers how to fix known problems. A warranty extension means the manufacturer pays for that repair for longer.

See all 23 bulletins for the 1992 Jeep Cherokee

1992 Jeep Cherokee fuel economy

Official EPA estimates in miles per gallon (MPGe for electric). Ranges cover trims that share the same engine.

EngineDriveCityHighwayCombined
2.5L 4‑cylRWD172219
2.5L 4‑cyl4WD172119
4.0L 6‑cylRWD14-1619-2016-18
4.0L 6‑cyl4WD14-1518-2015-17

What 1992 Jeep Cherokee owners say

Most recent owner complaints, unedited.

Filed Aug 2, 2019 · Brakes · NY

Tl* the contact owns a 1992 jeep cherokee. The contact stated that the VIN was included in the federal safety agency campaign number: 98v005000 (service brakes, hydraulic). The contact called mopar and the chrysler manufacturer; both confirmed that the parts were not available for the recall remedy. The contact was advised by mopar to have the recall repaired 21 years ago by an independent mechanic. The contact stated that the vehicle would not pass inspection until the recall was repaired. The contact had not experienced a failure.

Filed Aug 15, 2015 · Steering · 110,000 miles · IL

I was driving on the interstate. The speed limit was 65. When I got to 60 I noticed my SUV began to shake. Hitting a bump most of the time starts the problem. It vibrated so much and so loudly that I had to slow down to 55. I took it to the first mechanic who said it was the "steering stabilizer" it did cost about $150-$300 to fix. I can't remember exactly but it wasn't cheap. It worked for awhile. I have gone to several other car service companies and they have not been able to permanently fix this problem. I'm afraid I will lose control of steering. Although there is no recall on this vehicle at the moment it should be. This is a serious safety problem. I'm not exactly sure when this started but if I go over 60 there is a 90% chance of it happening. If I go over 60 and hit a bump there is a 100% chance of this happening.

Filed Sep 15, 2011 · Tires · 125,880 miles · FL

Douglas tire 215/75r15, 1200 miles on tires all at 55 to 60 MPH. I had them balanced and at slow speed they were smooth. The following day I got on the interstate at 65 to 70 MPH and I could hear a loud slapping noise and the car shook. At high speeds the tires must take on a different shape. Walmart refused any concession so I'm confined to slow driving until I can afford another set of tires; another brand that is. My tire line is xtra-trac ii (roman numeral 2). You don't give me the option to select that line. I cannot tell while driving which tire or how many tires are becoming deformed while driving. Parked, they all look good.

Filed Mar 7, 2007 · Lights · CA · 1 injury

(1) cover on interior halogen lamp fell off. (2) halogen lamp was exposed and five year old child suffered burns to hand from halogen lamp. (3) halogen lamp was removed from vehicle.

Filed Apr 8, 2005 · Seat belts · 138,000 miles · FL · crash · 2 injuries

During an accident the seat belt equipment on the 1992 jeep cherokee malfunctioned.*mr the driver's side and passenger's side seat belts did not lock on impact. The occupants sustained facial and head injuries as a result.

Filed Apr 15, 2004 · Acceleration · 11,000 miles · SC

While backing out from a parking lot vehicle suddenly accelerated. Consumer applied the brakes, and the pedal went to the floor. Consumer was able to turn off the vehicle. The driver tried to restart, and was able to start the vehicle. The driver was able to take the vehicle to the dealer for inspection.

Filed Dec 23, 2003 · Brakes · 11,000 miles · CA

After starting the vehicle, the ABS light would illuminate and would stay on the reminder of the time the vehicle is being operated. The consumer is not having any other problems with the ABS at this time. The dealership was notified, but did not resolve the problem. Please provide any additional information.

Filed Dec 10, 2003 · Body, Brakes · 202,223 miles · MD

Vehicle experienced fuel leak and problems with front rotors.*mr after having paid for repairs on his car, the consumer was never made aware of a recall on his vehicle regarding the rotors.*cb also water leaked onto the floor.

Filed Dec 4, 2003 · Transmission · 111,100 miles · MI · crash

Dear sir/madam: I would like to bring to your attention matters related to a certain safety defect which I believe resulted in car crashes caused by the unintended acceleration of daimler/chrysler's, chrysler group vehicles. Daimler/chrysler is my former employer and I worked there as an engineer. During my tenure there, I worked closely with the group that now has as its members, the corporations expert witness defending the corporation in law suits related to these crashes. This same group was also responsible for developing and releasing the controls which are believed to be the root cause of the problem. At one point in time I was part of the team at dailmer/chrysler that was responsible for investigating customer complaints regarding crashes caused by unintended acceleration. Accordingly, I believe that I may be able to provide some very good if not exclusive inside information related to this matter. I believe that these car crashes are the result of dailmer/chryslers flagrant negligence in developing the systems that are believed to be the root cause of these crashes. If my assistance in investigating this matter would be of interest to you, please let me know. I am willing to help in whatever capacity I can. It is wrong that dailmer/chrysler built and sold vehicles which may hurt if not kill someone. Regardless of your disposition of this matter, if possible, I would greatly appreciate a reply on or before december 18, 2003 outlining you intended course of action to my concern. Thank you very much for your time and consideration. I am looking forward to hearing from you soon.

Filed Oct 20, 2003 · Engine · 142,600 miles · OR

My car has been steadily losing oil for the last month and I after I came back from lunch at work one day, which was less than a mile from my work, I noticed that my car was smoking so I pulled over and waited for a half an hour then went directly to the gas station where he told me I needed to have the exhaust manifold repaired, I took it to my mechanic and he advised me that the exhaust manifold was cracked and if he took it apart it would end up costing more than the car was worth. Since we just paid the car off, I was hoping the dealer would replace the cracked manifold. It has been steadily losing oil and I have to put oil in almost every other week now, which is expensive. This has never been a problem until recently. Also at times the neutral safety switch does not work as there have been instances where my car will not start and when I put the car in neutral it will start.

Used buying checklistWhat to check on a 1992 Jeep Cherokee before you buy

Compare the 1992 Jeep Cherokee

Cherokee vs Ford EscapeCherokee vs Honda CR-VCherokee vs Toyota RAV4Cherokee vs Chevrolet EquinoxCherokee vs Nissan RogueCherokee vs Subaru ForesterCherokee vs Hyundai TucsonCherokee vs Kia Sportage

Other model years

199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200620142015201620172018201920202021202220232026

Questions about the 1992 Jeep Cherokee

Is the 1992 Jeep Cherokee reliable?

Owners have filed 113 complaints about the 1992 Jeep Cherokee, fewer than a typical Cherokee model year.

What is the most common problem with the 1992 Jeep Cherokee?

Brakes, with 40 complaints. Next is acceleration (19).

How many recalls does the 1992 Jeep Cherokee have?

1 recall, covering service brakes, hydraulic.

Was there a recall on the 1992 Jeep Cherokee brakes?

Yes, 1 recall: 99V340000. Check your VIN to see if your car still needs the free repair.

What year does the Jeep Cherokee have bad brakes?

The Jeep Cherokee model years with the most brakes complaints are 2014 (211 complaints), 1991 (163 complaints) and 1990 (152 complaints).

What gas mileage does the 1992 Jeep Cherokee get?

Official estimates for the 1992 Jeep Cherokee range from 15 to 19 mpg combined. The most efficient version (2.5L 4-cyl, RWD) gets 17 city and 22 highway.

Share your experience with the 1992 Jeep Cherokee

Tell other buyers what went wrong and what it cost. We review every report before it appears, and we never publish names, emails or VINs.

No names, contact details or links. Reports about a dealer or a person are not published.

VIN decoder

See the problems and recalls for an exact car

Buying a used 1992 Jeep Cherokee?

Check the exact car before you pay: accidents, salvage or flood titles, odometer readings and previous owners.

Check its history
Is this car on a recall?Check VIN